Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship 2/2014

01-06-2014

Unintended consequences: the social context of cancer survivors and work

Authors: Angela Ka Ying Mak, Suwichit Chaidaroon, Gilbert Fan, Fahimah Thalib

Published in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship | Issue 2/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This article describes the ways in which socioeconomic characteristics and workplace contexts shape the unintended consequences that cancer survivors can experience as they return to work. The study was conducted in an employment setting where there is a major focus on productivity and economic growth in the business sector.

Methods

Five focus groups (N = 33 participants) were conducted in 2012 in Singapore. Questions were directed at obtaining information related to the meaning of a job and reactions to return to work as a cancer survivor completes primary cancer treatment. A thematic analysis using a two-staged analytical process was conducted to identify (1) work-related challenges faced by survivors as a result of the interplay between their self-identity as someone with a critical illness and organizational structure, and (2) unintended social consequences (USCs) related to the interaction between the workplace and cancer survivor.

Results

Eight emerging themes of work-related challenges and unintended consequences were categorized. Fear of losing out by compromising one’s expectation, downplaying illness to avoid being a burden to others, working harder to meet expectations, and passive acceptance to perceived discrimination. Unintended consequences were also observed in relation to policies, procedures, and economic factors in the context of a heightened economically driven social climate.

Conclusions

This study contributes to the understanding of how cancer survivors perceive their work situation. These findings can inform health care providers, employers, and policy makers regarding the challenges faced by cancer survivors as they return to the workplace in a culture of a rapidly growing emphasis on economic concerns.

Implications for Cancer Survivorship

These findings offer a new perspective on the complexities that can occur when cancer survivors interact with their workplace. Awareness of the existence and types of unintended consequences in this context can help provide a more comprehensive understanding of the cancer survivor and work interface.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Spelten ER, Sprangers MA, Verbeek JH. Factors reported to influence the return to work of cancer survivors: a literature review. Psychooncology. 2002;11:124–31.CrossRefPubMed Spelten ER, Sprangers MA, Verbeek JH. Factors reported to influence the return to work of cancer survivors: a literature review. Psychooncology. 2002;11:124–31.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Kennedy F, Haslam C, Munir F, Pryce J. Returning to work following cancer: a qualitative exploratory study into the experience of returning to work following cancer. Eur J Cancer Care. 2007;16:17–25.CrossRef Kennedy F, Haslam C, Munir F, Pryce J. Returning to work following cancer: a qualitative exploratory study into the experience of returning to work following cancer. Eur J Cancer Care. 2007;16:17–25.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Carlsson M, Hamrin E, Lindqvist R. Psychometric assessment of the life satisfaction questionnaire (LSQ) and a comparison of randomized sample of Swedish women and those suffering from breast cancer. Qual Life Res. 1999;8(3):245–53.CrossRefPubMed Carlsson M, Hamrin E, Lindqvist R. Psychometric assessment of the life satisfaction questionnaire (LSQ) and a comparison of randomized sample of Swedish women and those suffering from breast cancer. Qual Life Res. 1999;8(3):245–53.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Pryce J, Munir F, Haslam C. Cancer survivorship and work: symptoms, supervisor response, co-worker disclosure, and work adjustment. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17:83–92.CrossRefPubMed Pryce J, Munir F, Haslam C. Cancer survivorship and work: symptoms, supervisor response, co-worker disclosure, and work adjustment. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17:83–92.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Feuerstein M, Tood B, Moskowitz M, et al. Work in cancer survivors: a model for practice and research. J Cancer Surviv. 2010;4:415–37.CrossRefPubMed Feuerstein M, Tood B, Moskowitz M, et al. Work in cancer survivors: a model for practice and research. J Cancer Surviv. 2010;4:415–37.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Mehnert A. Employment and work-related issues in cancer survivors. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2011;77:109–30.CrossRefPubMed Mehnert A. Employment and work-related issues in cancer survivors. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2011;77:109–30.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Mehnert A, de Boer A, Feuerstein, M. Employment challenges for cancer survivors. Cancer. (2013, in press). Mehnert A, de Boer A, Feuerstein, M. Employment challenges for cancer survivors. Cancer. (2013, in press).
8.
go back to reference Giddens A. Central problems in social theory: action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. Los Angeles: University of California Press; 1979.CrossRef Giddens A. Central problems in social theory: action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. Los Angeles: University of California Press; 1979.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Giddens A. The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Los Angeles: University of California Press; 1984. Giddens A. The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Los Angeles: University of California Press; 1984.
10.
go back to reference Koehn D. Living with the dragon: thinking and acting ethically in a world of unintended consequences. New York: Routledge; 2010. Koehn D. Living with the dragon: thinking and acting ethically in a world of unintended consequences. New York: Routledge; 2010.
11.
go back to reference Wells M, Williams B, Firnigl D, Lang H, Coyle J, Kroll T, et al. Supporting ‘work-related goals’ rather than ‘return to work’ after cancer? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of 25 qualitative studies. Psychooncology. 2012. doi:10.1002/pon.3148.PubMedCentral Wells M, Williams B, Firnigl D, Lang H, Coyle J, Kroll T, et al. Supporting ‘work-related goals’ rather than ‘return to work’ after cancer? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of 25 qualitative studies. Psychooncology. 2012. doi:10.​1002/​pon.​3148.PubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Amir Z, Neary D, Luker K. Cancer survivors’ views of work 3 years post diagnosis: a UK perspective. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2008;12:190–7.CrossRefPubMed Amir Z, Neary D, Luker K. Cancer survivors’ views of work 3 years post diagnosis: a UK perspective. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2008;12:190–7.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Boykoff N, Moieni M, Subramanian SK. Confronting chemobrain: an in-depth look at survivors’ reports of impact on work, social networks, and health care response. J Cancer Surviv. 2009;3:223–32.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Boykoff N, Moieni M, Subramanian SK. Confronting chemobrain: an in-depth look at survivors’ reports of impact on work, social networks, and health care response. J Cancer Surviv. 2009;3:223–32.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Maunsell E, Brisson C, Dubois L, Lauzier S, Fraser A. Work problems after breast cancer: an exploratory qualitative study. Psychooncology. 1999;8(6):467–73.CrossRefPubMed Maunsell E, Brisson C, Dubois L, Lauzier S, Fraser A. Work problems after breast cancer: an exploratory qualitative study. Psychooncology. 1999;8(6):467–73.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Spector R. Culture and diversity in health and illness. Stamford: Appleton Lange; 1996. Spector R. Culture and diversity in health and illness. Stamford: Appleton Lange; 1996.
16.
go back to reference Galanti G. Caring for patients from different cultures: case studies from American hospitals. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1991. Galanti G. Caring for patients from different cultures: case studies from American hospitals. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1991.
17.
go back to reference Wright KB, Sparks L, O’Hair HD. Health communication in the 21st century. Malden: Blackwell Publishing; 2008. Wright KB, Sparks L, O’Hair HD. Health communication in the 21st century. Malden: Blackwell Publishing; 2008.
18.
go back to reference Hofstede G. Cultures and organizations: software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2004. Hofstede G. Cultures and organizations: software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2004.
19.
go back to reference Kluckhohn FR, Strodtbeck FL. Variations in value orientations. Evanston: Row, Peterson; 1961. Kluckhohn FR, Strodtbeck FL. Variations in value orientations. Evanston: Row, Peterson; 1961.
20.
go back to reference Ho KL. Citizen participation and policy making in Singapore: conditions and predicaments. Asian Surv. 2000;40(3):436–55.CrossRef Ho KL. Citizen participation and policy making in Singapore: conditions and predicaments. Asian Surv. 2000;40(3):436–55.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ting GS, Yen JL. Patient advocacy and its role in Singapore. Ethics Healthc SGH Proc. 2008;17(1):3–8. Ting GS, Yen JL. Patient advocacy and its role in Singapore. Ethics Healthc SGH Proc. 2008;17(1):3–8.
22.
go back to reference Mak AKY. Toward an occupational rehabilitation policy community for cancer survivors in Singapore: a stakeholder perspective from the SME employers. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21:77–85.CrossRef Mak AKY. Toward an occupational rehabilitation policy community for cancer survivors in Singapore: a stakeholder perspective from the SME employers. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21:77–85.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Chen HMK, Tan WH, Tan WC, Yu CKE, Lim THJ, Tay MH, et al. Attitudes towards cancer survivors: a small survey. Singapore Med J. 2006;47(2):143–6.PubMed Chen HMK, Tan WH, Tan WC, Yu CKE, Lim THJ, Tay MH, et al. Attitudes towards cancer survivors: a small survey. Singapore Med J. 2006;47(2):143–6.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Marshall C, Rossman GB. Designing qualitative research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1999. Marshall C, Rossman GB. Designing qualitative research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1999.
25.
go back to reference Lindlof TR. Qualitative communication research methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1995. Lindlof TR. Qualitative communication research methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1995.
26.
go back to reference Whaley BB. Explaining illness: research, theory, and strategies. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 2000. Whaley BB. Explaining illness: research, theory, and strategies. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 2000.
27.
go back to reference Mystakidou K, Parpa E, Tsilika E, Katsouda E, Vlahos L. Cancer information disclosure in different cultural context. Support Care Cancer. 2004;12:147–54.CrossRefPubMed Mystakidou K, Parpa E, Tsilika E, Katsouda E, Vlahos L. Cancer information disclosure in different cultural context. Support Care Cancer. 2004;12:147–54.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for health research. London: Sage; 2004. Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for health research. London: Sage; 2004.
29.
go back to reference McKay G, Knott V, Delfabbro P. Return to work and cancer: the Australian experience. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23:93–105.CrossRefPubMed McKay G, Knott V, Delfabbro P. Return to work and cancer: the Australian experience. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23:93–105.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Kim JY, Nam SH. The concept and dynamics of face: implications for organizational behavior in Asia. Organ Sci. 1998;9(4):522–34.CrossRef Kim JY, Nam SH. The concept and dynamics of face: implications for organizational behavior in Asia. Organ Sci. 1998;9(4):522–34.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Goldsmith DJ. Communicating social support. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004.CrossRef Goldsmith DJ. Communicating social support. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship. Self-advocacy: a cancer survivor’s handbook. MD: Silver Spring; 2009. National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship. Self-advocacy: a cancer survivor’s handbook. MD: Silver Spring; 2009.
33.
go back to reference Coreil J, Wilke J, Pintado I. Cultural models of illness and recovery in breast cancer support groups. Qual Health Res. 2004;14(7):905–23.CrossRefPubMed Coreil J, Wilke J, Pintado I. Cultural models of illness and recovery in breast cancer support groups. Qual Health Res. 2004;14(7):905–23.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Carlson LE, Halifax J. Mindfulness for cancer and terminal illness. In: McCracken LM, editor. Mindfulness and acceptance in behavioral medicine: current theory and practice. Oakland: New Harbinger; 2011. p. 159–86. Carlson LE, Halifax J. Mindfulness for cancer and terminal illness. In: McCracken LM, editor. Mindfulness and acceptance in behavioral medicine: current theory and practice. Oakland: New Harbinger; 2011. p. 159–86.
35.
go back to reference Carver CS. Resilience and thriving: issues, models, and linkages. J Soc Issues. 1998;54(2):245–63.CrossRef Carver CS. Resilience and thriving: issues, models, and linkages. J Soc Issues. 1998;54(2):245–63.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Parent JD, Levitt K. Manager versus employee perceptions of adaptability and work performance. Bus Renaiss Q. 2009;4(4):23–48. Parent JD, Levitt K. Manager versus employee perceptions of adaptability and work performance. Bus Renaiss Q. 2009;4(4):23–48.
37.
go back to reference Frazier LM, Miller VA, Horbelt DV, Delmore JE, Miller BE, Paschal AM. Comparison of focus groups on cancer and employment conducted face to face or by telephone. Qual Health Res. 2010;20(5):617–27.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Frazier LM, Miller VA, Horbelt DV, Delmore JE, Miller BE, Paschal AM. Comparison of focus groups on cancer and employment conducted face to face or by telephone. Qual Health Res. 2010;20(5):617–27.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Unintended consequences: the social context of cancer survivors and work
Authors
Angela Ka Ying Mak
Suwichit Chaidaroon
Gilbert Fan
Fahimah Thalib
Publication date
01-06-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Cancer Survivorship / Issue 2/2014
Print ISSN: 1932-2259
Electronic ISSN: 1932-2267
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-013-0330-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2014

Journal of Cancer Survivorship 2/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine