Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Ophthalmology 3/2007

01-07-2007

A Comparison of a Monofocal Acrysoft IOL Using the “Blended Monovision” Formula with the Multifocal Array IOL for Glasses Independence After Cataract Surgery

Authors: Ming Chen, MD FACS, Neal H. Atebara, MD, Te Tsaw Chen, MD

Published in: Annals of Ophthalmology | Issue 3/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

We compared the Acrysoft monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) in the mini monovision formula (n = 20) with the Array multifocal intraocular lens (n = 20) for glasses independence after cataract surgery. The Acrysoft monofocal IOL group showed similar and even slightly better results than the Array multifocal IOL group. The monofocal Acrysoft IOL using the mini monovision (blended vision) formula is a good alternative for providing post-cataract surgery glasses independence.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Leyland M, Zinicola E. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: a systematic review. Ophthalmology 2003;110:1789–1798PubMedCrossRef Leyland M, Zinicola E. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: a systematic review. Ophthalmology 2003;110:1789–1798PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Leyland MD, Langan L, Goolfee F, et al. Prospective randomised double-masked trial of bilateral multifocal, bifocal or monofocal intraocular lenses. Eye 2002;16:481–490PubMedCrossRef Leyland MD, Langan L, Goolfee F, et al. Prospective randomised double-masked trial of bilateral multifocal, bifocal or monofocal intraocular lenses. Eye 2002;16:481–490PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Javitt JC, Steinert RF. Cataract extraction with multifocal intraocular lens implantation: a multinational clinical trial evaluating clinical, functional, and quality-of-life outcomes. Ophthalmology 2000;107:2040–2048PubMedCrossRef Javitt JC, Steinert RF. Cataract extraction with multifocal intraocular lens implantation: a multinational clinical trial evaluating clinical, functional, and quality-of-life outcomes. Ophthalmology 2000;107:2040–2048PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Rossetti L Carraro F, Rovati M, et al. Performance of diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses in extracapsular cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 1994;20:124–128 Rossetti L Carraro F, Rovati M, et al. Performance of diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses in extracapsular cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 1994;20:124–128
5.
go back to reference Allen ED, Burton RL, Webber SK, et al. Comparison of a diffractive bifocal and a monofocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 1996;22:446–451PubMed Allen ED, Burton RL, Webber SK, et al. Comparison of a diffractive bifocal and a monofocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 1996;22:446–451PubMed
6.
go back to reference El-Maghraby A, Marzouky A, Gazayerli E, et al. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses. Visual and refractive comparisons. J Cataract Refract Surg 1992;18:147–152PubMed El-Maghraby A, Marzouky A, Gazayerli E, et al. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses. Visual and refractive comparisons. J Cataract Refract Surg 1992;18:147–152PubMed
7.
go back to reference Percival SP, Setty SS. Prospectively randomized trial comparing the pseudoaccommodation of the AMO ARRAY multifocal lens and a monofocal lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 1993;19:26–31PubMed Percival SP, Setty SS. Prospectively randomized trial comparing the pseudoaccommodation of the AMO ARRAY multifocal lens and a monofocal lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 1993;19:26–31PubMed
8.
go back to reference Steinert RF, Post CT, Brint SF, et al. A prospective, randomized, double-masked comparison of a zonal-progressive multifocal intraocular lens and a monofocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology 1992;99:853–860PubMed Steinert RF, Post CT, Brint SF, et al. A prospective, randomized, double-masked comparison of a zonal-progressive multifocal intraocular lens and a monofocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology 1992;99:853–860PubMed
9.
go back to reference Kamlesh, Dadeya S, Kaushik S. Contrast sensitivity and depth of focus with aspheric multifocal versus conventional monofocal intraocular lens. Can J Ophthalmol 2001;36:197–201PubMed Kamlesh, Dadeya S, Kaushik S. Contrast sensitivity and depth of focus with aspheric multifocal versus conventional monofocal intraocular lens. Can J Ophthalmol 2001;36:197–201PubMed
10.
go back to reference Nawa Y, Ueda T, Nakatsuka M, et al. Accommodation obtained per 1.0 mm forward movement of a posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:2069–2072PubMedCrossRef Nawa Y, Ueda T, Nakatsuka M, et al. Accommodation obtained per 1.0 mm forward movement of a posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:2069–2072PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Fine IH, Hoffman RS, Packer M. Clear-lens extraction with multifocal lens implantation. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2001;41:113–121PubMedCrossRef Fine IH, Hoffman RS, Packer M. Clear-lens extraction with multifocal lens implantation. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2001;41:113–121PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A Comparison of a Monofocal Acrysoft IOL Using the “Blended Monovision” Formula with the Multifocal Array IOL for Glasses Independence After Cataract Surgery
Authors
Ming Chen, MD FACS
Neal H. Atebara, MD
Te Tsaw Chen, MD
Publication date
01-07-2007
Publisher
Humana Press Inc
Published in
Annals of Ophthalmology / Issue 3/2007
Print ISSN: 1530-4086
Electronic ISSN: 1558-9951
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12009-007-0035-4

Other articles of this Issue 3/2007

Annals of Ophthalmology 3/2007 Go to the issue

Consultation Section

Consultation Section

Annals of Ophthalmology Quiz

Annals of Ophthalmology Quiz