Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 3/2018

01-09-2018 | Original Article

Surgical training in robotic surgery: surgical experience of robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal herniorrhaphy with and without resident participation

Authors: Jessica Gonzalez-Hernandez, Purvi Prajapati, Gerald Ogola, Ryan D. Burkart, Lam D. Le

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Robotic-assisted surgery is becoming more popular in general surgery. Implementation of a robotic curriculum is necessary and will influence surgical training. The aim of this study is to compare surgical experience and outcomes with and without resident participation in robotic inguinal herniorrhaphy. A retrospective review of patients who underwent either unilateral or bilateral robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal herniorrhaphy, with and without resident participation as console surgeons from January through December 2015, was performed. Patient demographics, procedure-related data, postoperative variables, and follow-up data were analyzed. A total of 104 patients were included. Patients were significantly older in the Resident group (57.5 ± 14.1 vs 50.6 ± 13.5 years, p = 0.01). Gender, BMI, and ASA classification were similar between groups. There were similar mean operative times for unilateral (89.9 ± 19.5 vs 84.8 ± 22.2 min, p = 0.42) and bilateral (128.4 ± 21.9 vs 129.8 ± 50.9 min, p = 0.90) inguinal herniorrhaphy as well as mean robot console times for unilateral (73.2 ± 18.4 vs 67.3 ± 29.9 min, p = 0.44) and bilateral (115.5 ± 24.6 vs 109.3 ± 55.4 min, p = 0.67) inguinal herniorrhaphy with and without resident participation, respectively. Postoperative complications included urinary retention (11.1 vs 2.0%, p = 0.11), conversion to open repair (0 vs 2%, p = 0.48), and delayed reoperation (0 vs 4%, p = 0.22) with and without resident participation, respectively. Patients’ symptoms/signs at follow-up were similar among groups. Robotic-assisted TAPP inguinal herniorrhaphy with resident participation as console surgeons did not affect the hospital operative experience or patient outcomes. This procedure can be implemented as part of the resident robotic curriculum with rates of morbidity equivalent to those of published studies.
Level of evidence 2b.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mathur S, Lin SY (2016) The learning curve for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a newly qualified surgeon perspective. J Surg Res 205:246–251CrossRefPubMed Mathur S, Lin SY (2016) The learning curve for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a newly qualified surgeon perspective. J Surg Res 205:246–251CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Mahajna A (2009) Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: lessons learned from 3,100 hernia repairs over 15 years. Surg Endosc 23:482–486CrossRefPubMed Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Mahajna A (2009) Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: lessons learned from 3,100 hernia repairs over 15 years. Surg Endosc 23:482–486CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Lal P, Kajla RK, Chander J, Saha R, Ramteke VK (2003) Randomized controlled study of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal versus open Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 17:850–856CrossRefPubMed Lal P, Kajla RK, Chander J, Saha R, Ramteke VK (2003) Randomized controlled study of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal versus open Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 17:850–856CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kehlet H, Roumen R, Reinpold W, Miserez M (2013) Invited commentary: persistent pain after inguinal hernia repair: what do we know and what do we need to know. Hernia 17:293–297CrossRefPubMed Kehlet H, Roumen R, Reinpold W, Miserez M (2013) Invited commentary: persistent pain after inguinal hernia repair: what do we know and what do we need to know. Hernia 17:293–297CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Cavazzola LT, Rosen MJ (2013) Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair. Surg Clin N Am 93:1269–1279CrossRefPubMed Cavazzola LT, Rosen MJ (2013) Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair. Surg Clin N Am 93:1269–1279CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Engan C, Engan M, Bonilla V, Dyer DC, Randall BR (2015) Description of robotically assisted single-site transabdominal preperitoneal (RASS-TAPP) inguinal hernia repair and presentation of clinical outcomes. Hernia 19:423–428CrossRefPubMed Engan C, Engan M, Bonilla V, Dyer DC, Randall BR (2015) Description of robotically assisted single-site transabdominal preperitoneal (RASS-TAPP) inguinal hernia repair and presentation of clinical outcomes. Hernia 19:423–428CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hussain A, Malik A, Halim MU, Ali AM (2014) The use of robotics in surgery: a review. Int J Clin Pract 68:1376–1382CrossRefPubMed Hussain A, Malik A, Halim MU, Ali AM (2014) The use of robotics in surgery: a review. Int J Clin Pract 68:1376–1382CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Ruurda JP, Broeders IAMJ, Pulles B, Kappelhof FM, van der Werken C (2004) Manual robot assisted endoscopic suturing: time-action analysis in an experimental model. Surg Endosc 18:1249–1252CrossRefPubMed Ruurda JP, Broeders IAMJ, Pulles B, Kappelhof FM, van der Werken C (2004) Manual robot assisted endoscopic suturing: time-action analysis in an experimental model. Surg Endosc 18:1249–1252CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Sleeper J, Lotan Y (2011) Cost-effectiveness of robotic-assisted laparoscopic procedures in urologic surgery in the USA. Expert Rev Med Devices 8:97–103CrossRefPubMed Sleeper J, Lotan Y (2011) Cost-effectiveness of robotic-assisted laparoscopic procedures in urologic surgery in the USA. Expert Rev Med Devices 8:97–103CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Marecik SJ, Chaudhry V, Jan A, Pearl RK, Park JJ, Prasad LM (2007) A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and hand-sewn intestinal sutured anastomoses performed by residents. Am J Surg 193:349–355CrossRefPubMed Marecik SJ, Chaudhry V, Jan A, Pearl RK, Park JJ, Prasad LM (2007) A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and hand-sewn intestinal sutured anastomoses performed by residents. Am J Surg 193:349–355CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Waite KE, Hermann MA, Doyle PJ (2016) Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair. J Robot Surg 10:239–244CrossRefPubMed Waite KE, Hermann MA, Doyle PJ (2016) Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair. J Robot Surg 10:239–244CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kapischke M, Schulze H, Caliebe A (2010) Self-fixating mesh for the Lichtenstein procedure—a prestudy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395:317–322CrossRefPubMed Kapischke M, Schulze H, Caliebe A (2010) Self-fixating mesh for the Lichtenstein procedure—a prestudy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395:317–322CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Jorgensen LN, Sommer T, Assaadzadeh S, Strand L, Dorfelt A, Hensler M et al (2013) Danish Multicentre DANGRIP Study Group. Randomized clinical trial of self-gripping mesh versus sutured mesh for Lichtenstein hernia repair. Br J Surg 100:474–481CrossRefPubMed Jorgensen LN, Sommer T, Assaadzadeh S, Strand L, Dorfelt A, Hensler M et al (2013) Danish Multicentre DANGRIP Study Group. Randomized clinical trial of self-gripping mesh versus sutured mesh for Lichtenstein hernia repair. Br J Surg 100:474–481CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Bittner R, Leibl BJ, Jäger C, Kraft B, Ulrich M, Schwarz J (2006) TAPP—Stuttgart technique and result of a large single center series. J Minim Access Surg 2:155–159CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bittner R, Leibl BJ, Jäger C, Kraft B, Ulrich M, Schwarz J (2006) TAPP—Stuttgart technique and result of a large single center series. J Minim Access Surg 2:155–159CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Chastan P (2009) Tension-free open hernia repair using an innovative self-gripping semi-resorbable mesh. Hernia 13:137–142CrossRefPubMed Chastan P (2009) Tension-free open hernia repair using an innovative self-gripping semi-resorbable mesh. Hernia 13:137–142CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Kingsnorth A, Gingell-Littlejohn M, Nienhuijs S, Schüle S, Appel P, Ziprin P et al (2012) Randomized controlled multicenter international clinical trial of self-gripping Parietex™ ProGrip™ polyester mesh versus lightweight polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: interim results at 3 months. Hernia 16:287–294CrossRefPubMed Kingsnorth A, Gingell-Littlejohn M, Nienhuijs S, Schüle S, Appel P, Ziprin P et al (2012) Randomized controlled multicenter international clinical trial of self-gripping Parietex™ ProGrip™ polyester mesh versus lightweight polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: interim results at 3 months. Hernia 16:287–294CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Anadol AZ, Akin M, Kurukahvecioglu O, Tezel E, Ersoy E (2011) A prospective comparative study of the efficacy of conventional Lichtenstein versus self-adhesive mesh repair for inguinal hernia. Surg Today 41:1498–1503CrossRefPubMed Anadol AZ, Akin M, Kurukahvecioglu O, Tezel E, Ersoy E (2011) A prospective comparative study of the efficacy of conventional Lichtenstein versus self-adhesive mesh repair for inguinal hernia. Surg Today 41:1498–1503CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Klobusicky P, Feyerherd P (2016) Usage of a self-adhesive mesh in TAPP hernia repair: a prospective study based on Herniamed Register. J Minim Access Surg 12:226–234CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Klobusicky P, Feyerherd P (2016) Usage of a self-adhesive mesh in TAPP hernia repair: a prospective study based on Herniamed Register. J Minim Access Surg 12:226–234CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Ross SW, Oommen B, Kim M, Walters AL, Augenstein VA, Todd Heniford B (2015) Tacks, staples, or suture: method of peritoneal closure in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair effects early quality of life. Surg Endosc 29:1686–1693CrossRefPubMed Ross SW, Oommen B, Kim M, Walters AL, Augenstein VA, Todd Heniford B (2015) Tacks, staples, or suture: method of peritoneal closure in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair effects early quality of life. Surg Endosc 29:1686–1693CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Lau H, Patil NG, Yuen WK, Lee F (2002) Urinary retention following endoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty. Surg Endosc 16:1547–1550CrossRefPubMed Lau H, Patil NG, Yuen WK, Lee F (2002) Urinary retention following endoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty. Surg Endosc 16:1547–1550CrossRefPubMed
22.
23.
go back to reference Escobar Dominguez JE, Ramos MG, Seetharamaiah R, Donkor C, Rabaza J, Gonzalez A (2016) Feasibility of robotic inguinal hernia repair, a single-institution experience. Surg Endosc 30:4042–4048CrossRefPubMed Escobar Dominguez JE, Ramos MG, Seetharamaiah R, Donkor C, Rabaza J, Gonzalez A (2016) Feasibility of robotic inguinal hernia repair, a single-institution experience. Surg Endosc 30:4042–4048CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Surgical training in robotic surgery: surgical experience of robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal herniorrhaphy with and without resident participation
Authors
Jessica Gonzalez-Hernandez
Purvi Prajapati
Gerald Ogola
Ryan D. Burkart
Lam D. Le
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0771-4

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Journal of Robotic Surgery 3/2018 Go to the issue