Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 11/2016

Open Access 01-11-2016 | Symposium: Advances in PEEK Technology

The Biologic Response to Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Wear Particles in Total Joint Replacement: A Systematic Review

Authors: Ashley A. Stratton-Powell, MSc, Kinga M. Pasko, MSc, Claire L. Brockett, PhD, Joanne L. Tipper, PhD

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 11/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and its composites are polymers resistant to fatigue strain, radiologically transparent, and have mechanical properties suitable for a range of orthopaedic applications. In bulk form, PEEK composites are generally accepted as biocompatible. In particulate form, however, the biologic response relevant to joint replacement devices remains unclear. The biologic response to wear particles affects the longevity of total joint arthroplasties. Particles in the phagocytozable size range of 0.1 µm to 10 µm are considered the most biologically reactive, particularly particles with a mean size of < 1 µm. This systematic review aimed to identify the current evidence for the biologic response to PEEK-based wear debris from total joint arthroplasties.

Questions/purposes

(1) What are the quantitative characteristics of PEEK-based wear particles produced by total joint arthroplasties? (2) Do PEEK wear particles cause an adverse biologic response when compared with UHMWPE or a similar negative control biomaterial? (3) Is the biologic response affected by particle characteristics?

Methods

Embase and Ovid Medline databases were searched for studies that quantified PEEK-based particle characteristics and/or investigated the biologic response to PEEK-based particles relevant to total joint arthroplasties. The keyword search included brands of PEEK (eg, MITCH, MOTIS) or variations of PEEK types and nomenclature (eg, PAEK, CFR-PEEK) in combination with types of joint (eg, hip, knee) and synonyms for wear debris or immunologic response (eg, particles, cytotoxicity). Peer-reviewed studies, published in English, investigating total joint arthroplasty devices and cytotoxic effects of PEEK particulates were included. Studies investigating devices without articulating bearings (eg, spinal instrumentation devices) and bulk material or contact cytotoxicity were excluded. Of 129 studies, 15 were selected for analysis and interpretation. No studies were found that isolated and characterized PEEK wear particles from retrieved periprosthetic human tissue samples.

Results

In the four studies that quantified PEEK-based particles produced using hip, knee, and spinal joint replacement simulators, the mean particle size was 0.23 µm to 2.0 µm. The absolute range reported was approximately 0.01 µm to 50 µm. Rod-like carbon particulates and granular-shaped PEEK particles were identified in human tissue by histologic analysis. Ten studies, including six animal models (rat, mouse, and rabbit), three cell line experiments, and two human tissue retreival studies, investigated the biologic response to PEEK-based particles. Qualitative histologic assessments showed immunologic cell infiltration to be similar for PEEK particles when compared with UHMWPE particles in all six of the animal studies identified. However, increased inflammatory cytokine release (such as tumor necrosis factor-α) was identified in only one in vitro study, but without substantial suppression in macrophage viability. Only one study tested the effects of particle size on cytotoxicity and found the largest unfilled PEEK particles (approximately 13 µm) to have a toxic effect; UHMWPE particles in the same size range showed a similar cytotoxic effect.

Conclusions

Wear particles produced by PEEK-based bearings were, in almost all cases, in the phagocytozable size range (0.1–10 µm). The studies that evaluated the biologic response to PEEK-based particles generally found cytotoxicity to be within acceptable limits relative to the UHMWPE control, but inconsistent when inflammatory cytokine release was considered.

Clinical Relevance

To translate new and advanced materials into clinical use more quickly, the clinical relevance and validity of preclinical tests need to be improved. To achieve this for PEEK-based devices, human tissue retrieval studies including subsequent particle isolation and characterization analyses are required. In vitro cell studies using isolated wear particles from tissue or validated joint replacement simulators, instead of manufactured particles, are also required.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Amstutz HC, Campbell P, Kossovsky N, Clarke IC. Mechanism and clinical significance of wear debris-induced osteolysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;276:7–18.PubMed Amstutz HC, Campbell P, Kossovsky N, Clarke IC. Mechanism and clinical significance of wear debris-induced osteolysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;276:7–18.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Bladen C, Teramura S, Russell S, Fujiwara K, Fisher J, Ingham E, Tomita N, Tipper J. Analysis of wear, wear particles, and reduced inflammatory potential of vitamin E ultrahigh‐molecular‐weight polyethylene for use in total joint replacement. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2013;101:458–466.PubMed Bladen C, Teramura S, Russell S, Fujiwara K, Fisher J, Ingham E, Tomita N, Tipper J. Analysis of wear, wear particles, and reduced inflammatory potential of vitamin E ultrahigh‐molecular‐weight polyethylene for use in total joint replacement. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2013;101:458–466.PubMed
3.
go back to reference British Standards Institute. Implants for surgery—wear of total intervertebral spinal disc prostheses Part 1: Loading and displacement parameters for wear testing and corresponding environmental conditions for test.: British Standards Online [Online]; 2011. Available at: https://bsol.bsigroup.com/. Accessed June 29, 2016. British Standards Institute. Implants for surgery—wear of total intervertebral spinal disc prostheses Part 1: Loading and displacement parameters for wear testing and corresponding environmental conditions for test.: British Standards Online [Online]; 2011. Available at: https://​bsol.​bsigroup.​com/​. Accessed June 29, 2016.
4.
go back to reference Brockett CL, John G, Williams S, Jin Z, Isaac GH, Fisher J. Wear of ceramic-on-carbon fiber-reinforced poly-ether ether ketone hip replacements. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2012;100:1459–1465.CrossRefPubMed Brockett CL, John G, Williams S, Jin Z, Isaac GH, Fisher J. Wear of ceramic-on-carbon fiber-reinforced poly-ether ether ketone hip replacements. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2012;100:1459–1465.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Brown T, Bao QB, Kilpela T, Songer M. An in vitro biotribological assessment of NUBAC, a polyetheretherketone-on- polyetheretherketone articulating nucleus replacement device: Methodology and results from a series of wear tests using different motion profiles, test frequencies, and environmental conditions. Spine. 2010;35:E774–E781.CrossRefPubMed Brown T, Bao QB, Kilpela T, Songer M. An in vitro biotribological assessment of NUBAC, a polyetheretherketone-on- polyetheretherketone articulating nucleus replacement device: Methodology and results from a series of wear tests using different motion profiles, test frequencies, and environmental conditions. Spine. 2010;35:E774–E781.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Cunningham BW, Hallab NJ, Hu N, McAfee PC. Epidural application of spinal instrumentation particulate wear debris: a comprehensive evaluation of neurotoxicity using an in vivo animal model Laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;19:336–350.CrossRefPubMed Cunningham BW, Hallab NJ, Hu N, McAfee PC. Epidural application of spinal instrumentation particulate wear debris: a comprehensive evaluation of neurotoxicity using an in vivo animal model Laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;19:336–350.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Glant TT, Jacobs JJ. Response of three murine macrophage populations to particulate debris: bone resorption in organ cultures. J Orthop Res. 1994;12:720–731.CrossRefPubMed Glant TT, Jacobs JJ. Response of three murine macrophage populations to particulate debris: bone resorption in organ cultures. J Orthop Res. 1994;12:720–731.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Green S. Compounds and composite materials. In: Kurtz, SM. PEEK Biomaterials Handbook. Oxford, UK: William Andrew Publishing; 2012:23–48.CrossRef Green S. Compounds and composite materials. In: Kurtz, SM. PEEK Biomaterials Handbook. Oxford, UK: William Andrew Publishing; 2012:23–48.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Green T, Fisher J, Stone M, Wroblewski B, Ingham E. Polyethylene particles of a ‘critical size’ are necessary for the induction of cytokines by macrophages in vitro. Biomaterials. 1998;19:2297–2302.CrossRefPubMed Green T, Fisher J, Stone M, Wroblewski B, Ingham E. Polyethylene particles of a ‘critical size’ are necessary for the induction of cytokines by macrophages in vitro. Biomaterials. 1998;19:2297–2302.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Green TR, Fisher J, Matthews JB, Stone MH, Ingham E. Effect of size and dose on bone resorption activity of macrophages by in vitro clinically relevant ultra high molecular weight polyethylene particles. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;53:490–497.CrossRefPubMed Green TR, Fisher J, Matthews JB, Stone MH, Ingham E. Effect of size and dose on bone resorption activity of macrophages by in vitro clinically relevant ultra high molecular weight polyethylene particles. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;53:490–497.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Grupp T, Kabir K, Fritz B, Schwiesau J, Bloemer W, Jansson V. Evaluation of carbon-fibre-reinforced PEEK as material for intervertebral disc replacement. Bone Joint J. 2014;96:223–223.CrossRef Grupp T, Kabir K, Fritz B, Schwiesau J, Bloemer W, Jansson V. Evaluation of carbon-fibre-reinforced PEEK as material for intervertebral disc replacement. Bone Joint J. 2014;96:223–223.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Grupp TM, Giurea A, Miehlke RK, Hintner M, Gaisser M, Schilling C, Schwiesau J, Kaddick C. Biotribology of a new bearing material combination in a rotating hinge knee articulation. Acta Biomater. 2013;9:7054–7063.CrossRefPubMed Grupp TM, Giurea A, Miehlke RK, Hintner M, Gaisser M, Schilling C, Schwiesau J, Kaddick C. Biotribology of a new bearing material combination in a rotating hinge knee articulation. Acta Biomater. 2013;9:7054–7063.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Grupp TM, Meisel HJ, Cotton JA, Schwiesau J, Fritz B, Blomer W, Jansson V. Alternative bearing materials for intervertebral disc arthroplasty. Biomaterials. 2010;31:523–531.CrossRefPubMed Grupp TM, Meisel HJ, Cotton JA, Schwiesau J, Fritz B, Blomer W, Jansson V. Alternative bearing materials for intervertebral disc arthroplasty. Biomaterials. 2010;31:523–531.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Grupp TM, Utzschneider S, Schroder C, Schwiesau J, Fritz B, Maas A, Blomer W, Jansson V. Biotribology of alternative bearing materials for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:3601–3610.CrossRefPubMed Grupp TM, Utzschneider S, Schroder C, Schwiesau J, Fritz B, Maas A, Blomer W, Jansson V. Biotribology of alternative bearing materials for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:3601–3610.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Hallab NJ, Anderson S, Stafford T, Glant T, Jacobs JJ. Lymphocyte responses in patients with total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2005;23:384–391.CrossRefPubMed Hallab NJ, Anderson S, Stafford T, Glant T, Jacobs JJ. Lymphocyte responses in patients with total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2005;23:384–391.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Hallab NJ, McAllister K, Brady M, Jarman‐Smith M. Macrophage reactivity to different polymers demonstrates particle size‐and material‐specific reactivity: PEEK‐OPTIMA® particles versus UHMWPE particles in the submicron, micron, and 10 micron size ranges. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2012;100:480–492.CrossRefPubMed Hallab NJ, McAllister K, Brady M, Jarman‐Smith M. Macrophage reactivity to different polymers demonstrates particle size‐and material‐specific reactivity: PEEK‐OPTIMA® particles versus UHMWPE particles in the submicron, micron, and 10 micron size ranges. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2012;100:480–492.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Holt G, Murnaghan C, Reilly J, Meek R. The biology of aseptic osteolysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;460:240–252.PubMed Holt G, Murnaghan C, Reilly J, Meek R. The biology of aseptic osteolysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;460:240–252.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Howling GI, Sakoda H, Antonarulrajah A, Marrs H, Stewart TD, Appleyard S, Rand B, Fisher J, Ingham E. Biological response to wear debris generated in carbon based composites as potential bearing surfaces for artificial hip joints. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2003;67:758–764.CrossRefPubMed Howling GI, Sakoda H, Antonarulrajah A, Marrs H, Stewart TD, Appleyard S, Rand B, Fisher J, Ingham E. Biological response to wear debris generated in carbon based composites as potential bearing surfaces for artificial hip joints. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2003;67:758–764.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Illgen RL, Forsythe TM, Pike JW, Laurent MP, Blanchard CR. Highly crosslinked vs conventional polyethylene particles—an in vitro comparison of biologic activities. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:721–731.CrossRefPubMed Illgen RL, Forsythe TM, Pike JW, Laurent MP, Blanchard CR. Highly crosslinked vs conventional polyethylene particles—an in vitro comparison of biologic activities. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:721–731.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Ingham E, Fisher J. Biological reactions to wear debris in total joint replacement. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2000;214:21–37.CrossRefPubMed Ingham E, Fisher J. Biological reactions to wear debris in total joint replacement. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2000;214:21–37.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Ingram J, Matthews JB, Tipper J, Stone M, Fisher J, Ingham E. Comparison of the biological activity of grade GUR 1120 and GUR 415HP UHMWPE wear debris. Biomed Mater Eng. 2001;12:177–188. Ingram J, Matthews JB, Tipper J, Stone M, Fisher J, Ingham E. Comparison of the biological activity of grade GUR 1120 and GUR 415HP UHMWPE wear debris. Biomed Mater Eng. 2001;12:177–188.
23.
go back to reference Kabir K, Schwiesau J, Pflugmacher R, Burger C, Grupp T, Wirtz D. Comparision of biological response to PEK and UHMWPEWear debris in epidural space. Eur Spine J. 2010;19:2059–2060. Kabir K, Schwiesau J, Pflugmacher R, Burger C, Grupp T, Wirtz D. Comparision of biological response to PEK and UHMWPEWear debris in epidural space. Eur Spine J. 2010;19:2059–2060.
24.
go back to reference Katzer A, Marquardt H, Westendorf J, Wening J, Von Foerster G. Polyetheretherketone—cytotoxicity and mutagenicity in vitro. Biomaterials. 2002;23:1749–1759.CrossRefPubMed Katzer A, Marquardt H, Westendorf J, Wening J, Von Foerster G. Polyetheretherketone—cytotoxicity and mutagenicity in vitro. Biomaterials. 2002;23:1749–1759.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Latif AM, Mehats A, Elcocks M, Rushton N, Field RE, Jones E. Pre-clinical studies to validate the Mitch PCR™ cup: a flexible and anatomically shaped acetabular component with novel bearing characteristics. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 2008;19:1729–1736.PubMed Latif AM, Mehats A, Elcocks M, Rushton N, Field RE, Jones E. Pre-clinical studies to validate the Mitch PCR™ cup: a flexible and anatomically shaped acetabular component with novel bearing characteristics. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 2008;19:1729–1736.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Li CS, Vannabouathong C, Sprague S, Bhandari M. The use of carbon-fiber-reinforced (CFR) PEEK material in orthopedic implants: a systematic review. Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;8:33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Li CS, Vannabouathong C, Sprague S, Bhandari M. The use of carbon-fiber-reinforced (CFR) PEEK material in orthopedic implants: a systematic review. Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;8:33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Liu A, Richards L, Bladen CL, Ingham E, Fisher J, Tipper JL. The biological response to nanometre-sized polymer particles. Acta Biomater. 2015;23:38–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Liu A, Richards L, Bladen CL, Ingham E, Fisher J, Tipper JL. The biological response to nanometre-sized polymer particles. Acta Biomater. 2015;23:38–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Lorber V, Paulus AC, Buschmann A, Schmitt B, Grupp TM, Jansson V, Utzschneider S. Elevated cytokine expression of different PEEK wear particles compared to UHMWPE in vivo. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2014;25:141–149.CrossRefPubMed Lorber V, Paulus AC, Buschmann A, Schmitt B, Grupp TM, Jansson V, Utzschneider S. Elevated cytokine expression of different PEEK wear particles compared to UHMWPE in vivo. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2014;25:141–149.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Ma T, Goodman S. Biological effects of wear debris from joint arthroplasties. In: Wnek GE, Bowlin GL, eds. Encyclopedia of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering. London, UK: Informa Healthcare; 2008. Ma T, Goodman S. Biological effects of wear debris from joint arthroplasties. In: Wnek GE, Bowlin GL, eds. Encyclopedia of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering. London, UK: Informa Healthcare; 2008.
31.
go back to reference Matthews JB, Besong AA, Green TR, Stone MH, Wroblewski BM, Fisher J, Ingham E. Evaluation of the response of primary human peripheral blood mononuclear phagocytes to challenge with in vitro generated clinically relevant UHMWPE particles of known size and dose. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;52:296–307.CrossRefPubMed Matthews JB, Besong AA, Green TR, Stone MH, Wroblewski BM, Fisher J, Ingham E. Evaluation of the response of primary human peripheral blood mononuclear phagocytes to challenge with in vitro generated clinically relevant UHMWPE particles of known size and dose. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;52:296–307.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Matthews JB, Green TR, Stone MH, Wroblewski BM, Fisher J, Ingham E. Comparison of the response of primary murine peritoneal macrophages and the U937 human histiocytic cell line to challenge with in vitro generated clinically relevant UHMWPE particles. Biomed Mater Eng. 1999;10:229–240. Matthews JB, Green TR, Stone MH, Wroblewski BM, Fisher J, Ingham E. Comparison of the response of primary murine peritoneal macrophages and the U937 human histiocytic cell line to challenge with in vitro generated clinically relevant UHMWPE particles. Biomed Mater Eng. 1999;10:229–240.
33.
go back to reference Medel F, Kurtz SM, Klein GR, Levine H, Sharkey P, Austin M, Kraay M, Rimnac CM. Clinical, surface damage and oxidative performance of poly II tibial inserts after long-term implantation. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2008;18:151–165.CrossRefPubMed Medel F, Kurtz SM, Klein GR, Levine H, Sharkey P, Austin M, Kraay M, Rimnac CM. Clinical, surface damage and oxidative performance of poly II tibial inserts after long-term implantation. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2008;18:151–165.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Morrison C, Macnair R, MacDonald C, Wykman A, Goldie I, Grant MH. In vitro biocompatibility testing of polymers for orthopaedic implants using cultured fibroblasts and osteoblasts. Biomaterials. 1995;16:987–992.CrossRefPubMed Morrison C, Macnair R, MacDonald C, Wykman A, Goldie I, Grant MH. In vitro biocompatibility testing of polymers for orthopaedic implants using cultured fibroblasts and osteoblasts. Biomaterials. 1995;16:987–992.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Pace N, Marinelli M, Spurio S. Technical and histologic analysis of a retrieved carbon fiber-reinforced poly-ether-ether-ketone composite alumina-bearing liner 28 months after implantation. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:151–155.CrossRefPubMed Pace N, Marinelli M, Spurio S. Technical and histologic analysis of a retrieved carbon fiber-reinforced poly-ether-ether-ketone composite alumina-bearing liner 28 months after implantation. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:151–155.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Pace N, Spurio S, Rizzato G. Clinical trial of a new CF-PEEK acetabular insert in hip arthroplasty. Hip Int. 2004;14:132–133. Pace N, Spurio S, Rizzato G. Clinical trial of a new CF-PEEK acetabular insert in hip arthroplasty. Hip Int. 2004;14:132–133.
37.
go back to reference Pizzoferrato A, Ciapetti G, Stea S, Toni A. Cellular events in the mechanisms of prosthesis loosening. Clin Mater. 1991;7:51–81.CrossRefPubMed Pizzoferrato A, Ciapetti G, Stea S, Toni A. Cellular events in the mechanisms of prosthesis loosening. Clin Mater. 1991;7:51–81.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Rader CP, Sterner T, Jakob F, Schütze N, Eulert J. Cytokine response of human macrophage-like cells after contact with polyethylene and pure titanium particles. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14:840–848.CrossRefPubMed Rader CP, Sterner T, Jakob F, Schütze N, Eulert J. Cytokine response of human macrophage-like cells after contact with polyethylene and pure titanium particles. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14:840–848.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Rivard CH, Rhalmi S, Coillard C. In vivo biocompatibility testing of PEEK polymer for a spinal implant system: a study in rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;62:488–498.CrossRefPubMed Rivard CH, Rhalmi S, Coillard C. In vivo biocompatibility testing of PEEK polymer for a spinal implant system: a study in rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;62:488–498.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Sclippa E, Piekarski K. Carbon fiber reinforced polyethylene for possible orthopedic uses. J Biomed Mater Res. 1973;7:59–70.CrossRefPubMed Sclippa E, Piekarski K. Carbon fiber reinforced polyethylene for possible orthopedic uses. J Biomed Mater Res. 1973;7:59–70.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Shanbhag AS, Jacobs JJ, Black J, Galante JO, Glant TT. Human monocyte response to particulate biomaterials generated in vivo and in vitro. J Orthop Res. 1995;13:792–801.CrossRefPubMed Shanbhag AS, Jacobs JJ, Black J, Galante JO, Glant TT. Human monocyte response to particulate biomaterials generated in vivo and in vitro. J Orthop Res. 1995;13:792–801.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Sieving A, Wu B, Mayton L, Nasser S, Wooley PH. Morphological characteristics of total joint arthroplasty‐derived ultra‐high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) wear debris that provoke inflammation in a murine model of inflammation. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003;64:457–464.CrossRefPubMed Sieving A, Wu B, Mayton L, Nasser S, Wooley PH. Morphological characteristics of total joint arthroplasty‐derived ultra‐high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) wear debris that provoke inflammation in a murine model of inflammation. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003;64:457–464.CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Skinner HB. Composite technology for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;235:224–236.PubMed Skinner HB. Composite technology for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;235:224–236.PubMed
44.
go back to reference Utzschneider S, Becker F, Grupp TM, Sievers B, Paulus A, Gottschalk O, Jansson V. Inflammatory response against different carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK wear particles compared with UHMWPE in vivo. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:4296–4304.CrossRefPubMed Utzschneider S, Becker F, Grupp TM, Sievers B, Paulus A, Gottschalk O, Jansson V. Inflammatory response against different carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK wear particles compared with UHMWPE in vivo. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:4296–4304.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference von Knoch M, Jewison DE, Sibonga JD, Sprecher C, Morrey BF, Loer F, Berry DJ, Scully SP. The effectiveness of polyethylene versus titanium particles in inducing osteolysis in vivo. J Orthop Res. 2004;22:237–243.CrossRef von Knoch M, Jewison DE, Sibonga JD, Sprecher C, Morrey BF, Loer F, Berry DJ, Scully SP. The effectiveness of polyethylene versus titanium particles in inducing osteolysis in vivo. J Orthop Res. 2004;22:237–243.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Wang A, Lin R, Stark C, Dumbleton J. Suitability and limitations of carbon fiber reinforced PEEK composites as bearing surfaces for total joint replacements. Wear. 1999;225:724–727.CrossRef Wang A, Lin R, Stark C, Dumbleton J. Suitability and limitations of carbon fiber reinforced PEEK composites as bearing surfaces for total joint replacements. Wear. 1999;225:724–727.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Williams D, McNamara A, Turner R. Potential of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and carbon-fibre-reinforced PEEK in medical applications. J Mater Sci Lett. 1987;6:188–190.CrossRef Williams D, McNamara A, Turner R. Potential of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and carbon-fibre-reinforced PEEK in medical applications. J Mater Sci Lett. 1987;6:188–190.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Wright T, Astion D, Bansal M, Rimnac C, Green T, Insall J, Robinson R. Failure of carbon fiber-reinforced polyethylene total knee-replacement components. A report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70:926–932.PubMed Wright T, Astion D, Bansal M, Rimnac C, Green T, Insall J, Robinson R. Failure of carbon fiber-reinforced polyethylene total knee-replacement components. A report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70:926–932.PubMed
49.
go back to reference Xin H, Shepherd D, Dearn K. A tribological assessment of a PEEK based self-mating total cervical disc replacement. Wear. 2013;303:473–479.CrossRef Xin H, Shepherd D, Dearn K. A tribological assessment of a PEEK based self-mating total cervical disc replacement. Wear. 2013;303:473–479.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Biologic Response to Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Wear Particles in Total Joint Replacement: A Systematic Review
Authors
Ashley A. Stratton-Powell, MSc
Kinga M. Pasko, MSc
Claire L. Brockett, PhD
Joanne L. Tipper, PhD
Publication date
01-11-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 11/2016
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-4976-z

Other articles of this Issue 11/2016

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 11/2016 Go to the issue