Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 3/2014

01-09-2014 | Original Article

Training current and future robotic surgeons simultaneously: initial experiences with safety and efficiency

Authors: Ryan M. Juza, Randy S. Haluck, Eugene J. Won, Laura M. Enomoto, Eric M. Pauli, Ann M. Rogers, Vinay Singhal, Tung Tran, Stephanie J. Estes, Jerome R. Lyn-Sue

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 3/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Robotic surgery is experiencing a rapidly-increasing presence in the field of general surgery. The adoption of any new technology carries the challenge of training current and future surgeons in a safe and effective manner. We report our experience with the initiation of a robotic general surgery program at an academic institution while simultaneously incorporating surgical trainees. The initial procedure performed was robotic-assisted cholecystectomy (RAC). Concurrent with the introduction of a robotic general surgical program, our institution implemented a progressive surgical trainee curriculum for all active residents and fellows. Immediately after being credentialed to perform RAC, attending surgeons began incorporating surgical trainees into robotic procedures. We retrospectively reviewed our first 50 RACs and compared them with our previous 50 standard laparoscopic cholecystectomies (SLC) to determine the impact of rapid integration of surgical trainees on developing technologies. Despite new technology and novice surgeons, there was no difference in mean operative time between the SLC and RAC groups (75.3 vs. 84.1 min, p = 0.077). Two patients in the robotic-assisted group required intraoperative conversion. Hospital length of stay was similar between groups, with the majority of patients leaving the same day. There were no postoperative complications in either group. A robotic general surgery program can be initiated while concurrently instructing surgical trainees on robotic surgery in a safe and efficient manner. We report our initial experience with the adoption of this rapidly advancing technology and describe our training model.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Martin RC 2nd, Kehdy FJ, Allen JW (2005) Formal training in advanced surgical technologies enhances the surgical residency. Am J Surg 190(2):244–248PubMedCrossRef Martin RC 2nd, Kehdy FJ, Allen JW (2005) Formal training in advanced surgical technologies enhances the surgical residency. Am J Surg 190(2):244–248PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Escarce JJ (1996) Externalities in hospitals and physician adoption of a new surgical technology: an exploratory analysis. J Health Econ 15(6):715–734PubMedCrossRef Escarce JJ (1996) Externalities in hospitals and physician adoption of a new surgical technology: an exploratory analysis. J Health Econ 15(6):715–734PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Haluck RS, Krummel TM (2000) Computers and virtual reality for surgical education in the 21st century. Arch Surg 135(7):786–792PubMedCrossRef Haluck RS, Krummel TM (2000) Computers and virtual reality for surgical education in the 21st century. Arch Surg 135(7):786–792PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Philibert I, Friedmann P, Williams WT, ACGME Work Group on Resident Duty Hours, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (2002) New requirements for resident duty hours. JAMA 288(9):1112–1114PubMedCrossRef Philibert I, Friedmann P, Williams WT, ACGME Work Group on Resident Duty Hours, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (2002) New requirements for resident duty hours. JAMA 288(9):1112–1114PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Wilson EB (2009) The evolution of robotic general surgery. Scand J Surg 98(2):125–129PubMed Wilson EB (2009) The evolution of robotic general surgery. Scand J Surg 98(2):125–129PubMed
7.
go back to reference Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, Sarle R, Hemal A, Peabody JO, Vallancien G (2002) Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. J Urol 168(3):945–949PubMedCrossRef Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, Sarle R, Hemal A, Peabody JO, Vallancien G (2002) Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. J Urol 168(3):945–949PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ferguson JL, Beste TM, Nelson KH, Daucher JA (2004) Making the transition from standard gynecologic laparoscopy to robotic laparoscopy. JSLS 8(4):326–328PubMedCentralPubMed Ferguson JL, Beste TM, Nelson KH, Daucher JA (2004) Making the transition from standard gynecologic laparoscopy to robotic laparoscopy. JSLS 8(4):326–328PubMedCentralPubMed
9.
go back to reference Beste TM, Nelson KH, Daucher JA (2005) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy utilizing a robotic surgical system. JSLS 9(1):13–15PubMedCentralPubMed Beste TM, Nelson KH, Daucher JA (2005) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy utilizing a robotic surgical system. JSLS 9(1):13–15PubMedCentralPubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Liss MA, Abdelshehid C, Quach S, Lusch A, Graversen J, Landman J, McDougall EM (2012) Validation, correlation, and comparison of the da Vinci trainer(™) and the daVinci surgical skills simulator(™) using the Mimic(™) software for urologic robotic surgical education. J Endourol 26(12):1629–1634. doi:10.1089/end 2012.0328PubMedCrossRef Liss MA, Abdelshehid C, Quach S, Lusch A, Graversen J, Landman J, McDougall EM (2012) Validation, correlation, and comparison of the da Vinci trainer(™) and the daVinci surgical skills simulator(™) using the Mimic(™) software for urologic robotic surgical education. J Endourol 26(12):1629–1634. doi:10.​1089/​end 2012.0328PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Rosser JC Jr, Murayama M, Gabriel NH (2000) Minimally invasive surgical training solutions for the twenty-first century. Surg Clin North Am 80(5):1607–1624PubMedCrossRef Rosser JC Jr, Murayama M, Gabriel NH (2000) Minimally invasive surgical training solutions for the twenty-first century. Surg Clin North Am 80(5):1607–1624PubMedCrossRef
15.
16.
go back to reference Seamon LG, Fowler JM, Richardson DL, Carlson MJ, Valmadre S, Phillips GS, Cohn DE (2009) A detailed analysis of the learning curve: robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 114(2):162–167. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.04.017 PubMedCrossRef Seamon LG, Fowler JM, Richardson DL, Carlson MJ, Valmadre S, Phillips GS, Cohn DE (2009) A detailed analysis of the learning curve: robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 114(2):162–167. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ygyno.​2009.​04.​017 PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Vidovszky TJ, Smith W, Ghosh J, Ali MR (2006) Robotic cholecystectomy: learning curve, advantages, and limitations. J Surg Res 136(2):172–178PubMedCrossRef Vidovszky TJ, Smith W, Ghosh J, Ali MR (2006) Robotic cholecystectomy: learning curve, advantages, and limitations. J Surg Res 136(2):172–178PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Stegemann AP, Ahmed K, Syed JR, Rehman S, Ghani K, Autorino R, Sharif M, Rao A, Shi Y, Wilding GE, Hassett JM, Chowriappa A, Kesavadas T, Peabody JO, Menon M, Kaouk J, Guru KA (2013) Fundamental skills of robotic surgery: a multi-institutional randomized controlled trial for validation of a simulation-based curriculum. Urology 81(4):767–774. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2012.12.033 PubMedCrossRef Stegemann AP, Ahmed K, Syed JR, Rehman S, Ghani K, Autorino R, Sharif M, Rao A, Shi Y, Wilding GE, Hassett JM, Chowriappa A, Kesavadas T, Peabody JO, Menon M, Kaouk J, Guru KA (2013) Fundamental skills of robotic surgery: a multi-institutional randomized controlled trial for validation of a simulation-based curriculum. Urology 81(4):767–774. doi:10.​1016/​j.​urology.​2012.​12.​033 PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Training current and future robotic surgeons simultaneously: initial experiences with safety and efficiency
Authors
Ryan M. Juza
Randy S. Haluck
Eugene J. Won
Laura M. Enomoto
Eric M. Pauli
Ann M. Rogers
Vinay Singhal
Tung Tran
Stephanie J. Estes
Jerome R. Lyn-Sue
Publication date
01-09-2014
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-014-0455-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

Journal of Robotic Surgery 3/2014 Go to the issue