Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 1/2018

01-01-2018 | Original Contributions

Comparison of Banded Versus Non-banded Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Series of 1150 Patients at a Single Institution

Authors: Rena C. Moon, Ashley Frommelt, Andre F. Teixeira, Muhammad A. Jawad

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Variations have been proposed in order to improve weight loss and decrease complication profiles in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) patients. We previously reported a preliminary result of pericardial patch ring RYGB. We aim to report a detailed result of banded RYGB by comparing these patients to non-banded RYGB patients with larger case number and longer follow-up.

Material and Methods

A retrospective chart review was performed in 543 banded RYGB and 607 non-banded RYGB patients who underwent laparoscopic RYGB between January 2009 and December 2014.

Results

Thirty-day readmission rate was 3.1% (n = 16) in the banded group and 3.8% (n = 23) in the non-banded group. Thirty-day reoperation rate was 1.5% (n = 8) in the banded group and 1.6% (n = 10) in the non-banded group. Two mortalities occurred after a mesenteric venous thrombosis and an intracranial hemorrhage in the non-banded group. The differences in 30-day readmission and reoperation rates were not statistically significant between the two groups. Mean percentage of excess BMI loss (%EBMIL) dating from the time of RYGB was 53.1, 72.5, 76.5, 78.8, and 73.3% in the banded group, and 51.5, 73.5, 78.8, 79.0, and 74.8% in the non-banded group at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months, respectively, adjusted for preoperative BMI. The differences in %EBMIL were not significant at any follow-up points between the two groups.

Conclusions

Banded laparoscopic RYGB with a pericardial patch may not demonstrate a significant additional weight loss or prevent future weight regain. We were not able to demonstrate a clear advantage of banded RYGB over non-banded RYGB.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference SAGES Guidelines Committee. SAGES guideline for clinical application of laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5:387–405.CrossRef SAGES Guidelines Committee. SAGES guideline for clinical application of laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5:387–405.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Parikh M, Pomp A, Gagner M. Laparoscopic conversion of failed gastric bypass to duodenal switch: technical considerations and preliminary outcomes. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3:611–8.CrossRefPubMed Parikh M, Pomp A, Gagner M. Laparoscopic conversion of failed gastric bypass to duodenal switch: technical considerations and preliminary outcomes. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3:611–8.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Brolin RE, Cody RP. Adding malabsorption for weight loss failure after gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1924–6.CrossRefPubMed Brolin RE, Cody RP. Adding malabsorption for weight loss failure after gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1924–6.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Ahluwalia JS, Chang PC, Tai CM, et al. Comparative study between laparoscopic adjustable gastric banded plication and sleeve gastrectomy in moderate obesity—2 year results. Obes Surg. 2016;26:552–7.CrossRefPubMed Ahluwalia JS, Chang PC, Tai CM, et al. Comparative study between laparoscopic adjustable gastric banded plication and sleeve gastrectomy in moderate obesity—2 year results. Obes Surg. 2016;26:552–7.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Bessler M, Daud A, DiGiorgi MF, et al. Adjustable gastric banding as revisional bariatric procedure after failed gastric bypass—intermediate results. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6:31–6.CrossRefPubMed Bessler M, Daud A, DiGiorgi MF, et al. Adjustable gastric banding as revisional bariatric procedure after failed gastric bypass—intermediate results. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6:31–6.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Mali Jr J, Fernandes FA, Valezi AC, et al. Influence of the actual diameter of the gastric pouch outlet in weight loss after silicon ring Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: an endoscopic study. Obes Surg. 2010;20:1231–5.CrossRefPubMed Mali Jr J, Fernandes FA, Valezi AC, et al. Influence of the actual diameter of the gastric pouch outlet in weight loss after silicon ring Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: an endoscopic study. Obes Surg. 2010;20:1231–5.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Fobi MA, Lee H. Silastic ring vertical banded gastric bypass for the treatment of obesity. J Natl Med Assoc. 1994;86:125–8.PubMedPubMedCentral Fobi MA, Lee H. Silastic ring vertical banded gastric bypass for the treatment of obesity. J Natl Med Assoc. 1994;86:125–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Altieri MS, Yang J, Telem DA, et al. Lap band outcomes from 19,221 patients across centers and over a decade within the state of New York. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:1725–32.CrossRefPubMed Altieri MS, Yang J, Telem DA, et al. Lap band outcomes from 19,221 patients across centers and over a decade within the state of New York. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:1725–32.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Heneghan HM, Yimcharoen P, Brethauer SA, et al. Influence of pouch and stoma size on weight loss after gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8:408–15.CrossRefPubMed Heneghan HM, Yimcharoen P, Brethauer SA, et al. Influence of pouch and stoma size on weight loss after gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8:408–15.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Moon R, Teixeira A, Jawad MA. Pericardial patch ring Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a preliminary report. Obes Surg. 2013;23:480–5.CrossRefPubMed Moon R, Teixeira A, Jawad MA. Pericardial patch ring Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a preliminary report. Obes Surg. 2013;23:480–5.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Bessler M, Daud A, Kim T, et al. Prospective randomized trial of banded versus nonbanded gastric bypass for the super obese: early results. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3:480–5.CrossRefPubMed Bessler M, Daud A, Kim T, et al. Prospective randomized trial of banded versus nonbanded gastric bypass for the super obese: early results. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3:480–5.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Bhandari M, Bhandari S, Mishra A, et al. Comparison between banded and nonbanded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with 2-year follow-up : a preliminary retrospective analysis. Obes Surg. 2016;26:213–8.CrossRefPubMed Bhandari M, Bhandari S, Mishra A, et al. Comparison between banded and nonbanded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with 2-year follow-up : a preliminary retrospective analysis. Obes Surg. 2016;26:213–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Moon RC, Nelson L, Teixeira AF, et al. Outcomes of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in the super obese: comparison of body mass index 50–60 kg/m2 and ≥ 60 kg/m2 with the morbidly obese. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12:292–6.CrossRefPubMed Moon RC, Nelson L, Teixeira AF, et al. Outcomes of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in the super obese: comparison of body mass index 50–60 kg/m2 and ≥ 60 kg/m2 with the morbidly obese. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12:292–6.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Taylor JD, Leitman IM, Hon P, et al. Outcome and complications of gastric bypass in super-super obesity versus morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2006;16:16–8.CrossRefPubMed Taylor JD, Leitman IM, Hon P, et al. Outcome and complications of gastric bypass in super-super obesity versus morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2006;16:16–8.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Thereaux J, Czernichow S, Corigliano N, et al. Five-year outcomes of gastric bypass for super-super-obesity (BMI ≥ 60 kg/m2): a case matched study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11:32–7.CrossRefPubMed Thereaux J, Czernichow S, Corigliano N, et al. Five-year outcomes of gastric bypass for super-super-obesity (BMI ≥ 60 kg/m2): a case matched study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11:32–7.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Heneghan H, Annaberdyev S, Eldar S, et al. Banded Roux-en-y gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10:210–6.CrossRefPubMed Heneghan H, Annaberdyev S, Eldar S, et al. Banded Roux-en-y gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10:210–6.CrossRefPubMed
17.
18.
go back to reference White S, Brooks E, Jurikova L, et al. Long-term outcomes after gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2005;15:155–63.CrossRefPubMed White S, Brooks E, Jurikova L, et al. Long-term outcomes after gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2005;15:155–63.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Buchwald H, Buchwald JN, McGlennon TW. Systemic review and meta-analysis of medium-term outcomes after banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2014;24:1536–51.CrossRefPubMed Buchwald H, Buchwald JN, McGlennon TW. Systemic review and meta-analysis of medium-term outcomes after banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2014;24:1536–51.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Salinas A, Salinas HM, Santiago E, et al. Silastic ring vertical gastric bypass: cohort study with 83% rate of 5-year follow up. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5:455–8.CrossRefPubMed Salinas A, Salinas HM, Santiago E, et al. Silastic ring vertical gastric bypass: cohort study with 83% rate of 5-year follow up. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5:455–8.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Crampton NA, Izvornikov V, Stubbs RS. Silastic ring gastric bypass: results in 64 patients. Obes Surg. 1997;7:489–94.CrossRefPubMed Crampton NA, Izvornikov V, Stubbs RS. Silastic ring gastric bypass: results in 64 patients. Obes Surg. 1997;7:489–94.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Mahawar KK, Parikh C, Carr WRJ, et al. Primary banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systemic review. Obes Surg. 2014;24:1771–92.CrossRefPubMed Mahawar KK, Parikh C, Carr WRJ, et al. Primary banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systemic review. Obes Surg. 2014;24:1771–92.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparison of Banded Versus Non-banded Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Series of 1150 Patients at a Single Institution
Authors
Rena C. Moon
Ashley Frommelt
Andre F. Teixeira
Muhammad A. Jawad
Publication date
01-01-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2832-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Obesity Surgery 1/2018 Go to the issue