Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Pain and Headache Reports 1/2024

19-10-2023 | Spinal Cord Stimulation | Chronic Pain Medicine (A Kaye, Section Editor)

Complications of Spinal Cord Stimulators—A Comprehensive Review Article

Authors: Sarang S. Koushik, Jagun Raghavan, Shreya Saranathan, Kateryna Slinchenkova, Omar Viswanath, Naum Shaparin

Published in: Current Pain and Headache Reports | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Spinal cord stimulation has been increasing in influence as an option to regulate pain, especially in the chronic pain patient population. However, even with the numerous changes made to this technology since its inception, it is still prone to various complications such as hardware issues, neurological injury/epidural hematoma, infections, and other biological concerns. The purpose of this article is to thoroughly review and evaluate literature pertaining to the complications associated with percutaneous spinal cord stimulation.

Recent Findings

Lead migration is generally the most common complication of percutaneous spinal cord stimulation; however, recent utilization of various anchoring techniques has been discussed and experienced clinical success in decreasing the prevalence of lead migration and lead fractures. With newer high-frequency systems gaining traction to improve pain management and decrease complications as compared to traditional systems, rechargeable implantable pulse generators have been the preferred power source. However, recent findings may suggest that these rechargeable implantable pulse generators do not significantly increase battery life as much as was proposed. Intraoperative neuromonitoring has seen success in mitigating neurological injury postoperatively and may see more usage in the future through more testing. Though the occurrence of infection and biological complications, including dural puncture and skin erosion, has been less frequent over time, they should still be treated in accordance with established protocols.

Summary

While many complications can arise following percutaneous spinal cord stimulator implantation, the procedure is less invasive than open implantation and has seen largely positive patient feedback. Hardware complications, the more common issues that can occur, rarely indicate a serious risk and can generally be remedied through reoperation. However, less common cases such as neurological injury, infections, and biological complications require prompt diagnosis to improve the condition of the patient and prevent significant damage.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Shealy CN, Mortimer JT, Reswick JB. Electrical inhibition of pain by stimulation of the dorsal columns: preliminary clinical report. Anesth Analg. 1967;46(4):489–91.CrossRefPubMed Shealy CN, Mortimer JT, Reswick JB. Electrical inhibition of pain by stimulation of the dorsal columns: preliminary clinical report. Anesth Analg. 1967;46(4):489–91.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Costantini A. Spinal cord stimulation. Minerva Anestesiol. 2005;71(7–8):471–4.PubMed Costantini A. Spinal cord stimulation. Minerva Anestesiol. 2005;71(7–8):471–4.PubMed
5.
go back to reference • Blackburn AZ, Chang HH, DiSilvestro K, Veeramani A, McDonald C, Zhang AS, Daniels A. Spinal cord stimulation via percutaneous and open implantation: systematic review and meta-analysis examining complication rates. In World Neurosurgery. (2021);154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.07.077. This study utilized 32 articles and compared SCS implantation via a percutaneous and open approach while providing thorough data on a variety of metrics, including complication rates involving equipment, technical, and medical issues. • Blackburn AZ, Chang HH, DiSilvestro K, Veeramani A, McDonald C, Zhang AS, Daniels A. Spinal cord stimulation via percutaneous and open implantation: systematic review and meta-analysis examining complication rates. In World Neurosurgery. (2021);154. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​wneu.​2021.​07.​077. This study utilized 32 articles and compared SCS implantation via a percutaneous and open approach while providing thorough data on a variety of metrics, including complication rates involving equipment, technical, and medical issues.
6.
go back to reference Hayek SM, Veizi E, Hanes M. Treatment-limiting complications of percutaneous spinal cord stimulator implants: a review of eight years of experience from an academic center database. Neuromodulation J Int Neuromodulation Soc. 2015;18(7):603–8; discussion 608–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12312. Hayek SM, Veizi E, Hanes M. Treatment-limiting complications of percutaneous spinal cord stimulator implants: a review of eight years of experience from an academic center database. Neuromodulation J Int Neuromodulation Soc. 2015;18(7):603–8; discussion 608–9. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​ner.​12312.
7.
go back to reference Shaparin N, Gritsenko K, Agrawal P, Kim S, Wahezi S, Gitkind A, Hascalovici J, Vydyanathan A, Bernstein J, Dizdarevic A, Mehta N, Kaufman A. A retrospective case series of a novel spinal cord stimulator trial technique with less displacement and migration of the trial leads. Pain Res Manage. 2019;2019:1236430. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1236430.CrossRef Shaparin N, Gritsenko K, Agrawal P, Kim S, Wahezi S, Gitkind A, Hascalovici J, Vydyanathan A, Bernstein J, Dizdarevic A, Mehta N, Kaufman A. A retrospective case series of a novel spinal cord stimulator trial technique with less displacement and migration of the trial leads. Pain Res Manage. 2019;2019:1236430. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1155/​2019/​1236430.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gazelka HM, Freeman ED, Hooten WM, Eldrige JS, Hoelzer BC, Mauck WD, Moeschler SM, Pingree MJ, Rho RH, Lamer TJ. Incidence of clinically significant percutaneous spinal cord stimulator lead migration. Neuromodulation J Int Neuromodulation Soc. 2015;18(2):123–5; discussion 125. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12184. Gazelka HM, Freeman ED, Hooten WM, Eldrige JS, Hoelzer BC, Mauck WD, Moeschler SM, Pingree MJ, Rho RH, Lamer TJ. Incidence of clinically significant percutaneous spinal cord stimulator lead migration. Neuromodulation J Int Neuromodulation Soc. 2015;18(2):123–5; discussion 125. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​ner.​12184.
14.
go back to reference • Beletsky A, Liu C, Alexander E, Hassanin SW, Vickery K, Loomba M, Winston N, Chen J, Gabriel RA. The association of psychiatric comorbidities with short-term and long-term outcomes following spinal cord stimulator placement. Neuromodulation J Int Neuromodulation Soc. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurom.2022.12.010. In addition to having a large sample size of 12,751 SCS cases, this study was novel in how it separated the cases into those containing psychiatric comorbidities and those with no psychiatric comorbidities and evaluated how this affected postprocedural outcomes following implantation, including complications and reoperation rates. • Beletsky A, Liu C, Alexander E, Hassanin SW, Vickery K, Loomba M, Winston N, Chen J, Gabriel RA. The association of psychiatric comorbidities with short-term and long-term outcomes following spinal cord stimulator placement. Neuromodulation J Int Neuromodulation Soc. 2023. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​neurom.​2022.​12.​010. In addition to having a large sample size of 12,751 SCS cases, this study was novel in how it separated the cases into those containing psychiatric comorbidities and those with no psychiatric comorbidities and evaluated how this affected postprocedural outcomes following implantation, including complications and reoperation rates.
16.
go back to reference Babu R, Hazzard MA, Huang KT, Ugiliweneza B, Patil CG, Boakye M, Lad SP. Outcomes of percutaneous and paddle lead implantation for spinal cord stimulation: a comparative analysis of complications, reoperation rates, and health-care costs. Neuromodulation J Int Neuromodulation Soc. 2013;16(5):418–26; discussion 426–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12065. Babu R, Hazzard MA, Huang KT, Ugiliweneza B, Patil CG, Boakye M, Lad SP. Outcomes of percutaneous and paddle lead implantation for spinal cord stimulation: a comparative analysis of complications, reoperation rates, and health-care costs. Neuromodulation J Int Neuromodulation Soc. 2013;16(5):418–26; discussion 426–7. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​ner.​12065.
21.
go back to reference Antonovich DD, Gama W, Ritter A, Wolf BJ, Nobles RH, Selassie MA, Hillegass MG. Reoperation rates of percutaneous and paddle leads in spinal cord stimulator systems: a single-center retrospective analysis. Pain Med (Malden, Mass). 2021;22(1):34–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaa215.CrossRef Antonovich DD, Gama W, Ritter A, Wolf BJ, Nobles RH, Selassie MA, Hillegass MG. Reoperation rates of percutaneous and paddle leads in spinal cord stimulator systems: a single-center retrospective analysis. Pain Med (Malden, Mass). 2021;22(1):34–40. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​pm/​pnaa215.CrossRef
22.
26.
go back to reference Gill JS, Kohan LR, Hasoon J, Urits I, Viswanath O, Cai VL, Yazdi C, Aner MM, Kaye AD, Simopoulos TT. A survey on the choice of spinal cord stimulation parameters and implantable pulse generators and on reasons for explantation. Orthop Rev. 2022;14(4):39648. https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.39648.CrossRef Gill JS, Kohan LR, Hasoon J, Urits I, Viswanath O, Cai VL, Yazdi C, Aner MM, Kaye AD, Simopoulos TT. A survey on the choice of spinal cord stimulation parameters and implantable pulse generators and on reasons for explantation. Orthop Rev. 2022;14(4):39648. https://​doi.​org/​10.​52965/​001c.​39648.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Costandi S, Mekhail N, Azer G, Mehanny DS, Hanna D, Salma Y, Bolash R, Saweris Y. Longevity and utilization cost of rechargeable and non-rechargeable spinal cord stimulation implants: a comparative study. Pain Practice : The Official Journal of World Institute of Pain. 2020;20(8):937–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.12926.CrossRefPubMed Costandi S, Mekhail N, Azer G, Mehanny DS, Hanna D, Salma Y, Bolash R, Saweris Y. Longevity and utilization cost of rechargeable and non-rechargeable spinal cord stimulation implants: a comparative study. Pain Practice : The Official Journal of World Institute of Pain. 2020;20(8):937–45. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​papr.​12926.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Petraglia FW, Farber SH, Gramer R, Verla T, Wang F, Thomas S, Parente B, Lad SP. The incidence of spinal cord injury in implantation of percutaneous and paddle electrodes for spinal cord stimulation. Neuromodulation J Int Neuromodulation Soc. 2016;19(1):85–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12370.CrossRef Petraglia FW, Farber SH, Gramer R, Verla T, Wang F, Thomas S, Parente B, Lad SP. The incidence of spinal cord injury in implantation of percutaneous and paddle electrodes for spinal cord stimulation. Neuromodulation J Int Neuromodulation Soc. 2016;19(1):85–90. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​ner.​12370.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Moeschler SM, Warner NS, Lamer TJ, Bendel MA, Warner MA, Eldrige JS, Mauck WD, Gazelka HM, Kor DJ, Hoelzer BC. Bleeding complications in patients undergoing percutaneous spinal cord stimulator trials and implantations. Pain Med (Malden, Mass). 2016;17(11):2076–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnw124.CrossRef Moeschler SM, Warner NS, Lamer TJ, Bendel MA, Warner MA, Eldrige JS, Mauck WD, Gazelka HM, Kor DJ, Hoelzer BC. Bleeding complications in patients undergoing percutaneous spinal cord stimulator trials and implantations. Pain Med (Malden, Mass). 2016;17(11):2076–81. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​pm/​pnw124.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Bendel MA, O’Brien T, Hoelzer BC, Deer TR, Pittelkow TP, Costandi S, Walega DR, Azer G, Hayek SM, Wang Z, Eldrige JS, Qu W, Rosenow JM, Falowski SM, Neuman SA, Moeschler SM, Wassef C, Kim C, Niazi T, Choi DY. Spinal cord stimulator related infections: findings from a multicenter retrospective analysis of 2737 implants. Neuromodulation J Int Neuromodulation Soc. 2017;20(6):553–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12636.CrossRef Bendel MA, O’Brien T, Hoelzer BC, Deer TR, Pittelkow TP, Costandi S, Walega DR, Azer G, Hayek SM, Wang Z, Eldrige JS, Qu W, Rosenow JM, Falowski SM, Neuman SA, Moeschler SM, Wassef C, Kim C, Niazi T, Choi DY. Spinal cord stimulator related infections: findings from a multicenter retrospective analysis of 2737 implants. Neuromodulation J Int Neuromodulation Soc. 2017;20(6):553–7. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​ner.​12636.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Hoelzer BC, Bendel MA, Deer TR, Eldrige JS, Walega DR, Wang Z, Costandi S, Azer G, Qu W, Falowski SM, Neuman SA, Moeschler SM, Wassef C, Kim C, Niazi T, Saifullah T, Yee B, Kim C, Oryhan CL, Rosenow JM, Warren DT, Lerman I, Mora R, Hayek SM, Hanes M, Simopoulos T, Sharma S, Gilligan C, Grace W, Ade T, Mekhail NA, Hunter JP, Choi D, Choi DY. Spinal cord stimulator implant infection rates and risk factors: a multicenter retrospective study. Neuromodulation. 2017;20(6):558–62.CrossRefPubMed Hoelzer BC, Bendel MA, Deer TR, Eldrige JS, Walega DR, Wang Z, Costandi S, Azer G, Qu W, Falowski SM, Neuman SA, Moeschler SM, Wassef C, Kim C, Niazi T, Saifullah T, Yee B, Kim C, Oryhan CL, Rosenow JM, Warren DT, Lerman I, Mora R, Hayek SM, Hanes M, Simopoulos T, Sharma S, Gilligan C, Grace W, Ade T, Mekhail NA, Hunter JP, Choi D, Choi DY. Spinal cord stimulator implant infection rates and risk factors: a multicenter retrospective study. Neuromodulation. 2017;20(6):558–62.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Falowski SM, Provenzano DA, Xia Y, Doth AH. Spinal cord stimulation infection rate and risk factors: results from a United States payer database. Neuromodulation. 2019;22(2):179–89.CrossRefPubMed Falowski SM, Provenzano DA, Xia Y, Doth AH. Spinal cord stimulation infection rate and risk factors: results from a United States payer database. Neuromodulation. 2019;22(2):179–89.CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Engle MP, Vinh BP, Harun N, Koyyalagunta D. Infectious complications related to intrathecal drug delivery system and spinal cord stimulator system implantations at a comprehensive cancer pain center. Pain Physician. 2013;16(3):251–7.CrossRefPubMed Engle MP, Vinh BP, Harun N, Koyyalagunta D. Infectious complications related to intrathecal drug delivery system and spinal cord stimulator system implantations at a comprehensive cancer pain center. Pain Physician. 2013;16(3):251–7.CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Provenzano DA, Deer T, Luginbuhl Phelps A, Drennen ZC, Thomson S, Hayek SM, Narouze S, Rana M, v, Watson, T. W., & Buvanendran, A. An international survey to understand infection control practices for spinal cord stimulation. Neuromodulation J Int Neuromodulation Soc. 2016;19(1):71–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12356.CrossRef Provenzano DA, Deer T, Luginbuhl Phelps A, Drennen ZC, Thomson S, Hayek SM, Narouze S, Rana M, v, Watson, T. W., & Buvanendran, A. An international survey to understand infection control practices for spinal cord stimulation. Neuromodulation J Int Neuromodulation Soc. 2016;19(1):71–84. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​ner.​12356.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Tarakji KG, Mittal S, Kennergren C, Corey R, Poole JE, Schloss E, Gallastegui J, Pickett RA, Evonich R, Philippon F, McComb JM, Roark SF, Sorrentino D, Sholevar D, Cronin E, Berman B, Riggio D, Biffi M, Khan H, WRAP-IT investigators. Antibacterial Envelope to Prevent Cardiac Implantable Device Infection. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(20):1895–905. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1901111.CrossRefPubMed Tarakji KG, Mittal S, Kennergren C, Corey R, Poole JE, Schloss E, Gallastegui J, Pickett RA, Evonich R, Philippon F, McComb JM, Roark SF, Sorrentino D, Sholevar D, Cronin E, Berman B, Riggio D, Biffi M, Khan H, WRAP-IT investigators. Antibacterial Envelope to Prevent Cardiac Implantable Device Infection. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(20):1895–905. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1056/​NEJMoa1901111.CrossRefPubMed
49.
go back to reference Deer TR, Provenzano DA, Hanes M, Pope JE, Thomson SJ, Russo MA, McJunkin T, Saulino M, Raso LJ, Lad SP, Narouze S, Falowski SM, Levy RM, Baranidharan G, Golovac S, Demesmin D, Witt WO, Simpson B, Krames E, Mekhail N. The Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC) recommendations for infection prevention and management. Neuromodulation J Int Neuromodulation Soc. 2017;20(1):31–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12565.CrossRef Deer TR, Provenzano DA, Hanes M, Pope JE, Thomson SJ, Russo MA, McJunkin T, Saulino M, Raso LJ, Lad SP, Narouze S, Falowski SM, Levy RM, Baranidharan G, Golovac S, Demesmin D, Witt WO, Simpson B, Krames E, Mekhail N. The Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC) recommendations for infection prevention and management. Neuromodulation J Int Neuromodulation Soc. 2017;20(1):31–50. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​ner.​12565.CrossRef
50.
go back to reference Hussain N, Karri J, Dimitrov T, D’Souza RS, Zhou S, Abdel-Rasoul M, Abd-Elsayed A, Gill J, Simopoulos T, Weaver TE. Incidence and predictors of inadvertent dural puncture after percutaneous spinal cord stimulation: a retrospective data base analysis. Neuromodulation J Int Neuromodulation Soc. 2022;S1094–7159(22):00760–7. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurom.2022.06.008. Hussain N, Karri J, Dimitrov T, D’Souza RS, Zhou S, Abdel-Rasoul M, Abd-Elsayed A, Gill J, Simopoulos T, Weaver TE. Incidence and predictors of inadvertent dural puncture after percutaneous spinal cord stimulation: a retrospective data base analysis. Neuromodulation J Int Neuromodulation Soc. 2022;S1094–7159(22):00760–7. Advance online publication. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​neurom.​2022.​06.​008.
51.
go back to reference Simopoulos TT, Sharma S, Aner M, Gill JS. The incidence and management of postdural puncture headache in patients undergoing percutaneous lead placement for spinal cord stimulation. Neuromodulation J Int Neuromodulation Soc. 2016;19(7):738–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12445.CrossRef Simopoulos TT, Sharma S, Aner M, Gill JS. The incidence and management of postdural puncture headache in patients undergoing percutaneous lead placement for spinal cord stimulation. Neuromodulation J Int Neuromodulation Soc. 2016;19(7):738–43. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​ner.​12445.CrossRef
57.
go back to reference Spirollari E, Vazquez S, Ng C, Naftchi AF, Graifman G, Das A, Greisman JD, Dominguez JF, Kinon MD, Sukul VV. Comparison of characteristics, inpatient outcomes, and trends in percutaneous vs open placement of spinal cord stimulators. Neuromodulation J Int Neuromodulation Soc. 2022;S1094–7159(22):01253–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurom.2022.08.456.CrossRef Spirollari E, Vazquez S, Ng C, Naftchi AF, Graifman G, Das A, Greisman JD, Dominguez JF, Kinon MD, Sukul VV. Comparison of characteristics, inpatient outcomes, and trends in percutaneous vs open placement of spinal cord stimulators. Neuromodulation J Int Neuromodulation Soc. 2022;S1094–7159(22):01253–3. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​neurom.​2022.​08.​456.CrossRef
59.
go back to reference Southerland WA, Hasoon J, Urits I, Viswanath O, Simopoulos TT, Imani F, Karimi-Aliabadi H, Aner MM, Kohan L, Gill J. Dural puncture during spinal cord stimulator lead insertion: analysis of practice patterns. Anesth Pain Med. 2022;12(2):e127179. https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-127179. Southerland WA, Hasoon J, Urits I, Viswanath O, Simopoulos TT, Imani F, Karimi-Aliabadi H, Aner MM, Kohan L, Gill J. Dural puncture during spinal cord stimulator lead insertion: analysis of practice patterns. Anesth Pain Med. 2022;12(2):e127179. https://​doi.​org/​10.​5812/​aapm-127179.
Metadata
Title
Complications of Spinal Cord Stimulators—A Comprehensive Review Article
Authors
Sarang S. Koushik
Jagun Raghavan
Shreya Saranathan
Kateryna Slinchenkova
Omar Viswanath
Naum Shaparin
Publication date
19-10-2023
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Pain and Headache Reports / Issue 1/2024
Print ISSN: 1531-3433
Electronic ISSN: 1534-3081
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-023-01178-3