Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4/2016

01-12-2016 | Recent Developments (Invite Only)

Regulating “Quack” Medicine and Decision-Making For Children Re-visited

Authors: Bernadette Richards, Michaela E. Okninski

Published in: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry | Issue 4/2016

Login to get access

Excerpt

Regulating “Quack” Medicine: Inquest Into the Death of Sheila Drysdale, 2013/383970, 15/07/2016
Footnotes
1
Professor Kellie’s report was largely consistent with the evidence of PMH. He rejected the position of Oshin’s parents concerning administering palliative care only and alternative therapies see CAHS v Kiszko & Anor [2016] FCWA 34, [18]–[22].
 
2
Re J (A Minor) (wardship: medical treatment) [1991] Fam 33, 46 (Lord Donaldson), cited in The NHS Trust v A (A Child) Ors [2007] EWCH 1696 (Fam), recently applied in Re JM (A Child) [2015] EWCH 2832 (Fam).
 
3
The NHS Trust v A (A Child) & Ors [2007] EWHC 1696 (Fam); Re JM (A Child) [2015] EWHC 2832 (Fam); Re Norma [1992] NZFLR 445.
 
4
Re Norma [1992] NZFLR 445, 451 cited by Thackray CJ at [57].
 
Metadata
Title
Regulating “Quack” Medicine and Decision-Making For Children Re-visited
Authors
Bernadette Richards
Michaela E. Okninski
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 1176-7529
Electronic ISSN: 1872-4353
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-016-9746-9

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4/2016 Go to the issue

Symposium: Composing Disability

from The Hindrances of a Householder

Symposium: Composing Disability

Composing Disability: Diagnosis, Interrupted