Top

Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology

Published in:

01-03-2014 | Original Article

Cardiothoracic ratio in postmortem computed tomography: reliability and threshold for the diagnosis of cardiomegaly

Authors: Sebastian Winklhofer, Nicole Berger, Thomas Ruder, Marina Elliott, Paul Stolzmann, Michael Thali, Hatem Alkadhi, Garyfalia Ampanozi

Published in: Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology | Issue 1/2014

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) in postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) and to assess a CTR threshold for the diagnosis of cardiomegaly based on the weight of the heart at autopsy. PMCT data of 170 deceased human adults were retrospectively evaluated by two blinded radiologists. The CTR was measured on axial computed tomography images and the actual cardiac weight was weighed at autopsy. Inter-rater reliability, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated. Receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated to assess enlarged heart weight by CTR. The autopsy definition of cardiomegaly was based on normal values of the Zeek method (within a range of both, one or two SD) and the Smith method (within the given range). Intra-class correlation coefficients demonstrated excellent agreements (0.983) regarding CTR measurements. In 105/170 (62 %) cases the CTR in PMCT was >0.5, indicating enlarged heart weight, according to clinical references. The mean heart weight measured in autopsy was 405 ± 105 g. As a result, 114/170 (67 %) cases were interpreted as having enlarged heart weights according to the normal values of Zeek within one SD, while 97/170 (57 %) were within two SD. 100/170 (59 %) were assessed as enlarged according to Smith’s normal values. The sensitivity/specificity of the 0.5 cut-off of the CTR for the diagnosis of enlarged heart weight was 78/71 % (Zeek one SD), 74/55 % (Zeek two SD), and 76/59 % (Smith), respectively. The discriminative power between normal heart weight and cardiomegaly was 79, 73, and 74 % for the Zeek (1SD/2SD) and Smith methods respectively. Changing the CTR threshold to 0.57 resulted in a minimum specificity of 95 % for all three definitions of cardiomegaly. With a CTR threshold of 0.57, cardiomegaly can be identified with a very high specificity. This may be useful if PMCT is used by forensic pathologists as a screening tool for medico-legal autopsies.

Danzer C. The cardiothoracic ratio. An index of cardiac enlargement. Am J Med Sci. 1919;157:513–21.CrossRef

Michiue T, Ishikawa T, Sakoda S, Quan L, Li DR, Kamikodai Y, et al. Cardiothoracic ratio in postmortem chest radiography with regard to the cause of death. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2010;12(2):73–8.CrossRef

Zaman MJ, Sanders J, Crook AM, Feder G, Shipley M, Timmis A, et al. Cardiothoracic ratio within the “normal” range independently predicts mortality in patients undergoing coronary angiography. Heart. 2007;93(4):491–4.PubMedCrossRef

Davis JL, Murphy ML, Blue LR, Ferris EJ. A comparison of objective measurements on the chest roentgenogram as screening tests for right or left ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Cardiol. 1986;58(7):658–60.PubMedCrossRef

Murphy ML, Blue LR, Thenabadu PN, Phillips JR, Ferris EJ. The reliability of the routine chest roentgenogram for determination of heart size based on specific ventricular chamber evaluation at postmortem. Invest Radiol. 1985;20(1):21–5.PubMedCrossRef

Ungerleider HE, Gubner R. Evaluation of heart size measurements. Am Heart J. 1942;24:494–510.CrossRef

Raphael MJ. The normal heart. In: Sutton D, editor. Textbook of radiology and imaging. 6th ed. London: Church Livingstone; 1998. p. 541–62.

Weissleder R, Wittenberg J, Harisinghani MG. Primer of diagnostic imaging. 5th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier/Mosby; 2011.

Ernst ER, Shub C, Bailey KR, Brown LR, Redfield MM. Radiographic measurements of cardiac size as predictors of outcome in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. J Card Fail. 2001;7(1):13–20.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Gollub MJ, Panu N, Delaney H, Sohn M, Zheng J, Moskowitz CS, et al. Shall we report cardiomegaly at routine computed tomography of the chest? J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2012;36(1):67–71.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Miller JA, Hinrichs A, Contractor S, Doddakashi S. Cardiac dimensions derived from helical Ct: correlation with plain film radiography. Internet J Radiol. 2000. http://ispub.com/IJRA/1/1/8223. Accessed 30 Sept 2013.

12.

Schlett CL, Kwait DC, Mahabadi AA, Bamberg F, O’Donnell CJ, Fox CS, et al. Simple area-based measurement for multidetector computed tomography to predict left ventricular size. Eur Radiol. 2010;20(7):1590–6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

13.

Robbins SL, Kumar V. The heart Robbins and Cotran pathologic basis of disease. 8th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2010. p. 555–618.

14.

Zeek P. Heart Weight: the weight of the normal human heart. Arch Pathol. 1942;34:820–32.

15.

Smith H. The relation of the weight of the heart to the weight of the body and the weight of the heart to age. Am Heart J. 1928;4:79–93.CrossRef

16.

Thali MJ, Jackowski C, Oesterhelweg L, Ross SG, Dirnhofer R. VIRTOPSY—the Swiss virtual autopsy approach. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2007;9(2):100–4.CrossRef

17.

Levy AD, Harcke HT, Mallak CT. Postmortem imaging: MDCT features of postmortem change and decomposition. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2010;31(1):12–7.PubMedCrossRef

18.

Brinkmann B. Harmonization of medico-legal autopsy rules. Committee of Ministers. Council of Europe. Int J Legal Med. 1999;113(1):1–14.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Recommendation no. R (99) 3 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the harmonization of medico-legal autopsy rules. Forensic Sci Int. 2000;111(1–3):5–58.

20.

Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–74.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Baglivo M, Winklhofer S, Hatch G, Ampanozi G, Thali MJ, Ruder TD. The rise of forensic and postmortem radiology—analysis of the literature between the year 2000 and 2011. J Forensic Radiol Imaging. 2013;1(1):3–9.CrossRef

22.

Leth PM. Virtual autopsy. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2013;9(3):432.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Kabala JE, Wilde P. The measurement of heart size in the antero-posterior chest radiograph. Br J Radiol. 1987;60(718):981–6.PubMedCrossRef

24.

van der Jagt EJ, Smits HJ. Cardiac size in the supine chestfilm. Eur J Radiol. 1992;14(3):173–7.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Hatch GM, Ampanozi G, Thali MJ, Ruder TD. Validation of left ventricular circumferential area as a surrogate for heart weight on postmortem computed tomography. J Forensic Radiol Imaging. 2013;1(3):98–101.CrossRef

26.

Bedford PJ, Routine CT. scan combined with preliminary examination as a new method in determining the need for autopsy. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2012;8(4):390–4.PubMedCrossRef

27.

Shiotani S, Kohno M, Ohashi N, Yamazaki K, Nakayama H, Watanabe K, et al. Dilatation of the heart on postmortem computed tomography (PMCT): comparison with live CT. Radiat Med. 2003;21(1):29–35.PubMed

Title: Cardiothoracic ratio in postmortem computed tomography: reliability and threshold for the diagnosis of cardiomegaly
Authors: Sebastian Winklhofer
Nicole Berger
Thomas Ruder
Marina Elliott
Paul Stolzmann
Michael Thali
Hatem Alkadhi
Garyfalia Ampanozi
Publication date: 01-03-2014
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology / Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 1547-769X
Electronic ISSN: 1556-2891
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-013-9504-9

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Cardiothoracic ratio in postmortem computed tomography: reliability and threshold for the diagnosis of cardiomegaly

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Honor crimes: review and proposed definition

Liver and peripheral blood concentration ratio (L/P) as a marker of postmortem drug redistribution: a literature review

The autopsy of Reinhard Heydrich

Tattooing: a reminder of bygone follies

Diogenes or Havisham syndrome and the mortuary

Effects of incapacitant spray deployed in the restraint and arrest of detainees in the Metropolitan Police Service area, London, UK: a prospective study