Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Treatment Options in Oncology 2/2017

01-02-2017 | Lower Gastrointestinal Cancers (AB Benson, Section Editor)

BRAF-Mutated Colorectal Cancer: What Is the Optimal Strategy for Treatment?

Authors: Romain Cohen, MD, Pascale Cervera, MD, PhD, Magali Svrcek, MD, PhD, Anna Pellat, MD, Chantal Dreyer, MD, Aimery de Gramont, MD, Thierry André, MD

Published in: Current Treatment Options in Oncology | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Opinion statement

The BRAF activating mutation, harbored by approximately 10% of colorectal cancers (CRC), confers dramatic prognosis to advanced diseases. In early-stage setting, the identification of the BRAF mutation does not impact the therapeutic decision. Yet, the BRAF mutation could be considered as a stratification factor in adjuvant trials, because of its prognostic impact after relapse. Moreover, both BRAF mutation and mismatch repair (MMR) statuses should be determined in all CRC to help identify sporadic tumors versus Lynch syndrome-related tumors. Indeed, in patients with MMR-deficient (dMMR) tumors and MLH1 loss of expression, the BRAFV600E mutation indicates a sporadic origin. In advanced BRAF-mutated CRC, the standard of care remains fluoropyrimidine-based cytotoxic regimen in combination with bevacizumab. Although a recent meta-analysis showed that there was insufficient data to justify the exclusion of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies, antiangiogenic agents should be preferred in the first-line setting. Despite the lack of a randomized phase 3 study dedicated to BRAF-mutated CRC, chemotherapy intensification combining a quadruple association of 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI), and bevacizumab seems like a valid option. Although first results with BRAF inhibitors as single agents in BRAF-mutated CRC were disappointing, their association with therapies targeting the MAPK pathway seems to overcome the primary resistance to BRAF inhibition. In the field of sporadic CRC, the BRAF mutation is strongly associated with MMR deficiency. Considering breakthrough results of immune checkpoint inhibitors in dMMR repair tumors, determination of the MMR status appears to be mandatory. Given the dramatic prognosis conferred by the BRAF mutation, patients with BRAF-mutated advanced CRC need to be systematically identified and proposed for clinical trial enrolment in order to benefit from innovative therapies.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Roth AD, Tejpar S, Delorenzi M, et al. Prognostic role of KRAS and BRAF in stage II and III resected Colon cancer: results of the translational study on the PETACC-3, EORTC 40993, SAKK 60-00 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:466–74.CrossRefPubMed Roth AD, Tejpar S, Delorenzi M, et al. Prognostic role of KRAS and BRAF in stage II and III resected Colon cancer: results of the translational study on the PETACC-3, EORTC 40993, SAKK 60-00 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:466–74.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Taieb J, Zaanan A, Le Malicot K, et al. Prognostic effect of BRAF and KRAS mutations in patients with stage III colon cancer treated with leucovorin, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin with or without cetuximab: a post hoc analysis of the PETACC-8 trial. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2:643.CrossRef Taieb J, Zaanan A, Le Malicot K, et al. Prognostic effect of BRAF and KRAS mutations in patients with stage III colon cancer treated with leucovorin, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin with or without cetuximab: a post hoc analysis of the PETACC-8 trial. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2:643.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference André T, de Gramont A, Vernerey D, et al. Adjuvant fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin in stage II to III Colon cancer: updated 10-year survival and outcomes according to BRAF mutation and mismatch repair status of the MOSAIC study. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:4176–87.CrossRefPubMed André T, de Gramont A, Vernerey D, et al. Adjuvant fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin in stage II to III Colon cancer: updated 10-year survival and outcomes according to BRAF mutation and mismatch repair status of the MOSAIC study. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:4176–87.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Venderbosch S, Nagtegaal ID, Maughan TS, et al. Mismatch repair status and BRAF mutation status in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a pooled analysis of the CAIRO, CAIRO2, COIN, and FOCUS studies. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:5322–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Venderbosch S, Nagtegaal ID, Maughan TS, et al. Mismatch repair status and BRAF mutation status in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a pooled analysis of the CAIRO, CAIRO2, COIN, and FOCUS studies. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:5322–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Gavin PG, Colangelo LH, Fumagalli D, et al. Mutation profiling and microsatellite instability in stage II and III Colon cancer: an assessment of their prognostic and oxaliplatin predictive value. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:6531–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gavin PG, Colangelo LH, Fumagalli D, et al. Mutation profiling and microsatellite instability in stage II and III Colon cancer: an assessment of their prognostic and oxaliplatin predictive value. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:6531–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Jass JR. Classification of colorectal cancer based on correlation of clinical, morphological and molecular features. Histopathology. 2007;50:113–30.CrossRefPubMed Jass JR. Classification of colorectal cancer based on correlation of clinical, morphological and molecular features. Histopathology. 2007;50:113–30.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Tran B, Kopetz S, Tie J, Gibbs P, Jiang Z-Q, Lieu CH, Agarwal A, Maru DM, Sieber O, Desai J. Impact of BRAF mutation and microsatellite instability on the pattern of metastatic spread and prognosis in metastatic colorectal cancer. Cancer. 2011;117:4623–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tran B, Kopetz S, Tie J, Gibbs P, Jiang Z-Q, Lieu CH, Agarwal A, Maru DM, Sieber O, Desai J. Impact of BRAF mutation and microsatellite instability on the pattern of metastatic spread and prognosis in metastatic colorectal cancer. Cancer. 2011;117:4623–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Greene C, Atreya CE, McWhirter R, Ikram N, Loon KV, Venook AP, Yeh BM, Behr S. Differential radiographic appearance of BRAF V600E mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in patients matched by primary tumor location. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(suppl 4S):abstr 554.CrossRef Greene C, Atreya CE, McWhirter R, Ikram N, Loon KV, Venook AP, Yeh BM, Behr S. Differential radiographic appearance of BRAF V600E mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in patients matched by primary tumor location. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(suppl 4S):abstr 554.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Weisenberger DJ, Siegmund KD, Campan M, et al. CpG island methylator phenotype underlies sporadic microsatellite instability and is tightly associated with BRAF mutation in colorectal cancer. Nat Genet. 2006;38:787–93.CrossRefPubMed Weisenberger DJ, Siegmund KD, Campan M, et al. CpG island methylator phenotype underlies sporadic microsatellite instability and is tightly associated with BRAF mutation in colorectal cancer. Nat Genet. 2006;38:787–93.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference •• Guinney J, Dienstmann R, Wang X, et al. The consensus molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer. Nat Med. 2015;21:1350–6. Guinney and collegues deciphered colorectal cancers through a consensus molecular classification within BRAF-mutated and MMR-deficient tumors which constitute a unique subgroupCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral •• Guinney J, Dienstmann R, Wang X, et al. The consensus molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer. Nat Med. 2015;21:1350–6. Guinney and collegues deciphered colorectal cancers through a consensus molecular classification within BRAF-mutated and MMR-deficient tumors which constitute a unique subgroupCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference • Cremolini C, Bartolomeo MD, Amatu A, et al. BRAF codons 594 and 596 mutations identify a new molecular subtype of metastatic colorectal cancer at favorable prognosis. Ann Oncol. 2015;26:2092–7. Cremolini et al. searched for all BRAF mutations and showed that non-V600E mutations do not impact prognosis as BRAFV600E mutation • Cremolini C, Bartolomeo MD, Amatu A, et al. BRAF codons 594 and 596 mutations identify a new molecular subtype of metastatic colorectal cancer at favorable prognosis. Ann Oncol. 2015;26:2092–7. Cremolini et al. searched for all BRAF mutations and showed that non-V600E mutations do not impact prognosis as BRAFV600E mutation
12.
go back to reference Jones JC, Kipp B, Leal AD, Voss JS, Hubbard JM, McWilliams RR, Grothey A. Commonality and clinical, pathological, and prognostic characteristics of non-V600E BRAF mutations (BRAFMut) in metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRC) compared to V600 BRAFMut CRCs. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:abstr 3529.CrossRef Jones JC, Kipp B, Leal AD, Voss JS, Hubbard JM, McWilliams RR, Grothey A. Commonality and clinical, pathological, and prognostic characteristics of non-V600E BRAF mutations (BRAFMut) in metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRC) compared to V600 BRAFMut CRCs. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:abstr 3529.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hutchins G, Southward K, Handley K, et al. Value of mismatch repair, KRAS, and BRAF mutations in predicting recurrence and benefits from chemotherapy in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1261–70.CrossRefPubMed Hutchins G, Southward K, Handley K, et al. Value of mismatch repair, KRAS, and BRAF mutations in predicting recurrence and benefits from chemotherapy in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1261–70.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference French AJ, Sargent DJ, Burgart LJ, Foster NR, Kabat BF, Goldberg R, Shepherd L, Windschitl HE, Thibodeau SN. Prognostic significance of defective mismatch repair and BRAF V600E in patients with colon cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:3408–15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral French AJ, Sargent DJ, Burgart LJ, Foster NR, Kabat BF, Goldberg R, Shepherd L, Windschitl HE, Thibodeau SN. Prognostic significance of defective mismatch repair and BRAF V600E in patients with colon cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:3408–15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Seligmann J, Fisher D, Elliott F, et al. Exploring the poor outcomes of BRAF mutant (BRAF Mut) advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC): analysis from 2,530 patients (pts) in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:abstr 3509. Seligmann J, Fisher D, Elliott F, et al. Exploring the poor outcomes of BRAF mutant (BRAF Mut) advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC): analysis from 2,530 patients (pts) in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:abstr 3509.
16.
go back to reference Falcone A. Biweekly chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, irinotecan, infusional fluorouracil, and leucovorin: a pilot study in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:4006–14.CrossRefPubMed Falcone A. Biweekly chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, irinotecan, infusional fluorouracil, and leucovorin: a pilot study in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:4006–14.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Masi G, Allegrini G, Cupini S, Marcucci L, Cerri E, Brunetti I, Fontana E, Ricci S, Andreuccetti M, Falcone A. First-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer with irinotecan, oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFOXIRI): results of a phase II study with a simplified biweekly schedule. Ann Oncol. 2004;15:1766–72.CrossRefPubMed Masi G, Allegrini G, Cupini S, Marcucci L, Cerri E, Brunetti I, Fontana E, Ricci S, Andreuccetti M, Falcone A. First-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer with irinotecan, oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFOXIRI): results of a phase II study with a simplified biweekly schedule. Ann Oncol. 2004;15:1766–72.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Falcone A, Ricci S, Brunetti I, et al. Phase III trial of Infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) compared with Infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: the Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1670–6.CrossRefPubMed Falcone A, Ricci S, Brunetti I, et al. Phase III trial of Infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) compared with Infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: the Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1670–6.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Masi G, Loupakis F, Salvatore L, et al. Bevacizumab with FOLFOXIRI (irinotecan, oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and folinate) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:845–52.CrossRefPubMed Masi G, Loupakis F, Salvatore L, et al. Bevacizumab with FOLFOXIRI (irinotecan, oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and folinate) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:845–52.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Loupakis F, Cremolini C, Salvatore L, et al. FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment in BRAF mutant metastatic colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50:57–63.CrossRefPubMed Loupakis F, Cremolini C, Salvatore L, et al. FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment in BRAF mutant metastatic colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50:57–63.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Loupakis F, Cremolini C, Masi G, et al. Initial therapy with FOLFOXIRI and bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1609–18.CrossRefPubMed Loupakis F, Cremolini C, Masi G, et al. Initial therapy with FOLFOXIRI and bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1609–18.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference •• Cremolini C, Loupakis F, Antoniotti C, et al. FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: updated overall survival and molecular subgroup analyses of the open-label, phase 3 TRIBE study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:1306–15. Post hoc analysis of the phase 3 TRIBE study shows that FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab is a valid option for patients with BRAF-mutated mCRC (median OS 19.0 versus 10.7 months, HR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.24–1.20) •• Cremolini C, Loupakis F, Antoniotti C, et al. FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: updated overall survival and molecular subgroup analyses of the open-label, phase 3 TRIBE study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:1306–15. Post hoc analysis of the phase 3 TRIBE study shows that FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab is a valid option for patients with BRAF-mutated mCRC (median OS 19.0 versus 10.7 months, HR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.24–1.20)
23.
