Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 9/2012

01-09-2012 | Clinical Research

Impact of Lap-Band Size on Weight Loss: Does Gender Matter?

Authors: Ali Ardestani, Ardalan Tangestanipoor, Malcolm K. Robinson, David B. Lautz, Ashley H. Vernon, Ali Tavakkoli

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 9/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) has gone through major design modifications to improve clinical endpoints and reduce complications. Little is known, however, about the effects of LAGB size on clinical outcomes, or whether outcomes differ based on gender. We set out to examine the impact of band size on surgical weight loss, reoperations, comorbidity resolution, and compare outcomes within gender.

Methods

We reviewed our prospectively collected longitudinal bariatric database between 2008 and 2010, and compared patients with BMI 35–50 kg/m2 who had undergone LAGB with the LAP-BAND® APS to those who had the larger APL. Those patients with initial BMI > 50 kg/m2 were excluded to reduce any possible selection bias which favors larger band use in such subjects.

Results

Three hundred ninety-four patients met our inclusion criteria; 230 (58 %) in the APS group and 164 (42 %) in the APL group. Female patients in APS group experienced significantly higher percentage excess body weight loss at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years in comparison to female patients in APL group (p < 0.001 for all time points). In contrast, a reverse pattern was observed for male patients. No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding frequency of band adjustments, complications, or comorbidity resolution.

Conclusions

Male patients might benefit from APL bands, in contrast to female patients who appear to experience superior weight loss with the smaller APS bands. This study provides the first set of evidence to facilitate surgical decision making for band size selection and highlights differences between genders.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference LAP-BAND AP® Adjustable Gastric Banding System with OMNIFORM® Design. Directions for use. Irvine, CA: Allergan. 2009. LAP-BAND AP® Adjustable Gastric Banding System with OMNIFORM® Design. Directions for use. Irvine, CA: Allergan. 2009.
3.
go back to reference Chau WY, et al. Patient characteristics impacting excess weight loss following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2005;15(3):346–50.PubMedCrossRef Chau WY, et al. Patient characteristics impacting excess weight loss following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2005;15(3):346–50.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Wolnerhanssen BK, et al. Predictors of outcome in treatment of morbid obesity by laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: results of a prospective study of 380 patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis: Off J Am Soc Bariatric Surg. 2008;4(4):500–6. Wolnerhanssen BK, et al. Predictors of outcome in treatment of morbid obesity by laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: results of a prospective study of 380 patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis: Off J Am Soc Bariatric Surg. 2008;4(4):500–6.
5.
go back to reference Dixon JB, Dixon ME, O’Brien PE. Pre-operative predictors of weight loss at 1-year after Lap-Band surgery. Obes Surg. 2001;11(2):200–7.PubMedCrossRef Dixon JB, Dixon ME, O’Brien PE. Pre-operative predictors of weight loss at 1-year after Lap-Band surgery. Obes Surg. 2001;11(2):200–7.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Dixon JB, O’Brien PE. Selecting the optimal patient for LAP-BAND placement. Am J Surg. 2002;184(6B):17S–20S.PubMedCrossRef Dixon JB, O’Brien PE. Selecting the optimal patient for LAP-BAND placement. Am J Surg. 2002;184(6B):17S–20S.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference NIH conference. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. Consensus Development Conference Panel. Ann Intern Med. 1991;115(12):956–61. NIH conference. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. Consensus Development Conference Panel. Ann Intern Med. 1991;115(12):956–61.
8.
go back to reference Favretti F, O’Brien PE, Dixon JB. Patient management after LAP-BAND placement. Am J Surg. 2002;184(6B):38S–41S.PubMedCrossRef Favretti F, O’Brien PE, Dixon JB. Patient management after LAP-BAND placement. Am J Surg. 2002;184(6B):38S–41S.PubMedCrossRef
9.
10.
go back to reference Lyass S, et al. Device-related reoperations after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Am Surg. 2005;71(9):738–43.PubMed Lyass S, et al. Device-related reoperations after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Am Surg. 2005;71(9):738–43.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Parikh MS, Fielding GA, Ren CJ. U.S. experience with 749 laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands: intermediate outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2005;19(12):1631–5.PubMedCrossRef Parikh MS, Fielding GA, Ren CJ. U.S. experience with 749 laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands: intermediate outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2005;19(12):1631–5.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Mittermair RP, Aigner F, Nehoda H. Results and complications after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in super-obese patients, using the Swedish band. Obes Surg. 2004;14(10):1327–30.PubMedCrossRef Mittermair RP, Aigner F, Nehoda H. Results and complications after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in super-obese patients, using the Swedish band. Obes Surg. 2004;14(10):1327–30.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Angrisani L, et al. Results of the Italian multicenter study on 239 super-obese patients treated by adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2002;12(6):846–50.PubMedCrossRef Angrisani L, et al. Results of the Italian multicenter study on 239 super-obese patients treated by adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2002;12(6):846–50.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Chevallier JM, et al. Predictive factors of outcome after gastric banding: a nationwide survey on the role of center activity and patients’ behavior. Ann Surg. 2007;246(6):1034–9.PubMedCrossRef Chevallier JM, et al. Predictive factors of outcome after gastric banding: a nationwide survey on the role of center activity and patients’ behavior. Ann Surg. 2007;246(6):1034–9.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ponce J, et al. New adjustable gastric bands available in the United States: a comparative study. Surg Obes Relat Dis: Off J Am Soc Bariatric Surg. 2011;7(1):74–9. Ponce J, et al. New adjustable gastric bands available in the United States: a comparative study. Surg Obes Relat Dis: Off J Am Soc Bariatric Surg. 2011;7(1):74–9.
16.
go back to reference O’Brien PE. The LAP-BAND AP™ system: the platform advances. Bariatric Times. 2007;4(5):24–6 O’Brien PE. The LAP-BAND AP™ system: the platform advances. Bariatric Times. 2007;4(5):24–6
17.
go back to reference Dixon AF, Dixon JB, O’Brien PE. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding induces prolonged satiety: a randomized blind crossover study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(2):813–9.PubMedCrossRef Dixon AF, Dixon JB, O’Brien PE. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding induces prolonged satiety: a randomized blind crossover study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(2):813–9.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference de Jong JR, et al. Weight loss after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding is not caused by altered gastric emptying. Obes Surg. 2009;19(3):287–92.PubMedCrossRef de Jong JR, et al. Weight loss after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding is not caused by altered gastric emptying. Obes Surg. 2009;19(3):287–92.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Burton PR, et al. Effects of adjustable gastric bands on gastric emptying, supra- and infraband transit and satiety: a randomized double-blind crossover trial using a new technique of band visualization. Obes Surg. 2010;20(12):1690–7.PubMedCrossRef Burton PR, et al. Effects of adjustable gastric bands on gastric emptying, supra- and infraband transit and satiety: a randomized double-blind crossover trial using a new technique of band visualization. Obes Surg. 2010;20(12):1690–7.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Frank S, et al. Processing of food pictures: influence of hunger, gender and calorie content. Brain Res. 2010;1350:159–66.PubMedCrossRef Frank S, et al. Processing of food pictures: influence of hunger, gender and calorie content. Brain Res. 2010;1350:159–66.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Haase L, Green E, Murphy C. Males and females show differential brain activation to taste when hungry and sated in gustatory and reward areas. Appetite. 2011;57(2):421–34.PubMedCrossRef Haase L, Green E, Murphy C. Males and females show differential brain activation to taste when hungry and sated in gustatory and reward areas. Appetite. 2011;57(2):421–34.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Chial HJ, et al. A nutrient drink test to assess maximum tolerated volume and postprandial symptoms: effects of gender, body mass index and age in health. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2002;14(3):249–53.PubMedCrossRef Chial HJ, et al. A nutrient drink test to assess maximum tolerated volume and postprandial symptoms: effects of gender, body mass index and age in health. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2002;14(3):249–53.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Ardestani A, Lautz DB, Tavakkolizadeh A. Band revision versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass conversion as salvage operation after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Surg Obes Relat Dis: Off J Am Soc Bariatric Surg. 2011;7(1):33–7. Ardestani A, Lautz DB, Tavakkolizadeh A. Band revision versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass conversion as salvage operation after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Surg Obes Relat Dis: Off J Am Soc Bariatric Surg. 2011;7(1):33–7.
24.
go back to reference Wolnerhanssen B, et al. Reduction in slippage with 11-cm Lap-Band and change of gastric banding technique. Obes Surg. 2005;15(7):1050–4.PubMedCrossRef Wolnerhanssen B, et al. Reduction in slippage with 11-cm Lap-Band and change of gastric banding technique. Obes Surg. 2005;15(7):1050–4.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Dargent J. Pouch dilatation and slippage after adjustable gastric banding: is it still an issue? Obes Surg. 2003;13(1):111–5.PubMedCrossRef Dargent J. Pouch dilatation and slippage after adjustable gastric banding: is it still an issue? Obes Surg. 2003;13(1):111–5.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Chevallier JM, et al. Complications after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity: experience with 1,000 patients over 7 years. Obes Surg. 2004;14(3):407–14.PubMedCrossRef Chevallier JM, et al. Complications after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity: experience with 1,000 patients over 7 years. Obes Surg. 2004;14(3):407–14.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Kurian M, et al. Evaluating gastric erosion in band management: an algorithm for stratification of risk. Surg Obes Relat Dis: Off J Am Soc Bariatric Surg. 2010;6(4):386–9. Kurian M, et al. Evaluating gastric erosion in band management: an algorithm for stratification of risk. Surg Obes Relat Dis: Off J Am Soc Bariatric Surg. 2010;6(4):386–9.
28.
go back to reference Matlach J, et al. Small-diameter bands lead to high complication rates in patients after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2011;21(4):448–56.PubMedCrossRef Matlach J, et al. Small-diameter bands lead to high complication rates in patients after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2011;21(4):448–56.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Naef M, et al. Esophageal dysmotility disorders after laparoscopic gastric banding—an underestimated complication. Ann Surg. 2011;253(2):285–90.PubMedCrossRef Naef M, et al. Esophageal dysmotility disorders after laparoscopic gastric banding—an underestimated complication. Ann Surg. 2011;253(2):285–90.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Shen R, et al. Impact of patient follow-up on weight loss after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2004;14(4):514–9.PubMedCrossRef Shen R, et al. Impact of patient follow-up on weight loss after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2004;14(4):514–9.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Impact of Lap-Band Size on Weight Loss: Does Gender Matter?
Authors
Ali Ardestani
Ardalan Tangestanipoor
Malcolm K. Robinson
David B. Lautz
Ashley H. Vernon
Ali Tavakkoli
Publication date
01-09-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 9/2012
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-012-0667-3

Other articles of this Issue 9/2012

Obesity Surgery 9/2012 Go to the issue