Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports 1/2012

01-03-2012 | Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (JJ Kiladjian, Section Editor)

Prognostication in Primary Myelofibrosis

Authors: Francisco Cervantes, Arturo Pereira

Published in: Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is a Philadelphia chromosome–negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm usually affecting elderly people. Median survival currently approaches 6 years, with a few patients surviving more than 20 years but others dying soon after diagnosis. In 10% to 20% of patients, PMF evolves into acute leukemia. Conventional treatment is merely palliative and does not prolong survival. The only chance for cure is allogeneic hemopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), which is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Introduction of less aggressive forms of allo-HSCT and the prospect of molecular-targeted therapies has renewed interest in prognostication in PMF. The most important prognostic factors are anemia, age over 65 years, constitutional symptoms, leukocytosis, blood blasts, and some cytogenetic abnormalities. These factors have recently been systematized into an International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) and further refined in a dynamic IPSS (DIPSS), useful at any time over the disease course, as well as a DIPSS-plus model including karyotypic information.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Vardiman JW, Thiele J, Arber DA, et al. The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes. Blood. 2009;30(114):937–51.CrossRef Vardiman JW, Thiele J, Arber DA, et al. The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes. Blood. 2009;30(114):937–51.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Tefferi A. Novel mutations and their functional and clinical relevance in myeloproliferative neoplasms: JAK2, MPL, TET2, ASXL1, CBL, IDH and IKZF1. Leukemia. 2010;24:1128–38.PubMedCrossRef Tefferi A. Novel mutations and their functional and clinical relevance in myeloproliferative neoplasms: JAK2, MPL, TET2, ASXL1, CBL, IDH and IKZF1. Leukemia. 2010;24:1128–38.PubMedCrossRef
3.
4.
go back to reference Vainchenker W, Delhommeau F, Constantinescu SN, Bernard O-A. New mutations and pathogenesis of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood. 2011;118:1723–35.PubMedCrossRef Vainchenker W, Delhommeau F, Constantinescu SN, Bernard O-A. New mutations and pathogenesis of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood. 2011;118:1723–35.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference • Cervantes F, Dupriez B, Pereira A, et al. New prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis based on a study of the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment. Blood. 2009;113:2895–901. Based on more than 1,000 PMF patients from several European and American centers, this study by the IWG-MRT defined the first International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) for primary myelofibrosis. The IPSS demonstrated high discriminating power and predictive accuracy, and could be reproduced after discounting the demographic factors related to the patients’ age, sex, period of diagnosis, and country of origin. PubMedCrossRef • Cervantes F, Dupriez B, Pereira A, et al. New prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis based on a study of the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment. Blood. 2009;113:2895–901. Based on more than 1,000 PMF patients from several European and American centers, this study by the IWG-MRT defined the first International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) for primary myelofibrosis. The IPSS demonstrated high discriminating power and predictive accuracy, and could be reproduced after discounting the demographic factors related to the patients’ age, sex, period of diagnosis, and country of origin. PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Tefferi A, Huang J, Schwager S, et al. Validation and comparison of contemporary prognostic models in primary myelofibrosis: analysis based on 334 patients from a single institution. Cancer. 2007;109:2083–8.PubMedCrossRef Tefferi A, Huang J, Schwager S, et al. Validation and comparison of contemporary prognostic models in primary myelofibrosis: analysis based on 334 patients from a single institution. Cancer. 2007;109:2083–8.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference • Morel P, Duhamel A, Hivert B, et al. Identification during the follow-up of time-dependent prognostic factors for the competing risks of death and blast phase in primary myelofibrosis: a study of 172 patients. Blood. 2010;115:4350–5. These authors rely on competing risk analysis to investigate factors predicting leukemic transformation in PMF. PubMedCrossRef • Morel P, Duhamel A, Hivert B, et al. Identification during the follow-up of time-dependent prognostic factors for the competing risks of death and blast phase in primary myelofibrosis: a study of 172 patients. Blood. 2010;115:4350–5. These authors rely on competing risk analysis to investigate factors predicting leukemic transformation in PMF. PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference • Gangat N, Caramazza D, Vaidya R. DIPSS plus: a refined dynamic international prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis that incorporates prognostic information from karyotype, platelet count, and transfusion status. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:392–7. These authors show that thrombocytopenia, transfusion need, and some definite cytogenetic abnormalities allow further refinement of the DIPSS. PubMedCrossRef • Gangat N, Caramazza D, Vaidya R. DIPSS plus: a refined dynamic international prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis that incorporates prognostic information from karyotype, platelet count, and transfusion status. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:392–7. These authors show that thrombocytopenia, transfusion need, and some definite cytogenetic abnormalities allow further refinement of the DIPSS. PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Vaidya R, Siragusa S, Huang J, et al. Mature survival data for 176 patients younger than 60 years with primary myelofibrosis diagnosed between 1976 and 2005: evidence for survival gains in recent years. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84:1114–9.PubMedCrossRef Vaidya R, Siragusa S, Huang J, et al. Mature survival data for 176 patients younger than 60 years with primary myelofibrosis diagnosed between 1976 and 2005: evidence for survival gains in recent years. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84:1114–9.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Cervantes F, Passamonti F, Barosi G. Life expectancy and prognostic factors in the classic BCR/ABL-negative myeloproliferative disorders. Leukemia. 2008;22:905–14.PubMedCrossRef Cervantes F, Passamonti F, Barosi G. Life expectancy and prognostic factors in the classic BCR/ABL-negative myeloproliferative disorders. Leukemia. 2008;22:905–14.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Reilly JT, Snowden JA, Spearing RL, et al. Cytogenetic abnormalities and their prognostic significance in idiopathic myelofibrosis: a study of 106 cases. Br J Haematol. 1997;98:96–102.PubMedCrossRef Reilly JT, Snowden JA, Spearing RL, et al. Cytogenetic abnormalities and their prognostic significance in idiopathic myelofibrosis: a study of 106 cases. Br J Haematol. 1997;98:96–102.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Dupriez B, Morel P, Demory JL, et al. Prognostic factors in agnogenic myeloid metaplasia: a report on 195 cases with a new scoring system. Blood. 1996;88:1013–8.PubMed Dupriez B, Morel P, Demory JL, et al. Prognostic factors in agnogenic myeloid metaplasia: a report on 195 cases with a new scoring system. Blood. 1996;88:1013–8.PubMed
15.
go back to reference • Passamonti F, Cervantes F, Vannucchi AM, et al. A dynamic prognostic model to predict survival in primary myelofibrosis: a study by the IWG-MRT (International Working Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment). Blood. 2010;115:1703–8. This study builds on previous research by the IWG-MRT to show how the acquisition of the IPSS poor prognosis factors during the course of PMF (dynamic IPSS or DIPSS) allows dynamic prediction of the patients’ remaining life expectancy. PubMedCrossRef • Passamonti F, Cervantes F, Vannucchi AM, et al. A dynamic prognostic model to predict survival in primary myelofibrosis: a study by the IWG-MRT (International Working Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment). Blood. 2010;115:1703–8. This study builds on previous research by the IWG-MRT to show how the acquisition of the IPSS poor prognosis factors during the course of PMF (dynamic IPSS or DIPSS) allows dynamic prediction of the patients’ remaining life expectancy. PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Cervantes F, Pereira A, Esteve J, et al. Identification of ‘short-lived’ and ‘long-lived’ patients at presentation of idiopathic myelofibrosis. Br J Haematol. 1997;97:635–40.PubMedCrossRef Cervantes F, Pereira A, Esteve J, et al. Identification of ‘short-lived’ and ‘long-lived’ patients at presentation of idiopathic myelofibrosis. Br J Haematol. 1997;97:635–40.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Cervantes F, Barosi G, Demory JL, et al. Myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia in young individuals: disease characteristics, prognostic factors and identification of risk groups. Br J Haematol. 1998;102:684–90.PubMedCrossRef Cervantes F, Barosi G, Demory JL, et al. Myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia in young individuals: disease characteristics, prognostic factors and identification of risk groups. Br J Haematol. 1998;102:684–90.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Barosi G, Berzuini C, Liberato LN, et al. A prognostic classification of myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia. Br J Haematol. 1988;70:397–401.PubMedCrossRef Barosi G, Berzuini C, Liberato LN, et al. A prognostic classification of myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia. Br J Haematol. 1988;70:397–401.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Visani G, Finelli C, Castelli U, et al. Myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia: clinical and haematological parameters predicting survival in a series of 133 patients. Br J Haematol. 1990;75:4–9.PubMedCrossRef Visani G, Finelli C, Castelli U, et al. Myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia: clinical and haematological parameters predicting survival in a series of 133 patients. Br J Haematol. 1990;75:4–9.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Tefferi A, Vaidya R, Caramazza D, et al. Circulating interleukin (IL)-8, IL-2R, IL-12, and IL-15 levels are independently prognostic in Primary Myelofibrosis: a comprehensive cytokine profiling study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1356–63.PubMedCrossRef Tefferi A, Vaidya R, Caramazza D, et al. Circulating interleukin (IL)-8, IL-2R, IL-12, and IL-15 levels are independently prognostic in Primary Myelofibrosis: a comprehensive cytokine profiling study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1356–63.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Tefferi A, Mesa RA, Pardanani A, et al. Red blood cell transfusion need at diagnosis adversely affects survival in primary myelofibrosis-increased serum ferritin or transfusion load does not. Am J Hematol. 2009;84:265–7.PubMedCrossRef Tefferi A, Mesa RA, Pardanani A, et al. Red blood cell transfusion need at diagnosis adversely affects survival in primary myelofibrosis-increased serum ferritin or transfusion load does not. Am J Hematol. 2009;84:265–7.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Tefferi A, Siragusa S, Hussein K, et al. Transfusion-dependency at presentation and its acquisition in the first year of diagnosis are both equally detrimental for survival in primary myelofibrosis–prognostic relevance is independent of IPSS or karyotype. Am J Hematol. 2010;85:14–7.PubMedCrossRef Tefferi A, Siragusa S, Hussein K, et al. Transfusion-dependency at presentation and its acquisition in the first year of diagnosis are both equally detrimental for survival in primary myelofibrosis–prognostic relevance is independent of IPSS or karyotype. Am J Hematol. 2010;85:14–7.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Elena C, Passamonti F, Rumi E, et al. Red blood cell transfusion-dependency implies a poor survival in primary myelofibrosis irrespective of IPSS and DIPSS. Haematologica. 2011;96:167–70.PubMedCrossRef Elena C, Passamonti F, Rumi E, et al. Red blood cell transfusion-dependency implies a poor survival in primary myelofibrosis irrespective of IPSS and DIPSS. Haematologica. 2011;96:167–70.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Pereira A, Nomdedeu M, Aguilar JL, et al. Transfusion intensity, not the cumulative red blood cell transfusion burden, determines the prognosis of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome on chronic transfusion support. Am J Hematol. 2011;86:245–50.PubMedCrossRef Pereira A, Nomdedeu M, Aguilar JL, et al. Transfusion intensity, not the cumulative red blood cell transfusion burden, determines the prognosis of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome on chronic transfusion support. Am J Hematol. 2011;86:245–50.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Barosi G, Viarengo G, Pecci A, et al. Diagnostic and clinical relevance of the number of circulating CD34 + cells in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia. Blood. 2001;98:3249–55.PubMedCrossRef Barosi G, Viarengo G, Pecci A, et al. Diagnostic and clinical relevance of the number of circulating CD34 + cells in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia. Blood. 2001;98:3249–55.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Sagaster V, Jager E, Weltermann A, et al. Circulating hematopoietic progenitor cells predict survival in patients with myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia. Haematologica. 2003;88:1204–12.PubMed Sagaster V, Jager E, Weltermann A, et al. Circulating hematopoietic progenitor cells predict survival in patients with myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia. Haematologica. 2003;88:1204–12.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Arora B, Sirhan S, Hover JD, et al. Peripheral blood CD34 count in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia: a prospective evaluation of prognostic value in 94 patients. Br J Haematol. 2004;128:42–8.CrossRef Arora B, Sirhan S, Hover JD, et al. Peripheral blood CD34 count in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia: a prospective evaluation of prognostic value in 94 patients. Br J Haematol. 2004;128:42–8.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Mesa RA, Hanson CA, Rajkumar SV, et al. Evaluation and clinical correlations of bone marrow angiogenesis in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasma. Blood. 2000;96:3374–80.PubMed Mesa RA, Hanson CA, Rajkumar SV, et al. Evaluation and clinical correlations of bone marrow angiogenesis in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasma. Blood. 2000;96:3374–80.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Pereira A, Cervantes F, Brugues R, Rozman C. Bone marrow histopathology in primary myelofibrosis: clinical and haematologic correlations and prognostic evaluation. Eur J Haematol. 1990;44:95–9.PubMedCrossRef Pereira A, Cervantes F, Brugues R, Rozman C. Bone marrow histopathology in primary myelofibrosis: clinical and haematologic correlations and prognostic evaluation. Eur J Haematol. 1990;44:95–9.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Tam CS, Abruzzo LV, Lin KI, et al. The role of cytogenetic abnormalities as a prognostic marker in primary myelofibrosis: applicability at the time of diagnosis and later during disease course. Blood. 2009;113:4171–8.PubMedCrossRef Tam CS, Abruzzo LV, Lin KI, et al. The role of cytogenetic abnormalities as a prognostic marker in primary myelofibrosis: applicability at the time of diagnosis and later during disease course. Blood. 2009;113:4171–8.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Hidaka T, Slide K, Shimoda H, et al. The impact of cytogenetic abnormalities on the prognosis of primary myelofibrosis: a prospective survey of 202 cases in Japan. Eur J Haematol. 2009;83:328–33.PubMedCrossRef Hidaka T, Slide K, Shimoda H, et al. The impact of cytogenetic abnormalities on the prognosis of primary myelofibrosis: a prospective survey of 202 cases in Japan. Eur J Haematol. 2009;83:328–33.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Hussein K, Pardanani AD, Van Dyke DL, et al. International prognostic scoring system-independent cytogenetic risk categorization in primary myelofibrosis. Blood. 2010;115:496–9.PubMedCrossRef Hussein K, Pardanani AD, Van Dyke DL, et al. International prognostic scoring system-independent cytogenetic risk categorization in primary myelofibrosis. Blood. 2010;115:496–9.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference • Caramazza D, Begna KH, Gangat N, et al. Refined cytogenetic-risk categorization for overall and leukemia-free survival in primary myelofibrosis: a single center study of 433 patients. Leukemia. 2011;25;82–8. Until now, this is the largest study on the prognostic significance of karyotype abnormalities in PMF. PubMedCrossRef • Caramazza D, Begna KH, Gangat N, et al. Refined cytogenetic-risk categorization for overall and leukemia-free survival in primary myelofibrosis: a single center study of 433 patients. Leukemia. 2011;25;82–8. Until now, this is the largest study on the prognostic significance of karyotype abnormalities in PMF. PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Tefferi A, Mesa RA, Schroeder G, et al. Cytogenetic findings and their clinical relevance in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia. Br J Haematol. 2001;113:763–71.PubMedCrossRef Tefferi A, Mesa RA, Schroeder G, et al. Cytogenetic findings and their clinical relevance in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia. Br J Haematol. 2001;113:763–71.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference • Vaidya R, Caramazza D, Begna KH, et al. Monosomal karyotype in primary myelofibrosis is detrimental to both overall and leukemia-free survival. Blood. 2011;117:5612–5. This study identifies monosomal karyotype, which is present in about 2% of PMF patients, as a strong predictor of extremely short survival and high risk of leukemic transformation. PubMedCrossRef • Vaidya R, Caramazza D, Begna KH, et al. Monosomal karyotype in primary myelofibrosis is detrimental to both overall and leukemia-free survival. Blood. 2011;117:5612–5. This study identifies monosomal karyotype, which is present in about 2% of PMF patients, as a strong predictor of extremely short survival and high risk of leukemic transformation. PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Santos FPS, Verstovsek S. JAK2 inhibitors: what’s the true potential? Blood Rev. 2011;25:53–63.PubMedCrossRef Santos FPS, Verstovsek S. JAK2 inhibitors: what’s the true potential? Blood Rev. 2011;25:53–63.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Campbell PJ, Griesshammer M, Döhner K, et al. V617F mutation in JAK2 is associated with poorer survival in idiopathic myelofibrosis. Blood. 2006;107:2098–100.PubMedCrossRef Campbell PJ, Griesshammer M, Döhner K, et al. V617F mutation in JAK2 is associated with poorer survival in idiopathic myelofibrosis. Blood. 2006;107:2098–100.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Barosi G, Bergamaschi G, Marchetti M, et al. JAK2 V617F mutational status predicts progression to large splenomegaly and leukemic transformation in primary myelofibrosis. Blood. 2007;110:430–6.CrossRef Barosi G, Bergamaschi G, Marchetti M, et al. JAK2 V617F mutational status predicts progression to large splenomegaly and leukemic transformation in primary myelofibrosis. Blood. 2007;110:430–6.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Tefferi A, Lasho TL, Huang J, et al. Low JAK2V617F allele burden in primary myelofibrosis, compared to either a higher allele burden or unmutated status, is associated with inferior overall and leukemia-free survival. Leukemia. 2008;22:756–61.PubMedCrossRef Tefferi A, Lasho TL, Huang J, et al. Low JAK2V617F allele burden in primary myelofibrosis, compared to either a higher allele burden or unmutated status, is associated with inferior overall and leukemia-free survival. Leukemia. 2008;22:756–61.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Guglielmelli P, Barosi G, Specchia G, et al. Identification of patients with poorer survival in primary myelofibrosis based on the burden of JAK2V617F mutated allele. Blood. 2009;114:1477–83.PubMedCrossRef Guglielmelli P, Barosi G, Specchia G, et al. Identification of patients with poorer survival in primary myelofibrosis based on the burden of JAK2V617F mutated allele. Blood. 2009;114:1477–83.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Huang J, Li C-Y Li, Mesa RA, et al. Risk factors for leukemic transformation in patients with primary myelofibrosis. Cancer. 2008;112:2726–32.PubMedCrossRef Huang J, Li C-Y Li, Mesa RA, et al. Risk factors for leukemic transformation in patients with primary myelofibrosis. Cancer. 2008;112:2726–32.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Tam CS, Kantarjian H, Cortes J, et al. Dynamic model for predicting death within 12 months in patients with primary or post–polycythemia vera/essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5587–93.PubMedCrossRef Tam CS, Kantarjian H, Cortes J, et al. Dynamic model for predicting death within 12 months in patients with primary or post–polycythemia vera/essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5587–93.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Pardanani A, Guglielmelli P, Lasho TL, et al. Primary myelofibrosis with or without mutant MPL: comparison of survival and clinical features involving 603 patients Leukemia. 2011 Jun 21 (Epub ahead of print). doi:10.1038/leu.2011.161 Pardanani A, Guglielmelli P, Lasho TL, et al. Primary myelofibrosis with or without mutant MPL: comparison of survival and clinical features involving 603 patients Leukemia. 2011 Jun 21 (Epub ahead of print). doi:10.​1038/​leu.​2011.​161
44.
go back to reference Barosi G, Ambrosetti A, Centra A, et al. Splenectomy and risk of blast transformation in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia. Italian Cooperative Study Group on Myeloid with Myeloid Metaplasia. Blood. 1998;91:3630–6.PubMed Barosi G, Ambrosetti A, Centra A, et al. Splenectomy and risk of blast transformation in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia. Italian Cooperative Study Group on Myeloid with Myeloid Metaplasia. Blood. 1998;91:3630–6.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Prognostication in Primary Myelofibrosis
Authors
Francisco Cervantes
Arturo Pereira
Publication date
01-03-2012
Publisher
Current Science Inc.
Published in
Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports / Issue 1/2012
Print ISSN: 1558-8211
Electronic ISSN: 1558-822X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11899-011-0102-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports 1/2012 Go to the issue

Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (EJ Feldman, Section Editor)

What Happened to Anti-CD33 Therapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia?

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (S O'Brien, Section Editor)

Treatment of Older Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (S O'Brien, Section Editor)

Can Prognostic Factors Be Used to Direct Therapy in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia?

Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine