Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 11/2013

01-11-2013 | Original Contributions

Multifactorial Analysis of the Learning Curve for Totally Robotic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Morbid Obesity

Authors: Myriam Renaud, Nicolas Reibel, Rasa Zarnegar, Adeline Germain, Didier Quilliot, Ahmet Ayav, Laurent Bresler, Laurent Brunaud

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 11/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is one of the most commonly performed bariatric operation worldwide for the surgical management of obesity. Totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (TR-RYGBP) has been considered to be a better approach by some groups especially early in a surgeon's experience. However, the learning curve associated with TR-RYGBP has been poorly evaluated yet. The aim of this study was to evaluate the learning curve of patients who underwent TR-RYGBP.

Methods

This is a prospective study of 154 first consecutive patients undergoing TR-RYGBP to analyze the influence of surgeon experience, bedside first assistant, and patient factors on operative time and postoperative complications. To give a comprehensive view of success related to the learning process, a single hybrid variable was generated. Multivariate analysis predicted the risk factors for complications and operative time. A risk-adjusted cumulative sum analysis estimated the learning curve.

Results

The learning curve for TR-RYGBP was 84 cases. Case rank and first assistant level were independent predictors of total operative time. Overall 30-day postoperative morbidity rate was 33.1 % and decreased over time. Surgeon experience (OR 2.6; CI 95 [1.290 to 5.479]; p = 0.0081) and first assistant level (OR 2.42; CI 95 [1.197 to 4.895]; p = 0.0139) remained independent predictors of composite event (operative time and complications).

Conclusions

This study identifed criteria that should be assessed in future studies about TR-RYGBP. Both surgeon experience and bedside first assistant level affected operative duration, but surgeon experience was the most significant factor in reducing complication rates.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Zevin B, Aggarwal R, Grantcharov TP. Simulation-based training and learning curves in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Br J Surg. 2012;99:887–95.PubMedCrossRef Zevin B, Aggarwal R, Grantcharov TP. Simulation-based training and learning curves in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Br J Surg. 2012;99:887–95.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Iordens G, Klaassen R, Van Lieshout E, et al. How to train surgical residents to perform laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass safely? World J Surg. 2012;36:2003–10.PubMedCrossRef Iordens G, Klaassen R, Van Lieshout E, et al. How to train surgical residents to perform laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass safely? World J Surg. 2012;36:2003–10.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Livingston EH. The incidence of bariatric surgery has plateaued in the U.S. Am J Surg. 2010;200:378–85.PubMedCrossRef Livingston EH. The incidence of bariatric surgery has plateaued in the U.S. Am J Surg. 2010;200:378–85.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Puzziferri N, Austrheim-Smith I, Wolfe B, et al. Three-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass. Ann Surg. 2006;243:181–8.PubMedCrossRef Puzziferri N, Austrheim-Smith I, Wolfe B, et al. Three-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass. Ann Surg. 2006;243:181–8.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Buchs NC, Pugin F, Bucher P, et al. Learning curve for robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:1116–21.PubMedCrossRef Buchs NC, Pugin F, Bucher P, et al. Learning curve for robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:1116–21.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Zevin B, Aggarwal R, Grantcharov TP. Volume–outcome association in bariatric surgery. A systematic review. Ann Surg. 2012;256:60–71.PubMedCrossRef Zevin B, Aggarwal R, Grantcharov TP. Volume–outcome association in bariatric surgery. A systematic review. Ann Surg. 2012;256:60–71.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Sanchez BR, Mohr CJ, Morton JM, et al. Comparison of totally robotic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and traditional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2005;1:549–54.PubMedCrossRef Sanchez BR, Mohr CJ, Morton JM, et al. Comparison of totally robotic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and traditional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2005;1:549–54.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Tieu K, Allison N, Snyder B, et al. Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: an update from two high volume centers. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9:284–8.PubMedCrossRef Tieu K, Allison N, Snyder B, et al. Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: an update from two high volume centers. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9:284–8.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hubens G, Balliu L, Ruppert M, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure performed with the da Vinci robot system: is it worth it? Surg Endosc. 2008;22:1690–6.PubMedCrossRef Hubens G, Balliu L, Ruppert M, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure performed with the da Vinci robot system: is it worth it? Surg Endosc. 2008;22:1690–6.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Mohr CJ, Nadzam GS, Alami RS, et al. Totally robotic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: results from 75 patients. Obes Surg. 2006;16:690–6.PubMedCrossRef Mohr CJ, Nadzam GS, Alami RS, et al. Totally robotic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: results from 75 patients. Obes Surg. 2006;16:690–6.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Park CW, Lam EC, Walsh TM, et al. Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass performed in a community hospital setting: the future of bariatric sugery? Surg Endosc. 2011;25:3312–21.PubMedCrossRef Park CW, Lam EC, Walsh TM, et al. Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass performed in a community hospital setting: the future of bariatric sugery? Surg Endosc. 2011;25:3312–21.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Yu SC, Clapp BL, Lee MJ, et al. Robotic assistance provides excellent outcomes during the learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: results from 100 robotic-assisted gastric bypasses. Am J Surg. 2006;192:746–9.PubMedCrossRef Yu SC, Clapp BL, Lee MJ, et al. Robotic assistance provides excellent outcomes during the learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: results from 100 robotic-assisted gastric bypasses. Am J Surg. 2006;192:746–9.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bolsin S, Colson M. The use of the CUSUM technique in the assessment of trainee competence in new procedures. Int J Qual Health Care. 2000;12:433–8.PubMedCrossRef Bolsin S, Colson M. The use of the CUSUM technique in the assessment of trainee competence in new procedures. Int J Qual Health Care. 2000;12:433–8.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Poloniecki J, Valencia O, Littlejohns P. Cumulative risk adjusted mortality chart for detecting changes in death rate: observational study of heart surgery. BMJ. 1998;6:1697–700.CrossRef Poloniecki J, Valencia O, Littlejohns P. Cumulative risk adjusted mortality chart for detecting changes in death rate: observational study of heart surgery. BMJ. 1998;6:1697–700.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ziegler O, Sirveaux MA, Brunaud L, et al. Medical follow up after bariatric surgery: nutritional and drug issues. Diabetes Metab. 2009;35:544–57.PubMedCrossRef Ziegler O, Sirveaux MA, Brunaud L, et al. Medical follow up after bariatric surgery: nutritional and drug issues. Diabetes Metab. 2009;35:544–57.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Olbers T, Fagevik-Olsen M, Maleckas A, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty for obesity. Br J Surg. 2005;92:557–62.PubMedCrossRef Olbers T, Fagevik-Olsen M, Maleckas A, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty for obesity. Br J Surg. 2005;92:557–62.PubMedCrossRef
21.
22.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.PubMedCrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Bege T, Lelong B, Esterni B, et al. The learning curve for the laparoscopic approach to conservative mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2010;251:249–53.PubMedCrossRef Bege T, Lelong B, Esterni B, et al. The learning curve for the laparoscopic approach to conservative mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2010;251:249–53.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Grunkemeier GL, Wu YX, Furnary AP. Cumulative sum techniques for assessing surgical results. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76:663–7.PubMedCrossRef Grunkemeier GL, Wu YX, Furnary AP. Cumulative sum techniques for assessing surgical results. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76:663–7.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Noyez L. Control charts, CUSUM techniques and funnel plots. A review of methods for monitoring performance in healthcare. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009;9:494–9.PubMedCrossRef Noyez L. Control charts, CUSUM techniques and funnel plots. A review of methods for monitoring performance in healthcare. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009;9:494–9.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Sudan R, Bennett K, Jacobs D, et al. Multifactorial analysis of the learning curve for robot-assisted laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Ann Surg. 2012;255:940–5.PubMedCrossRef Sudan R, Bennett K, Jacobs D, et al. Multifactorial analysis of the learning curve for robot-assisted laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Ann Surg. 2012;255:940–5.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Mohr CJ, Nadzam GS, Curet MJ. Totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Arch Surg. 2005;140:779–86.PubMedCrossRef Mohr CJ, Nadzam GS, Curet MJ. Totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Arch Surg. 2005;140:779–86.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Snyder BE, Wilson T, Leong BY, et al. Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: minimizing morbidity and mortality. Obes Surg. 2010;20:265–70.PubMedCrossRef Snyder BE, Wilson T, Leong BY, et al. Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: minimizing morbidity and mortality. Obes Surg. 2010;20:265–70.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Ayloo SM, Addeo P, Buchs NC, et al. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: is there a difference in outcomes? World J Surg. 2011;35:637–42.PubMedCrossRef Ayloo SM, Addeo P, Buchs NC, et al. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: is there a difference in outcomes? World J Surg. 2011;35:637–42.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Scozzari G, Rebecchi F, Millo P, et al. Robot-assisted gastrojejunal anastomosis does not improve the results of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:597–603.PubMedCrossRef Scozzari G, Rebecchi F, Millo P, et al. Robot-assisted gastrojejunal anastomosis does not improve the results of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:597–603.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Addeo P, Buchs N. Robotic and laparoscopic gastric bypass: are they comparable? Surg Endosc. 2012;26:576–7.PubMedCrossRef Addeo P, Buchs N. Robotic and laparoscopic gastric bypass: are they comparable? Surg Endosc. 2012;26:576–7.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Brunaud L, Ayav A, Zarnegar R, et al. Prospective evaluation of 100 robotic-assisted unilateral adrenalectomies. Surgery. 2008;144:995–1001.PubMedCrossRef Brunaud L, Ayav A, Zarnegar R, et al. Prospective evaluation of 100 robotic-assisted unilateral adrenalectomies. Surgery. 2008;144:995–1001.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Buchs NC, Pugin F, Chassot G, et al. Robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for super obese patients: a comparative study. Obes Surg. 2013;23:353–7.PubMedCrossRef Buchs NC, Pugin F, Chassot G, et al. Robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for super obese patients: a comparative study. Obes Surg. 2013;23:353–7.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Vonlanthen R, Slankamenac K, Breitenstein S, et al. The impact of complications on costs of major surgical procedures. Ann Surg. 2011;254:907–13.PubMedCrossRef Vonlanthen R, Slankamenac K, Breitenstein S, et al. The impact of complications on costs of major surgical procedures. Ann Surg. 2011;254:907–13.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Chandra V, Nehra D, Parent R, et al. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices. Surgery. 2010;147:830–9.PubMedCrossRef Chandra V, Nehra D, Parent R, et al. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices. Surgery. 2010;147:830–9.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Chang L, Satava M, Pellegrini A, et al. Identifying the learning curve through objective measurement of skill. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:1744–8.PubMedCrossRef Chang L, Satava M, Pellegrini A, et al. Identifying the learning curve through objective measurement of skill. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:1744–8.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Narazaki K, Oleynikov D, Stergiou N. Robotic surgery training and performance. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:96–103.PubMedCrossRef Narazaki K, Oleynikov D, Stergiou N. Robotic surgery training and performance. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:96–103.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Multifactorial Analysis of the Learning Curve for Totally Robotic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Morbid Obesity
Authors
Myriam Renaud
Nicolas Reibel
Rasa Zarnegar
Adeline Germain
Didier Quilliot
Ahmet Ayav
Laurent Bresler
Laurent Brunaud
Publication date
01-11-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 11/2013
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-013-1020-1

Other articles of this Issue 11/2013

Obesity Surgery 11/2013 Go to the issue