Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 4/2019

01-04-2019 | Perspective

Practicing Medicine with Colleagues: Pitfalls from Social Psychology Science

Authors: Donald A. Redelmeier, MD, FRCPC, MS(HSR), FACP, Lee D. Ross, PhD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 4/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

This perspective reviews three pitfalls from psychology science that can distort clinical assessments and contribute to interpersonal conflicts. One pitfall is the illusion that one’s own subjective perceptions or judgments are objective observations or interpretations that reasonable colleagues would share. A second pitfall involves self-serving situational attributions rather than disposition attributions for explaining missteps after things go wrong. A third pitfall is confirmation bias that leads to a perseverance of erroneous beliefs, a tendency to mostly seek supportive colleagues, and a failure to check for dissenting viewpoints. An awareness of these three pitfalls may help clinicians improve patient care when practicing with colleagues.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Gilovich T, Ross L. The wisest in the room. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2015. Gilovich T, Ross L. The wisest in the room. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2015.
3.
go back to reference Gilovich T, Keltner D, Chen S, Nisbett RE. Social psychology [4th edition]. New York: W. W. Norton & Co, 2016. Gilovich T, Keltner D, Chen S, Nisbett RE. Social psychology [4th edition]. New York: W. W. Norton & Co, 2016.
4.
go back to reference Redelmeier DA, Cialdini RB. Problems for clinical judgement: 5. Principles of influence in medical practice. CMAJ 2002;166(13):1680–4.PubMedPubMedCentral Redelmeier DA, Cialdini RB. Problems for clinical judgement: 5. Principles of influence in medical practice. CMAJ 2002;166(13):1680–4.PubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Ross L, Greene D, House P. The false consensus effect: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. J Exp Soc Psychol 1977;13(3):279–301.CrossRef Ross L, Greene D, House P. The false consensus effect: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. J Exp Soc Psychol 1977;13(3):279–301.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Leavy RL, Dunlosky JT. Undergraduate student and faculty perceptions of problem drinking. J Stud Alcohol 1989;50(2):101–7.CrossRefPubMed Leavy RL, Dunlosky JT. Undergraduate student and faculty perceptions of problem drinking. J Stud Alcohol 1989;50(2):101–7.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Monteiro SD, Sherbino J, Patel A, Mazzetti I, Norman GR, Howey E. Reflecting on diagnostic errors: taking a second look is not enough. J Gen Intern Med 2015;30(9):1270–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Monteiro SD, Sherbino J, Patel A, Mazzetti I, Norman GR, Howey E. Reflecting on diagnostic errors: taking a second look is not enough. J Gen Intern Med 2015;30(9):1270–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Jones EE, Nisbett RE. The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press, 1971. Jones EE, Nisbett RE. The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press, 1971.
9.
go back to reference Hastorf AH, Cantril H. They saw a game; a case study. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 1954;49(1):129–134.CrossRef Hastorf AH, Cantril H. They saw a game; a case study. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 1954;49(1):129–134.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Becker F, Sweeney B, Parsons K. Ambulatory facility design and patients’ perceptions of healthcare quality. HERD 2008;1(4):35–54.CrossRefPubMed Becker F, Sweeney B, Parsons K. Ambulatory facility design and patients’ perceptions of healthcare quality. HERD 2008;1(4):35–54.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Leykum LK, Chesser H, Lanham HJ, Carla P, Palmer R, Ratcliffe T, Reisinger H, Agar M, Pugh J. The association between sensemaking during physician team rounds and hospitalized patients’ outcomes. J Gen Intern Med 2015;30(12):1821–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Leykum LK, Chesser H, Lanham HJ, Carla P, Palmer R, Ratcliffe T, Reisinger H, Agar M, Pugh J. The association between sensemaking during physician team rounds and hospitalized patients’ outcomes. J Gen Intern Med 2015;30(12):1821–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Ross L, Nisbett RE. The person and the situation: perspectives of social psychology. London: McGraw-Hill, 2011. Ross L, Nisbett RE. The person and the situation: perspectives of social psychology. London: McGraw-Hill, 2011.
13.
go back to reference Blumenthal-Barby JS, Krieger H. Cognitive biases and heuristics in medical decision making: a critical review using a systematic search strategy. Med Decis Mak 2015;35(4):539–57.CrossRef Blumenthal-Barby JS, Krieger H. Cognitive biases and heuristics in medical decision making: a critical review using a systematic search strategy. Med Decis Mak 2015;35(4):539–57.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Knobloch-Westerwick S, Meng J. Looking the other way: Selective exposure to attitude-consistent and counterattitudinal political information. Commun Res 2009;36(3):426–448.CrossRef Knobloch-Westerwick S, Meng J. Looking the other way: Selective exposure to attitude-consistent and counterattitudinal political information. Commun Res 2009;36(3):426–448.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Redelmeier DA. Improving patient care. The cognitive psychology of missed diagnoses. Ann Intern Med 2005;142(2):115–20.CrossRefPubMed Redelmeier DA. Improving patient care. The cognitive psychology of missed diagnoses. Ann Intern Med 2005;142(2):115–20.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Redelmeier DA, Ferris LE, Tu JV, Hux JE, Schull MJ. Problems for clinical judgement: introducing cognitive psychology as one more basic science. CMAJ 2001;164(3):358–60.PubMedPubMedCentral Redelmeier DA, Ferris LE, Tu JV, Hux JE, Schull MJ. Problems for clinical judgement: introducing cognitive psychology as one more basic science. CMAJ 2001;164(3):358–60.PubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Redelmeier DA, Dickinson VM. Judging whether a patient is actually improving: more pitfalls from the science of human perception. J Gen Intern Med 2012;27(9):1195–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Redelmeier DA, Dickinson VM. Judging whether a patient is actually improving: more pitfalls from the science of human perception. J Gen Intern Med 2012;27(9):1195–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Saposnik G, Redelmeier D, Ruff CC, Tobler PN. Cognitive biases associated with medical decisions: a systematic review.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2016;16(1):138.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Saposnik G, Redelmeier D, Ruff CC, Tobler PN. Cognitive biases associated with medical decisions: a systematic review.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2016;16(1):138.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Practicing Medicine with Colleagues: Pitfalls from Social Psychology Science
Authors
Donald A. Redelmeier, MD, FRCPC, MS(HSR), FACP
Lee D. Ross, PhD
Publication date
01-04-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-04839-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2019

Journal of General Internal Medicine 4/2019 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine