Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 3/2018

01-09-2018 | Original Article

Technical and operational modifications required for evolving robotic programs performing anatomic pulmonary resection

Authors: Benjamin Smood, Asem Ghanim, Benjamin Wei, Robert J. Cerfolio

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

The objectives of this study are to review the complicated and often confusing technical changes required when converting from the Si robotic system to the Xi when performing pulmonary lobectomy and segmentectomy. We reviewed a prospective database of a consecutive series of patients who intended to undergo robotic lobectomy or segmentectomy by one surgeon. There were 101 lobectomies and 25 segmentectomies performed on the Si robot in 2015–2016, and 95 lobectomies and 28 segmentectomies in 2016 on the Xi robot. The two groups were similar for age, height, weight, pulmonary function, anatomic resections, and co-morbidities. Technical differences in robotic arm numbering, port placement, and instrumentation are shown below. Median docking time was shorter with the Xi robot [7.5 (95% CI 6–8) versus 10 (95% CI 9–12) min, p = 0.003] as was operation duration [114 (95% CI 104–123) versus 119 (95% CI 116–126) min, p = 0.041] and skin closure to room exit [12 (95% CI 10–24) versus 13 (95% CI 12–15) min, p = 0.081]. Anesthesiologists expressed greater comfort with the Xi system, because the patient’s head was not covered by the robot. Outcomes for Si and Xi operations such as median blood loss (20 cc versus 20 cc), transfusion rate (0 versus 0), major complication rate (3.2 versus 3.3%), and the 30- and 90-day mortality were no different (one 30-day death in the Si group). The technical changes that are required for robotic Si-to-Xi conversion are shown. The Xi system may offer improved operational efficiency.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rajaram R, Mohanty S, Bentrem DJ et al (2017) Nationwide assessment of robotic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 103(4):1092–1100CrossRefPubMed Rajaram R, Mohanty S, Bentrem DJ et al (2017) Nationwide assessment of robotic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 103(4):1092–1100CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Yang CF, Sun Z, Speicher PJ et al (2016) Use and outcomes of minimally invasive lobectomy for stage i non-small cell lung cancer in the national cancer data base. Ann Thorac Surg 101(3):1037–1042CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yang CF, Sun Z, Speicher PJ et al (2016) Use and outcomes of minimally invasive lobectomy for stage i non-small cell lung cancer in the national cancer data base. Ann Thorac Surg 101(3):1037–1042CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Wei B, Eldaif SM, Cerfolio RJ (2016) Robotic lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 25(3):515–531CrossRefPubMed Wei B, Eldaif SM, Cerfolio RJ (2016) Robotic lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 25(3):515–531CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Wei B, Cerfolio RJ (2017) Robotic lobectomy and segmentectomy: technical details and results. Surg Clin N Am 97(4):771–782CrossRefPubMed Wei B, Cerfolio RJ (2017) Robotic lobectomy and segmentectomy: technical details and results. Surg Clin N Am 97(4):771–782CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Brunswicker A, Berman M, Van Leuven M, Van Tornout F, Bartosik WR (2013) Video assisted lobectomy learning curve—what is the magic number? J Cardiothorac Surg 8(1):O221CrossRefPubMedCentral Brunswicker A, Berman M, Van Leuven M, Van Tornout F, Bartosik WR (2013) Video assisted lobectomy learning curve—what is the magic number? J Cardiothorac Surg 8(1):O221CrossRefPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Okyere S, Attia R, Toufektzian L, Routledge T (2015) Is the learning curve for video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy affected by prior experience in open lobectomy? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 21(1):108–112CrossRefPubMed Okyere S, Attia R, Toufektzian L, Routledge T (2015) Is the learning curve for video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy affected by prior experience in open lobectomy? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 21(1):108–112CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Skylizard L, Minnich DJ (2011) Initial consecutive experience of completely portal robotic pulmonary resection with 4 arms. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 142:740–746CrossRefPubMed Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Skylizard L, Minnich DJ (2011) Initial consecutive experience of completely portal robotic pulmonary resection with 4 arms. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 142:740–746CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Cerfolio RJ, Cichos KH, Wei B, Minnich DJ (2016) Robotic lobectomy can be taught while maintaining quality patient outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 152(4):991–997CrossRefPubMed Cerfolio RJ, Cichos KH, Wei B, Minnich DJ (2016) Robotic lobectomy can be taught while maintaining quality patient outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 152(4):991–997CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Cerfolio RJ, Watson C, Minnich DJ, Calloway Wei B (2016) One hundred planned robotic segmentectomies: early results, technical details, and preferred port placement. Ann Thorac Surg 101(3):1089–1095 (discussion 1095–6) CrossRefPubMed Cerfolio RJ, Watson C, Minnich DJ, Calloway Wei B (2016) One hundred planned robotic segmentectomies: early results, technical details, and preferred port placement. Ann Thorac Surg 101(3):1089–1095 (discussion 1095–6) CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Park BJ, Flores RM (2008) Cost comparison of robotic, video-assisted thoracic surgery and thoracotomy approaches to pulmonary lobectomy. Thorac Surg Clin 18:297–300CrossRefPubMed Park BJ, Flores RM (2008) Cost comparison of robotic, video-assisted thoracic surgery and thoracotomy approaches to pulmonary lobectomy. Thorac Surg Clin 18:297–300CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Adams RD, Bolton WD, Stephenson JE, Henry G, Robbins ET, Sommers E (2014) Initial multicenter community robotic lobectomy experience: comparisons to a national database. Ann Thorac Surg 97:1893–1898CrossRefPubMed Adams RD, Bolton WD, Stephenson JE, Henry G, Robbins ET, Sommers E (2014) Initial multicenter community robotic lobectomy experience: comparisons to a national database. Ann Thorac Surg 97:1893–1898CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kent M, Want T, Whyte R, Curran T, Flores R, Gangadharan S (2014) Open, video-assisted thoracic surgery, and robotic lobectomy: review of a national database. Ann Thorac Surg 97:236–242CrossRefPubMed Kent M, Want T, Whyte R, Curran T, Flores R, Gangadharan S (2014) Open, video-assisted thoracic surgery, and robotic lobectomy: review of a national database. Ann Thorac Surg 97:236–242CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Wilson JL, Louie BE, Cerfolio RJ et al (2014) The prevalence of nodal upstaging during robotic lung resection in early stage non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 97(6):1901–1906 (discussion 1906–7) CrossRefPubMed Wilson JL, Louie BE, Cerfolio RJ et al (2014) The prevalence of nodal upstaging during robotic lung resection in early stage non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 97(6):1901–1906 (discussion 1906–7) CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Lee Hs, Jang HJ (2012) Thoracoscopic mediastinal lymph node dissection for lung cancer. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 24:131–141CrossRefPubMed Lee Hs, Jang HJ (2012) Thoracoscopic mediastinal lymph node dissection for lung cancer. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 24:131–141CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Nasir BS, Bryant AS, Minnich DJ, Wei B, Cerfolio RJ (2014) Performing robotic lobectomy and segmentectomy: cost, profitability, and outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 98(1):203–208 (discussion 208–9) CrossRefPubMed Nasir BS, Bryant AS, Minnich DJ, Wei B, Cerfolio RJ (2014) Performing robotic lobectomy and segmentectomy: cost, profitability, and outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 98(1):203–208 (discussion 208–9) CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Deen SA, Wilson JL, Wishire CL et al (2014) Defining the cost of care for lobectomy and segmentectomy: a comparison of open, video-assisted thoracoscopic, and robotic approaches. Ann Thorac Surg 97:1000–1007CrossRefPubMed Deen SA, Wilson JL, Wishire CL et al (2014) Defining the cost of care for lobectomy and segmentectomy: a comparison of open, video-assisted thoracoscopic, and robotic approaches. Ann Thorac Surg 97:1000–1007CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Swanson SJ, Miller DL, McKenna RJ et al (2014) Comparing robot-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy with conventional video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy and wedge resection: results from a multihospital database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 147:929–937CrossRefPubMed Swanson SJ, Miller DL, McKenna RJ et al (2014) Comparing robot-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy with conventional video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy and wedge resection: results from a multihospital database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 147:929–937CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Technical and operational modifications required for evolving robotic programs performing anatomic pulmonary resection
Authors
Benjamin Smood
Asem Ghanim
Benjamin Wei
Robert J. Cerfolio
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-018-0779-4

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Journal of Robotic Surgery 3/2018 Go to the issue