Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Current Osteoporosis Reports
Published in: Current Osteoporosis Reports 6/2023

16-11-2023 | Osteoporosis

Zebrafish as a Model for Osteoporosis: Functional Validations of Genome-Wide Association Studies

Authors: Inbar Ben-Zvi, David Karasik, Cheryl L. Ackert-Bicknell

Published in: Current Osteoporosis Reports | Issue 6/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose of Review

GWAS, as a largely correlational analysis, requires in vitro or in vivo validation. Zebrafish (Danio rerio) have many advantages for studying the genetics of human diseases. Since gene editing in zebrafish has been highly valuable for studying embryonic skeletal developmental processes that are prenatally or perinatally lethal in mammalian models, we are reviewing pros and cons of this model.

Recent Findings

The true power for the use of zebrafish is the ease by which the genome can be edited, especially using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Gene editing, followed by phenotyping, for complex traits such as BMD, is beneficial, but the major physiological differences between the fish and mammals must be considered. Like mammals, zebrafish do have main bone cells; thus, both in vivo stem cell analyses and in vivo imaging are doable. Yet, the “long” bones of fish are peculiar, and their bone cavities do not contain bone marrow. Partial duplication of the zebrafish genome should be taken into account.

Summary

Overall, small fish toolkit can provide unmatched opportunities for genetic modifications and morphological investigation as a follow-up to human-first discovery.
Literature
1.
Watson JD, Jordan E. The Human Genome Program at the National Institutes of Health. Genomics. 1989;5(3):654–6.PubMedCrossRef
2.
3.
Wade N. Scientists complete rough draft of human genome. The New York Times. 2000, 26.
4.
Tsujimoto G. ‘Millennium Project’ of MHLW. Nihon Rinsho. 2001;59(10):1884–8.PubMed
5.•
Sollis E, et al. The NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog: knowledgebase and deposition resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023; 51(D1): D977–D985. This resource is constantly updated as new GWAS are published. As it is not single disease or single phenotype focused, substantial information about cross-phenome associations can quickly be found. The catalog reports based on the information published in manuscripts or provided by the authors, so associations between and gene and a phenotype may not yet be proven.
6.
7.
8.
Styrkarsdottir U, et al. Multiple genetic loci for bone mineral density and fractures. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(22):2355–65.PubMedCrossRef
9.
10.
Rivadeneira F, et al. Twenty bone-mineral-density loci identified by large-scale meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2009;41(11):1199–206.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
11.
Cho YS, et al. A large-scale genome-wide association study of Asian populations uncovers genetic factors influencing eight quantitative traits. Nat Genet. 2009;41(5):527–34.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Ackert-Bicknell CL, et al. Mouse BMD quantitative trait loci show improved concordance with human genome-wide association loci when recalculated on a new, common mouse genetic map. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25(8):1808–20.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
13.
14.
Kheirallah AK, et al. Translating lung function genome-wide association study (GWAS) findings: new insights for lung biology. Adv Genet. 2016;93:57–145.PubMedCrossRef
15.
von Scheidt M, et al. Applications and limitations of mouse models for understanding human atherosclerosis. Cell Metab. 2017;25(2):248–61.CrossRef
16.
Xiao SM, et al. Post-genome wide association studies and functional analyses identify association of MPP7 gene variants with site-specific bone mineral density. Hum Mol Genet. 2012;21(7):1648–57.PubMedCrossRef
17.
•• Morris JA, et al. An atlas of genetic influences on osteoporosis in humans and mice. Nat Genet. 2019; 51(2): 258–266. The largest published GWAS for bone traits and the first study to replicate loci for fracture. This study did not use X-ray-based techniques such as dual X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA), however. This study used data from the UK Biobank and therefore the BMD data is estimated BMD, which is derived from ultrasound measures.
18.
Kague E, Karasik D. Functional validation of osteoporosis genetic findings using small fish models. Genes (Basel). 2022;13(2):279–308.PubMedCrossRef
19.
• Khrystoforova I, et al. Zebrafish mutants reveal unexpected role of Lrp5 in osteoclast regulation. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022; 13: 985304. In this paper, we showed that in-depth phenotyping in zebrafish can yield information about a gene’s function that could not, or was not, identified using a higher organism. The Lrp5 gene is well studied in bone in humans and in mice.
20.
21.
22.
Brommage R, Ohlsson C. High fidelity of mouse models mimicking human genetic skeletal disorders. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:934.PubMedCrossRef
23.
24.
Kemmler CL, et al. Conserved enhancer logic controls the notochord expression of vertebrate Brachyury. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):6594.
25.
Drickamer LC. Seasonal variation in fertility, fecundity and litter sex ratio in laboratory and wild stocks of house mice (Mus domesticus). Lab Anim Sci. 1990;40(3):284–8.PubMed
26.
Veldman MB, Lin S. Zebrafish as a developmental model organism for pediatric research. Pediatr Res. 2008;64(5):470–6.PubMedCrossRef
27.
28.
Rauner M, et al. Perspective of the GEMSTONE Consortium on current and future approaches to functional validation for skeletal genetic disease using cellular, molecular and animal-modeling techniques. Front Endocrinol. 2021;12: 731217.CrossRef
29.
Furuya M, et al. Direct cell-cell contact between mature osteoblasts and osteoclasts dynamically controls their functions in vivo. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):300.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
30.
Fleming A, Sato M, Goldsmith P. High-throughput in vivo screening for bone anabolic compounds with zebrafish. J Biomol Screen. 2005;10(8):823–31.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Richardson L, et al. EMAGE mouse embryo spatial gene expression database: 2014 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(Database issue):D835-44.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Patton EE, Zon LI, Langenau DM. Zebrafish disease models in drug discovery: from preclinical modelling to clinical trials. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2021;20(8):611–28.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
33.
Lleras-Forero L, Winkler C, Schulte-Merker S. Zebrafish and medaka as models for biomedical research of bone diseases. Dev Biol. 2020;457(2):191–205.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Apschner A, Schulte-Merker S, Witten PE. Not all bones are created equal - using zebrafish and other teleost species in osteogenesis research. Methods Cell Biol. 2011;105:239–55.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Harris MP, et al. Fish is fish: the use of experimental model species to reveal causes of skeletal diversity in evolution and disease. J Appl Ichthyol. 2014;30(4):616–29.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
36.
37.
Diamond KM, et al. Examining craniofacial variation among crispant and mutant zebrafish models of human skeletal diseases. J Anat. 2023;243(1):66–77.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Diamond KM, et al. Computational anatomy and geometric shape analysis enables analysis of complex craniofacial phenotypes in zebrafish. Biol Open. 2022;11(2):bio058948.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
39.
40.
41.
Neuhauss SC, et al. Mutations affecting craniofacial development in zebrafish. Development. 1996;123:357–67.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Reeck JC, Oxford JT. The shape of the jaw-zebrafish Col11a1a regulates Meckel’s cartilage morphogenesis and mineralization. J Dev Biol. 2022;10(4):40.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
43.
Truong BT, Artinger KB. The power of zebrafish models for understanding the co-occurrence of craniofacial and limb disorders. Genesis. 2021;59(1–2): e23407.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
44.
de Bruijn E, Cuppen E, Feitsma H. Highly efficient ENU mutagenesis in zebrafish. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;546:3–12.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Bergen DJM, Kague E, Hammond CL. Zebrafish as an emerging model for osteoporosis: a primary testing platform for screening new osteo-active compounds. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:6.PubMedCrossRef
46.
47.
48.
49.
Irion U, Krauss J, Nusslein-Volhard C. Precise and efficient genome editing in zebrafish using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Development. 2014;141(24):4827–30.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
50.
Kamachi Y, Kawahara A. CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome modifications in zebrafish. Methods Mol Biol. 2023;2637:313–24.PubMedCrossRef
51.
52.
53.
• Watson CJ, et al. Phenomics-based quantification of CRISPR-induced mosaicism in zebrafish. Cell Syst. 2020;10(3): 275–286. In this paper, the concept of CRISPants is introduced for rapid generation of mosaic mutant fish for the bone-related phenotyping.
54.
Bek JW, et al. Lrp5 mutant and crispant zebrafish faithfully model human osteoporosis, establishing the zebrafish as a platform for CRISPR-based functional screening of osteoporosis candidate genes. J Bone Miner Res. 2021;36(9):1749–64.PubMedCrossRef
55.
Muñoz-Fuentes V, et al. The International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium (IMPC): a functional catalogue of the mammalian genome that informs conservation. Conserv Genet. 2018;19(4):995–1005.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
56.
Gistelinck C, et al. Loss of type I collagen telopeptide lysyl hydroxylation causes musculoskeletal abnormalities in a zebrafish model of Bruck syndrome. J Bone Miner Res. 2016;31(11):1930–42.PubMedCrossRef
57.
58.
59.
Phan QT, et al. Cxcl9l and Cxcr3.2 regulate recruitment of osteoclast progenitors to bone matrix in a medaka osteoporosis model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(32):19276–86.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
60.
Butylina M, et al. Nothobranchius furzeri, the turquoise killifish: a model of age-related osteoporosis? Gerontology. 2022;68(12):1415–27.PubMedCrossRef
61.
62.
Dubale NM, Kapron CM, West SL. Commentary: zebrafish as a model for osteoporosis-an approach to accelerating progress in drug and exercise-based treatment. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(23):15866.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
63.
Rajpurohit SK, et al. Development of Tg(UAS:SEC-Hsa.ANXA5-YFP, myl7:RFP); casper(roy(-/-), nacre(-/-)) transparent transgenic in vivo zebrafish model to study the cardiomyocyte function. Cells. 2021;10(8):1963.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
64.
65.
66.
67.
Charles JF, et al. Utility of quantitative micro-computed tomographic analysis in zebrafish to define gene function during skeletogenesis. Bone. 2017;101:162–71.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
68.
69.
70.
Bachrach LK, et al. Bone mineral acquisition in healthy Asian, Hispanic, black, and Caucasian youth: a longitudinal study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(12):4702–12.PubMed
71.
72.
Beamer WG, et al. Genetic variability in adult bone density among inbred strains of mice. Bone. 1996;18(5):397–403.PubMedCrossRef
73.
74.
Liao W-N, et al. Micro-CT analysis reveals the changes in bone mineral density in zebrafish craniofacial skeleton with age. J Anat. 2023;242(3):544–51.PubMedCrossRef
75.
Kague E, et al. 3D assessment of intervertebral disc degeneration in zebrafish identifies changes in bone density that prime disc disease. Bone Res. 2021;9(1):39.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
76.
77.
Buniello A, et al. The NHGRI-EBI GWAS catalog of published genome-wide association studies, targeted arrays and summary statistics 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(D1):D1005–12.PubMedCrossRef
78.
Watson CJ, et al. wnt16 regulates spine and muscle morphogenesis through parallel signals from notochord and dermomyotome. PLoS Genet. 2022;18(11): e1010496.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
79.
80.
Lasconi C, et al. Variant-to-gene-mapping analyses reveal a role for pancreatic islet cells in conferring genetic susceptibility to sleep-related traits. Sleep. 2022;45(8):zsac109.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
81.
82.
Chesi A, et al. Genome-scale Capture C promoter interactions implicate effector genes at GWAS loci for bone mineral density. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):1260.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
83.
Zhong W, et al. Understanding the function of regulatory DNA interactions in the interpretation of non-coding GWAS variants. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10: 957292.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
84.
Kikuta H, et al. Genomic regulatory blocks encompass multiple neighboring genes and maintain conserved synteny in vertebrates. Genome Res. 2007;17(5):545–55.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
85.
86.
Xue Z, et al. Genome-wide association meta-analysis of 88,250 individuals highlights pleiotropic mechanisms of five ocular diseases in UK Biobank. eBioMedicine. 2022;82:104161.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
87.
Madelaine R, et al. A screen for deeply conserved non-coding GWAS SNPs uncovers a MIR-9-2 functional mutation associated to retinal vasculature defects in human. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(7):3517–31.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
88.
Kichaev G, et al. Leveraging polygenic functional enrichment to improve GWAS power. Am J Hum Genet. 2019;104(1):65–75.PubMedCrossRef
89.
90.
Styrkarsdottir U, et al. Two rare mutations in the COL1A2 gene associate with low bone mineral density and fractures in Iceland. J Bone Miner Res. 2016;31(1):173–9.PubMedCrossRef
91.
Henke K, et al. Genetic screen for postembryonic development in the zebrafish (Danio rerio): dominant mutations affecting adult form. Genetics. 2017;207(2):609–23.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
92.
Medina-Gomez C, et al. Life-course genome-wide association study meta-analysis of total body BMD and assessment of age-specific effects. Am J Hum Genet. 2018;102(1):88–102.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
93.
Zheng HF, et al. WNT16 influences bone mineral density, cortical bone thickness, bone strength, and osteoporotic fracture risk. PLoS Genet. 2012;8(7): e1002745.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
94.
Laue K, et al. Restriction of retinoic acid activity by Cyp26b1 is required for proper timing and patterning of osteogenesis during zebrafish development. Development. 2008;135(22):3775–87.PubMedCrossRef
95.
Trajanoska K, et al. Assessment of the genetic and clinical determinants of fracture risk: genome wide association and Mendelian randomisation study. BMJ. 2018;362: k3225.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
96.
97.
98.
Kemp JP, et al. Phenotypic dissection of bone mineral density reveals skeletal site specificity and facilitates the identification of novel loci in the genetic regulation of bone mass attainment. PLoS Genet. 2014;10(6): e1004423.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
99.
Stevenson NL, et al. Giantin-knockout models reveal a feedback loop between Golgi function and glycosyltransferase expression. J Cell Sci. 2017;130(24):4132–43.PubMedPubMedCentral
100.
Yao Y, et al. Evaluate the effects of serum urate level on bone mineral density: a genome-wide gene-environment interaction analysis in UK Biobank cohort. Endocrine. 2021;73(3):702–11.PubMedCrossRef
101.
Estrada K, et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies 56 bone mineral density loci and reveals 14 loci associated with risk of fracture. Nat Genet. 2012;44(5):491–501.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
102.
Han Y, et al. Zebrafish mafbb mutants display osteoclast over-activation and bone deformity resembling osteolysis in MCTO patients. Biomolecules. 2021;11(3):480.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
103.
Zheng HF, et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide studies identifies MEF2C SNPs associated with bone mineral density at forearm. J Med Genet. 2013;50(7):473–8.PubMedCrossRef
104.
DeLaurier A, et al. Role of mef2ca in developmental buffering of the zebrafish larval hyoid dermal skeleton. Dev Biol. 2014;385(2):189–99.PubMedCrossRef
105.
Nichols JT, et al. Ligament versus bone cell identity in the zebrafish hyoid skeleton is regulated by mef2ca. Development. 2016;143(23):4430–40.PubMedPubMedCentral
106.
Dauer MVP, Currie PD, Berger J. Skeletal malformations of Meox1-deficient zebrafish resemble human Klippel-Feil syndrome. J Anat. 2018;233(6):687–95.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
107.
Kemp JP, et al. Identification of 153 new loci associated with heel bone mineral density and functional involvement of GPC6 in osteoporosis. Nat Genet. 2017;49(10):1468–75.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
108.
de Vos I, et al. Functional analysis of a hypomorphic allele shows that MMP14 catalytic activity is the prime determinant of the Winchester syndrome phenotype. Hum Mol Genet. 2018;27(16):2775–88.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
109.
110.
Medina-Gomez C, et al. Bivariate genome-wide association meta-analysis of pediatric musculoskeletal traits reveals pleiotropic effects at the SREBF1/TOM1L2 locus. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):121.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
111.
Shochat C, et al. Deletion of SREBF1, a functional bone-muscle pleiotropic gene, alters bone density and lipid signaling in zebrafish. Endocrinology. 2020;162(1):bqaa189.PubMedCentralCrossRef
112.
Qu X, et al. Loss of Wnt16 leads to skeletal deformities and downregulation of bone developmental pathway in zebrafish. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(13):6673.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
113.
Medina-Gomez C, et al. Bone mineral density loci specific to the skull portray potential pleiotropic effects on craniosynostosis. Commun Biol. 2023;6(1):691.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Zebrafish as a Model for Osteoporosis: Functional Validations of Genome-Wide Association Studies
Authors
Inbar Ben-Zvi
David Karasik
Cheryl L. Ackert-Bicknell
Publication date
16-11-2023
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Osteoporosis Reports / Issue 6/2023
Print ISSN: 1544-1873
Electronic ISSN: 1544-2241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-023-00831-5

Other articles of this Issue 6/2023

Current Osteoporosis Reports 6/2023 Go to the issue

ReviewPaper

Osteocytes and Primary Cilia

ReviewPaper

Inflammatory Processes Affecting Bone Health and Repair

ReviewPaper

Micropetrosis: Osteocyte Lacunar Mineralization in Aging and Disease

ReviewPaper

From Inflammation to Resolution: Specialized Pro-resolving Mediators in Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis

ReviewPaper

Loss of Muscle Mass and Strength After Hip Fracture: an Intervention Target for Nutrition Supplementation

ReviewPaper

Racial/Ethnic Differences in Bone Mineral Density for Osteoporosis