Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) 2/2008

01-06-2008 | Original Article

Current trends in the management of acute appendicitis

Authors: S. Ng, F. J. Fleming, J. Drumm, D. Waldron, P. A. Grace

Published in: Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) | Issue 2/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

While laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) has become established in the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis, its utilisation compared to open appendectomy (OA) is variable.

Aim

To compare the utilisation and outcome of laparoscopic (LA) versus OA in an Irish regional hospital setting.

Method

Retrospective review of OA and LA performed from 2003 to 2005.

Results

Intention-to-treat analysis of 787 patients in this study revealed that 149 patients (19%) had LA and 638 patients (81%) had OA. Consultants were significantly more likely than trainees to undertake a LA (P < 0.0001). Twenty-two complications (2.8%) were recorded in the post-operative period. The overall negative appendectomy rate by histopathology was 17% with no significant difference between the rate in the LA group (19%) and the OA (17%) group.

Conclusion

Mean length of stay and complication rate were comparable between the LA and OA groups.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA (2002) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD001546PubMed Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA (2002) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD001546PubMed
3.
go back to reference Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, Gevorgyan A, Essani R (2005) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg 242:439–448PubMed Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, Gevorgyan A, Essani R (2005) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg 242:439–448PubMed
4.
go back to reference Moberg AC, Berndsen F, Palmquist I, Petersson U, Resch T, Montgomery A (2005) randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for confirmed appendicitis. Br J Surg 92(3):298–304PubMedCrossRef Moberg AC, Berndsen F, Palmquist I, Petersson U, Resch T, Montgomery A (2005) randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for confirmed appendicitis. Br J Surg 92(3):298–304PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Clothren CC, Moore EE, Johnson JL, Moore JB, Ciesla DJ, Burch JM (2005) Can we afford to do laparoscopic appendectomy in an academic hospital? Am J Surg 190:973–977CrossRef Clothren CC, Moore EE, Johnson JL, Moore JB, Ciesla DJ, Burch JM (2005) Can we afford to do laparoscopic appendectomy in an academic hospital? Am J Surg 190:973–977CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kieran JA, Curet MJ, Schermer CR (2003) Institutional differences in the management of acute appendicitis. J Gastroint Surg 7(4):523–528CrossRef Kieran JA, Curet MJ, Schermer CR (2003) Institutional differences in the management of acute appendicitis. J Gastroint Surg 7(4):523–528CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ekeh AP, Wozniak CJ, Monson B, Crawford J, McCarthy MC (2007) Laparoscopy in the contemporary management of acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 193:310–314PubMedCrossRef Ekeh AP, Wozniak CJ, Monson B, Crawford J, McCarthy MC (2007) Laparoscopy in the contemporary management of acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 193:310–314PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sweeney KJ, Dillon M, Johnston S, Keane FB, Conlon KC (2006) Training in laparoscopic appendectomy. World J Surg 30(3):358–363PubMedCrossRef Sweeney KJ, Dillon M, Johnston S, Keane FB, Conlon KC (2006) Training in laparoscopic appendectomy. World J Surg 30(3):358–363PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Margenthaler JA et al (2003) Risk factors for adverse outcomes after the surgical treatment of appendicitis in adults. Ann Surg 238(1):59–66PubMedCrossRef Margenthaler JA et al (2003) Risk factors for adverse outcomes after the surgical treatment of appendicitis in adults. Ann Surg 238(1):59–66PubMedCrossRef
10.
11.
go back to reference Hernandez K, Ramos E, Seas C, Henostroza G, Gotuzzo E (2005) Incidence of and risk factors for surgical-site infections in a Peruvian hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 26(5):473–477PubMedCrossRef Hernandez K, Ramos E, Seas C, Henostroza G, Gotuzzo E (2005) Incidence of and risk factors for surgical-site infections in a Peruvian hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 26(5):473–477PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Delgado-Rodriguez M, Gomez-Ortega A, Sillero-Arenas M, Llora J (2001) Epidemiology of surgical site infections diagnosed after hospital discharge: a prospective cohort study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 22(1):24–30PubMedCrossRef Delgado-Rodriguez M, Gomez-Ortega A, Sillero-Arenas M, Llora J (2001) Epidemiology of surgical site infections diagnosed after hospital discharge: a prospective cohort study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 22(1):24–30PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kaspatibal N, Norgaard M, Sorensen HT, Schonheyder HC, Jamulitrat S, Chongsuvivawong V (2006) BMC Infect Dis 12(6):111CrossRef Kaspatibal N, Norgaard M, Sorensen HT, Schonheyder HC, Jamulitrat S, Chongsuvivawong V (2006) BMC Infect Dis 12(6):111CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Delgado-Rodriguez M et al (2003) A prospective study of tobacco smoking as a predictor of complications in general surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 24(1):37–43PubMedCrossRef Delgado-Rodriguez M et al (2003) A prospective study of tobacco smoking as a predictor of complications in general surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 24(1):37–43PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Chiarugi M et al (2001) What you see is not what you get. A plea to remove a ‘normal’ appendix during diagnostic laparoscopy. Acta Chir Belg 101(5):243–245PubMed Chiarugi M et al (2001) What you see is not what you get. A plea to remove a ‘normal’ appendix during diagnostic laparoscopy. Acta Chir Belg 101(5):243–245PubMed
16.
go back to reference Teh SH, O’Ceallaigh S, McKeon JG, O’Donohoe MK, Tanner WA, Keane WB (2000) Should an appendix that looks normal be removed at diagnostic laparoscopy for acute right iliac fossa pain? Eur J Surg 166(5):388–389PubMedCrossRef Teh SH, O’Ceallaigh S, McKeon JG, O’Donohoe MK, Tanner WA, Keane WB (2000) Should an appendix that looks normal be removed at diagnostic laparoscopy for acute right iliac fossa pain? Eur J Surg 166(5):388–389PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Decadt B et al (1999) Randomized trial of early laparoscopy in the management of acute non-specific abdominal pain. Br J Surg 86(11):1383–1386PubMedCrossRef Decadt B et al (1999) Randomized trial of early laparoscopy in the management of acute non-specific abdominal pain. Br J Surg 86(11):1383–1386PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Van den Broek WT et al. (2001) A normal appendix found during diagnostic laparoscopy should not be removed. Br J Surg 38(2): 251–254 Van den Broek WT et al. (2001) A normal appendix found during diagnostic laparoscopy should not be removed. Br J Surg 38(2): 251–254
Metadata
Title
Current trends in the management of acute appendicitis
Authors
S. Ng
F. J. Fleming
J. Drumm
D. Waldron
P. A. Grace
Publication date
01-06-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) / Issue 2/2008
Print ISSN: 0021-1265
Electronic ISSN: 1863-4362
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-008-0116-4

Other articles of this Issue 2/2008

Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) 2/2008 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine