Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Urology Reports 3/2015

01-03-2015 | New Imaging Techniques (A Rastinehad and S Rais-Bahrami, Section Editors)

Renal Angiomyolipoma: Preoperative Identification of Atypical Fat-Poor AML

Authors: Crystal Farrell, Sabrina L. Noyes, Mouafak Tourojman, Brian R. Lane

Published in: Current Urology Reports | Issue 3/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

The preoperative distinction between benign and malignant renal masses is a well-known radiographic diagnostic challenge. With angiomyolipoma (AML) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) representing the most common benign and malignant renal parenchymal lesions, respectively, differentiating these two entities is especially important due to their vastly different treatments and prognoses. Renal AML is typically composed of smooth muscle cells, dysmorphic blood vessels, and varying amounts of adipose tissue. In most cases, “typical” AML can be diagnosed by identifying macroscopic fat with ultrasound, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging. However, approximately 4–5 % of AML tumors have fat that is grossly undetectable by conventional techniques, precluding a straightforward diagnosis. The overlapping radiographic features between “atypical” or “fat-poor” AML and RCC, especially in smaller (<3–4 cm) lesions, lead many patients with benign AML to undergo unnecessary surgery for suspected RCC when the diagnosis is not established beforehand. This review presents the most recent studies and developments in preoperative evaluation of fat-poor AML.
Literature
1.•
go back to reference Hindman N, Ngo L, Genega EM, et al. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: can it be differentiated from clear cell renal cell carcinoma by using standard MR techniques? Radiology. 2012;265:468–77. This manuscript focuses on fat-poor AML and clear cell RCC with an emphasis on smal renal massess <3cm.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Hindman N, Ngo L, Genega EM, et al. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: can it be differentiated from clear cell renal cell carcinoma by using standard MR techniques? Radiology. 2012;265:468–77. This manuscript focuses on fat-poor AML and clear cell RCC with an emphasis on smal renal massess <3cm.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
2.
go back to reference Lane BR, Aydin H, Danforth TL, et al. Clinical correlates of renal angiomyolipoma subtypes in 209 patients: classic, fat poor, tuberous sclerosis associated and epithelioid. J Urol. 2008;180:836–43.CrossRefPubMed Lane BR, Aydin H, Danforth TL, et al. Clinical correlates of renal angiomyolipoma subtypes in 209 patients: classic, fat poor, tuberous sclerosis associated and epithelioid. J Urol. 2008;180:836–43.CrossRefPubMed
3.••
go back to reference Houtzager S, Wijkstra H, de la Rosette JJ, et al. Evaluation of renal masses with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Curr Urol Rep. 2013;14:116–23. This is an outstanding review of the ability of contrast enhanced US to differentiate benign and malignant lesions, specifically for small renal masses (<4 cm).CrossRefPubMed Houtzager S, Wijkstra H, de la Rosette JJ, et al. Evaluation of renal masses with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Curr Urol Rep. 2013;14:116–23. This is an outstanding review of the ability of contrast enhanced US to differentiate benign and malignant lesions, specifically for small renal masses (<4 cm).CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Yang CW, Shen SH, Chang YH, et al. Are there useful CT features to differentiate renal cell carcinoma from lipid-poor renal angiomyolipoma? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201:1017–28.CrossRefPubMed Yang CW, Shen SH, Chang YH, et al. Are there useful CT features to differentiate renal cell carcinoma from lipid-poor renal angiomyolipoma? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201:1017–28.CrossRefPubMed
5.••
go back to reference Jinzaki M, Silverman SG, Akita H, et al. Renal angiomyolipoma: a radiological classification and update on recent developments in diagnosis and management. Abdom Imaging. 2014;39:588–604. Excellent review of the radiographic features and classification of all subtypes of AML.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Jinzaki M, Silverman SG, Akita H, et al. Renal angiomyolipoma: a radiological classification and update on recent developments in diagnosis and management. Abdom Imaging. 2014;39:588–604. Excellent review of the radiographic features and classification of all subtypes of AML.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
6.
go back to reference Nelson CP, Sanda MG. Contemporary diagnosis and management of renal angiomyolipoma. J Urol. 2002;168:1315–25.CrossRefPubMed Nelson CP, Sanda MG. Contemporary diagnosis and management of renal angiomyolipoma. J Urol. 2002;168:1315–25.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Katabathina VS, Vikram R, Nagar AM, et al. Mesenchymal neoplasms of the kidney in adults: imaging spectrum with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2010;30:1525–40.CrossRefPubMed Katabathina VS, Vikram R, Nagar AM, et al. Mesenchymal neoplasms of the kidney in adults: imaging spectrum with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2010;30:1525–40.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Aydin H, Magi-Galluzzi C, Lane BR, et al. Renal angiomyolipoma: clinicopathologic study of 194 cases with emphasis on the epithelioid histology and tuberous sclerosis association. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33:289–97.CrossRefPubMed Aydin H, Magi-Galluzzi C, Lane BR, et al. Renal angiomyolipoma: clinicopathologic study of 194 cases with emphasis on the epithelioid histology and tuberous sclerosis association. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33:289–97.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Schieda N, Avruch L, Flood TA. Small (<1 cm) incidental echogenic renal cortical nodules: chemical shift MRI outperforms CT for confirmatory diagnosis of angiomyolipoma (AML). Insights Imaging. 2014;5:295–9. Schieda N, Avruch L, Flood TA. Small (<1 cm) incidental echogenic renal cortical nodules: chemical shift MRI outperforms CT for confirmatory diagnosis of angiomyolipoma (AML). Insights Imaging. 2014;5:295–9.
11.•
go back to reference Lu Q, Li CX, Huang BJ, et al: Triphasic and epithelioid minimal fat renal angiomyolipoma and clear cell renal cell carcinoma: qualitative and quantitative CEUS characteristics and distinguishing features. Abdom Imaging. 2014. This manuscript not only differentiates fat-poor AML from ccRCC, but also identifies distinguishing characteristics between triphasic fat-poor AMLs and epithelioid fat-poor AMLs, as these two entities are often managed differently due to the malignant potential of epithelioid AMLs. Lu Q, Li CX, Huang BJ, et al: Triphasic and epithelioid minimal fat renal angiomyolipoma and clear cell renal cell carcinoma: qualitative and quantitative CEUS characteristics and distinguishing features. Abdom Imaging. 2014. This manuscript not only differentiates fat-poor AML from ccRCC, but also identifies distinguishing characteristics between triphasic fat-poor AMLs and epithelioid fat-poor AMLs, as these two entities are often managed differently due to the malignant potential of epithelioid AMLs.
12.
go back to reference Li X, Liang P, Guo M, et al. Real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound in diagnosis of solid renal lesions. Discov Med. 2013;16:15–25.PubMed Li X, Liang P, Guo M, et al. Real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound in diagnosis of solid renal lesions. Discov Med. 2013;16:15–25.PubMed
13.•
go back to reference Woo S, Cho JY, Kim SH, et al. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat and non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: differentiation on MDCT using classification and regression tree analysis-based algorithm. Acta Radiol. 2014;55:1258–69. Based on prior work in differentiation of fat-poor AML from RCC of all subtypes, the authors perform quantitative and detailed analysis of features of triphasic CT using CART analysis. This enabled differentiation of fat-poor AML from papillary and chromophobe RCC using when long-to-short axis ratio >1.25 and unenhanced tumor-kidney attenuation difference >7.5 HU are present.CrossRefPubMed Woo S, Cho JY, Kim SH, et al. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat and non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: differentiation on MDCT using classification and regression tree analysis-based algorithm. Acta Radiol. 2014;55:1258–69. Based on prior work in differentiation of fat-poor AML from RCC of all subtypes, the authors perform quantitative and detailed analysis of features of triphasic CT using CART analysis. This enabled differentiation of fat-poor AML from papillary and chromophobe RCC using when long-to-short axis ratio >1.25 and unenhanced tumor-kidney attenuation difference >7.5 HU are present.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Kim KH, Yun BH, Jung SI, et al. Usefulness of the ice-cream cone pattern in computed tomography for prediction of angiomyolipoma in patients with a small renal mass. Korean J Urol. 2013;54:504–9.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Kim KH, Yun BH, Jung SI, et al. Usefulness of the ice-cream cone pattern in computed tomography for prediction of angiomyolipoma in patients with a small renal mass. Korean J Urol. 2013;54:504–9.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
15.
go back to reference Zhang YY, Luo S, Liu Y, et al. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from papillary renal cell carcinoma by helical CT. Clin Radiol. 2013;68:365–70.CrossRefPubMed Zhang YY, Luo S, Liu Y, et al. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from papillary renal cell carcinoma by helical CT. Clin Radiol. 2013;68:365–70.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Kim MH, Lee J, Cho G, et al. MDCT-based scoring system for differentiating angiomyolipoma with minimal fat from renal cell carcinoma. Acta Radiol. 2013;54:1201–9.CrossRefPubMed Kim MH, Lee J, Cho G, et al. MDCT-based scoring system for differentiating angiomyolipoma with minimal fat from renal cell carcinoma. Acta Radiol. 2013;54:1201–9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Ho CL, Chen S, Ho KM, et al. Dual-tracer PET/CT in renal angiomyolipoma and subtypes of renal cell carcinoma. Clin Nucl Med. 2012;37:1075–82.CrossRefPubMed Ho CL, Chen S, Ho KM, et al. Dual-tracer PET/CT in renal angiomyolipoma and subtypes of renal cell carcinoma. Clin Nucl Med. 2012;37:1075–82.CrossRefPubMed
18.•
go back to reference Chung MS, Choi HJ, Kim MH, et al. Comparison of T2-weighted MRI with and without fat suppression for differentiating renal angiomyolipomas without visible fat from other renal tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202:765–71. Article demonstrates the utility of measuring the tumor-to-kidney signal intestity ration on T2 weighted imaging with fat-suppression, with a threshold of 0.9 or less having a sensitivity, specifictiy, PPV, and NPV for AML of 90.9%, 71.1%, 43.5%, and 97% respectively.CrossRefPubMed Chung MS, Choi HJ, Kim MH, et al. Comparison of T2-weighted MRI with and without fat suppression for differentiating renal angiomyolipomas without visible fat from other renal tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202:765–71. Article demonstrates the utility of measuring the tumor-to-kidney signal intestity ration on T2 weighted imaging with fat-suppression, with a threshold of 0.9 or less having a sensitivity, specifictiy, PPV, and NPV for AML of 90.9%, 71.1%, 43.5%, and 97% respectively.CrossRefPubMed
19.••
go back to reference Cornelis F, Tricaud E, Lasserre AS, et al. Routinely performed multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging helps to differentiate common subtypes of renal tumours. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:1068–80. Article presents a thorough evaluation and analysis of the ability of multiparametric MRI (including chemical shift, diffusion, and contrast enhanced imaging) to differentiate various histologic subtypes of benign and malignant renal tumors.CrossRefPubMed Cornelis F, Tricaud E, Lasserre AS, et al. Routinely performed multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging helps to differentiate common subtypes of renal tumours. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:1068–80. Article presents a thorough evaluation and analysis of the ability of multiparametric MRI (including chemical shift, diffusion, and contrast enhanced imaging) to differentiate various histologic subtypes of benign and malignant renal tumors.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Campbell SC and Lane BR: Malignant renal tumors., in Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Partin AW and Peters CA: Campbell-Walsh Urology 11th edition. Philadelphia, PA, Saunders, In press. Campbell SC and Lane BR: Malignant renal tumors., in Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Partin AW and Peters CA: Campbell-Walsh Urology 11th edition. Philadelphia, PA, Saunders, In press.
21.
go back to reference Pierorazio PM, Hyams ES, Tsai S, et al. Multiphasic enhancement patterns of small renal masses (</=4 cm) on preoperative computed tomography: utility for distinguishing subtypes of renal cell carcinoma, angiomyolipoma, and oncocytoma. Urology. 2013;81:1265–71. Pierorazio PM, Hyams ES, Tsai S, et al. Multiphasic enhancement patterns of small renal masses (</=4 cm) on preoperative computed tomography: utility for distinguishing subtypes of renal cell carcinoma, angiomyolipoma, and oncocytoma. Urology. 2013;81:1265–71.
22.
go back to reference Chen C, Liu Q, Hao Q, et al. Study of 320-slice dynamic volume CT perfusion in different pathologic types of kidney tumor: preliminary results. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e85522.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Chen C, Liu Q, Hao Q, et al. Study of 320-slice dynamic volume CT perfusion in different pathologic types of kidney tumor: preliminary results. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e85522.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
23.
go back to reference Mytsyk Y, Borys Y, Komnatska I, et al. Value of the diffusion-weighted MRI in the differential diagnostics of malignant and benign kidney neoplasms - our clinical experience. Pol J Radiol. 2014;79:290–5.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Mytsyk Y, Borys Y, Komnatska I, et al. Value of the diffusion-weighted MRI in the differential diagnostics of malignant and benign kidney neoplasms - our clinical experience. Pol J Radiol. 2014;79:290–5.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
24.
go back to reference Sasamori H, Saiki M, Suyama J, et al. Utility of apparent diffusion coefficients in the evaluation of solid renal tumors at 3 T. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2014;13:89–95. Sasamori H, Saiki M, Suyama J, et al. Utility of apparent diffusion coefficients in the evaluation of solid renal tumors at 3 T. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2014;13:89–95.
25.
go back to reference Halverson SJ, Kunju LP, Bhalla R, et al. Accuracy of determining small renal mass management with risk stratified biopsies: confirmation by final pathology. J Urol. 2013;189:441–6.CrossRefPubMed Halverson SJ, Kunju LP, Bhalla R, et al. Accuracy of determining small renal mass management with risk stratified biopsies: confirmation by final pathology. J Urol. 2013;189:441–6.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Leveridge MJ, Finelli A, Kachura JR, et al. Outcomes of small renal mass needle core biopsy, nondiagnostic percutaneous biopsy, and the role of repeat biopsy. Eur Urol. 2011;60:578–84.CrossRefPubMed Leveridge MJ, Finelli A, Kachura JR, et al. Outcomes of small renal mass needle core biopsy, nondiagnostic percutaneous biopsy, and the role of repeat biopsy. Eur Urol. 2011;60:578–84.CrossRefPubMed
27.
28.
go back to reference Lane BR, Canter D, Rini BI, et al. Cancer of the Kidney, in Devita H, Rosenberg: Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014. Lane BR, Canter D, Rini BI, et al. Cancer of the Kidney, in Devita H, Rosenberg: Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014.
29.
go back to reference Rahbar H, Bhayani S, Stifelman M, et al. Evaluation of renal mass biopsy risk stratification algorithm for robotic partial nephrectomy-could a biopsy have guided management? J Urol. 2014;192:1337–42.CrossRefPubMed Rahbar H, Bhayani S, Stifelman M, et al. Evaluation of renal mass biopsy risk stratification algorithm for robotic partial nephrectomy-could a biopsy have guided management? J Urol. 2014;192:1337–42.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Renal Angiomyolipoma: Preoperative Identification of Atypical Fat-Poor AML
Authors
Crystal Farrell
Sabrina L. Noyes
Mouafak Tourojman
Brian R. Lane
Publication date
01-03-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Urology Reports / Issue 3/2015
Print ISSN: 1527-2737
Electronic ISSN: 1534-6285
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-015-0484-z

Other articles of this Issue 3/2015

Current Urology Reports 3/2015 Go to the issue

New Imaging Techniques (A Rastinehad and S Rais-Bahrami, Section Editors)

Penile Doppler Ultrasound Predicting Cardiovascular Disease in Men with Erectile Dysfunction

Female Urology (K Kobashi, Section Editor)

Mixed Urinary Incontinence: What First?

New Imaging Techniques (A Rastinehad and S Rais-Bahrami, Section Editors)

Current and Evolving Uses of Optical Coherence Tomography in the Genitourinary Tract

Prostate Cancer (A Kibel, Section Editor)

Management of Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer