Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 2/2013

Open Access 01-06-2013 | Original Article

Dual-console robotic surgery: a new teaching paradigm

Authors: Ashlee L. Smith, Eirwen M. Scott, Thomas C. Krivak, Alexander B. Olawaiye, Tianjiao Chu, Scott D. Richard

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 2/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Robotic surgery has emerged as an alternative option in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. The development of the dual-console da Vinci Si Surgical System® has enabled modification of the training atmosphere. We sought to investigate operative times and surgical outcomes while operating with the dual-console model in a training environment for our first fifty cases. We identified the first fifty patients who underwent robot-assisted total hysterectomy (TRH), with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO), with or without pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection (PPALND), by use of the dual-console robotic system. Records were reviewed for patient demographics and surgical details. All surgery was conducted using the dual-console system and performed by staff physicians and fellows. Operative time was calculated from robotic docking until completion of the procedure. Cases were identified from November 2009 through July 2010. Mean age was 56.2 years (SD 13.35, 95 % CI 52.46–59.86). Mean BMI was 29.5 (SD 7.67, 95 % CI 27.35–31.61). Seventy-eight percent of these patients were considered overweight, including 12 defined as obese (BMI 30–34.9) and 10 patients classified as morbidly obese (BMI ≥ 35). Surgery completed included PPALND alone (n = 1); radical hysterectomy (n = 1); TRH only (n = 3); TRH/BSO (n = 25); and TRH/BSO/PPALND (n = 20). Mean total operating room time was 188.8 min (SD 55.31, 95 % CI 173.45–204.11). Mean total surgical time for all cases was 118.1 min (SD 44.28, 95 % CI 105.87–130.41). Two vascular injuries were encountered, with one requiring conversion to laparotomy. These results compare favorably with historically reported outcomes from single-console systems. Utilizing the dual-console enables use of an integrated teaching and supervising environment without compromising operative times or patient outcomes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Frumovitz M, dos Reis R, Sun CC, Milam MR, Bevers MW, Brown J et al (2007) Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 110:96–102PubMedCrossRef Frumovitz M, dos Reis R, Sun CC, Milam MR, Bevers MW, Brown J et al (2007) Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 110:96–102PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Leblanc E, Querleu D, Narducci F, Occelli B, Papageorgiou T, Sonoda Y (2004) Laparoscopic restaging of early stage invasive adnexal tumors: a 10-year experience. Gynecol Oncol 94:624–629PubMedCrossRef Leblanc E, Querleu D, Narducci F, Occelli B, Papageorgiou T, Sonoda Y (2004) Laparoscopic restaging of early stage invasive adnexal tumors: a 10-year experience. Gynecol Oncol 94:624–629PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Abu-Rustum NR, Sonoda Y (2007) Transperitoneal laparoscopic staging with aortic and pelvic lymph node dissection for gynecologic malignancies. Gynecol Oncol 104:5–8PubMedCrossRef Abu-Rustum NR, Sonoda Y (2007) Transperitoneal laparoscopic staging with aortic and pelvic lymph node dissection for gynecologic malignancies. Gynecol Oncol 104:5–8PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ramirez PT, Slomovitz BM, Soliman PT, Coleman RL, Levenback C (2006) Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Gynecol Oncol 102:252–255PubMedCrossRef Ramirez PT, Slomovitz BM, Soliman PT, Coleman RL, Levenback C (2006) Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Gynecol Oncol 102:252–255PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ahlering TE, Skarecky D, Lee D, Clayman RV (2003) Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 170:1738–1741PubMedCrossRef Ahlering TE, Skarecky D, Lee D, Clayman RV (2003) Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 170:1738–1741PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Mabrouk M, Frumovitz M, Greer M, Sharma S, Schmeler KM, Soliman PT et al (2009) Trends in laparoscopic and robotic surgery among gynecologic oncologists: a survey update. Gynecol Oncol 112:501–505PubMedCrossRef Mabrouk M, Frumovitz M, Greer M, Sharma S, Schmeler KM, Soliman PT et al (2009) Trends in laparoscopic and robotic surgery among gynecologic oncologists: a survey update. Gynecol Oncol 112:501–505PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Mendivil A, Holloway RW, Boggess JF (2009) Emergence of robotic assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology: American perspective. Gynecol Oncol 114:S24–S31PubMedCrossRef Mendivil A, Holloway RW, Boggess JF (2009) Emergence of robotic assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology: American perspective. Gynecol Oncol 114:S24–S31PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Altgassen C, Possover M, Krause N, Plaul K, Michels W, Schneider A (2000) Establishing a new technique of laparoscopic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Obstet Gynecol 95:348–352PubMedCrossRef Altgassen C, Possover M, Krause N, Plaul K, Michels W, Schneider A (2000) Establishing a new technique of laparoscopic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Obstet Gynecol 95:348–352PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kohler C, Tozzi R, Klemm P, Schneider A (2003) Laparoscopic paraaortic left-sided transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with gynecologic malignancies: technique and results. Gynecol Oncol 91:139–148PubMedCrossRef Kohler C, Tozzi R, Klemm P, Schneider A (2003) Laparoscopic paraaortic left-sided transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with gynecologic malignancies: technique and results. Gynecol Oncol 91:139–148PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Tozzi R, Malur S, Koehler C, Schneider A (2005) Laparoscopy versus laparotomy in endometrial cancer: first analysis of survival of a randomized prospective study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12:130–136PubMedCrossRef Tozzi R, Malur S, Koehler C, Schneider A (2005) Laparoscopy versus laparotomy in endometrial cancer: first analysis of survival of a randomized prospective study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12:130–136PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, Eisenkop SM, Schlaerth JB, Mannel RS et al (2009) Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2. J Clin Oncol 27:5331–5336PubMedCrossRef Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, Eisenkop SM, Schlaerth JB, Mannel RS et al (2009) Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2. J Clin Oncol 27:5331–5336PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bandera CA, Magrina JF (2009) Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 21:25–30PubMedCrossRef Bandera CA, Magrina JF (2009) Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 21:25–30PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Magrina JF, Kho RM, Weaver AL, Montero RP, Magtibay PM (2008) Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 109:86–91PubMedCrossRef Magrina JF, Kho RM, Weaver AL, Montero RP, Magtibay PM (2008) Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 109:86–91PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Field JB, Benoit MF, Dinh TA, Diaz-Arrastia C (2007) Computer-enhanced robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Surg Endosc 21:244–246PubMedCrossRef Field JB, Benoit MF, Dinh TA, Diaz-Arrastia C (2007) Computer-enhanced robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Surg Endosc 21:244–246PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Marengo F, Larrain D, Babilonti L, Spinillo A (2012) Learning experience using the double-console da Vinci surgical system in gynecology: a prospective cohort study in a university hospital. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285:441–445PubMedCrossRef Marengo F, Larrain D, Babilonti L, Spinillo A (2012) Learning experience using the double-console da Vinci surgical system in gynecology: a prospective cohort study in a university hospital. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285:441–445PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Diaz-Arrastia C, Jurnalov C, Gomez G, Townsend C Jr (2002) Laparoscopic hysterectomy using a computer-enhanced surgical robot. Surg Endosc 16:1271–1273PubMedCrossRef Diaz-Arrastia C, Jurnalov C, Gomez G, Townsend C Jr (2002) Laparoscopic hysterectomy using a computer-enhanced surgical robot. Surg Endosc 16:1271–1273PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, Shafer A, Ridgway M, Skinner EN et al. (2008) A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199:360.e1–360.e9 Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, Shafer A, Ridgway M, Skinner EN et al. (2008) A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199:360.e1–360.e9
18.
go back to reference Lenihan JP Jr, Kovanda C, Seshadri-Kreaden U (2008) What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery? J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15:589–594PubMedCrossRef Lenihan JP Jr, Kovanda C, Seshadri-Kreaden U (2008) What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery? J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15:589–594PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Sfakianos GP, Frederick PJ, Kendrick JE, Straughn JM, Kilgore LC, Huh WK (2010) Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology fellowship programs in the USA: a survey of fellows and fellowship directors. Int J Med Robot 6:405–412PubMedCrossRef Sfakianos GP, Frederick PJ, Kendrick JE, Straughn JM, Kilgore LC, Huh WK (2010) Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology fellowship programs in the USA: a survey of fellows and fellowship directors. Int J Med Robot 6:405–412PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lim PC, Kang E, Park do H (2010) Learning curve and surgical outcome for robot-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17:739–748 Lim PC, Kang E, Park do H (2010) Learning curve and surgical outcome for robot-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17:739–748
21.
go back to reference Seamon LG, Cohn DE, Richardson DL, Valmadre S, Carlson MJ, Phillips GS et al (2008) Robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 112:1207–1213PubMedCrossRef Seamon LG, Cohn DE, Richardson DL, Valmadre S, Carlson MJ, Phillips GS et al (2008) Robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 112:1207–1213PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Lim PC, Kang E, Park do H (2011) A comparative detail analysis of the learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy versus laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in treatment of endometrial cancer: a case-matched controlled study of the first one hundred twenty two patients. Gynecol Oncol 120:413–418PubMedCrossRef Lim PC, Kang E, Park do H (2011) A comparative detail analysis of the learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy versus laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in treatment of endometrial cancer: a case-matched controlled study of the first one hundred twenty two patients. Gynecol Oncol 120:413–418PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Dual-console robotic surgery: a new teaching paradigm
Authors
Ashlee L. Smith
Eirwen M. Scott
Thomas C. Krivak
Alexander B. Olawaiye
Tianjiao Chu
Scott D. Richard
Publication date
01-06-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 2/2013
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-012-0348-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2013

Journal of Robotic Surgery 2/2013 Go to the issue