Top

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Published in:

01-02-2013 | Clinical Research

Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction Society AIM Index Reliably Assesses Lower Limb Deformity

Authors: James J. McCarthy, MD, Christopher A. Iobst, MD, S. Robert Rozbruch, MD, Sanjeev Sabharwal, MD, Emily A. Eismann, MS

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 2/2013

Abstract

Background

Although several systems exist for classifying specific limb deformities, there currently are no validated rating scales for evaluating the complexity of general lower limb deformities. Accurate assessment of the complexity of a limb deformity is essential for successful treatment. A committee of the Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction Society (LLRS) therefore developed the LLRS AIM Index to quantify the severity of a broad range of lower extremity deformities in seven domains.

Questions/Purposes

We addressed two questions: (1) Does the LLRS AIM Index show construct validity by correlating with rankings of case complexity? (2) Does the LLRS AIM Index show sufficient interrater and intrarater reliabilities?

Methods

We had eight surgeons evaluate 10 fictionalized patients with various lower limb deformities. First, they ranked the cases from simplest to most complex, and then they rated the cases using the LLRS AIM Index. Two or more weeks later, they rated the cases again. We assessed reliability using the Kendall’s W test.

Results

Raters were consistent in their rankings of case complexity (W = 0.33). Patient rankings also correlated with both sets of LLRS AIM ratings (r² = 0.25; r² = 0.23). The LLRS AIM Index showed interrater reliability with an intraclass correlation (ICC) of 0.97 for Trial 1 and 0.98 for Trial 2 and intrarater reliability with an ICC of 0.94. The LLRS AIM Index ratings also were highly consistent between the attending surgeons and surgeons-in-training (ICC = 0.91).

Conclusions

Our preliminarily observations suggest that the LLRS AIM Index reliably classifies the complexity of lower limb deformities in and between observers.

Available only for authorised users

Achterman C, Kalamchi A. Congenital deficiency of the fibula. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1979;61:133–137.PubMed

Aitken GT. Proximal femoral focal deficiency: definition, classification, and management. In: Aitken GT, ed. Proximal Femoral Focal Deficiency: A Congenital Anomaly. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences; 1969:1–22.

Andersen KS. Radiological classification of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. Acta Orthop Scand. 1973;44:719–727.PubMedCrossRef

Bhave A, Paley D, Herzenberg JE. Improvement in gait parameters after lengthening for the treatment of limb-length discrepancy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:529–534.PubMed

Birch JG, Lincoln TL, Mack PW, Birch CM. Congenital fibular deficiency: a review of thirty years’ experience at one institution and a proposed classification system based on clinical deformity. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:1144–1151.PubMedCrossRef

Boyd HB. Pathology and natural history of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;166:5–13.PubMed

Brouwer GM, van Tol AW, Bergink AP, Belo JN, Bernsen RM, Reijman M, Pols HA, Bierma-Zeinstra SM. Association between valgus and varus alignment and the development and progression of radiographic osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56:1204–1211.PubMedCrossRef

Catagni MA, Guerreschi F, Manzotti A, Knuth A. Treatment of foot deformities using the Ilizarov method. Foot Ankle Surg. 2000;6:207–237.CrossRef

Catagni MA, Radwan M, Lovisetti L, Guerreschi F, Elmoghazy NA. Limb lengthening and deformity correction by the Ilizarov technique in type III fibular hemimelia: an alternative to amputation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:1175–1180.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Crawford AH. Neurofibromatosis in children. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1986;218:1–60.PubMed

11.

Hamanashi C. Congenital vertical talus: classification with 69 cases and new measurement system. J Pediatr Orthop. 1984;4:318–326.CrossRef

12.

Hefti F, Brunner R, Freuler F, Hasler C, Jundt G. Pediatric Orthopedics in Practice. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2007.

13.

Jones D, Barnes J, Lloyd-Roberts GC. Congenital aplasia and dysplasia of the tibia with intact fibula: classification and management. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1978;60:31–39.PubMed

14.

Kalamchi A, Dawe RV. Congenital deficiency of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985;67:581–584.PubMed

15.

Kaufman KR, Miller LS, Sutherland DH. Gait asymmetry in patients with limb-length inequality. J Pediatr Orthop. 1996;16:144–150.PubMedCrossRef

16.

McCarthy JJ, MacEwen GD. Management of leg length inequality. J South Orthop Assoc. 2001;10:73–85; discussion 85.PubMed

17.

Paley D. Lengthening reconstruction surgery for congenital femoral deficiency. In: Herring JA, Birch JG, eds. The Child with a Limb Deficiency. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 1998:113–132.

18.

Paley D, Bhave A, Herzenberg JE, Bowen JR. Multiplier method for predicting limb-length discrepancy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:1432–1446.PubMed

19.

Pappas AM. Congenital abnormalities of the femur and related lower extremity malformations: classification and treatment. J Pediatr Orthop. 1983;3:45–60.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Sabharwal S, Zhao C. The hip-knee-ankle angle in children: reference values based on a full-length standing radiograph. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:2461–2468.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86:420–428.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Song KM, Halliday SE, Little DG. The effect of limb-length discrepancy on gait. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1690–1698.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Stanitski DF. Limb-length inequality: assessment and treatment options. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1999;7:143–153.PubMed

24.

Stanitski DF, Stanitski CL. Fibular hemimelia: a new classification system. J Pediatr Orthop. 2003;23:30–34.PubMed

25.

Torode IP, Gillespie R. The classification and treatment of proximal femoral deficiencies. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1991;15:117–126.PubMed

Title: Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction Society AIM Index Reliably Assesses Lower Limb Deformity
Authors: James J. McCarthy, MD
Christopher A. Iobst, MD
S. Robert Rozbruch, MD
Sanjeev Sabharwal, MD
Emily A. Eismann, MS
Publication date: 01-02-2013
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 2/2013
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2609-8

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction Society AIM Index Reliably Assesses Lower Limb Deformity

Abstract

Background

Questions/Purposes

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Questions/Purposes

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 2/2013

50 Years Ago in CORR®: Rating Scale for Hip Disabilities Carroll B. Larson, MD, CORR 1963;31:85–93

Validation of the Korean Version of the Oxford Knee Score in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty

Editorial: Let’s Talk About Level IV: The Bones of a Good Retrospective Case Series

Acetabular Cup Design Influences Deformational Response in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Surgical Technique: Supine Patient Position With the Contralateral Leg Elevated for Femoral Intramedullary Nailing

Prevalence and Treatment of Intraarticular Pathology Recognized at the Time of Periacetabular Osteotomy for the Dysplastic Hip