Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Neurocritical Care 2/2015

01-04-2015 | Original Article

Epidemiology-Based Mortality Score in Status Epilepticus (EMSE)

Authors: M. Leitinger, Y. Höller, G. Kalss, A. Rohracher, H. F. Novak, J. Höfler, J. Dobesberger, G. Kuchukhidze, E. Trinka

Published in: Neurocritical Care | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Status epilepticus (SE) is a neurological emergency with high mortality and often a poor functional outcome amongst survivors. So far, only status epilepticus severity score (STESS) is available to predict individual outcomes. STESS is based on weighted sum scores of age, type of seizure, level of consciousness and history of previous seizures. Weighting factors were based on a priori assumptions.

Methods

We tested in an explorative, hypothesis generating approach, whether epidemiological data (i.e. mortality rates) can be combined to form a score (Epidemiology-based Mortality score in SE—EMSE), and further, which combination of aetiology, age, comorbidity, EEG, duration and level of consciousness yields highest test performance. Positive and negative predictive value, and correctly classified were compared to STESS (with different cut-off levels: STESS-3, STESS-4). Score points for each parameter, e.g. age, were derived from previously published specific mortality rates. For each combination of parameters, the lowest sum-score of deceased individuals was taken as cut-off. Ninety-two consecutive non-hypoxic patients (age range 20–90 years), with various forms of SE admitted to a tertiary care neurological intensive care unit were investigated retrospectively.

Results

EMSE using a combination of aetiology, age, comorbidity and EEG (NPV = 100 %, PPV = 68.8 %, correctly classified 89.1 %) was superior to STESS-3 and STESS-4 (p = 0.0022 or lower).

Conclusion

EMSE explained individual mortality in almost 90 % of cases, and performed significantly better than previous scores. This explorative study needs external prospective corroboration. EMSE may be a valuable tool for risk stratification in interventional studies in the future.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Neligan A, Shorvon SD. Frequency and prognosis of convulsive status epilepticus of different causes: a systematic review. Arch Neurol. 2010;67:931–40.PubMed Neligan A, Shorvon SD. Frequency and prognosis of convulsive status epilepticus of different causes: a systematic review. Arch Neurol. 2010;67:931–40.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Tan RY, Neligan A, Shorvon SD. The uncommon causes of status epilepticus: a systematic review. Epilepsy Res. 2010;91:111–22.CrossRefPubMed Tan RY, Neligan A, Shorvon SD. The uncommon causes of status epilepticus: a systematic review. Epilepsy Res. 2010;91:111–22.CrossRefPubMed
3.
4.
go back to reference Towne AR, Pellock JM, Ko D, DeLorenzo RJ. Determinants of mortality in status epilepticus. Epilepsia. 1994;35:27–34.CrossRefPubMed Towne AR, Pellock JM, Ko D, DeLorenzo RJ. Determinants of mortality in status epilepticus. Epilepsia. 1994;35:27–34.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Rossetti AO, Logroscino G, Bromfield EB. A clinical score for prognosis of status epilepticus in adults. Neurology. 2006;66:1736–8.CrossRefPubMed Rossetti AO, Logroscino G, Bromfield EB. A clinical score for prognosis of status epilepticus in adults. Neurology. 2006;66:1736–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Rossetti AO, Logroscino G, Milligan TA, Michaelides C, Ruffieux C, Bromfield EB. Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS): a tool to orient early treatment strategy. J Neurol. 2008;255(10):1561–6. Rossetti AO, Logroscino G, Milligan TA, Michaelides C, Ruffieux C, Bromfield EB. Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS): a tool to orient early treatment strategy. J Neurol. 2008;255(10):1561–6.
7.
go back to reference Sutter R, Kaplan PW, Rüegg S. Independent external validation of the status epilepticus severity score. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:e475–9.CrossRefPubMed Sutter R, Kaplan PW, Rüegg S. Independent external validation of the status epilepticus severity score. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:e475–9.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Neligan A, Shorvon SD. Prognostic factors, morbidity and mortality in tonic-clonic status epilepticus: a review. Epilepsy Res. 2011;93:1–10.CrossRefPubMed Neligan A, Shorvon SD. Prognostic factors, morbidity and mortality in tonic-clonic status epilepticus: a review. Epilepsy Res. 2011;93:1–10.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Wu YW, Shek DW, Garcia PA, Zhao S, Johnston SC. Incidence and mortality of generalized convulsive status epilepticus in California. Neurology. 2002;58(7):1070–6. Wu YW, Shek DW, Garcia PA, Zhao S, Johnston SC. Incidence and mortality of generalized convulsive status epilepticus in California. Neurology. 2002;58(7):1070–6.
10.
go back to reference Shneker BF, Fountain NB. Assessment of acute morbidity and mortality in nonconvulsive status epilepticus. Neurology. 2003;61:1066–73.CrossRefPubMed Shneker BF, Fountain NB. Assessment of acute morbidity and mortality in nonconvulsive status epilepticus. Neurology. 2003;61:1066–73.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Koubeissi M, Alshekhlee A. In-hospital mortality of generalized convulsive status epilepticus: a large US sample. Neurology. 2007;69:886–93.CrossRefPubMed Koubeissi M, Alshekhlee A. In-hospital mortality of generalized convulsive status epilepticus: a large US sample. Neurology. 2007;69:886–93.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Rossetti AO, Hurwitz S, Logroscino G, Bromfield EB. Prognosis of status epilepticus: role of aetiology, age, and consciousness impairment at presentation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006;77(5):611–5. Rossetti AO, Hurwitz S, Logroscino G, Bromfield EB. Prognosis of status epilepticus: role of aetiology, age, and consciousness impairment at presentation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006;77(5):611–5.
13.
go back to reference Jaitly R, Sgro JA, Towne AR, Ko D, DeLorenzo RJ. Prognostic value of EEG monitoring after status epilepticus: a prospective adult study. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1997;14(4):326–34. Jaitly R, Sgro JA, Towne AR, Ko D, DeLorenzo RJ. Prognostic value of EEG monitoring after status epilepticus: a prospective adult study. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1997;14(4):326–34.
14.
go back to reference Nei M, Lee JM, Shanker VL, Sperling MR. The EEG and prognosis in status epilepticus. Epilepsia. 1999;40(2):157–63. Nei M, Lee JM, Shanker VL, Sperling MR. The EEG and prognosis in status epilepticus. Epilepsia. 1999;40(2):157–63.
15.
go back to reference Beniczky S, Hirsch LJ, Kaplan PW, et al. Unified EEG terminology and criteria for nonconvulsive status epilepticus. Epilepsia. 2013;54(Suppl 6):28–9.CrossRefPubMed Beniczky S, Hirsch LJ, Kaplan PW, et al. Unified EEG terminology and criteria for nonconvulsive status epilepticus. Epilepsia. 2013;54(Suppl 6):28–9.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–83. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–83.
17.
go back to reference McManus DD, Gore J, Yarzebski J, Spencer F, Lessard D, Goldberg RJ. Recent trends in the incidence, treatment, and outcomes of patients with STEMI and NSTEMI. Am J Med. 2011;124(1):40–7. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.07.023. McManus DD, Gore J, Yarzebski J, Spencer F, Lessard D, Goldberg RJ. Recent trends in the incidence, treatment, and outcomes of patients with STEMI and NSTEMI. Am J Med. 2011;124(1):40–7. doi:10.​1016/​j.​amjmed.​2010.​07.​023.
18.
go back to reference Commission on Classification and Terminology of the International. League against Epilepsy. Proposal for revised clinical and electroencephalographic classification of epileptic seizures: from the Commission on Classification and Terminology of the International League against Epilepsy. Epilepsia. 1981;22:489–501.CrossRef Commission on Classification and Terminology of the International. League against Epilepsy. Proposal for revised clinical and electroencephalographic classification of epileptic seizures: from the Commission on Classification and Terminology of the International League against Epilepsy. Epilepsia. 1981;22:489–501.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lowenstein DH, Bleck T, Macdonald RL. It’s time to revise the definition of status epilepticus. Epilepsia. 1999;40:120–2.CrossRefPubMed Lowenstein DH, Bleck T, Macdonald RL. It’s time to revise the definition of status epilepticus. Epilepsia. 1999;40:120–2.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Waterhouse EJ, Garnett LK, Towne AR, et al. Prospective population-based study of intermittent and continuous convulsive status epilepticus in Richmond, Virginia. Epilepsia. 1999;40(6):752–8. Waterhouse EJ, Garnett LK, Towne AR, et al. Prospective population-based study of intermittent and continuous convulsive status epilepticus in Richmond, Virginia. Epilepsia. 1999;40(6):752–8.
21.
go back to reference Hirsch LJ, LaRoche SM, Gaspard N, et al. American clinical neurophysiology society’s standardized critical care EEG terminology: 2012 version. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2013;30(1):1–27. doi:10.1097/WNP.0b013e3182784729. Hirsch LJ, LaRoche SM, Gaspard N, et al. American clinical neurophysiology society’s standardized critical care EEG terminology: 2012 version. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2013;30(1):1–27. doi:10.​1097/​WNP.​0b013e3182784729​.
23.
go back to reference Trajman A, Luiz RR. McNemar chi2 test revisited: comparing sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic examinations. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2008;68:77–80.CrossRefPubMed Trajman A, Luiz RR. McNemar chi2 test revisited: comparing sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic examinations. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2008;68:77–80.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Benjamini Y, Yekutieli D. The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann Stat. 2001;29:1165–88.CrossRef Benjamini Y, Yekutieli D. The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann Stat. 2001;29:1165–88.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Sokic DV, Jankovic SM, Vojvodic NM, Ristic AJ. Etiology of a short-term mortality in the group of 750 patients with 920 episodes of status epilepticus within a period of 10 years (1988–1997). Seizure. 2009;18(3):215–9. Sokic DV, Jankovic SM, Vojvodic NM, Ristic AJ. Etiology of a short-term mortality in the group of 750 patients with 920 episodes of status epilepticus within a period of 10 years (1988–1997). Seizure. 2009;18(3):215–9.
26.
go back to reference Alvarez V, Januel JM, Burnand B, Rossetti AO. Role of comorbidities in outcome prediction after status epilepticus. Epilepsia. 2012;53(5):e89–92. Alvarez V, Januel JM, Burnand B, Rossetti AO. Role of comorbidities in outcome prediction after status epilepticus. Epilepsia. 2012;53(5):e89–92.
27.
go back to reference Vignatelli L, Tonon C, D’Alessandro R. Bologna group for the study of status epilepticus. Incidence and short-term prognosis of status epilepticus in adults in Bologna, Italy. Epilepsia. 2003;44:964–8.CrossRefPubMed Vignatelli L, Tonon C, D’Alessandro R. Bologna group for the study of status epilepticus. Incidence and short-term prognosis of status epilepticus in adults in Bologna, Italy. Epilepsia. 2003;44:964–8.CrossRefPubMed
29.
30.
go back to reference Rossetti AO, Logroscino G, Bromfield EB. Refractory status epilepticus: effect of treatment aggressiveness on prognosis. Arch Neurol. 2005;62:1698–702.CrossRefPubMed Rossetti AO, Logroscino G, Bromfield EB. Refractory status epilepticus: effect of treatment aggressiveness on prognosis. Arch Neurol. 2005;62:1698–702.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Sagduyu A, Tarlaci S, Sirin H. Generalized tonic-clonic status epilepticus: causes, treatment, complications and predictors of case fatality. J Neurol. 1998;245:640–6.CrossRefPubMed Sagduyu A, Tarlaci S, Sirin H. Generalized tonic-clonic status epilepticus: causes, treatment, complications and predictors of case fatality. J Neurol. 1998;245:640–6.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Treiman DM, Meyers PD, Walton NY, et al. A comparison of four treatments for generalized convulsive status epilepticus. Veterans affairs status epilepticus cooperative study group. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:792–8.CrossRefPubMed Treiman DM, Meyers PD, Walton NY, et al. A comparison of four treatments for generalized convulsive status epilepticus. Veterans affairs status epilepticus cooperative study group. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:792–8.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Hui AC, Joynt GM, Li H, Wong KS. Status epilepticus in Hong Kong Chinese: aetiology, outcome and predictors of death and morbidity. Seizure. 2003;12(7):478–82. Hui AC, Joynt GM, Li H, Wong KS. Status epilepticus in Hong Kong Chinese: aetiology, outcome and predictors of death and morbidity. Seizure. 2003;12(7):478–82.
34.
go back to reference Lowenstein DH, Alldredge BK. Status epilepticus at an urban public hospital in the 1980s. Neurology. 1993;43(3 Pt 1):483–8.CrossRefPubMed Lowenstein DH, Alldredge BK. Status epilepticus at an urban public hospital in the 1980s. Neurology. 1993;43(3 Pt 1):483–8.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Lothman E. The biochemical basis and pathophysiology of status epilepticus. Neurology. 1990;40(5 Suppl 2):13–23.PubMed Lothman E. The biochemical basis and pathophysiology of status epilepticus. Neurology. 1990;40(5 Suppl 2):13–23.PubMed
36.
go back to reference Mayer SA, Claassen J, Lokin J, Mendelsohn F, Dennis LJ, Fitzsimmons BF. Refractory status epilepticus: frequency, risk factors, and impact on outcome. Arch Neurol. 2002;59(2):205–10. Mayer SA, Claassen J, Lokin J, Mendelsohn F, Dennis LJ, Fitzsimmons BF. Refractory status epilepticus: frequency, risk factors, and impact on outcome. Arch Neurol. 2002;59(2):205–10.
Metadata
Title
Epidemiology-Based Mortality Score in Status Epilepticus (EMSE)
Authors
M. Leitinger
Y. Höller
G. Kalss
A. Rohracher
H. F. Novak
J. Höfler
J. Dobesberger
G. Kuchukhidze
E. Trinka
Publication date
01-04-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Neurocritical Care / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 1541-6933
Electronic ISSN: 1556-0961
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-014-0080-y

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

Neurocritical Care 2/2015 Go to the issue