Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Medical Oncology 1/2011

01-12-2011 | Original paper

A phase II randomized study comparing navelbine and capecitabine (Navcap) followed either by Navcap or by weekly docetaxel in the first-line treatment of HER-2/neu negative metastatic breast cancer

Authors: M. Ghosn, P. Aftimos, F. S. Farhat, J. G. Kattan, C. Hanna, N. Haddad, F. Nasr, G. Chahine

Published in: Medical Oncology | Special Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Following the proven efficacy and tolerability of Navcap and Navcap followed by docetaxel in the treatment of MBC, a phase II randomized study was initiated to assess the ORR of both arms in the first-line setting of MBC. Patients with no prior chemotherapy for MBC and HER-2/neu negative were eligible. All patients received Navcap (V 25 mg/m2 on d1 and d8 and C 825 mg/m2 bid D1-14 q3w) for a total of 4 cycles. Patients progressing under Navcap were withdrawn and received docetaxel as second-line treatment. Patients responding or stable were randomized to 2 arms: 4 cycles of Navcap (A) or 12 weekly docetaxel (25 mg/m²/week) (B). From July 2004 to July 2008, a total of 106 patients were enrolled. Ninety-four patients were evaluable before randomization, with a clinical benefit of 58%. Twenty-one patients (22%) had disease progression and were therefore not randomized. Forty-one patients were randomized to arm A and 29 patients to arm B. ORRs were 56 and 71% in arms A and B, respectively. The median time to progression and overall survival were 10 and 35 months in arm A and 12 and 37 months in arm B. Adverse events were mild. Arm A: grade 3–4 neutropenia (10%), grade 3 anemia (5%). Arm B: grade 3 neutropenia (6%), grade 3 anemia (6.2%), and grade 2 alopecia (12%). Conclusion: Both Navcap and Navcap followed by Docetaxel regimens were tolerated with manageable toxicity, offering consistent activities in terms of response rate for metastatic breast cancer patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mariani G. New developments in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer: from chemotherapy to biological therapy. Ann Oncol. 2005;16(Suppl 2):191–4. Mariani G. New developments in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer: from chemotherapy to biological therapy. Ann Oncol. 2005;16(Suppl 2):191–4.
2.
go back to reference Bernard-Marty C, Cardoso F, Piccart MJ. Facts and controversies in systemic treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Oncologist. 2004;9:617–32.PubMedCrossRef Bernard-Marty C, Cardoso F, Piccart MJ. Facts and controversies in systemic treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Oncologist. 2004;9:617–32.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Sawada N, Fujimoto-Ouchi F, Ishikawa T, et al. Antitumor acticity of combination therapy with capecitabine plus vinorelbine, and capecitabine plus gemcitabine in human tumor xenograft models, Proc Am Ass Cancer Res. 2002;43:1088 (Abstr 5388). Sawada N, Fujimoto-Ouchi F, Ishikawa T, et al. Antitumor acticity of combination therapy with capecitabine plus vinorelbine, and capecitabine plus gemcitabine in human tumor xenograft models, Proc Am Ass Cancer Res. 2002;43:1088 (Abstr 5388).
4.
go back to reference Blum JL, Jones SE, Buzdar AU, et al. Multicenter phase II study of capecitabine in paclitaxel-refractory metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:485–94.PubMed Blum JL, Jones SE, Buzdar AU, et al. Multicenter phase II study of capecitabine in paclitaxel-refractory metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:485–94.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Blum JL, Dieras V, Lorusso PM, et al. Multicenter phase II study of oral capecitabine in taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Cancer. 2001;92:1759–68.PubMedCrossRef Blum JL, Dieras V, Lorusso PM, et al. Multicenter phase II study of oral capecitabine in taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Cancer. 2001;92:1759–68.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference O’Shaughnessy J, Blum J, Moiseyenko V, et al. Randomized open-label, phase II trial of oral capecitabine (xeloda) versus a reference arm of intravenous CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-Xuorouracil) as first-line therapy for advanced/metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2001;12:1247–54.CrossRef O’Shaughnessy J, Blum J, Moiseyenko V, et al. Randomized open-label, phase II trial of oral capecitabine (xeloda) versus a reference arm of intravenous CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-Xuorouracil) as first-line therapy for advanced/metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2001;12:1247–54.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference O’Shaughnessy J, Miles D, Vukelja S, et al. Superior survival with capecitabine plus Docetaxel combination therapy in anthracycline-pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer: phase III trial results. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:2812–23.PubMedCrossRef O’Shaughnessy J, Miles D, Vukelja S, et al. Superior survival with capecitabine plus Docetaxel combination therapy in anthracycline-pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer: phase III trial results. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:2812–23.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Welt G, von Minckwitz A, Oberhof C, et al. Phase I/II study of capecitabine and vinorelbine in pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2005;16:64–9.PubMedCrossRef Welt G, von Minckwitz A, Oberhof C, et al. Phase I/II study of capecitabine and vinorelbine in pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2005;16:64–9.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ahn Jin-Hee, Kim Sung-Bae, Kim Tae-Won, et al. Capecitabine and Vinorelbine in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracycline and taxane. J Korean Med Sci. 2004;19:547–53.PubMedCrossRef Ahn Jin-Hee, Kim Sung-Bae, Kim Tae-Won, et al. Capecitabine and Vinorelbine in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracycline and taxane. J Korean Med Sci. 2004;19:547–53.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Chan S, Friedrichs K, Noel D, et al. Prospective randomized trial of Docetaxel versus doxorubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:2341–54.PubMed Chan S, Friedrichs K, Noel D, et al. Prospective randomized trial of Docetaxel versus doxorubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:2341–54.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Jones SE, Erban J, Overmoyer B, et al. Randomized phase III study of Docetaxel compared with paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:5434–6.CrossRef Jones SE, Erban J, Overmoyer B, et al. Randomized phase III study of Docetaxel compared with paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:5434–6.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Tabernero J, Climent MA, Lluch A, et al. A multicentre, randomised phase II study of weekly or 3-weekly Docetaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2004;15:1358–65.PubMedCrossRef Tabernero J, Climent MA, Lluch A, et al. A multicentre, randomised phase II study of weekly or 3-weekly Docetaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2004;15:1358–65.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Riviera E, Mejia JA, Arun B, et al. Phase III study of Docetaxel weekly (DW) versus every 3 weeks (D) in patients with metastatic breast cancer: final results. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2006;24(18S), part I of II, p 21 s (abstract 574). Riviera E, Mejia JA, Arun B, et al. Phase III study of Docetaxel weekly (DW) versus every 3 weeks (D) in patients with metastatic breast cancer: final results. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2006;24(18S), part I of II, p 21 s (abstract 574).
14.
go back to reference Ghosn M, Kattan J, Farhat F, et al. Phase II trial of capecitabine and vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer patients. Anticancer Res. 2006;26:2451–6.PubMed Ghosn M, Kattan J, Farhat F, et al. Phase II trial of capecitabine and vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer patients. Anticancer Res. 2006;26:2451–6.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Ghosn M, Kattan J, Farhat F, et al. Sequential vinorelbine-capecitabine followed by Docetaxel in advanced breast cancer: long-term results of a pilot phase II trial. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2008;62:11–8.PubMedCrossRef Ghosn M, Kattan J, Farhat F, et al. Sequential vinorelbine-capecitabine followed by Docetaxel in advanced breast cancer: long-term results of a pilot phase II trial. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2008;62:11–8.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference 2003 National Cancer Registry, Lebanon, 2006 February. 2003 National Cancer Registry, Lebanon, 2006 February.
18.
go back to reference El Saghir NS, Seoud M, Khalil MK, et al. Effects of young age at survival in breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2006;6:194.PubMedCrossRef El Saghir NS, Seoud M, Khalil MK, et al. Effects of young age at survival in breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2006;6:194.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Chia KL, Speers C, Kang A, et al. The impact of new chemotherapeutic and hormonal agents on the survival of women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in a population based cohort. Cancer. 2007;110:973–9.PubMedCrossRef Chia KL, Speers C, Kang A, et al. The impact of new chemotherapeutic and hormonal agents on the survival of women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in a population based cohort. Cancer. 2007;110:973–9.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Miller K, Wang M, Gralow J, et al. Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab versus paclitaxel alone for metastatic breast cancer. N Eng J Med. 2007;357:2666–76.CrossRef Miller K, Wang M, Gralow J, et al. Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab versus paclitaxel alone for metastatic breast cancer. N Eng J Med. 2007;357:2666–76.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Miles D, Chan A, Romieu G, et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study of bevacizumab with Docetaxel or Docetaxel with placebo as first-line therapy for patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (mBC): AVADO. J Clin Oncol. 26: May 20 suppl 2008 (abstract 1011). Miles D, Chan A, Romieu G, et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study of bevacizumab with Docetaxel or Docetaxel with placebo as first-line therapy for patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (mBC): AVADO. J Clin Oncol. 26: May 20 suppl 2008 (abstract 1011).
22.
go back to reference McGarvey EL, Baum LD, Pinkerton RC, et al. Psychological sequelae and alopecia among women with cancer. Cancer Pract. 2001;9:283–9.PubMedCrossRef McGarvey EL, Baum LD, Pinkerton RC, et al. Psychological sequelae and alopecia among women with cancer. Cancer Pract. 2001;9:283–9.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Cardoso F, Bedard PL, Winer EP, et al. International guidelines for management of metastatic breast cancer: combination vs sequential single-agent chemotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:1174–81.PubMedCrossRef Cardoso F, Bedard PL, Winer EP, et al. International guidelines for management of metastatic breast cancer: combination vs sequential single-agent chemotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:1174–81.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Albain KS, Nag SM, Calderillo-Ruiz G, et al. Gemcitabine plus paclitaxel versus paclitaxel monotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer and prior anthracycline treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3950–7.PubMedCrossRef Albain KS, Nag SM, Calderillo-Ruiz G, et al. Gemcitabine plus paclitaxel versus paclitaxel monotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer and prior anthracycline treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3950–7.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Sledge GW, Neuberg D, Bernardo P, et al. Phase III trial of doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and the combination of doxorubicin and paclitaxel as front-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: an intergroup trial (E1193). J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:588–92.PubMedCrossRef Sledge GW, Neuberg D, Bernardo P, et al. Phase III trial of doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and the combination of doxorubicin and paclitaxel as front-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: an intergroup trial (E1193). J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:588–92.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Liu PY, LeBlanc M, Desai M. False positive rates of randomized phase II designs. Control Clin Trials. 1999;20:343–52.PubMedCrossRef Liu PY, LeBlanc M, Desai M. False positive rates of randomized phase II designs. Control Clin Trials. 1999;20:343–52.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Lee JJ, Feng L. Randomized phase II designs in cancer clinical trials: current status and future directions. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:4450–7.PubMedCrossRef Lee JJ, Feng L. Randomized phase II designs in cancer clinical trials: current status and future directions. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:4450–7.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference O’Shauughnessy J, Osborne C, Pippen J, et al. Efficacy of BSI-201, a Poly (ADP-ribose) Polymerase-1 (PARP1) Inhibitor, in Combination with Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (G/C) in Patients with Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC): Results of a Randomized Phase II Trial. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2009;27:18 s (abstract 3). O’Shauughnessy J, Osborne C, Pippen J, et al. Efficacy of BSI-201, a Poly (ADP-ribose) Polymerase-1 (PARP1) Inhibitor, in Combination with Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (G/C) in Patients with Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC): Results of a Randomized Phase II Trial. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2009;27:18 s (abstract 3).
Metadata
Title
A phase II randomized study comparing navelbine and capecitabine (Navcap) followed either by Navcap or by weekly docetaxel in the first-line treatment of HER-2/neu negative metastatic breast cancer
Authors
M. Ghosn
P. Aftimos
F. S. Farhat
J. G. Kattan
C. Hanna
N. Haddad
F. Nasr
G. Chahine
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Medical Oncology / Issue Special Issue 1/2011
Print ISSN: 1357-0560
Electronic ISSN: 1559-131X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-010-9754-2

Other articles of this Special Issue 1/2011

Medical Oncology 1/2011 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine