Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Urology Reports 5/2011

01-10-2011

Retropubic and Transobturator Slings: Still Useful or Should All Patients Be Treated with Mini-slings?

Authors: Michael J. Kennelly, Erinn M. Myers

Published in: Current Urology Reports | Issue 5/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Traditional retropubic and transobturator midurethral slings are reliable, safe, and effective treatments for stress urinary incontinence. Unfortunately, they also are associated with rare but severe complications, such as bladder or bowel perforation, vascular injury, nerve damage, and/or groin muscle pain that can occur with the blind passage of trocars. To maintain efficacy and patient satisfaction while avoiding such complications, minimally invasive mini-slings have been developed. These smaller mini-slings can be placed through a single vaginal incision at the level of the midurethra without trocars. Mini-slings often are performed as an outpatient surgery, with minimal morbidity, pain, and quick patient recovery. With continued refinement and surgeon experience, mini-slings potentially may be performed safely in the office setting under local anesthesia while maintaining the efficacy of traditional slings.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Luber KM. The definition, prevalence, and risk factors for stress urinary incontinence. Rev Urol. 2004;6 Suppl 3:S3.PubMed Luber KM. The definition, prevalence, and risk factors for stress urinary incontinence. Rev Urol. 2004;6 Suppl 3:S3.PubMed
2.
go back to reference National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). NHS, Guidance on the use of tension-free vaginal tape (Gynecare RPT) for stress incontinence. NICE Technology Appraisal Guidance No. 56; 2003. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). NHS, Guidance on the use of tension-free vaginal tape (Gynecare RPT) for stress incontinence. NICE Technology Appraisal Guidance No. 56; 2003.
3.
go back to reference Molden S, Lucente V. New minimally invasive slings: RPT secure. Current Urology Reports. 2008;9:358–61.PubMedCrossRef Molden S, Lucente V. New minimally invasive slings: RPT secure. Current Urology Reports. 2008;9:358–61.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Choo M. Challenge of One-incision Midurethral Sling for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: Current Results. LUTS. 2009;1:10–5. Choo M. Challenge of One-incision Midurethral Sling for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: Current Results. LUTS. 2009;1:10–5.
5.
go back to reference Petros P, Ulmsten U. An integral theory of female urinary incontinence. Experimental and clinical considerations. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl. 1990;153:7–31.PubMed Petros P, Ulmsten U. An integral theory of female urinary incontinence. Experimental and clinical considerations. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl. 1990;153:7–31.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Ulmsten U, Johnson P, Reqapour M. A three-year follow up of tension-free vaginal tape for surgical treatment of female stress incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;106:345–50.PubMedCrossRef Ulmsten U, Johnson P, Reqapour M. A three-year follow up of tension-free vaginal tape for surgical treatment of female stress incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;106:345–50.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Nilsson C, Palva K, Rezapour M, et al. Eleven years prospective follow-up of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogyncol J. 2008;19:1043–7.CrossRef Nilsson C, Palva K, Rezapour M, et al. Eleven years prospective follow-up of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogyncol J. 2008;19:1043–7.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ward K, Hilton P, UK and Ireland TVT Trial Group. Prospective multicentre randomized trial of tension-free vaginal tape and colposuspensions as primary treatment for stress incontinence. BMJ. 2002;325:67.PubMedCrossRef Ward K, Hilton P, UK and Ireland TVT Trial Group. Prospective multicentre randomized trial of tension-free vaginal tape and colposuspensions as primary treatment for stress incontinence. BMJ. 2002;325:67.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ward K, Hilton P, UK and Ireland TVT Trial Group. Tension-free vaginal tape versus colposuspensions for primary urodynamic stress incontinence: 5-year follow up. BJOG. 2008;115:226–33.PubMed Ward K, Hilton P, UK and Ireland TVT Trial Group. Tension-free vaginal tape versus colposuspensions for primary urodynamic stress incontinence: 5-year follow up. BJOG. 2008;115:226–33.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Kristensen I, Eldoma M, Williamson T, et al. Complications of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysgunct. 2010;21(11):1253–7. Epub 2010 June 25. Kristensen I, Eldoma M, Williamson T, et al. Complications of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysgunct. 2010;21(11):1253–7. Epub 2010 June 25.
11.
go back to reference Atherton M, Stanton S. The tension-free vaginal tape reviewed: an evidence-based review from inception to current status. Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;112:534–46. Atherton M, Stanton S. The tension-free vaginal tape reviewed: an evidence-based review from inception to current status. Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;112:534–46.
12.
go back to reference Delorme E. Transobturator urethral suspension: mini-invasive procedure in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. Prog Urol. 2001;11:1306–13.PubMed Delorme E. Transobturator urethral suspension: mini-invasive procedure in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. Prog Urol. 2001;11:1306–13.PubMed
13.
go back to reference De Leval J. Novel surgical technique for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: transobturator vaginal tape inside-out. Eur Urol. 2003;44:724–30.PubMedCrossRef De Leval J. Novel surgical technique for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: transobturator vaginal tape inside-out. Eur Urol. 2003;44:724–30.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Grise P, Droupy S, Saussine C, et al. Transobturator sling for female stress incontinence with polypropylene tape and outside in procedure: prospective study with 1 year follow up and review of transobturator tape sling. Urology. 2006;68:759–63.PubMedCrossRef Grise P, Droupy S, Saussine C, et al. Transobturator sling for female stress incontinence with polypropylene tape and outside in procedure: prospective study with 1 year follow up and review of transobturator tape sling. Urology. 2006;68:759–63.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Davila G, Johnson J, Serels D. Multicenter experience with the Monarc transobturator sling system to treat stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006;17:460–5.PubMedCrossRef Davila G, Johnson J, Serels D. Multicenter experience with the Monarc transobturator sling system to treat stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006;17:460–5.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference De Leval J, Waltregny D. New surgical technique for treatment of stress urinary incontinence TVT-Obturator: new developments and results. Surg Technol Int. 2005;14:212–21.PubMed De Leval J, Waltregny D. New surgical technique for treatment of stress urinary incontinence TVT-Obturator: new developments and results. Surg Technol Int. 2005;14:212–21.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Chae HD, Kim SR, Jeon GH. A comparative study of outside-in and inside-out transobturator tape procedures for stress urinary incontinence. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2010;70(3):200–5. Epub 2010 Jul 17.PubMedCrossRef Chae HD, Kim SR, Jeon GH. A comparative study of outside-in and inside-out transobturator tape procedures for stress urinary incontinence. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2010;70(3):200–5. Epub 2010 Jul 17.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Richter HE, Albo ME, Zyczynski HM, et al. Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(22):2066–76.PubMedCrossRef Richter HE, Albo ME, Zyczynski HM, et al. Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(22):2066–76.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Laurikainen E, Valpas A, Kivela A, et al. Retropubic compared with transobturator tape placement in treatment of urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:4–11.PubMedCrossRef Laurikainen E, Valpas A, Kivela A, et al. Retropubic compared with transobturator tape placement in treatment of urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:4–11.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Barry C, Lim Y, Muller R, et al. A multicentre randomized clinical controlled trial comparing the retropubic (RP) approach vs the transobturator approach (TO) for tension-free suburethral sling treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence: the TORP study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunc. 2008;19:171–8.CrossRef Barry C, Lim Y, Muller R, et al. A multicentre randomized clinical controlled trial comparing the retropubic (RP) approach vs the transobturator approach (TO) for tension-free suburethral sling treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence: the TORP study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunc. 2008;19:171–8.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ogah J, Cody JD, Rogerson L. Minimally invasive synthetic suburethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochran Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD006375. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub2. Ogah J, Cody JD, Rogerson L. Minimally invasive synthetic suburethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochran Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD006375. doi:10.​1002/​14651858.​CD006375.​pub2.
22.
go back to reference Deffieux X, Daher N, Mansoor A, et al. Transobturator TVT-O versus retropubic TVT: results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial at 24 months follow-up. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunction. 2010;21(11):1337–45. Epub 2010 Jun 16.CrossRef Deffieux X, Daher N, Mansoor A, et al. Transobturator TVT-O versus retropubic TVT: results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial at 24 months follow-up. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunction. 2010;21(11):1337–45. Epub 2010 Jun 16.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Cholhan HJ, Hutchings TB, Rooney KE. Dyspareunia associated with paraurethral banding in the transobturator sling. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202:481.e1–5.CrossRef Cholhan HJ, Hutchings TB, Rooney KE. Dyspareunia associated with paraurethral banding in the transobturator sling. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202:481.e1–5.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Chen Z, Chen Y, Du GH, et al. Comparison of three kinds of mid-urethral slings for surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Urologia. 2010;77(1):37–41.PubMed Chen Z, Chen Y, Du GH, et al. Comparison of three kinds of mid-urethral slings for surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Urologia. 2010;77(1):37–41.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Serels S, Duoso M, Short G. Preliminary findings with the Solyx single-incision sling system in female stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:557–61.PubMedCrossRef Serels S, Duoso M, Short G. Preliminary findings with the Solyx single-incision sling system in female stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:557–61.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Neuman M. Perioperative complications and early follow up with 100 TVT-Secur procedures. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15:480–4.PubMedCrossRef Neuman M. Perioperative complications and early follow up with 100 TVT-Secur procedures. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15:480–4.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Meschia M, Barbacini P, Ambrogi V, et al. TVT-Secur: a minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of primary stress urinary incontinence. One year data from a multicentre prospective trial. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunc. 2009;20:313–7.CrossRef Meschia M, Barbacini P, Ambrogi V, et al. TVT-Secur: a minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of primary stress urinary incontinence. One year data from a multicentre prospective trial. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunc. 2009;20:313–7.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Lim JL, de Cuyper EM, Cornish A, et al. Short-term clinical and quality-of-life outcomes in women treated by the TVT-Secur procedure. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;50(2):168–72.PubMedCrossRef Lim JL, de Cuyper EM, Cornish A, et al. Short-term clinical and quality-of-life outcomes in women treated by the TVT-Secur procedure. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;50(2):168–72.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Khandwala S, Jayachandran C, Sengstock D. Experience with TVT-SECUR sling for stress urinary incontinence: a 141-case analysis. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2010;21(7):767–72. Epub 2010 Feb 26.CrossRef Khandwala S, Jayachandran C, Sengstock D. Experience with TVT-SECUR sling for stress urinary incontinence: a 141-case analysis. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2010;21(7):767–72. Epub 2010 Feb 26.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Krofta L, Feyereisl J, Velebil P, et al. TVT-S for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence: prospective trial, 1-year follow-up. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(7):779–85.PubMedCrossRef Krofta L, Feyereisl J, Velebil P, et al. TVT-S for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence: prospective trial, 1-year follow-up. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(7):779–85.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference • Gagnon LO, Tu le M. Better short-term outcomes with the U-method compared with the Hammock technique for the implantation of the TVT-SECUR under local anesthesia. Urology. 2010, 75(5):1060–4. This was the first study to place all mini-slings under local anesthesia. PubMedCrossRef • Gagnon LO, Tu le M. Better short-term outcomes with the U-method compared with the Hammock technique for the implantation of the TVT-SECUR under local anesthesia. Urology. 2010, 75(5):1060–4. This was the first study to place all mini-slings under local anesthesia. PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Liapis A, Bakas P, Creatsas G. Comparison of the TVT SECUR System “hammock” and “U” tape positions for management of stress urinary incontinence. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010;111(3):233–6.PubMedCrossRef Liapis A, Bakas P, Creatsas G. Comparison of the TVT SECUR System “hammock” and “U” tape positions for management of stress urinary incontinence. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010;111(3):233–6.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Kim JJ, Lee YS, Lee KS. Randomized comparative study of the U- and H-type approaches of the TVT-secur procedure for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: one-year follow up. Korean J Urol. 2010;51(4):250–6.PubMedCrossRef Kim JJ, Lee YS, Lee KS. Randomized comparative study of the U- and H-type approaches of the TVT-secur procedure for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: one-year follow up. Korean J Urol. 2010;51(4):250–6.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Lee KS, Lee YS, Seo JT, et al. A prospective multicenter randomized comparative study between the U- and H-type methods of the TVT SECUR procedure for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up. Eur Urol. 2010;57(6):973–9.PubMedCrossRef Lee KS, Lee YS, Seo JT, et al. A prospective multicenter randomized comparative study between the U- and H-type methods of the TVT SECUR procedure for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up. Eur Urol. 2010;57(6):973–9.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Jeong MY, Kim SJ, Kim HS, et al. Comparison of efficacy and satisfaction between the TVT-SECUR® and MONARC® procedures for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Korean J Urol. 2010;51(11):767–71.PubMedCrossRef Jeong MY, Kim SJ, Kim HS, et al. Comparison of efficacy and satisfaction between the TVT-SECUR® and MONARC® procedures for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Korean J Urol. 2010;51(11):767–71.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Tommaselli GA, Di Carlo C, Gargano V, et al. Efficacy and safety of TVT-O and TVT-Secur in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2010;21(10):1211–7.CrossRef Tommaselli GA, Di Carlo C, Gargano V, et al. Efficacy and safety of TVT-O and TVT-Secur in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2010;21(10):1211–7.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Moore RD, Serel SR, Davila GW, et al. Minimally invasive treatment for female stress urinary incontinence (SUI): a review including TVT, TOT, and Mini-sling. Surgical Technology International. 2009;18:157–73.PubMed Moore RD, Serel SR, Davila GW, et al. Minimally invasive treatment for female stress urinary incontinence (SUI): a review including TVT, TOT, and Mini-sling. Surgical Technology International. 2009;18:157–73.PubMed
38.
go back to reference Moore R, Mitchell G, Miklos J. Single-center retrospective study of the technique, safety, and 12-month efficacy of the MiniArc Single-incision sling: a new minimally invasive procedure for treatment of female SUI. Surg Technol Int. 2009;18:175–81.PubMed Moore R, Mitchell G, Miklos J. Single-center retrospective study of the technique, safety, and 12-month efficacy of the MiniArc Single-incision sling: a new minimally invasive procedure for treatment of female SUI. Surg Technol Int. 2009;18:175–81.PubMed
39.
go back to reference Palma P, Riccetto C, Reges R, et al. Arcus to arcus microsling: technique and preliminary results. Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19(8):1133–6.CrossRef Palma P, Riccetto C, Reges R, et al. Arcus to arcus microsling: technique and preliminary results. Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19(8):1133–6.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference • Kennelly MJ, Moore R, Nguyen JN. Prospective evaluation of a single incision sling for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2010;184:604–609. This article was the first to describe office placement of mini-slings under local anesthesia. PubMedCrossRef • Kennelly MJ, Moore R, Nguyen JN. Prospective evaluation of a single incision sling for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2010;184:604–609. This article was the first to describe office placement of mini-slings under local anesthesia. PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Pickens RB, Klein FA, Mobley 3rd JD, et al. Single incision mid-urethral sling for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Urology. 2011;77(2):321–4.PubMedCrossRef Pickens RB, Klein FA, Mobley 3rd JD, et al. Single incision mid-urethral sling for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Urology. 2011;77(2):321–4.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference De Ridder D, Berkers J, Deprest J, et al. Single incision mini-sling versus a transobturator sling: a comparative study of MiniArc™ and Monarc™ slings. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:773–8.PubMedCrossRef De Ridder D, Berkers J, Deprest J, et al. Single incision mini-sling versus a transobturator sling: a comparative study of MiniArc™ and Monarc™ slings. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:773–8.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Oliveira R, Botelho F, Silva P, et al. Exploratory study assessing efficacy and complications of TVT-O, TVT-Secur, and Mini-Arc: results at 12-month follow-up. Eur Urol. 2011 Jan 21. [Epub ahead of print]. Oliveira R, Botelho F, Silva P, et al. Exploratory study assessing efficacy and complications of TVT-O, TVT-Secur, and Mini-Arc: results at 12-month follow-up. Eur Urol. 2011 Jan 21. [Epub ahead of print].
44.
go back to reference Meschia M, Barbacini P, Baccichet R. Short-term outcomes with the Ajust™ system: a new single incision sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;22:177–82.PubMedCrossRef Meschia M, Barbacini P, Baccichet R. Short-term outcomes with the Ajust™ system: a new single incision sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;22:177–82.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Retropubic and Transobturator Slings: Still Useful or Should All Patients Be Treated with Mini-slings?
Authors
Michael J. Kennelly
Erinn M. Myers
Publication date
01-10-2011
Publisher
Current Science Inc.
Published in
Current Urology Reports / Issue 5/2011
Print ISSN: 1527-2737
Electronic ISSN: 1534-6285
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-011-0200-6

Other articles of this Issue 5/2011

Current Urology Reports 5/2011 Go to the issue