Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 1/2018

01-03-2018 | Original Article

Robotic paraesophageal hernia repair: a single-center experience and systematic review

Authors: Vanitha Vasudevan, Ryan Reusche, Erek Nelson, Srinivas Kaza

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Robotic Surgery is becoming increasingly used in general surgery. The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety, effectiveness and short-term (less than 1 year) outcomes of Robotic Paraesophageal Hernia (RPEH) Surgery using the DaVinci Surgical Robot system (Intuitive Surgical, CA) in a large community hospital. This is a retrospective cohort study of 28 consecutive patients who underwent robotic paraesophageal hernia repair January 2011–March 2013 in this institution. Data and outcomes collected for analysis include patient demographics, operating times, conversion, complications, mortality and recurrence. The mean age of the patients was 68.7 +/− 12.7 years, 82% were females and the mean BMI was 29 +/− 6.3. The mean operative time, including the robot docking time, was 83.6 + 24 min. The average length of hospital stay (LOS) was 2.8 +/− 1.9 days. There were no conversions to open or laparoscopic procedures. Postoperative complications were noted in 3 patients (10.7%), including one mortality (3.4%). One symptomatic recurrence (3.4%) was noted during the 12-month follow-up period. Robotic Paraesophageal repair is a safe (similar rate of complication and mortality to literature for laparoscopic procedure) and an effective (paraeshopageal hernia repaired without high recurrence) procedure with acceptable complication rates even in older patients with high operative risks.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Andujar JJ, Papasavas PK, Birdas T et al (2004) Laparoscopic repair of large paraesophageal hernia is associated with a low incidence of recurrence and reoperation. Surg Endosc 18:444–447CrossRefPubMed Andujar JJ, Papasavas PK, Birdas T et al (2004) Laparoscopic repair of large paraesophageal hernia is associated with a low incidence of recurrence and reoperation. Surg Endosc 18:444–447CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Oelschlager BK, Petersen RP, Brunt LM et al (2012) Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: defining long-term clinical and anatomic outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg 16(3):453–459CrossRefPubMed Oelschlager BK, Petersen RP, Brunt LM et al (2012) Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: defining long-term clinical and anatomic outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg 16(3):453–459CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Nguyen NT, Christie C, Masoomi H et al (2011) Utilization and outcomes of laparoscopic versus open paraesophageal hernia repair. Am Surg 77(10):1353–1357PubMed Nguyen NT, Christie C, Masoomi H et al (2011) Utilization and outcomes of laparoscopic versus open paraesophageal hernia repair. Am Surg 77(10):1353–1357PubMed
5.
go back to reference Ballantyne GH (2002) The pitfalls of laparoscopic surgery: challenges for robotics and telerobotic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12(1):1–5CrossRefPubMed Ballantyne GH (2002) The pitfalls of laparoscopic surgery: challenges for robotics and telerobotic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12(1):1–5CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Zureikat AH, Moser AJ, Boone BA et al (2013) 250 robotic pancreatic resections: safety and feasibility. Ann Surg 258(4):554–562PubMedPubMedCentral Zureikat AH, Moser AJ, Boone BA et al (2013) 250 robotic pancreatic resections: safety and feasibility. Ann Surg 258(4):554–562PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Hyun MH, Lee CH, Kwon YJ et al (2013) Robot versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer by an experienced surgeon: comparisons of surgery, complications, and surgical stress. Ann Surg Oncol 20(4):1258–1265CrossRefPubMed Hyun MH, Lee CH, Kwon YJ et al (2013) Robot versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer by an experienced surgeon: comparisons of surgery, complications, and surgical stress. Ann Surg Oncol 20(4):1258–1265CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Gehrig T, Mehrabi A, Fischer L et al (2013) Robotic-assisted paraesophageal hernia repair: a case–control study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 398(5):691–696CrossRefPubMed Gehrig T, Mehrabi A, Fischer L et al (2013) Robotic-assisted paraesophageal hernia repair: a case–control study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 398(5):691–696CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Braumann C, Jacobi CA, Menenakos C et al (2008) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic and thoracoscopic surgery with the da Vinci system: a 4-year experience in a single institution. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 18(3):260–266CrossRefPubMed Braumann C, Jacobi CA, Menenakos C et al (2008) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic and thoracoscopic surgery with the da Vinci system: a 4-year experience in a single institution. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 18(3):260–266CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Draaisma WA, Gooszen HG, Consten EC, Broeders IA (2008) Mid-term results of robot-assisted laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernia: a symptomatic and radiological prospective cohort study. Surg Technol Int 17:165–170PubMed Draaisma WA, Gooszen HG, Consten EC, Broeders IA (2008) Mid-term results of robot-assisted laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernia: a symptomatic and radiological prospective cohort study. Surg Technol Int 17:165–170PubMed
11.
go back to reference Gangopadhyay N, Perrone JM, Soper NJ et al (2006) Outcomes of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair in elderly and high-risk patients. Surgery 140(4):491–498CrossRefPubMed Gangopadhyay N, Perrone JM, Soper NJ et al (2006) Outcomes of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair in elderly and high-risk patients. Surgery 140(4):491–498CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Paul S, Nasar A, Port JL et al (2012) Comparative analysis of diaphragmatic hernia repair outcomes using the nationwide inpatient sample database. Arch Surg 147(7):607–612CrossRefPubMed Paul S, Nasar A, Port JL et al (2012) Comparative analysis of diaphragmatic hernia repair outcomes using the nationwide inpatient sample database. Arch Surg 147(7):607–612CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Soper NJ, Teitelbaum EN (2013) Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: current controversies. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 23(5):442–445CrossRefPubMed Soper NJ, Teitelbaum EN (2013) Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: current controversies. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 23(5):442–445CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Bhayani NH, Kurian AA, Sharata AM et al (2013) Wait only to resuscitate: early surgery for acutely presenting paraesophageal hernias yields better outcomes. Surg Endosc 27(1):267–271CrossRefPubMed Bhayani NH, Kurian AA, Sharata AM et al (2013) Wait only to resuscitate: early surgery for acutely presenting paraesophageal hernias yields better outcomes. Surg Endosc 27(1):267–271CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Parker DM, Rambhajan A, Johanson K et al (2013) Urgent laparoscopic repair of acutely symptomatic PEH is safe and effective. Surg Endosc 27(11):4081–4086CrossRefPubMed Parker DM, Rambhajan A, Johanson K et al (2013) Urgent laparoscopic repair of acutely symptomatic PEH is safe and effective. Surg Endosc 27(11):4081–4086CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Tolboom RC, Draaisma WA (2016) Broeders IA Evaluation of conventional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic redo hiatal hernia and antireflux surgery: a cohort study. J Robot Surg 10(1):33–39CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tolboom RC, Draaisma WA (2016) Broeders IA Evaluation of conventional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic redo hiatal hernia and antireflux surgery: a cohort study. J Robot Surg 10(1):33–39CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Galvani CA, Loebl H, Osuchukwu O, Samamé J, Apel ME, Ghaderi I (2016) Robotic-assisted paraesophageal hernia repair: initial experience at a single institution. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 26(4):290–295CrossRefPubMed Galvani CA, Loebl H, Osuchukwu O, Samamé J, Apel ME, Ghaderi I (2016) Robotic-assisted paraesophageal hernia repair: initial experience at a single institution. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 26(4):290–295CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Okrainec A, Ferri LE, Feldman LS, Fried GM (2011) Defining the learning curve in laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a CUSUM analysis. Surg Endosc 25(4):1083–1087CrossRefPubMed Okrainec A, Ferri LE, Feldman LS, Fried GM (2011) Defining the learning curve in laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a CUSUM analysis. Surg Endosc 25(4):1083–1087CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Vasudevan V, Reusche R, Wallace H, Kaza S (2016) Clinical outcomes and cost-benefit analysis comparing laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgeries. Surg Endosc 30(12):5490–5493CrossRefPubMed Vasudevan V, Reusche R, Wallace H, Kaza S (2016) Clinical outcomes and cost-benefit analysis comparing laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgeries. Surg Endosc 30(12):5490–5493CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Robotic paraesophageal hernia repair: a single-center experience and systematic review
Authors
Vanitha Vasudevan
Ryan Reusche
Erek Nelson
Srinivas Kaza
Publication date
01-03-2018
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0697-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Journal of Robotic Surgery 1/2018 Go to the issue