Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Children's Orthopaedics 3/2010

01-06-2010 | Original Clinical Article

No effect of osteopathic treatment on trunk morphology and spine flexibility in young women with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Authors: Carol Hasler, Caius Schmid, Andreas Enggist, Conny Neuhaus, Thomas Erb

Published in: Journal of Children's Orthopaedics | Issue 3/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Brace treatment is the gold standard for patients with mild adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (Cobb angle 20°–40°). However, negative psychosocial impacts, physical constraints and incompliance cause many patients and parents to seek for so-called holistic and apparently less harmful approaches within the field of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Osteopathy—manual interventions on the viscera and locomotor system—is widely used for scoliosis. There is, however, a complete lack of evidence regarding its efficacy. We, therefore, tested the hypothesis that osteopathy alters trunk morphology, a prerequisite to unload the concave side of the scoliosis, and that it halts curve progression.

Methods

This was a prospective, controlled trial of 20 post-pubertal young women (20°–40° idiopathic scoliosis) randomly allocated to an observation (group 0) or osteopathic treatment (group 1). The latter comprised three sessions (5 weeks). Trunk morphology (clinical examination, video rasterstereography) and spine flexibility (MediMouse®) were assessed at a pre- and post-intervention with a 3-month interval (blinded examiner). We chose scoliometer measurement (rib hump, lumbar prominence) as the main outcome parameter.

Results

Two patients in the treatment group refused further treatment and the final examination, as they felt no benefit after two osteopathic treatments. Regression analysis for repeat measurements (independent statistician) revealed no therapeutic effect on rib hump, lumbar prominence, plumb line, sagittal profile and global spinal flexibility.

Conclusions

We found no evidence to support osteopathy in the treatment of mild adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Therefore, we caution against abandoning the conventional standard of care for mild idiopathic scoliosis. As for other CAM therapies, the use of osteopathy as a treatment option for scoliosis still needs to be clearly defined.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Danielsson AJ, Hasserius R, Ohlin A, Nachemson AL (2007) A prospective study of brace treatment versus observation alone in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a follow-up mean of 16 years after maturity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(20):2198–2207CrossRef Danielsson AJ, Hasserius R, Ohlin A, Nachemson AL (2007) A prospective study of brace treatment versus observation alone in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a follow-up mean of 16 years after maturity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(20):2198–2207CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Climent JM, Sánchez J (1999) Impact of the type of brace on the quality of life of adolescents with spine deformities. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24(18):1903–1908CrossRef Climent JM, Sánchez J (1999) Impact of the type of brace on the quality of life of adolescents with spine deformities. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24(18):1903–1908CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Goldberg CJ, Dowling FE, Hall JE, Emans JB (1993) A statistical comparison between natural history of idiopathic scoliosis and brace treatment in skeletally immature adolescent girls. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18(7):902–908CrossRef Goldberg CJ, Dowling FE, Hall JE, Emans JB (1993) A statistical comparison between natural history of idiopathic scoliosis and brace treatment in skeletally immature adolescent girls. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18(7):902–908CrossRef
4.
go back to reference MacLean WE Jr, Green NE, Pierre CB, Ray DC (1989) Stress and coping with scoliosis: psychological effects on adolescents and their families. J Pediatr Orthop 9(3):257–261CrossRef MacLean WE Jr, Green NE, Pierre CB, Ray DC (1989) Stress and coping with scoliosis: psychological effects on adolescents and their families. J Pediatr Orthop 9(3):257–261CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Nachemson AL, Peterson LE (1995) Effectiveness of treatment with a brace in girls who have adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A prospective, controlled study based on data from the Brace Study of the Scoliosis Research Society. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77(6):815–822 Nachemson AL, Peterson LE (1995) Effectiveness of treatment with a brace in girls who have adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A prospective, controlled study based on data from the Brace Study of the Scoliosis Research Society. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77(6):815–822
6.
go back to reference Nicholson GP, Ferguson-Pell MW, Smith K, Edgar M, Morley T (2003) The objective measurement of spinal orthosis use for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28(19):2243–2250CrossRef Nicholson GP, Ferguson-Pell MW, Smith K, Edgar M, Morley T (2003) The objective measurement of spinal orthosis use for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28(19):2243–2250CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Noonan KJ, Dolan LA, Jacobson WC, Weinstein SL (1997) Long-term psychosocial characteristics of patients treated for idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 17(6):712–717 Noonan KJ, Dolan LA, Jacobson WC, Weinstein SL (1997) Long-term psychosocial characteristics of patients treated for idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 17(6):712–717
8.
go back to reference O’Neill PJ, Karol LA, Shindle MK, Elerson EE, BrintzenhofeSzoc KM, Katz DE, Farmer KW, Sponseller PD (2005) Decreased orthotic effectiveness in overweight patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(5):1069–1074CrossRef O’Neill PJ, Karol LA, Shindle MK, Elerson EE, BrintzenhofeSzoc KM, Katz DE, Farmer KW, Sponseller PD (2005) Decreased orthotic effectiveness in overweight patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(5):1069–1074CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Rowe DE, Bernstein SM, Riddick MF, Adler F, Emans JB, Gardner-Bonneau D (1997) A meta-analysis of the efficacy of non-operative treatments for idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79(5):664–674 Rowe DE, Bernstein SM, Riddick MF, Adler F, Emans JB, Gardner-Bonneau D (1997) A meta-analysis of the efficacy of non-operative treatments for idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79(5):664–674
10.
go back to reference Weiss HR, Klein R (2006) Improving excellence in scoliosis rehabilitation: a controlled study of matched pairs. Pediatr Rehabil 9(3):190–200 Weiss HR, Klein R (2006) Improving excellence in scoliosis rehabilitation: a controlled study of matched pairs. Pediatr Rehabil 9(3):190–200
11.
go back to reference Weiss HR, Weiss G (2002) Curvature progression in patients treated with scoliosis in-patient rehabilitation—a sex and age matched controlled study. Stud Health Technol Inform 91:352–356 Weiss HR, Weiss G (2002) Curvature progression in patients treated with scoliosis in-patient rehabilitation—a sex and age matched controlled study. Stud Health Technol Inform 91:352–356
12.
go back to reference Stone B, Beekman C, Hall V, Guess V, Brooks HL (1979) The effect of an exercise program on change in curve in adolescents with minimal idiopathic scoliosis. A preliminary study. Phys Ther 59(6):759–763 Stone B, Beekman C, Hall V, Guess V, Brooks HL (1979) The effect of an exercise program on change in curve in adolescents with minimal idiopathic scoliosis. A preliminary study. Phys Ther 59(6):759–763
13.
go back to reference Birbaumer N, Flor H, Cevey B, Dworkin B, Miller NE (1994) Behavioral treatment of scoliosis and kyphosis. J Psychosom Res 38(6):623–628CrossRef Birbaumer N, Flor H, Cevey B, Dworkin B, Miller NE (1994) Behavioral treatment of scoliosis and kyphosis. J Psychosom Res 38(6):623–628CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Romano M, Negrini S (2008) Manual therapy as a conservative treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review. Scoliosis 3:2CrossRef Romano M, Negrini S (2008) Manual therapy as a conservative treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review. Scoliosis 3:2CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Bunnell WP (1984) An objective criterion for scoliosis screening. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66(9):1381–1387 Bunnell WP (1984) An objective criterion for scoliosis screening. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66(9):1381–1387
16.
go back to reference Murrell GA, Coonrad RW, Moorman CT 3rd, Fitch RD (1993) An assessment of the reliability of the Scoliometer. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18(6):709–712CrossRef Murrell GA, Coonrad RW, Moorman CT 3rd, Fitch RD (1993) An assessment of the reliability of the Scoliometer. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18(6):709–712CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Amendt LE, Ause-Ellias KL, Eybers JL, Wadsworth CT, Nielsen DH, Weinstein SL (1990) Validity and reliability testing of the Scoliometer. Phys Ther 70(2):108–117 Amendt LE, Ause-Ellias KL, Eybers JL, Wadsworth CT, Nielsen DH, Weinstein SL (1990) Validity and reliability testing of the Scoliometer. Phys Ther 70(2):108–117
18.
go back to reference Côté P, Cassidy JD (1999) Re: A study of the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of the scoliometer and Adam’s forward bend test (Spine 1999;23;796–802). Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24(22):2411–2412CrossRef Côté P, Cassidy JD (1999) Re: A study of the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of the scoliometer and Adam’s forward bend test (Spine 1999;23;796–802). Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24(22):2411–2412CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Côté P, Kreitz BG, Cassidy JD, Dzus AK, Martel J (1998) A study of the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of the Scoliometer and Adam’s forward bend test. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23(7):796–802CrossRef Côté P, Kreitz BG, Cassidy JD, Dzus AK, Martel J (1998) A study of the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of the Scoliometer and Adam’s forward bend test. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23(7):796–802CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sapkas G, Papagelopoulos PJ, Kateros K, Koundis GL, Boscainos PJ, Koukou UI, Katonis P (2003) Prediction of Cobb angle in idiopathic adolescent scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 411:32–39CrossRef Sapkas G, Papagelopoulos PJ, Kateros K, Koundis GL, Boscainos PJ, Koukou UI, Katonis P (2003) Prediction of Cobb angle in idiopathic adolescent scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 411:32–39CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Griffet J, Leroux MA, Badeaux J, Coillard C, Zabjek KF, Rivard CH (2000) Relationship between gibbosity and Cobb angle during treatment of idiopathic scoliosis with the SpineCor brace. Eur Spine J 9(6):516–522CrossRef Griffet J, Leroux MA, Badeaux J, Coillard C, Zabjek KF, Rivard CH (2000) Relationship between gibbosity and Cobb angle during treatment of idiopathic scoliosis with the SpineCor brace. Eur Spine J 9(6):516–522CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Hackenberg L, Hierholzer E (2002) 3-D back surface analysis of severe idiopathic scoliosis by rasterstereography: comparison of rasterstereographic and digitized radiometric data. Stud Health Technol Inform 88:86–89 Hackenberg L, Hierholzer E (2002) 3-D back surface analysis of severe idiopathic scoliosis by rasterstereography: comparison of rasterstereographic and digitized radiometric data. Stud Health Technol Inform 88:86–89
23.
go back to reference Hackenberg L, Hierholzer E, Bullmann V, Liljenqvist U, Götze C (2006) Rasterstereographic analysis of axial back surface rotation in standing versus forward bending posture in idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 15(7):1144–1149CrossRef Hackenberg L, Hierholzer E, Bullmann V, Liljenqvist U, Götze C (2006) Rasterstereographic analysis of axial back surface rotation in standing versus forward bending posture in idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 15(7):1144–1149CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lyon R, Liu XC, Thometz JG, Nelson ER, Logan B (2004) Reproducibility of spinal back-contour measurements taken with raster stereography in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Am J Orthop 33(2):67–70 Lyon R, Liu XC, Thometz JG, Nelson ER, Logan B (2004) Reproducibility of spinal back-contour measurements taken with raster stereography in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Am J Orthop 33(2):67–70
25.
go back to reference Stokes IA (1989) Axial rotation component of thoracic scoliosis. J Orthop Res 7(5):702–708CrossRef Stokes IA (1989) Axial rotation component of thoracic scoliosis. J Orthop Res 7(5):702–708CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Stokes IA, Armstrong JG, Moreland MS (1988) Spinal deformity and back surface asymmetry in idiopathic scoliosis. J Orthop Res 6(1):129–137CrossRef Stokes IA, Armstrong JG, Moreland MS (1988) Spinal deformity and back surface asymmetry in idiopathic scoliosis. J Orthop Res 6(1):129–137CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Stokes IA, Shuma-Hartswick D, Moreland MS (1988) Spine and back-shape changes in scoliosis. Acta Orthop Scand 59(2):128–133CrossRef Stokes IA, Shuma-Hartswick D, Moreland MS (1988) Spine and back-shape changes in scoliosis. Acta Orthop Scand 59(2):128–133CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Thulbourne T, Gillespie R (1976) The rib hump in idiopathic scoliosis. Measurement, analysis and response to treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 58(1):64–71 Thulbourne T, Gillespie R (1976) The rib hump in idiopathic scoliosis. Measurement, analysis and response to treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 58(1):64–71
29.
go back to reference Liu XC, Thometz JG, Lyon RM, Klein J (2001) Functional classification of patients with idiopathic scoliosis assessed by the Quantec system: a discriminant functional analysis to determine patient curve magnitude. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26(11):1274–1278CrossRef Liu XC, Thometz JG, Lyon RM, Klein J (2001) Functional classification of patients with idiopathic scoliosis assessed by the Quantec system: a discriminant functional analysis to determine patient curve magnitude. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26(11):1274–1278CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Goldberg CJ, Kaliszer M, Moore DP, Fogarty EE, Dowling FE (2001) Surface topography, Cobb angles, and cosmetic change in scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26(4):E55–E63CrossRef Goldberg CJ, Kaliszer M, Moore DP, Fogarty EE, Dowling FE (2001) Surface topography, Cobb angles, and cosmetic change in scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26(4):E55–E63CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Mannion AF, Knecht K, Balaban G, Dvorak J, Grob D (2004) A new skin-surface device for measuring the curvature and global and segmental ranges of motion of the spine: reliability of measurements and comparison with data reviewed from the literature. Eur Spine J 13(2):122–136CrossRef Mannion AF, Knecht K, Balaban G, Dvorak J, Grob D (2004) A new skin-surface device for measuring the curvature and global and segmental ranges of motion of the spine: reliability of measurements and comparison with data reviewed from the literature. Eur Spine J 13(2):122–136CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Schulz S (1999) Measurement of shape and mobility of the spinal column: validation of the SpinalMouse by comparison with functional radiographs. Dissertation, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany Schulz S (1999) Measurement of shape and mobility of the spinal column: validation of the SpinalMouse by comparison with functional radiographs. Dissertation, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
33.
go back to reference Post RB, Leferink VJ (2004) Spinal mobility: sagittal range of motion measured with the SpinalMouse, a new non-invasive device. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124(3):187–192CrossRef Post RB, Leferink VJ (2004) Spinal mobility: sagittal range of motion measured with the SpinalMouse, a new non-invasive device. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124(3):187–192CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Emans JB, Kaelin A, Bancel P, Hall JE, Miller ME (1986) The Boston bracing system for idiopathic scoliosis. Follow-up results in 295 patients. Spine Phila Pa 11(8):792–801CrossRef Emans JB, Kaelin A, Bancel P, Hall JE, Miller ME (1986) The Boston bracing system for idiopathic scoliosis. Follow-up results in 295 patients. Spine Phila Pa 11(8):792–801CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Fernandez-Feliberti R, Flynn J, Ramirez N, Trautmann M, Alegria M (1995) Effectiveness of TLSO bracing in the conservative treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 15(2):176–181CrossRef Fernandez-Feliberti R, Flynn J, Ramirez N, Trautmann M, Alegria M (1995) Effectiveness of TLSO bracing in the conservative treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 15(2):176–181CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Richards BS, Bernstein RM, D’Amato CR, Thompson GH (2005) Standardization of criteria for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis brace studies: SRS Committee on Bracing and Nonoperative Management. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(18):2068–2075CrossRef Richards BS, Bernstein RM, D’Amato CR, Thompson GH (2005) Standardization of criteria for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis brace studies: SRS Committee on Bracing and Nonoperative Management. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(18):2068–2075CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Rahman T, Bowen JR, Takemitsu M, Scott C (2005) The association between brace compliance and outcome for patients with idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 25(4):420–422CrossRef Rahman T, Bowen JR, Takemitsu M, Scott C (2005) The association between brace compliance and outcome for patients with idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 25(4):420–422CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Lindeman M, Behm K (1999) Cognitive strategies and self-esteem as predictors of brace-wear noncompliance in patients with idiopathic scoliosis and kyphosis. J Pediatr Orthop 19(4):493–499CrossRef Lindeman M, Behm K (1999) Cognitive strategies and self-esteem as predictors of brace-wear noncompliance in patients with idiopathic scoliosis and kyphosis. J Pediatr Orthop 19(4):493–499CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Korovessis P, Zacharatos S, Koureas G, Megas P (2007) Comparative multifactorial analysis of the effects of idiopathic adolescent scoliosis and Scheuermann kyphosis on the self-perceived health status of adolescents treated with brace. Eur Spine J 16(4):537–546CrossRef Korovessis P, Zacharatos S, Koureas G, Megas P (2007) Comparative multifactorial analysis of the effects of idiopathic adolescent scoliosis and Scheuermann kyphosis on the self-perceived health status of adolescents treated with brace. Eur Spine J 16(4):537–546CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Helfenstein A, Lankes M, Ohlert K, Varoga D, Hahne HJ, Ulrich HW, Hassenpflug J (2006) The objective determination of compliance in treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with spinal orthoses. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(3):339–344CrossRef Helfenstein A, Lankes M, Ohlert K, Varoga D, Hahne HJ, Ulrich HW, Hassenpflug J (2006) The objective determination of compliance in treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with spinal orthoses. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(3):339–344CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Lou E, Raso J, Hill D, Durdle N, Mahood J, Moreau M (2002) Brace monitoring system for the treatment of scoliosis. Stud Health Technol Inform 88:218–221 Lou E, Raso J, Hill D, Durdle N, Mahood J, Moreau M (2002) Brace monitoring system for the treatment of scoliosis. Stud Health Technol Inform 88:218–221
42.
go back to reference Dolan LA, Weinstein SL (2007) Surgical rates after observation and bracing for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an evidence-based review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(19 Suppl):S91–S100CrossRef Dolan LA, Weinstein SL (2007) Surgical rates after observation and bracing for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an evidence-based review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(19 Suppl):S91–S100CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Lenssinck ML, Frijlink AC, Berger MY, Bierman-Zeinstra SM, Verkerk K, Verhagen AP (2005) Effect of bracing and other conservative interventions in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents: a systematic review of clinical trials. Phys Ther 85(12):1329–1339 Lenssinck ML, Frijlink AC, Berger MY, Bierman-Zeinstra SM, Verkerk K, Verhagen AP (2005) Effect of bracing and other conservative interventions in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents: a systematic review of clinical trials. Phys Ther 85(12):1329–1339
44.
go back to reference Price CT, Abel MF, Richards BS, D’Amato C (2000) Report from the bracing and non-operative committee of the Scoliosis Research Society. 2000 Price CT, Abel MF, Richards BS, D’Amato C (2000) Report from the bracing and non-operative committee of the Scoliosis Research Society. 2000
45.
go back to reference Mathur S, Shanti N, Brkaric M, Sood V, Kubeck J, Paulino C, Merola AA (2005) Surfing for scoliosis: the quality of information available on the Internet. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(23):2695–2700CrossRef Mathur S, Shanti N, Brkaric M, Sood V, Kubeck J, Paulino C, Merola AA (2005) Surfing for scoliosis: the quality of information available on the Internet. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(23):2695–2700CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Park RL (2001) Voodoo science. The road from foolishness to fraud. Oxford University Press, Oxford Park RL (2001) Voodoo science. The road from foolishness to fraud. Oxford University Press, Oxford
47.
go back to reference Hoffman DA, Lonstein JE, Morin MM, Visscher W, Harris BS 3rd, Boice JD Jr (1989) Breast cancer in women with scoliosis exposed to multiple diagnostic X rays. J Natl Cancer Inst 81(17):1307–1312CrossRef Hoffman DA, Lonstein JE, Morin MM, Visscher W, Harris BS 3rd, Boice JD Jr (1989) Breast cancer in women with scoliosis exposed to multiple diagnostic X rays. J Natl Cancer Inst 81(17):1307–1312CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Ovadia D, Bar-On E, Fragnière B, Rigo M, Dickman D, Leitner J, Wientroub S, Dubousset J (2007) Radiation-free quantitative assessment of scoliosis: a multi center prospective study. Eur Spine J 16(1):97–105CrossRef Ovadia D, Bar-On E, Fragnière B, Rigo M, Dickman D, Leitner J, Wientroub S, Dubousset J (2007) Radiation-free quantitative assessment of scoliosis: a multi center prospective study. Eur Spine J 16(1):97–105CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Rowe DE, Feise RJ, Crowther ER, Grod JP, Menke JM, Goldsmith CH, Stoline MR, Souza TA, Kambach B (2006) Chiropractic manipulation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a pilot study. Chiropr Osteopat 14:15CrossRef Rowe DE, Feise RJ, Crowther ER, Grod JP, Menke JM, Goldsmith CH, Stoline MR, Souza TA, Kambach B (2006) Chiropractic manipulation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a pilot study. Chiropr Osteopat 14:15CrossRef
50.
go back to reference Morningstar MW, Joy T (2006) Scoliosis treatment using spinal manipulation and the Pettibon Weighting System: a summary of 3 atypical presentations. Chiropr Osteopat 14:1CrossRef Morningstar MW, Joy T (2006) Scoliosis treatment using spinal manipulation and the Pettibon Weighting System: a summary of 3 atypical presentations. Chiropr Osteopat 14:1CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Niesluchowski W, Dabrowska A, Kedzior K, Zagrajek T (1999) The potential role of brain asymmetry in the development of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a hypothesis. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 22(8):540–544CrossRef Niesluchowski W, Dabrowska A, Kedzior K, Zagrajek T (1999) The potential role of brain asymmetry in the development of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a hypothesis. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 22(8):540–544CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Aspegren DD, Cox JM (1987) Correction of progressive idiopathic scoliosis utilizing neuromuscular stimulation and manipulation: a case report. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 10(4):147–156 Aspegren DD, Cox JM (1987) Correction of progressive idiopathic scoliosis utilizing neuromuscular stimulation and manipulation: a case report. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 10(4):147–156
Metadata
Title
No effect of osteopathic treatment on trunk morphology and spine flexibility in young women with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Authors
Carol Hasler
Caius Schmid
Andreas Enggist
Conny Neuhaus
Thomas Erb
Publication date
01-06-2010
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Journal of Children's Orthopaedics / Issue 3/2010
Print ISSN: 1863-2521
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2548
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-010-0258-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2010

Journal of Children's Orthopaedics 3/2010 Go to the issue