Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 12/2009

01-12-2009 | Clinical Research

LMA Supreme™ Versus Facemask Ventilation Performed by Novices: A Comparative Study in Morbidly Obese Patients Showing Difficult Ventilation Predictors

Authors: Widad Abdi, Gilles Dhonneur, Roland Amathieu, Anis Adhoum, Walid Kamoun, Velislav Slavov, Christophe Barrat, Xavier Combes

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 12/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

We designed a study to compare ventilation characteristics performed in morbidly obese patients by medical students via the facemask to that via the LMA Supreme®.

Methods

This prospective, randomized, crossover study included 31 ASA I–III morbidly patients showing difficult mask ventilation predictors. After induction of anesthesia, ten medical students with no previous clinical experience in airway management, clinically educated to facemask ventilation maneuvers, and theoretically educated to laryngeal mask use were supervised by a senior anesthesiologist during performance of 60 s facemask and LMA Supreme® ventilation in a randomly assigned order. Ventilation quality and difficulty were measured using an original score calculated as the sum of seven indicators (0 = no ventilation and complications, 12 = optimal and safe ventilation) and a visual analog scale (VAS; 0 = no difficult–100 = impossible), respectively. Values are presented as means (standard deviation) or medians [extremes].

Results

Mean age and body mass index of the patients were 39 years (12 years) and 44 kg m−2 (7 kg m−2), respectively. One patient was excluded because of ventilation difficulty experienced by the senior anesthesiologist. Medical students successfully established ventilation with the LMA Supreme® in all the 30 patients after a delay of 21 s (9 s) compared to 34 s (14 s) with the facemask (P < 0.05). Failure of ventilation occurred in four patients with the facemask. Ventilation quality score was superior and ventilation difficulty (VAS 0–100) was inferior with the LMA Supreme® than with the facemask (11 [10–12] and 9 [0–45] versus 5 [1–12] and 50 [5–100]); both P < 0.05, respectively.

Conclusions

We showed that the LMA Supreme™ placed in novice hands systematically promoted easier ventilation of better quality than the facemask in morbidly obese patients showing difficult mask ventilation predictors. Our data suggest that the LMA Supreme™ could be considered as a standard airway management tool for both elective and rescue airway management of morbidly obese patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. International consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. Part 4: advanced life support. Resuscitation. 2005;67:213–47.CrossRef International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. International consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. Part 4: advanced life support. Resuscitation. 2005;67:213–47.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Nolan JP, Deakin CD, Soar J, et al. European resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation 2005: section 4. Adult advanced life support. Resuscitation. 2005;67:S39–86.CrossRef Nolan JP, Deakin CD, Soar J, et al. European resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation 2005: section 4. Adult advanced life support. Resuscitation. 2005;67:S39–86.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Langeron O, Masso E, Huraux C, et al. Prediction of difficult mask ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2000;92:1229–36.CrossRef Langeron O, Masso E, Huraux C, et al. Prediction of difficult mask ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2000;92:1229–36.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kheterpal S, Han R, Tremper KK, et al. Incidence and predictors of difficult and impossible mask ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2006;105:885–91.CrossRef Kheterpal S, Han R, Tremper KK, et al. Incidence and predictors of difficult and impossible mask ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2006;105:885–91.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Han R, Tremper KK, Kheterpal S, et al. Grading scale for mask ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2004;101:267.CrossRef Han R, Tremper KK, Kheterpal S, et al. Grading scale for mask ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2004;101:267.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Combes X, Le Roux B, Suen P, et al. Unanticipated difficult airway in anesthetized patients: prospective validation of a management algorithm. Anesthesiology. 2004;100:1146–50.CrossRef Combes X, Le Roux B, Suen P, et al. Unanticipated difficult airway in anesthetized patients: prospective validation of a management algorithm. Anesthesiology. 2004;100:1146–50.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Wharton NM, Gibbison B, Gabbott DA, et al. I-gel insertion by novices in manikins and patients. Anaesthesia. 2008;63:991–5.CrossRef Wharton NM, Gibbison B, Gabbott DA, et al. I-gel insertion by novices in manikins and patients. Anaesthesia. 2008;63:991–5.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
LMA Supreme™ Versus Facemask Ventilation Performed by Novices: A Comparative Study in Morbidly Obese Patients Showing Difficult Ventilation Predictors
Authors
Widad Abdi
Gilles Dhonneur
Roland Amathieu
Anis Adhoum
Walid Kamoun
Velislav Slavov
Christophe Barrat
Xavier Combes
Publication date
01-12-2009
Publisher
Springer New York
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 12/2009
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-009-9953-0

Other articles of this Issue 12/2009

Obesity Surgery 12/2009 Go to the issue