Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 3/2014

01-03-2014 | Cochrane in CORR

Cochrane in CORR ® : Arthroplasty Versus Fusion in Single-level Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease

Authors: Nathan Evaniew, MD, Kim Madden, Bsc, Mohit Bhandari, MD, PhD, FRCSC

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 3/2014

Login to get access

Excerpt

Cervical spondylosis is a common age-related degenerative condition that affects the vertebrae, intervertebral discs, and associated ligaments of the cervical spine [17]. By age 60, 95% of men and 70% of women show radiographic evidence of cervical spondylosis [9], and approximately 8% have MRI evidence of early spinal cord compression [13]. Patients may present with varying combinations of radiculopathy, progressive myelopathy, and axial neck pain [6]. For those who fail to improve with conservative management, decompression through anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is an established and effective surgical option [8]. Following fusion, however, compensatory changes at adjacent spinal levels may lead to accelerated degeneration and recurrence of symptoms. Estimates of the clinical importance and prevalence of adjacent segment disease are highly variable [8]. …
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Anderson PA, Sasso RC, Hipp J, Norvell DC, Raich A, Hashimoto R. Kinematics of the cervical adjacent segments after disc arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(22 Suppl):S85–95.CrossRef Anderson PA, Sasso RC, Hipp J, Norvell DC, Raich A, Hashimoto R. Kinematics of the cervical adjacent segments after disc arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(22 Suppl):S85–95.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bhandari M, Busse JW, Jackowski D, Montori VM, Schunemann H, Sprague S, Mears D, Schemitsch EH, Heels-Ansdell D, Devereaux PJ. Association between industry funding and statistically significant pro-industry findings in medical and surgical randomized trials. CMAJ. 2004;170:477–480.PubMedCentralPubMed Bhandari M, Busse JW, Jackowski D, Montori VM, Schunemann H, Sprague S, Mears D, Schemitsch EH, Heels-Ansdell D, Devereaux PJ. Association between industry funding and statistically significant pro-industry findings in medical and surgical randomized trials. CMAJ. 2004;170:477–480.PubMedCentralPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bhandari M, Jonsson A, Buhren V. Conducting industry-partnered trials in orthopaedic surgery. Injury. 2006;37:361–366.PubMedCrossRef Bhandari M, Jonsson A, Buhren V. Conducting industry-partnered trials in orthopaedic surgery. Injury. 2006;37:361–366.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Boselie TF, Willems PC, van Mameren H, de Bie R, Benzel EC, van Santbrink H. Arthroplasty versus fusion in single-level cervical degenerative disc disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;9:CD009173. Boselie TF, Willems PC, van Mameren H, de Bie R, Benzel EC, van Santbrink H. Arthroplasty versus fusion in single-level cervical degenerative disc disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;9:CD009173.
5.
go back to reference Brozek JL, Akl EA, Alonso-Coello P, Lang D, Jaeschke R, Williams JW, Phillips B, Lelgemann M, Lethaby A, Bousquet J, Guyat GH, Schünemann HJ, GRADE Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines. Part 1 of 3. An overview of the GRADE approach and grading quality of evidence about interventions. Allergy. 2009;64:669–677.PubMedCrossRef Brozek JL, Akl EA, Alonso-Coello P, Lang D, Jaeschke R, Williams JW, Phillips B, Lelgemann M, Lethaby A, Bousquet J, Guyat GH, Schünemann HJ, GRADE Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines. Part 1 of 3. An overview of the GRADE approach and grading quality of evidence about interventions. Allergy. 2009;64:669–677.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Cason GW, Herkowitz HN. Cervical intervertebral disc replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:279–285.PubMedCrossRef Cason GW, Herkowitz HN. Cervical intervertebral disc replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:279–285.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Chen J, Fan SW, Wang XW, Yuan W. Motion analysis of single-level cervical total disc arthroplasty: A meta-analysis. Orthop Surg. 2012;4:94–100.PubMedCrossRef Chen J, Fan SW, Wang XW, Yuan W. Motion analysis of single-level cervical total disc arthroplasty: A meta-analysis. Orthop Surg. 2012;4:94–100.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Cho SK, Riew KD. Adjacent segment disease following cervical spine surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013;21:3–11.PubMedCrossRef Cho SK, Riew KD. Adjacent segment disease following cervical spine surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013;21:3–11.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Gore DR, Sepic SB, Gardner GM. Roentgenographic findings of the cervical spine in asymptomatic people. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1986;11:521–524.CrossRef Gore DR, Sepic SB, Gardner GM. Roentgenographic findings of the cervical spine in asymptomatic people. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1986;11:521–524.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Harrod CC, Hilibrand AS, Fischer DJ, Skelly AC. Adjacent segment pathology following cervical motion-sparing procedures or devices compared with fusion surgery: A systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(22 Suppl):S96–S112.CrossRef Harrod CC, Hilibrand AS, Fischer DJ, Skelly AC. Adjacent segment pathology following cervical motion-sparing procedures or devices compared with fusion surgery: A systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(22 Suppl):S96–S112.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials. 1989;10:407–415.PubMedCrossRef Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials. 1989;10:407–415.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Karanicolas PJ, Bhandari M, Taromi B, Akl EA, Bassler D, Alonso-Coello P, Rigau D, Bryant D, Smith SE, Walter SD, Guyatt GH. Blinding of outcomes in trials of orthopaedic trauma: An opportunity to enhance the validity of clinical trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1026–1033.PubMedCrossRef Karanicolas PJ, Bhandari M, Taromi B, Akl EA, Bassler D, Alonso-Coello P, Rigau D, Bryant D, Smith SE, Walter SD, Guyatt GH. Blinding of outcomes in trials of orthopaedic trauma: An opportunity to enhance the validity of clinical trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1026–1033.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Matsumoto M, Fujimura Y, Suzuki N, Nishi Y, Nakamura M, Yabe Y, Shiga H. MRI of cervical intervertebral discs in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80:19–24.PubMedCrossRef Matsumoto M, Fujimura Y, Suzuki N, Nishi Y, Nakamura M, Yabe Y, Shiga H. MRI of cervical intervertebral discs in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80:19–24.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Pool JJ, Ostelo RW, Hoving JL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Minimal clinically important change of the neck disability index and the numerical rating scale for patients with neck pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32:3047–3051.CrossRef Pool JJ, Ostelo RW, Hoving JL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Minimal clinically important change of the neck disability index and the numerical rating scale for patients with neck pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32:3047–3051.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Scholtes VA, Nijman TH, van Beers L, Devereaux PJ, Poolman RW. Emerging designs in orthopaedics: Expertise-based randomized controlled trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94 Suppl 1:24–28.PubMedCrossRef Scholtes VA, Nijman TH, van Beers L, Devereaux PJ, Poolman RW. Emerging designs in orthopaedics: Expertise-based randomized controlled trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94 Suppl 1:24–28.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sprague S, Quigley L, Adili A, Bhandari M. Understanding cost effectiveness: Money matters? J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2007;17:145–152.PubMedCrossRef Sprague S, Quigley L, Adili A, Bhandari M. Understanding cost effectiveness: Money matters? J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2007;17:145–152.PubMedCrossRef
17.
18.
go back to reference Yang B, Li H, Zhang T, He X, Xu S. The incidence of adjacent segment degeneration after cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA): A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2012;7:e35032.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Yang B, Li H, Zhang T, He X, Xu S. The incidence of adjacent segment degeneration after cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA): A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2012;7:e35032.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Yu L, Song Y, Yang X, Lv C. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials: Comparison of total disk replacement with anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Orthopedics. 2011;34:e651–658.PubMed Yu L, Song Y, Yang X, Lv C. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials: Comparison of total disk replacement with anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Orthopedics. 2011;34:e651–658.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Cochrane in CORR ® : Arthroplasty Versus Fusion in Single-level Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease
Authors
Nathan Evaniew, MD
Kim Madden, Bsc
Mohit Bhandari, MD, PhD, FRCSC
Publication date
01-03-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3284-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 3/2014 Go to the issue