Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 9/2009

01-09-2009 | Original Article

CT Outperforms Radiography for Determination of Acetabular Cup Version after THA

Authors: Bernard Ghelman, MD, Christopher K. Kepler, MD, MBA, Stephen Lyman, PhD, Alejandro González Della Valle, MD

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 9/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Precise evaluation of acetabular cup version is necessary for patients with recurrent hip dislocation after THA. We retrospectively studied 42 patients, who underwent THAs, with multiple cross-table lateral radiographs and CT scans to determine whether radiographic or CT measurement of acetabular component version is more accurate. One observer measured cup version on all radiographs. CT scans were interpreted by one observer. Twenty radiographs were measured twice each by two observers to determine intraobserver and interobserver reliability. We implanted cups in four model pelvises using navigation and compared measurements of anteversion made with radiographs and CT scans. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for anteversion measurements of two observers were 0.9990 and 0.9998, respectively, when comparing measurements of identical radiographs (intraobserver). Paired values for two observers measuring the same radiograph had an ICC of 0.9686 (interobserver) compared with 0.7412 for measurements from serial radiographs of the same component. The ICC comparing radiographic versus CT-based measurements was 0.6981. CT measurements had stronger correlations with navigated values than radiographic measurements. Accuracy of anteversion measurements on cross-table radiographs depends on radiographic technique and patient positioning whereas properly performed CT measurements are independent of patient position.
Level of Evidence: Level III, diagnostic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ackland MK, Bourne WB, Uhthoff HK. Anteversion of the acetabular cup. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1986;68:409–413.PubMed Ackland MK, Bourne WB, Uhthoff HK. Anteversion of the acetabular cup. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1986;68:409–413.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Ali Khan MA, Brakenbury PH, Reynolds IS. Dislocation following total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1981;63:214–218.PubMed Ali Khan MA, Brakenbury PH, Reynolds IS. Dislocation following total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1981;63:214–218.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Arai N, Nakamura S, Matsushita T. Difference between 2 measurement methods of version angles of the acetabular component. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:715–720.PubMedCrossRef Arai N, Nakamura S, Matsushita T. Difference between 2 measurement methods of version angles of the acetabular component. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:715–720.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Biedermann R, Tonin A, Krismer M, Rachbauer F, Eibl G, Stockl B. Reducing the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:762–769.PubMedCrossRef Biedermann R, Tonin A, Krismer M, Rachbauer F, Eibl G, Stockl B. Reducing the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:762–769.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Calvert GT, Devane PA, Fielden J, Adams K, Horne JG. A double-blind, prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing highly cross-linked and conventional polyethylene in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Jun 9. [Epub ahead of print]. Calvert GT, Devane PA, Fielden J, Adams K, Horne JG. A double-blind, prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing highly cross-linked and conventional polyethylene in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Jun 9. [Epub ahead of print].
6.
go back to reference D’Lima DD, Urquhart AG, Buehler KO, Walker RH, Colwell CW Jr. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:315–332.PubMed D’Lima DD, Urquhart AG, Buehler KO, Walker RH, Colwell CW Jr. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:315–332.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Dorr LD, Malik A, Wan Z, Long WT, Harris M. Precision and bias of imageless computer navigation and surgeon estimates for acetabular component position. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;465:92–99.PubMed Dorr LD, Malik A, Wan Z, Long WT, Harris M. Precision and bias of imageless computer navigation and surgeon estimates for acetabular component position. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;465:92–99.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Goergen TG, Resnick D. Evaluation of acetabular anteversion following total hip arthroplasty: necessity of proper centering. Br J Radiol. 1975;48:259–260.PubMedCrossRef Goergen TG, Resnick D. Evaluation of acetabular anteversion following total hip arthroplasty: necessity of proper centering. Br J Radiol. 1975;48:259–260.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Haaker RG, Tiedjen K, Ottersbach A, Rubenthaler F, Stockheim M, Stiehl JB. Comparison of conventional versus computer-navigated acetabular component insertion. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:151–159.PubMedCrossRef Haaker RG, Tiedjen K, Ottersbach A, Rubenthaler F, Stockheim M, Stiehl JB. Comparison of conventional versus computer-navigated acetabular component insertion. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:151–159.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hassan DM, Johnston GH, Dust WN, Watson LG, Cassidy D. Radiographic calculation of anteversion in acetabular prostheses. J Arthroplasty. 1995;10:369–372.PubMedCrossRef Hassan DM, Johnston GH, Dust WN, Watson LG, Cassidy D. Radiographic calculation of anteversion in acetabular prostheses. J Arthroplasty. 1995;10:369–372.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hassan DM, Johnston GH, Dust WN, Watson G, Dolovich AT. Accuracy of intraoperative assessment of acetabular prosthesis placement. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13:80–84.PubMedCrossRef Hassan DM, Johnston GH, Dust WN, Watson G, Dolovich AT. Accuracy of intraoperative assessment of acetabular prosthesis placement. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13:80–84.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hayakawa K, Minoda Y, Aihara M, Sakawa A, Ohzono K, Tada K. Acetabular component orientation in intra- and postoperative positions in total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008 Apr 22. [Epub ahead of print]. Hayakawa K, Minoda Y, Aihara M, Sakawa A, Ohzono K, Tada K. Acetabular component orientation in intra- and postoperative positions in total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008 Apr 22. [Epub ahead of print].
13.
go back to reference Hirakawa K, Mitsugi N, Koshino T, Saito T, Hirasawa Y, Kubo T. Effect of acetabular cup position and orientation in cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;388:135–142.PubMedCrossRef Hirakawa K, Mitsugi N, Koshino T, Saito T, Hirasawa Y, Kubo T. Effect of acetabular cup position and orientation in cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;388:135–142.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kalteis T, Handel M, Herold T, Perlick L, Paetzel C, Grifka J. Position of the acetabular cup: accuracy of radiographic calculation compared to CT-based measurement. Eur J Radiol. 2006;58:294–300.PubMedCrossRef Kalteis T, Handel M, Herold T, Perlick L, Paetzel C, Grifka J. Position of the acetabular cup: accuracy of radiographic calculation compared to CT-based measurement. Eur J Radiol. 2006;58:294–300.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kennedy JG, Rogers WB, Soffe KE, Sullivan RJ, Griffen DG, Sheehan LJ. Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethylene wear and component migration. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13:530–534.PubMedCrossRef Kennedy JG, Rogers WB, Soffe KE, Sullivan RJ, Griffen DG, Sheehan LJ. Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethylene wear and component migration. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13:530–534.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lembeck B, Mueller O, Reize P, Wuelker N. Pelvic tilt makes acetabular cup navigation inaccurate. Acta Orthop. 2005;76:517–523.PubMedCrossRef Lembeck B, Mueller O, Reize P, Wuelker N. Pelvic tilt makes acetabular cup navigation inaccurate. Acta Orthop. 2005;76:517–523.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmermann JR. Dislocation after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60:217–220.PubMed Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmermann JR. Dislocation after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60:217–220.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Liaw CK, Hou SM, Yang RS, Wu TY, Fuh CS. A new tool for measuring cup orientation in total hip arthroplasties from plain radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;451:134–139.PubMedCrossRef Liaw CK, Hou SM, Yang RS, Wu TY, Fuh CS. A new tool for measuring cup orientation in total hip arthroplasties from plain radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;451:134–139.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Liaw CK, Yang RS, Hou SM, Wu TY, Fuh CS. Measurement of the acetabular cup anteversion on the simulated radiographs. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Apr 2. [Epub ahead of print]. Liaw CK, Yang RS, Hou SM, Wu TY, Fuh CS. Measurement of the acetabular cup anteversion on the simulated radiographs. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Apr 2. [Epub ahead of print].
20.
go back to reference Marx A, von Knoch M, Pfortner J, Wiese M, Saxler G. Misinterpretation of cup anteversion in total hip arthroplasty using planar radiography. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2006;126:487–492.PubMedCrossRef Marx A, von Knoch M, Pfortner J, Wiese M, Saxler G. Misinterpretation of cup anteversion in total hip arthroplasty using planar radiography. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2006;126:487–492.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference McCollum DE, Gray WJ. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: causes and prevention. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;261:159–170.PubMed McCollum DE, Gray WJ. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: causes and prevention. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;261:159–170.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Mian SW, Truchly G, Pflum FA. Computer tomography measurement of acetabular cup anteversion and retroversion in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;276:206–209.PubMed Mian SW, Truchly G, Pflum FA. Computer tomography measurement of acetabular cup anteversion and retroversion in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;276:206–209.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Munro BH. Correlation. In: Munro BH, ed. Statistical Methods for Healthcare Research. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1997:224–245. Munro BH. Correlation. In: Munro BH, ed. Statistical Methods for Healthcare Research. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1997:224–245.
24.
go back to reference Murray DW. The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:228–232.PubMed Murray DW. The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:228–232.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Najarian BC, Kilgore JE, Markel DC. Evaluation of component positioning in primary total hip arthroplasty using an imageless navigation device compared with traditional methods. J Arthroplasty. 2008;24:15–21.PubMedCrossRef Najarian BC, Kilgore JE, Markel DC. Evaluation of component positioning in primary total hip arthroplasty using an imageless navigation device compared with traditional methods. J Arthroplasty. 2008;24:15–21.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Nogler M, Kessler O, Prassl A, Donnelly B, Streicher R, Sledge JB, Krismer M. Reduced variability of acetabular cup positioning with use of an imageless navigation system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;426:159–163.PubMedCrossRef Nogler M, Kessler O, Prassl A, Donnelly B, Streicher R, Sledge JB, Krismer M. Reduced variability of acetabular cup positioning with use of an imageless navigation system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;426:159–163.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Olivecrona H, Weidenhielm L, Olivecrona L, Beckman MO, Stark A, Noz ME, Maguire GQ, Zeleznik MP, Svensson L, Jonson T. A new CT method for measuring cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75:252–260.PubMedCrossRef Olivecrona H, Weidenhielm L, Olivecrona L, Beckman MO, Stark A, Noz ME, Maguire GQ, Zeleznik MP, Svensson L, Jonson T. A new CT method for measuring cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75:252–260.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Ritter MA. Dislocation and subluxation of the total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;121:92–94.PubMed Ritter MA. Dislocation and subluxation of the total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;121:92–94.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Sah AP, Estok DM 2nd. Dislocation rate after conversion from hip hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:506–516.PubMedCrossRef Sah AP, Estok DM 2nd. Dislocation rate after conversion from hip hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:506–516.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Schmalzried TP, Guttmann D, Grecula M, Amstutz H. The relationship between the design, position, and articular wear of acetabular components inserted without cement and the development of pelvic osteolysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76:677–688.PubMed Schmalzried TP, Guttmann D, Grecula M, Amstutz H. The relationship between the design, position, and articular wear of acetabular components inserted without cement and the development of pelvic osteolysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76:677–688.PubMed
31.
go back to reference Seradge H, Nagle KR, Miller RJ. Analysis of version in the acetabular cup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;166:152–157.PubMed Seradge H, Nagle KR, Miller RJ. Analysis of version in the acetabular cup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;166:152–157.PubMed
32.
go back to reference Wines AP, McNicol D. Computer tomography measurement of the accuracy of component version in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:696–701.PubMedCrossRef Wines AP, McNicol D. Computer tomography measurement of the accuracy of component version in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:696–701.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Yao L, Yao J, Gold RH. Measurement of acetabular version on the axiolateral radiograph. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;316:106–111.PubMed Yao L, Yao J, Gold RH. Measurement of acetabular version on the axiolateral radiograph. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;316:106–111.PubMed
Metadata
Title
CT Outperforms Radiography for Determination of Acetabular Cup Version after THA
Authors
Bernard Ghelman, MD
Christopher K. Kepler, MD, MBA
Stephen Lyman, PhD
Alejandro González Della Valle, MD
Publication date
01-09-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 9/2009
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0774-1

Other articles of this Issue 9/2009

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 9/2009 Go to the issue

Symposium: Papers Presented at the Annual Closed Meeting of the International Hip Society

Enhanced Cell Integration to Titanium Alloy by Surface Treatment with Microarc Oxidation: A Pilot Study

Orthopaedic • Radiology • Pathology Conference

Idiopathic Equinocavovarus Foot Deformity in an 8-year-old Girl

Symposium: Papers Presented at the Annual Closed Meeting of the International Hip Society

Role of the Extraosseus Blood Supply in Osteoarthritic Femoral Heads?

Symposium: Papers Presented at the Annual Closed Meeting of the International Hip Society

Intra- and Intersurgeon Variability in Image-free Navigation System for THA

Symposium: Papers Presented at the Annual Closed Meeting of the International Hip Society

High Cup Angle and Microseparation Increase the Wear of Hip Surface Replacements

Symposium: Papers Presented at the Annual Closed Meeting of the International Hip Society

The Classic: On Rest and Pain: Lecture XIV