Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 2/2023

26-06-2022 | Colectomy | Original Article

Robotic right colectomy with robotic-sewn anastomosis: a pilot case series

Authors: C. G. S. Huscher, Gianni Lazzarin, F. Marchegiani, J. Marks

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 2/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

The background of this study is to assess the feasibility, clinical utility and safety of intra-corporeal robotic-sewn anastomosis (ICrA) in completely robotic right hemicolectomy (CRH) for adenocarcinoma. A protocol for completely robotic right hemicolectomy (CRH) and intra-corporeal robotic-sewn anastomosis (ICrA), was established at the authors’ institution from January 2012 through December 2017. Univariate and multivariable models were constructed to explore the prognostic significance of clinical and surgical findings. Survival and recurrence analysis were performed using standard univariable and multivariable methods. The study population consisted of 123 patients. The median number of examined lymph nodes (ELN) was 25 (range 1–59), the median number of positive lymph nodes (PLN) was 1 (range 0–21). Mean operative time was 240 min (SD 43.56, range 180–360 min), and conversion to open rate was 0%. Anastomotic leaks rate was 1.6%. The median overall survival was 69 months. This pilot series, in which an intra-corporeal robotic-sewn anastomosis (ICrA) was performed during CRH, demonstrated the safety and feasibility of this approach. Compared to the current standard of care at a high-volume center, ICrA was associated with post-operative surgical outcomes similar to those reported in the literature. These results call for further validation in a prospective and controlled setting to be fully incorporated into clinical practice.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Solaini L, Bazzocchi F, Cavaliere D, Avanzolini A, Cucchetti A, Ercolani G (2018) Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 32(3):1104–1110CrossRefPubMed Solaini L, Bazzocchi F, Cavaliere D, Avanzolini A, Cucchetti A, Ercolani G (2018) Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 32(3):1104–1110CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Green BL, Marshall HC, Collinson F, Quirke P, Guillou P, Jayne DG, Brown JM (2013) Long-term follow-up of the medical research council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 100(1):75–82CrossRefPubMed Green BL, Marshall HC, Collinson F, Quirke P, Guillou P, Jayne DG, Brown JM (2013) Long-term follow-up of the medical research council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 100(1):75–82CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Scatizzi M, Kroning KC, Borrelli A, Andan G, Lenzi E, Feroci F (2010) Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right colectomy for cancer: a case–control study. World J Surg 34(12):2902–2908CrossRefPubMed Scatizzi M, Kroning KC, Borrelli A, Andan G, Lenzi E, Feroci F (2010) Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right colectomy for cancer: a case–control study. World J Surg 34(12):2902–2908CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Scotton G, Contardo T, Zerbinati A, Tosato SM, Orsini C, Morpurgo E (2018) From laparoscopic right colectomy with extracorporeal anastomosis to robot assisted intracorporeal anastomosis to totally robotic right colectomy for cancer: the evolution of robotic multiquadrant abdominal surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 28(10):1216–1222CrossRefPubMed Scotton G, Contardo T, Zerbinati A, Tosato SM, Orsini C, Morpurgo E (2018) From laparoscopic right colectomy with extracorporeal anastomosis to robot assisted intracorporeal anastomosis to totally robotic right colectomy for cancer: the evolution of robotic multiquadrant abdominal surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 28(10):1216–1222CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Trastulli S, Coratti A, Guarino S, Piagnerelli R, Annecchiarico M, Coratti F, Di Marino M, Ricci F, Desiderio J, Cirocchi R, Parisi A (2015) Robotic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis compared with laparoscopic right colectomy with extracorporeal and intracorporeal anastomosis: a retrospective multicentre study. Surg Endosc 29(6):1512–1521CrossRefPubMed Trastulli S, Coratti A, Guarino S, Piagnerelli R, Annecchiarico M, Coratti F, Di Marino M, Ricci F, Desiderio J, Cirocchi R, Parisi A (2015) Robotic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis compared with laparoscopic right colectomy with extracorporeal and intracorporeal anastomosis: a retrospective multicentre study. Surg Endosc 29(6):1512–1521CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien, (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–201CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien, (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–201CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Marchegiani F, Damoli I, Huscher C (2021) Inferior mesenteric artery preservation during robotic sigmoidectomy for cancer: is Valdoni back? Dis Colon Rectum 64(7):e389–e390CrossRefPubMed Marchegiani F, Damoli I, Huscher C (2021) Inferior mesenteric artery preservation during robotic sigmoidectomy for cancer: is Valdoni back? Dis Colon Rectum 64(7):e389–e390CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Blumberg D (2019) Robotic colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis is feasible with no operative conversions during the learning curve for an experienced laparoscopic surgeon developing a robotics program. J Robot Surg 13(4):545–555CrossRefPubMed Blumberg D (2019) Robotic colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis is feasible with no operative conversions during the learning curve for an experienced laparoscopic surgeon developing a robotics program. J Robot Surg 13(4):545–555CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference van Oostendorp S, Elfrink A, Borstlap W, Schoonmade L, Sietses C, Meijerink J, Tuynman J (2016) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in right hemicolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 31(1):64–77CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van Oostendorp S, Elfrink A, Borstlap W, Schoonmade L, Sietses C, Meijerink J, Tuynman J (2016) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in right hemicolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 31(1):64–77CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Jessen M, Nerstrøm M, Wilbek TE, Roepstorff S, Rasmussen MS, Krarup PM (2016) Risk factors for clinical anastomotic leakage after right hemicolectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 31:1619–1624CrossRefPubMed Jessen M, Nerstrøm M, Wilbek TE, Roepstorff S, Rasmussen MS, Krarup PM (2016) Risk factors for clinical anastomotic leakage after right hemicolectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 31:1619–1624CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Gustafsson P, Jestin P, Gunnarsson U, Lindforss U (2015) Higher frequency of anastomotic leakage with stapled compared to handsewn ileocolic anastomosis in a large population-based study. World J Surg 39:1834–1839CrossRefPubMed Gustafsson P, Jestin P, Gunnarsson U, Lindforss U (2015) Higher frequency of anastomotic leakage with stapled compared to handsewn ileocolic anastomosis in a large population-based study. World J Surg 39:1834–1839CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Robotic right colectomy with robotic-sewn anastomosis: a pilot case series
Authors
C. G. S. Huscher
Gianni Lazzarin
F. Marchegiani
J. Marks
Publication date
26-06-2022
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 2/2023
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-022-01435-4

Other articles of this Issue 2/2023

Journal of Robotic Surgery 2/2023 Go to the issue