go back to reference Van Cutsem E, Cervantes A, Adam R, et al. ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:1386–422.CrossRefPubMed Van Cutsem E, Cervantes A, Adam R, et al. ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:1386–422.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Cremolini C, Loupakis F, Rossini D, et al. FOLFOXIRI with or without bevacizumab (bev) as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): a propensity score-based analysis. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(suppl_4):iv167–209.CrossRef Cremolini C, Loupakis F, Rossini D, et al. FOLFOXIRI with or without bevacizumab (bev) as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): a propensity score-based analysis. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(suppl_4):iv167–209.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Cunningham D, Humblet Y, Siena S, et al. Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:337–45.CrossRefPubMed Cunningham D, Humblet Y, Siena S, et al. Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:337–45.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Wainberg Z, Hecht JR. A phase III randomized, open-label, controlled trial of chemotherapy and bevacizumab with or without panitumumab in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2006;5:363–7.CrossRefPubMed Wainberg Z, Hecht JR. A phase III randomized, open-label, controlled trial of chemotherapy and bevacizumab with or without panitumumab in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2006;5:363–7.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Lièvre A, Bachet J-B, Corre DL, et al. KRAS mutation status is predictive of response to cetuximab therapy in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 2006;66:3992–5.CrossRefPubMed Lièvre A, Bachet J-B, Corre DL, et al. KRAS mutation status is predictive of response to cetuximab therapy in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 2006;66:3992–5.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Tol J, Nagtegaal ID, Punt CJA. BRAF mutation in metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:98–9.CrossRefPubMed Tol J, Nagtegaal ID, Punt CJA. BRAF mutation in metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:98–9.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference De Roock W, Claes B, Bernasconi D, et al. Effects of KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA mutations on the efficacy of cetuximab plus chemotherapy in chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective consortium analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:753–62.CrossRefPubMed De Roock W, Claes B, Bernasconi D, et al. Effects of KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA mutations on the efficacy of cetuximab plus chemotherapy in chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective consortium analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:753–62.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Bokemeyer C, Cutsem EV, Rougier P, Ciardiello F, Heeger S, Schlichting M, Celik I, Köhne C-H. Addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy as first-line treatment for KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: pooled analysis of the CRYSTAL and OPUS randomised clinical trials. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48:1466–75.CrossRefPubMed Bokemeyer C, Cutsem EV, Rougier P, Ciardiello F, Heeger S, Schlichting M, Celik I, Köhne C-H. Addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy as first-line treatment for KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: pooled analysis of the CRYSTAL and OPUS randomised clinical trials. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48:1466–75.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Douillard J-Y, Oliner KS, Siena S, et al. Panitumumab–FOLFOX4 treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1023–34.CrossRefPubMed Douillard J-Y, Oliner KS, Siena S, et al. Panitumumab–FOLFOX4 treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1023–34.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Seymour MT, Brown SR, Middleton G, et al. Panitumumab and irinotecan versus irinotecan alone for patients with KRAS wild-type, fluorouracil-resistant advanced colorectal cancer (PICCOLO): a prospectively stratified randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:749–59.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Seymour MT, Brown SR, Middleton G, et al. Panitumumab and irinotecan versus irinotecan alone for patients with KRAS wild-type, fluorouracil-resistant advanced colorectal cancer (PICCOLO): a prospectively stratified randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:749–59.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Karapetis CS, Jonker D, Daneshmand M, et al. PIK3CA, BRAF, and PTEN status and benefit from cetuximab in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer—results from NCIC CTG/AGITG CO.17. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:744–53.CrossRefPubMed Karapetis CS, Jonker D, Daneshmand M, et al. PIK3CA, BRAF, and PTEN status and benefit from cetuximab in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer—results from NCIC CTG/AGITG CO.17. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:744–53.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Peeters M, Price TJ, Cervantes A, et al. Final results from a randomized phase 3 study of FOLFIRI panitumumab for second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2014;25:107–16.CrossRefPubMed Peeters M, Price TJ, Cervantes A, et al. Final results from a randomized phase 3 study of FOLFIRI panitumumab for second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2014;25:107–16.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Pietrantonio F, Petrelli F, Coinu A, et al. Predictive role of BRAF mutations in patients with advanced colorectal cancer receiving cetuximab and panitumumab: a meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51:587–94.CrossRefPubMed Pietrantonio F, Petrelli F, Coinu A, et al. Predictive role of BRAF mutations in patients with advanced colorectal cancer receiving cetuximab and panitumumab: a meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51:587–94.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Rowland A, Dias MM, Wiese MD, Kichenadasse G, McKinnon RA, Karapetis CS, Sorich MJ. Meta-analysis of BRAF mutation as a predictive biomarker of benefit from anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapy for RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2015;112:1888–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rowland A, Dias MM, Wiese MD, Kichenadasse G, McKinnon RA, Karapetis CS, Sorich MJ. Meta-analysis of BRAF mutation as a predictive biomarker of benefit from anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapy for RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2015;112:1888–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
go back to reference Stintzing S, Jung A, Rossius L, Modest DP, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Decker T, Möhler M, Scheithauer W, Kirchner T, Heinemann V. Analysis of KRAS/NRAS and BRAF mutations in FIRE-3: a randomized phase III study of FOLFIRI plus cetuximab or bevacizumab as first-line treatment for wild-type (WT) KRAS (exon 2) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(suppl_3):S7–S19. Stintzing S, Jung A, Rossius L, Modest DP, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Decker T, Möhler M, Scheithauer W, Kirchner T, Heinemann V. Analysis of KRAS/NRAS and BRAF mutations in FIRE-3: a randomized phase III study of FOLFIRI plus cetuximab or bevacizumab as first-line treatment for wild-type (WT) KRAS (exon 2) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(suppl_3):S7–S19.
38.
go back to reference Saridaki Z, Androulakis N, Vardakis N, et al. A triplet combination with irinotecan (CPT-11), oxaliplatin (LOHP), continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFOXIRI) plus cetuximab as first-line treatment in KRAS wt, metastatic colorectal cancer: a pilot phase II trial. Br J Cancer. 2012;107:1932–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Saridaki Z, Androulakis N, Vardakis N, et al. A triplet combination with irinotecan (CPT-11), oxaliplatin (LOHP), continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFOXIRI) plus cetuximab as first-line treatment in KRAS wt, metastatic colorectal cancer: a pilot phase II trial. Br J Cancer. 2012;107:1932–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
go back to reference Fornaro L, Lonardi S, Masi G, et al. FOLFOXIRI in combination with panitumumab as first-line treatment in quadruple wild-type (KRAS, NRAS, HRAS, BRAF) metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a phase II trial by the Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest (GONO). Ann Oncol. 2013;24:2062–7.CrossRefPubMed Fornaro L, Lonardi S, Masi G, et al. FOLFOXIRI in combination with panitumumab as first-line treatment in quadruple wild-type (KRAS, NRAS, HRAS, BRAF) metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a phase II trial by the Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest (GONO). Ann Oncol. 2013;24:2062–7.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Antoniotti C, Cremolini C, Loupakis F, et al. Modified FOLFOXIRI (mFOLFOXIRI) plus cetuximab (cet), followed by cet or bevacizumab (bev) maintenance, in RAS/BRAF wild-type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): results of the phase II randomized MACBETH trial by GONO. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:abstr 3543. Antoniotti C, Cremolini C, Loupakis F, et al. Modified FOLFOXIRI (mFOLFOXIRI) plus cetuximab (cet), followed by cet or bevacizumab (bev) maintenance, in RAS/BRAF wild-type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): results of the phase II randomized MACBETH trial by GONO. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:abstr 3543.
41.
42.
go back to reference Hauschild A, Grob J-J, Demidov LV, et al. Dabrafenib in BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma: a multicentre, open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;380:358–65.CrossRefPubMed Hauschild A, Grob J-J, Demidov LV, et al. Dabrafenib in BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma: a multicentre, open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;380:358–65.CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Kopetz S, Desai J, Chan E, et al. Phase II pilot study of vemurafenib in patients with metastatic BRAF-mutated colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:4032–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kopetz S, Desai J, Chan E, et al. Phase II pilot study of vemurafenib in patients with metastatic BRAF-mutated colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:4032–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
44.
go back to reference Falchook GS, Lewis KD, Infante JR, et al. Activity of the oral MEK inhibitor trametinib in patients with advanced melanoma: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:782–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Falchook GS, Lewis KD, Infante JR, et al. Activity of the oral MEK inhibitor trametinib in patients with advanced melanoma: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:782–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
45.
go back to reference Gomez-Roca CA, Delord J, Robert C, et al. Encorafenib (LGX818), an oral BRAF inhibitor, in patients (pts) with BRAF V600E metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) : results of dose expansion in an open-label, phase 1 study. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(suppl_4):iv182–3.CrossRef Gomez-Roca CA, Delord J, Robert C, et al. Encorafenib (LGX818), an oral BRAF inhibitor, in patients (pts) with BRAF V600E metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) : results of dose expansion in an open-label, phase 1 study. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(suppl_4):iv182–3.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Prahallad A, Sun C, Huang S, Di Nicolantonio F, Salazar R, Zecchin D, Beijersbergen RL, Bardelli A, Bernards R. Unresponsiveness of colon cancer to BRAF(V600E) inhibition through feedback activation of EGFR. Nature. 2012;483:100–3.CrossRefPubMed Prahallad A, Sun C, Huang S, Di Nicolantonio F, Salazar R, Zecchin D, Beijersbergen RL, Bardelli A, Bernards R. Unresponsiveness of colon cancer to BRAF(V600E) inhibition through feedback activation of EGFR. Nature. 2012;483:100–3.CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Corcoran RB, Ebi H, Turke AB, et al. EGFR-mediated reactivation of MAPK signaling contributes to insensitivity of BRAF-mutant colorectal cancers to RAF inhibition with vemurafenib. Cancer Discov. 2012;2:227–35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Corcoran RB, Ebi H, Turke AB, et al. EGFR-mediated reactivation of MAPK signaling contributes to insensitivity of BRAF-mutant colorectal cancers to RAF inhibition with vemurafenib. Cancer Discov. 2012;2:227–35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
48.
go back to reference Poulikakos PI, Zhang C, Bollag G, Shokat KM, Rosen N. RAF inhibitors transactivate RAF dimers and ERK signalling in cells with wild-type BRAF. Nature. 2010;464:427–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Poulikakos PI, Zhang C, Bollag G, Shokat KM, Rosen N. RAF inhibitors transactivate RAF dimers and ERK signalling in cells with wild-type BRAF. Nature. 2010;464:427–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
49.
go back to reference Hatzivassiliou G, Song K, Yen I, et al. RAF inhibitors prime wild-type RAF to activate the MAPK pathway and enhance growth. Nature. 2010;464:431–5.CrossRefPubMed Hatzivassiliou G, Song K, Yen I, et al. RAF inhibitors prime wild-type RAF to activate the MAPK pathway and enhance growth. Nature. 2010;464:431–5.CrossRefPubMed
50.
go back to reference Long GV, Stroyakovskiy D, Gogas H, et al. Dabrafenib and trametinib versus dabrafenib and placebo for Val600 BRAF-mutant melanoma: a multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386:444–51.CrossRefPubMed Long GV, Stroyakovskiy D, Gogas H, et al. Dabrafenib and trametinib versus dabrafenib and placebo for Val600 BRAF-mutant melanoma: a multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386:444–51.CrossRefPubMed
51.
go back to reference Corcoran RB, Atreya CE, Falchook GS, et al. Combined BRAF and MEK inhibition with dabrafenib and trametinib in BRAF V600–mutant colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:4023–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Corcoran RB, Atreya CE, Falchook GS, et al. Combined BRAF and MEK inhibition with dabrafenib and trametinib in BRAF V600–mutant colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:4023–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
52.
53.
go back to reference Hong D, Morris V, El Osta B, et al. Phase Ib study of vemurafenib in combination with irinotecan and cetuximab in patients with BRAF-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer and advanced cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:abstr 3511.CrossRef Hong D, Morris V, El Osta B, et al. Phase Ib study of vemurafenib in combination with irinotecan and cetuximab in patients with BRAF-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer and advanced cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:abstr 3511.CrossRef
54.
go back to reference Ahronian LG, Sennott EM, Allen EMV, et al. Clinical acquired resistance to RAF inhibitor combinations in BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer through MAPK pathway alterations. Cancer Discov. 2015;5:358–67.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ahronian LG, Sennott EM, Allen EMV, et al. Clinical acquired resistance to RAF inhibitor combinations in BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer through MAPK pathway alterations. Cancer Discov. 2015;5:358–67.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
55.
go back to reference •• Corcoran RB, André T, Yoshino T, et al. Efficacy and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis of the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib (D), MEK inhibitor trametinib (T), and anti-EGFR antibody panitumumab (P) in patients (pts) with BRAF V600E–mutated (BRAFm) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Ann Oncol. 2016;27(suppl_6):abstract 455O. Combination of BRAF inhibitor with MEK inhibitor and anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody is clinically active, demonstrating that optimal MAPK pathway inhibition may be a seductive strategy for BRAF-mutated colorectal cancerCrossRef •• Corcoran RB, André T, Yoshino T, et al. Efficacy and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis of the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib (D), MEK inhibitor trametinib (T), and anti-EGFR antibody panitumumab (P) in patients (pts) with BRAF V600E–mutated (BRAFm) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Ann Oncol. 2016;27(suppl_6):abstract 455O. Combination of BRAF inhibitor with MEK inhibitor and anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody is clinically active, demonstrating that optimal MAPK pathway inhibition may be a seductive strategy for BRAF-mutated colorectal cancerCrossRef
56.
go back to reference Mao M, Tian F, Mariadason JM, et al. Resistance to BRAF inhibition in BRAF-mutant colon cancer can be overcome with PI3K inhibition or demethylating agents. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:657–67.CrossRefPubMed Mao M, Tian F, Mariadason JM, et al. Resistance to BRAF inhibition in BRAF-mutant colon cancer can be overcome with PI3K inhibition or demethylating agents. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:657–67.CrossRefPubMed
57.
go back to reference Tabernero J, Geel RV, Guren TK, et al. Phase 2 results: encorafenib (ENCO) and cetuximab (CETUX) with or without alpelisib (ALP) in patients with advanced BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer (BRAFm CRC). J Clin Oncol. 2016;34 Tabernero J, Geel RV, Guren TK, et al. Phase 2 results: encorafenib (ENCO) and cetuximab (CETUX) with or without alpelisib (ALP) in patients with advanced BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer (BRAFm CRC). J Clin Oncol. 2016;34
58.
go back to reference Rajagopalan H, Bardelli A, Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Velculescu VE. Tumorigenesis: RAF/RAS oncogenes and mismatch-repair status. Nature. 2002;418:934–4. Rajagopalan H, Bardelli A, Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Velculescu VE. Tumorigenesis: RAF/RAS oncogenes and mismatch-repair status. Nature. 2002;418:934–4.
59.
go back to reference Capper D, Voigt A, Bozukova G, Ahadova A, Kickingereder P, von Deimling A, von Knebel DM, Kloor M. BRAF V600E-specific immunohistochemistry for the exclusion of lynch syndrome in MSI-H colorectal cancer: BRAF V600E immunohistochemistry in MSI-H colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2013;133:1624–30.CrossRefPubMed Capper D, Voigt A, Bozukova G, Ahadova A, Kickingereder P, von Deimling A, von Knebel DM, Kloor M. BRAF V600E-specific immunohistochemistry for the exclusion of lynch syndrome in MSI-H colorectal cancer: BRAF V600E immunohistochemistry in MSI-H colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2013;133:1624–30.CrossRefPubMed
60.
go back to reference Loughrey MB, Waring PM, Tan A, Trivett M, Kovalenko S, Beshay V, Young M-A, McArthur G, Boussioutas A, Dobrovic A. Incorporation of somatic BRAF mutation testing into an algorithm for the investigation of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer. Familial Cancer. 2007;6:301–10.CrossRefPubMed Loughrey MB, Waring PM, Tan A, Trivett M, Kovalenko S, Beshay V, Young M-A, McArthur G, Boussioutas A, Dobrovic A. Incorporation of somatic BRAF mutation testing into an algorithm for the investigation of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer. Familial Cancer. 2007;6:301–10.CrossRefPubMed
61.
go back to reference Le DT, Uram JN, Wang H, et al. Programmed death-1 blockade in mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:1abstr 103. Le DT, Uram JN, Wang H, et al. Programmed death-1 blockade in mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:1abstr 103.
62.
go back to reference •• Overman MJ, Kopetz S, Lonardi S, et al. Nivolumab ± ipilimumab treatment (Tx) efficacy, safety, and biomarkers in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with and without high microsatellite instability (MSI-H): results from the CheckMate-142 study. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(supplement 6):abstract 479P. MMR deficiency predicts efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibition in colorectal and non-colorectal carcinomas regardless of BRAFV600E mutation •• Overman MJ, Kopetz S, Lonardi S, et al. Nivolumab ± ipilimumab treatment (Tx) efficacy, safety, and biomarkers in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with and without high microsatellite instability (MSI-H): results from the CheckMate-142 study. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(supplement 6):abstract 479P. MMR deficiency predicts efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibition in colorectal and non-colorectal carcinomas regardless of BRAFV600E mutation
63.
go back to reference Yaeger R, Cercek A, O’Reilly EM, et al. Pilot trial of combined BRAF and EGFR inhibition in BRAF-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:1313–20.CrossRefPubMed Yaeger R, Cercek A, O’Reilly EM, et al. Pilot trial of combined BRAF and EGFR inhibition in BRAF-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:1313–20.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
BRAF-Mutated Colorectal Cancer: What Is the Optimal Strategy for Treatment?
Authors
Romain Cohen, MD
Pascale Cervera, MD, PhD
Magali Svrcek, MD, PhD
Anna Pellat, MD
Chantal Dreyer, MD
Aimery de Gramont, MD
Thierry André, MD
Publication date
01-02-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Treatment Options in Oncology / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 1527-2729
Electronic ISSN: 1534-6277
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-017-0453-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Current Treatment Options in Oncology 2/2017 Go to the issue

Lymphoma (JW Sweetenham, Section Editor)

Surveillance Scans in Lymphoma: Friend or Foe?

Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine