Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship 3/2014

01-09-2014

Adopting a survivor identity after cancer in a peer support context

Authors: Bronwyn A. Morris, Stephen J. Lepore, Bridget Wilson, Morton A. Lieberman, Jeff Dunn, Suzanne K. Chambers

Published in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship | Issue 3/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The term cancer survivor can refer to individuals from diagnosis through the rest of their life. However, not all people with cancer identify as a survivor, and underlying factors and correlates are yet to be well-explored empirically.

Methods

Study 1 surveyed men in a prostate cancer peer support network (n = 514), exploring psychosocial variables related to adopting a survivor identity. Study 2 interviewed 160 women with breast cancer in an online support group and collected observational data, assessing how survivor identity relates to perceptions of and participation in online support groups.

Results

For men, survivor identity (35 %) was related to lower levels of threat appraisal (p = .000), more deliberate rumination (p = .042), gaining greater understanding of cancer experience through peers (p = .041) and a higher, though marginally significant, level of posttraumatic growth (p = .052). Women adopting a survivor identity (50 %) had higher rates of online support group posts (p = .048), a greater feeling of mattering to the group (p = .002), rated the group as more helpful (p = .004 to .01) and had less difficulty in relating to the group (p = .002) than women not identifying as a survivor.

Conclusions

Survivor identity was related to active and positive engagement with peers, and cognitive processing.

Implications for cancer survivors

While the cancer survivor metaphor may be salient for some people diagnosed with cancer, many did not associate with the term, highlighting the complexity surrounding survivorship discourse and the need to be sensitive to unique individual needs in psychosocial interventions that involve groups.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Reisfield GM, Wilson GR. Use of metaphor in the discourse on cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(19):4024–7.CrossRefPubMed Reisfield GM, Wilson GR. Use of metaphor in the discourse on cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(19):4024–7.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Bellizzi KM, Blank TO. Cancer-related identity and positive affect in survivors of prostate cancer. J Cancer Surviv. 2007;1:44–8.CrossRefPubMed Bellizzi KM, Blank TO. Cancer-related identity and positive affect in survivors of prostate cancer. J Cancer Surviv. 2007;1:44–8.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Park CL, Zlateva I, Blank TO. Self-identity after cancer: “Survivor”, “victim”, “patient”, and “person with cancer”. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24 Suppl 2:430–5.PubMedCentralCrossRef Park CL, Zlateva I, Blank TO. Self-identity after cancer: “Survivor”, “victim”, “patient”, and “person with cancer”. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24 Suppl 2:430–5.PubMedCentralCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Deimling GT, Bowman KF, Wagner LJ. Cancer survivorship and identity among long-term survivors. Cancer Investig. 2007;25:758–65.CrossRef Deimling GT, Bowman KF, Wagner LJ. Cancer survivorship and identity among long-term survivors. Cancer Investig. 2007;25:758–65.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Chambers SK et al. Survivor identity after colorectal cancer: antecedents, prevalence and outcomes. Psycho-Oncology. 2012;21(9):962–9.CrossRefPubMed Chambers SK et al. Survivor identity after colorectal cancer: antecedents, prevalence and outcomes. Psycho-Oncology. 2012;21(9):962–9.CrossRefPubMed
11.
13.
go back to reference Khan NF et al. Interpretation and acceptance of the term ‘cancer survivor’: a United Kingdom-based qualitative study. Eur J Cancer Care. 2012;21:177–86.CrossRef Khan NF et al. Interpretation and acceptance of the term ‘cancer survivor’: a United Kingdom-based qualitative study. Eur J Cancer Care. 2012;21:177–86.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference McGrath P, Holewa H. What does the term ‘survivor’ mean to individuals diagnosed with a haematological malignancy? Findings from Australia. Support Care Cancer. 2012;20:3287–95.CrossRefPubMed McGrath P, Holewa H. What does the term ‘survivor’ mean to individuals diagnosed with a haematological malignancy? Findings from Australia. Support Care Cancer. 2012;20:3287–95.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Sontag S. Illness as metaphor. New York: Farrar, Straus, Giroux; 1978. Sontag S. Illness as metaphor. New York: Farrar, Straus, Giroux; 1978.
16.
go back to reference Morris BA, Campbell M, Dwyer M, Dunn J, Chambers SK. Survivor identity and post-traumatic growth after participating in challenge-based peer support programmes. Br J Health Psychol. 2011;16:660–74.CrossRefPubMed Morris BA, Campbell M, Dwyer M, Dunn J, Chambers SK. Survivor identity and post-traumatic growth after participating in challenge-based peer support programmes. Br J Health Psychol. 2011;16:660–74.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Stanton AL, Bower JE, Low CA. Posttraumatic growth model: sociocultural considerations. In: Calhoun LG et al., editors. Handbook of posttraumatic growth: research and practice. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2006. p. 138–75. Stanton AL, Bower JE, Low CA. Posttraumatic growth model: sociocultural considerations. In: Calhoun LG et al., editors. Handbook of posttraumatic growth: research and practice. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2006. p. 138–75.
18.
go back to reference Calhoun LG, Tedeschi RG. Posttraumatic growth in clinical practice. New York: Routledge; 2013. Calhoun LG, Tedeschi RG. Posttraumatic growth in clinical practice. New York: Routledge; 2013.
19.
go back to reference Davies B, Harre R. Positioning and personhood. In: Harre R, van Langenhove L, editors. Positioning theory. Oxford: Blackwell; 1998. Davies B, Harre R. Positioning and personhood. In: Harre R, van Langenhove L, editors. Positioning theory. Oxford: Blackwell; 1998.
20.
go back to reference Sabiston CM, McDonough MH, Crocker PRE. Psychological experiences of breast cancer survivors involved in dragon boat program: exploring links to positive psychological growth. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2007;29:419–38.PubMed Sabiston CM, McDonough MH, Crocker PRE. Psychological experiences of breast cancer survivors involved in dragon boat program: exploring links to positive psychological growth. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2007;29:419–38.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Burke P. Identity processes and social stress. Am Sociol Rev. 1991;56:836–49.CrossRef Burke P. Identity processes and social stress. Am Sociol Rev. 1991;56:836–49.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Lepore SJ, Kernan W. Positive life change and the social context of illness: an expanded social-cognitive processing model. In: Park CL et al., editors. Medical illness and positive life change: can crisis lead to personal transformation? Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2009. p. 139–52.CrossRef Lepore SJ, Kernan W. Positive life change and the social context of illness: an expanded social-cognitive processing model. In: Park CL et al., editors. Medical illness and positive life change: can crisis lead to personal transformation? Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2009. p. 139–52.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Ussher JM et al. A qualitative analysis of reasons for leaving, or not attending, a cancer support group. Soc Work Health Care. 2008;47(1):14–29.CrossRefPubMed Ussher JM et al. A qualitative analysis of reasons for leaving, or not attending, a cancer support group. Soc Work Health Care. 2008;47(1):14–29.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Roesch SC, Rowley AA. Evaluating and developing a multidimensional, dispositional measure of appraisal. J Pers Assess. 2005;85(2):188–96.CrossRefPubMed Roesch SC, Rowley AA. Evaluating and developing a multidimensional, dispositional measure of appraisal. J Pers Assess. 2005;85(2):188–96.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Phinney JS, Ong AD. Conceptualisation and measurement of ethnic identity: current status and future direction. J Couns Psychol. 2007;54(3):271–81.CrossRef Phinney JS, Ong AD. Conceptualisation and measurement of ethnic identity: current status and future direction. J Couns Psychol. 2007;54(3):271–81.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Cann A et al. The core beliefs inventory: a brief measure of disruption in the assumptive world. Anxiety, Stress Coping. 2010;23:19–34.CrossRef Cann A et al. The core beliefs inventory: a brief measure of disruption in the assumptive world. Anxiety, Stress Coping. 2010;23:19–34.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Cann A et al. Assessing posttraumatic cognitive activity: the event related rumination inventory. Anxiety, Stress Coping. 2011;24(2):137–56.CrossRef Cann A et al. Assessing posttraumatic cognitive activity: the event related rumination inventory. Anxiety, Stress Coping. 2011;24(2):137–56.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG. The posttraumatic growth inventory: measuring the positive legace of trauma. J Trauma Stress. 1996;9:455–71.CrossRefPubMed Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG. The posttraumatic growth inventory: measuring the positive legace of trauma. J Trauma Stress. 1996;9:455–71.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 6th ed. Boston: Pearson; 2012. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 6th ed. Boston: Pearson; 2012.
30.
go back to reference Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1988. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1988.
31.
go back to reference Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67:361–70.CrossRefPubMed Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67:361–70.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Lepore SJ et al. Standard versus prosocial online support groups for distressed breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:379–86.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Lepore SJ et al. Standard versus prosocial online support groups for distressed breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:379–86.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Winzelberg AJ et al. Evaluation of an internet support group for women with primary breast cancer. Cancer. 2003;97(5):1164–73.CrossRefPubMed Winzelberg AJ et al. Evaluation of an internet support group for women with primary breast cancer. Cancer. 2003;97(5):1164–73.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Lieberman MA et al. Electronic support groups for breast carcinoma: a clinical trial of effectiveness. Cancer. 2003;97(4):920–5.CrossRefPubMed Lieberman MA et al. Electronic support groups for breast carcinoma: a clinical trial of effectiveness. Cancer. 2003;97(4):920–5.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Marcus FM. Mattering: its measurement and theoretical significance for social psychology. In: Paper presented in Annual meeting of the Eastern Sociological Association. Cincinnati: OH; 1991. Marcus FM. Mattering: its measurement and theoretical significance for social psychology. In: Paper presented in Annual meeting of the Eastern Sociological Association. Cincinnati: OH; 1991.
36.
go back to reference Rosenberg M, McCullough BC. Mattering: inferred significance and mental health among adolescents. Res Community Ment Health. 1981;2:163–82. Rosenberg M, McCullough BC. Mattering: inferred significance and mental health among adolescents. Res Community Ment Health. 1981;2:163–82.
37.
go back to reference Lieberman MA. Understanding how groups work: a study of homogenous peer group failures. Int J Group Psychother. 1990;40:31–52.PubMed Lieberman MA. Understanding how groups work: a study of homogenous peer group failures. Int J Group Psychother. 1990;40:31–52.PubMed
38.
go back to reference Lieberman MA, Golant M. Leader behaviors as perceived by cancer patients in professionally directed support groups and outcomes. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice. 2002;6:267–76.CrossRef Lieberman MA, Golant M. Leader behaviors as perceived by cancer patients in professionally directed support groups and outcomes. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice. 2002;6:267–76.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Lieberman MA, Yalom ID, Miles M. Encounter groups: first facts. New York: Basic Books; 1973. Lieberman MA, Yalom ID, Miles M. Encounter groups: first facts. New York: Basic Books; 1973.
40.
go back to reference Zebrack B. Cancer survivors and quality of life: a critical review of the literature. Oncol Nurse Forum. 2000;27:1395–401. Zebrack B. Cancer survivors and quality of life: a critical review of the literature. Oncol Nurse Forum. 2000;27:1395–401.
41.
go back to reference Lepore SJ, Revenson RA. Social constraints on disclosure and adjustment to cancer. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2007;1(1):313–33.CrossRef Lepore SJ, Revenson RA. Social constraints on disclosure and adjustment to cancer. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2007;1(1):313–33.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Lepore SJ. A social-cognitive processing model of emotional adjustment to cancer. In: Baum A, Andersen B, editors. Psychosocial interventions for cancer. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2001. p. 99–118.CrossRef Lepore SJ. A social-cognitive processing model of emotional adjustment to cancer. In: Baum A, Andersen B, editors. Psychosocial interventions for cancer. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2001. p. 99–118.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Harwood J, Sparks L. Social identity and health: an intergroup communication approach to cancer. Health Commun. 2003;15:145–59.CrossRefPubMed Harwood J, Sparks L. Social identity and health: an intergroup communication approach to cancer. Health Commun. 2003;15:145–59.CrossRefPubMed
44.
45.
go back to reference Lakoff G, Johnsen M. Metaphors we live by. London: The University of Chicago Press; 2003.CrossRef Lakoff G, Johnsen M. Metaphors we live by. London: The University of Chicago Press; 2003.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Kagitcibasi C. Autonomy and relatedness in cultural context: implications for self and family. J Cross-Cult Psychol. 2005;36:403–22.CrossRef Kagitcibasi C. Autonomy and relatedness in cultural context: implications for self and family. J Cross-Cult Psychol. 2005;36:403–22.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Chambers SK et al. Intervening to improve psychological outcomes for men with prostate cancer. Psycho-Oncology. 2013;22(5):1025–34.CrossRefPubMed Chambers SK et al. Intervening to improve psychological outcomes for men with prostate cancer. Psycho-Oncology. 2013;22(5):1025–34.CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Lepore SJ et al. Improving quality of life in men with prostate cancer: a randomized controlled trial of group education interventions. Health Psychol. 2003;22(5):443–52.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Lepore SJ et al. Improving quality of life in men with prostate cancer: a randomized controlled trial of group education interventions. Health Psychol. 2003;22(5):443–52.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
49.
go back to reference Mayer KU. The sociology of life course and lifespan psychology: diverging or convering pathways? In: Stauginger UM, Lindenberger U, editors. Understanding human development: dialogues with lifespan psychology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2003. p. 463–81.CrossRef Mayer KU. The sociology of life course and lifespan psychology: diverging or convering pathways? In: Stauginger UM, Lindenberger U, editors. Understanding human development: dialogues with lifespan psychology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2003. p. 463–81.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Adopting a survivor identity after cancer in a peer support context
Authors
Bronwyn A. Morris
Stephen J. Lepore
Bridget Wilson
Morton A. Lieberman
Jeff Dunn
Suzanne K. Chambers
Publication date
01-09-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Cancer Survivorship / Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 1932-2259
Electronic ISSN: 1932-2267
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-014-0355-5

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

Journal of Cancer Survivorship 3/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine