Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 2/2015

01-02-2015 | CORR Insights

CORR Insights®: Systemic Review of Literature of Cemented Femoral Components: What Is the Durability at Minimum 20 Years Followup?

Author: Bernd Fink, MD

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Excerpt

Total hip arthroplasty is one of the most successful operations in the field of orthopaedic surgery. In fact, Lermonth et al. [4] called THA “the operation of the century” in 2007. Of course, that statement is still up for debate. What cannot be questioned is that the life expectancy of our patient population is getting higher. Because of this, the survival analysis of cemented stems beyond 20 years followup is very important. Cemented stems have shown good long-term results with low revision rates at 15- and 20-year followup. However, the survival of cemented stems is influenced by several femoral-stem characteristics and operative factors including stem geometry, material properties, surface roughness, cementing technique, cement mantle thickness and stem position [1, 6]. …
Literature
2.
go back to reference Clauss M, Gersbach S, Butscher A, Ilchmann T. Risk factors for aseptic looening of Muller-type straight stems: A registry-based analysis of 828 consecutive cases with a minimum follow-up of 16 years. Acta Orthop. 2013;84:353–359. Clauss M, Gersbach S, Butscher A, Ilchmann T. Risk factors for aseptic looening of Muller-type straight stems: A registry-based analysis of 828 consecutive cases with a minimum follow-up of 16 years. Acta Orthop. 2013;84:353–359.
3.
go back to reference Espehaug B, Furnes O, Engesaeter LB, Havelin LI. 18 years of results with cemented primary hip protheses in the Norwegian Arthroplsty Register. Concerns about some newer implants. Acta Orthop. 2009;80:402–412.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Espehaug B, Furnes O, Engesaeter LB, Havelin LI. 18 years of results with cemented primary hip protheses in the Norwegian Arthroplsty Register. Concerns about some newer implants. Acta Orthop. 2009;80:402–412.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C. The operation of the century: Total hip arthroplasty. Lancet. 2007;390:1508–1519.CrossRef Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C. The operation of the century: Total hip arthroplasty. Lancet. 2007;390:1508–1519.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Malchau H, Herberts P. Prognosis of total hip replacement. Int J Risk Saf Med. 1996;8:27–45.PubMed Malchau H, Herberts P. Prognosis of total hip replacement. Int J Risk Saf Med. 1996;8:27–45.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Meneghini RM, Feinberg JR, Capello WN. Primary hybrid total hip arthroplasty with roughene fermoral stem: Integrity of the stem-cemented interface. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:299–307.PubMedCrossRef Meneghini RM, Feinberg JR, Capello WN. Primary hybrid total hip arthroplasty with roughene fermoral stem: Integrity of the stem-cemented interface. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:299–307.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Middletone RG, Howie DW, Kosti K, Sharpe P. Effects of design changes on cemented typered femoral stems fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;355:47–56.CrossRef Middletone RG, Howie DW, Kosti K, Sharpe P. Effects of design changes on cemented typered femoral stems fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;355:47–56.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Rockkborn P, Olsson SS. Loosening and bone resorption in exteter hip arthroplasties. Review at a minimum of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75-Br:865–868. Rockkborn P, Olsson SS. Loosening and bone resorption in exteter hip arthroplasties. Review at a minimum of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75-Br:865–868.
Metadata
Title
CORR Insights®: Systemic Review of Literature of Cemented Femoral Components: What Is the Durability at Minimum 20 Years Followup?
Author
Bernd Fink, MD
Publication date
01-02-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3921-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 2/2015 Go to the issue