Skip to main content
Top
Published in: General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 7/2016

Open Access 01-07-2016 | Current Topics Review Article

Video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy: keynote lecture

Authors: Miguel A. Cuesta, Nicole van der Wielen, Jennifer Straatman, Donald L. van der Peet

Published in: General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | Issue 7/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) by thoracoscopy after neoadjuvant therapy results in significant short-term advantages such as a lower incidence of pulmonary infections and a better quality of life (QoL) with the same completeness of resection. After 1 year, a better QoL is still observed for MIE in comparison with the open approach, while having the same survival. Seven issues about implementation of MIE for cancer require discussion: (1) choice of the extension of esophageal resection and use of neoadjuvant therapy; (2) reasons to approach the esophageal cancer by MIE; (3) determining the best minimally invasive approach for gastro-esophageal junction cancers; (4) implementation of evidence-based MIE; (5) standardization of the surgical anatomy of the esophagus based on MIE; (6) future lines of research of MIE; and (7) learning process. In the time of imaging-integrated surgery it is clear that the MIE approach should be increasingly implemented in all centers worldwide having an adequate volume of patients and expertise.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dallemagne B, Weerts JM, Jehaes C. Thoracoscopic esophageal resection. In: Cuesta MA, Nagy AG, editors. Minimally invasive surgery in gastrointestinal cancer. Edingburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1993. p. 59–68. Dallemagne B, Weerts JM, Jehaes C. Thoracoscopic esophageal resection. In: Cuesta MA, Nagy AG, editors. Minimally invasive surgery in gastrointestinal cancer. Edingburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1993. p. 59–68.
2.
go back to reference Cuschieri A. Thoracoscopic subtotal esophagectomy. Endosc Surg Allied Technol. 1994;2:21–5.PubMed Cuschieri A. Thoracoscopic subtotal esophagectomy. Endosc Surg Allied Technol. 1994;2:21–5.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg. 2003;238:486–94.PubMedPubMedCentral Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg. 2003;238:486–94.PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Senthilkumar R, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position-experience of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;2013:7–16.CrossRef Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Senthilkumar R, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position-experience of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;2013:7–16.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Scheepers JJ, Veenhof XA, van der Peet DL, et al. Laparoscopic transhiatal resection for malignancies of the distal esophagus: outcome of the first 50 resected patients. Surgery. 2008;143:278–85.CrossRefPubMed Scheepers JJ, Veenhof XA, van der Peet DL, et al. Laparoscopic transhiatal resection for malignancies of the distal esophagus: outcome of the first 50 resected patients. Surgery. 2008;143:278–85.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:11–20.CrossRefPubMed Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:11–20.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Van Hagen P, Huslhof MC, van Lanschot JJ, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2074–84.CrossRefPubMed Van Hagen P, Huslhof MC, van Lanschot JJ, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2074–84.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Bumm R, Wong J. More or less surgery for esophageal cancer: extent of lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma—how much is necessary ? Dis Esophagus. 1994;7:151–5. Bumm R, Wong J. More or less surgery for esophageal cancer: extent of lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma—how much is necessary ? Dis Esophagus. 1994;7:151–5.
9.
go back to reference Akiyama H, Tsurumaru M, Ono Y, et al. Background of lymph node dissection for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. In: Sato T, Lizukan T, editors. In color atlas of surgical anatomy for esophageal cancer. New York: Springer; 1992. p. 9–24.CrossRef Akiyama H, Tsurumaru M, Ono Y, et al. Background of lymph node dissection for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. In: Sato T, Lizukan T, editors. In color atlas of surgical anatomy for esophageal cancer. New York: Springer; 1992. p. 9–24.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hulscher JBF, van Sandick JW, de Boer AGEM, et al. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1662–9.CrossRefPubMed Hulscher JBF, van Sandick JW, de Boer AGEM, et al. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1662–9.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Siewert JR, Stein HJ. Carcinoma of the cardia: carcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction. Classification, pathology and extent of resection. Dis Esophagus. 1996;9:173–82. Siewert JR, Stein HJ. Carcinoma of the cardia: carcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction. Classification, pathology and extent of resection. Dis Esophagus. 1996;9:173–82.
12.
go back to reference Biere SSAY, Cuesta MA, Van der Peet DL. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Chirurgica. 2009;64:121–33.PubMed Biere SSAY, Cuesta MA, Van der Peet DL. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Chirurgica. 2009;64:121–33.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M, et al. A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation. Br J Surg. 2003;90:108–13.CrossRefPubMed Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M, et al. A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation. Br J Surg. 2003;90:108–13.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Taguchi S, Osugi H, Hirashino M, et al. Comparison of three-field esophagectomy for esophageal cancer incorporating open or thoracoscopic thoracotomy. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:1445–50.CrossRefPubMed Taguchi S, Osugi H, Hirashino M, et al. Comparison of three-field esophagectomy for esophageal cancer incorporating open or thoracoscopic thoracotomy. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:1445–50.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Gemmill EH, McCulloch P. Systematic review of minimally invasive resection for gastro-oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg. 2007;94:1461–7.CrossRefPubMed Gemmill EH, McCulloch P. Systematic review of minimally invasive resection for gastro-oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg. 2007;94:1461–7.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Smithers BM, Gotley DC, Martin I, Thomas JM. Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Surg. 2007;245:232–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Smithers BM, Gotley DC, Martin I, Thomas JM. Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Surg. 2007;245:232–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Maas KW, Biere SS, van Hoogstraten IM, et al. Immunological changes after minimally invasive or conventional esophageal resection for cancer: a randomized trial. World J Surg. 2014;38:131–7.CrossRefPubMed Maas KW, Biere SS, van Hoogstraten IM, et al. Immunological changes after minimally invasive or conventional esophageal resection for cancer: a randomized trial. World J Surg. 2014;38:131–7.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Cuesta MA, van der Peet DL, Biere SSAY, Scheepers JJG, Heijnen BHM. Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy. In: Puntambeker SP, Cuesta MA, editors. Atlas of minimally invasive surgery in esophageal carcinoma. New York: Springer; 2010. p. 171–89.CrossRef Cuesta MA, van der Peet DL, Biere SSAY, Scheepers JJG, Heijnen BHM. Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy. In: Puntambeker SP, Cuesta MA, editors. Atlas of minimally invasive surgery in esophageal carcinoma. New York: Springer; 2010. p. 171–89.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Cuesta MA, Scheepers JJG, Oosterhuis W, Biere SSAY, Van der Peet DL, Heijnen BHM. Thoracoscopic esophageal resection for cancer in prone decubitus position: operative technique. In: Puntambeker SP, Cuesta MA, editors. Atlas of minimally invasive surgery in esophageal carcinoma. New York: Springer; 2010. p. 149–69.CrossRef Cuesta MA, Scheepers JJG, Oosterhuis W, Biere SSAY, Van der Peet DL, Heijnen BHM. Thoracoscopic esophageal resection for cancer in prone decubitus position: operative technique. In: Puntambeker SP, Cuesta MA, editors. Atlas of minimally invasive surgery in esophageal carcinoma. New York: Springer; 2010. p. 149–69.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Cadiere GB, Dapri G, Himpens J, et al. Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with manual esofagogastric anastomosis by thoracoscopic in prone position and laparoscopy. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1482–5.CrossRefPubMed Cadiere GB, Dapri G, Himpens J, et al. Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with manual esofagogastric anastomosis by thoracoscopic in prone position and laparoscopy. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1482–5.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Van der Sluis PC, Ruurda JP, Verhage RJ, et al. Oncologic long-term results of robotic assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy with two field lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(Suppl 3):1350–6.CrossRefPubMedCentral Van der Sluis PC, Ruurda JP, Verhage RJ, et al. Oncologic long-term results of robotic assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy with two field lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(Suppl 3):1350–6.CrossRefPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Lewis I. The surgical treatment of carcinoma of the oesophagus with special reference to a new operation for growths of the middle third. Br J Surg. 1946;34:18–31.CrossRefPubMed Lewis I. The surgical treatment of carcinoma of the oesophagus with special reference to a new operation for growths of the middle third. Br J Surg. 1946;34:18–31.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O, et al. Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy. Review of over 1000 patients. Ann Surg. 1000;2012(256):95–103. Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O, et al. Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy. Review of over 1000 patients. Ann Surg. 1000;2012(256):95–103.
24.
go back to reference Maas KW, Biere SSAY, Scheepers JJG, et al. Minimally invasive intrathoracic anastomosis after Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for cancer. A review of transoral or transthoracic use of staplers. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:1795–802.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Maas KW, Biere SSAY, Scheepers JJG, et al. Minimally invasive intrathoracic anastomosis after Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for cancer. A review of transoral or transthoracic use of staplers. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:1795–802.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference del Val Diez I, Loureiro C, McCulloch P. The IDEAL prospective development study format for reporting surgical innovations. An illustrative case study of robotic oesophagectomy. Int J Surg. 2015;19:104–11.CrossRef del Val Diez I, Loureiro C, McCulloch P. The IDEAL prospective development study format for reporting surgical innovations. An illustrative case study of robotic oesophagectomy. Int J Surg. 2015;19:104–11.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Verhage RJ, Hazebroek EJ, Boone J, et al. Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Minerva Chir. 2009;64:135–46.PubMed Verhage RJ, Hazebroek EJ, Boone J, et al. Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Minerva Chir. 2009;64:135–46.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Sgourakis G, Gockel I, Radtke A, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy: meta-analysis of outcomes. Dig Dis Sci. 2010;55:3031–40.CrossRefPubMed Sgourakis G, Gockel I, Radtke A, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy: meta-analysis of outcomes. Dig Dis Sci. 2010;55:3031–40.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Nagpal K, Ahmed K, Vats A, et al. Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer ? A meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1621–9.CrossRefPubMed Nagpal K, Ahmed K, Vats A, et al. Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer ? A meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1621–9.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Biere SSAY, Maas KW, Cuesta MA, van der Peet DL. Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Surg. 2011;28:29–35.CrossRefPubMed Biere SSAY, Maas KW, Cuesta MA, van der Peet DL. Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Surg. 2011;28:29–35.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Biere SSAY, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379:1887–92.CrossRefPubMed Biere SSAY, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379:1887–92.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Briez N, Piessen G, Torres F, et al. Effects of hybrid minimally invasive oesophagectomy on major postoperative pulmonary complications. Br J Surg. 2012;99:1547–53.CrossRefPubMed Briez N, Piessen G, Torres F, et al. Effects of hybrid minimally invasive oesophagectomy on major postoperative pulmonary complications. Br J Surg. 2012;99:1547–53.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Maas KW, Cuesta MA, van Berge Henegouwen MI, et al. Quality of life and late complications after minimally invasive compared to open esophagectomy: results of a randomized trial. World J Surg. 2015;39:1986–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Maas KW, Cuesta MA, van Berge Henegouwen MI, et al. Quality of life and late complications after minimally invasive compared to open esophagectomy: results of a randomized trial. World J Surg. 2015;39:1986–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Kawakubo H, Takeuchi H, Kitagawa Y. Current status and future perspectives on minimally invasive esophagectomy. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;46:241–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kawakubo H, Takeuchi H, Kitagawa Y. Current status and future perspectives on minimally invasive esophagectomy. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;46:241–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Kubo N, Ohira M, Yamashita Y, et al. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position versus in the lateral position for patients with esophageal cancer: a comparison of short term surgical results. Surg Laparosc Endosc percutan tech. 2014;24:158–63.CrossRefPubMed Kubo N, Ohira M, Yamashita Y, et al. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position versus in the lateral position for patients with esophageal cancer: a comparison of short term surgical results. Surg Laparosc Endosc percutan tech. 2014;24:158–63.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Messager M, Pasquer A, Duhamel A, et al. Laparoscopic gastric mobilization reduces postoperative mortality after esophageal cancer surgery : a French Nationwide Study. Ann Surg. 2015;262:817–23.CrossRefPubMed Messager M, Pasquer A, Duhamel A, et al. Laparoscopic gastric mobilization reduces postoperative mortality after esophageal cancer surgery : a French Nationwide Study. Ann Surg. 2015;262:817–23.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Burdall O, Boddy AP, Fullick J, et al. A comparative study of survival after minimally invasive and open oesophagectomy. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:431–7.CrossRefPubMed Burdall O, Boddy AP, Fullick J, et al. A comparative study of survival after minimally invasive and open oesophagectomy. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:431–7.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Cuesta MA, Weijs TJ, Bleys RLAW, et al. A new concept of the anatomy of the thoracic esophagus: the meso-esophagus. Observational study during thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:2576–82.CrossRefPubMed Cuesta MA, Weijs TJ, Bleys RLAW, et al. A new concept of the anatomy of the thoracic esophagus: the meso-esophagus. Observational study during thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:2576–82.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Weijs TJ, Ruurda JP, Luyer MDP et al. Preserving the pulmonary vagus nerve branches during thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Surg Endosc. 2015 (epub ahead of print). Weijs TJ, Ruurda JP, Luyer MDP et al. Preserving the pulmonary vagus nerve branches during thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Surg Endosc. 2015 (epub ahead of print).
39.
go back to reference Avery KN, Metcalfe C, Berrisford R, et al. The feasibility of a randomized controlled trial of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer—the romio (randomized oesophagectomy: minimally invasive or open) study: protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2014;15:200.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Avery KN, Metcalfe C, Berrisford R, et al. The feasibility of a randomized controlled trial of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer—the romio (randomized oesophagectomy: minimally invasive or open) study: protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2014;15:200.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
go back to reference Kataoka K, Takeuchi H, Mizusawa J, et al. A randomized Phase III trial of thoracoscopic versus open esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG 1409. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016;46:174–7.CrossRefPubMed Kataoka K, Takeuchi H, Mizusawa J, et al. A randomized Phase III trial of thoracoscopic versus open esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG 1409. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016;46:174–7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy: keynote lecture
Authors
Miguel A. Cuesta
Nicole van der Wielen
Jennifer Straatman
Donald L. van der Peet
Publication date
01-07-2016
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery / Issue 7/2016
Print ISSN: 1863-6705
Electronic ISSN: 1863-6713
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-016-0650-3

Other articles of this Issue 7/2016

General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 7/2016 Go to the issue