Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 3/2019

01-03-2019 | Review Paper

Practical Guidance for Involving Stakeholders in Health Research

Authors: Thomas W. Concannon, PhD, Sean Grant, PhD, Vivian Welch, PhD MSc, Jennifer Petkovic, PhD, Joseph Selby, MD MPH, Sally Crowe, PG Dip, Anneliese Synnot, MPH, Regina Greer-Smith, MPH, Evan Mayo-Wilson, DPhil, Ellen Tambor, MA, Peter Tugwell, MD MsC, for the Multi Stakeholder Engagement (MuSE) Consortium

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Stakeholder engagement is increasingly common in health research, with protocols for engaging multiple stakeholder groups becoming normative in patient-centered outcomes research. Previous work has focused on identifying relevant stakeholder groups with whom to work and on working with stakeholders in evidence implementation. This paper draws on the expertise of a team from four countries—Canada, Australia, the UK, and the USA—to provide researchers with practical guidance for carrying out multi-stakeholder–engaged projects: we present a list of questions to assist in selecting appropriate roles and modes of engagement; we introduce a matrix to help summarize engagement activities; and we provide a list of online resources. This guidance, matrix, and list of resources can assist researchers to consider more systematically which stakeholder groups to involve, in what study roles, and by what modes of engagement. By documenting how stakeholders are paired up with specific roles, the matrix also provides a potential structure for evaluating the impact of stakeholder engagement.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Frank L, Basch E, Selby JV. The PCORI perspective on patient-centered outcomes research. JAMA 2014;312(15):1513–1514.CrossRef Frank L, Basch E, Selby JV. The PCORI perspective on patient-centered outcomes research. JAMA 2014;312(15):1513–1514.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Viswanathan M, Ammerman A, Eng E, et al. Community-Based Participatory Research: Assessing the Evidence. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 99. AHRQ Publication 04-E022. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2004. Viswanathan M, Ammerman A, Eng E, et al. Community-Based Participatory Research: Assessing the Evidence. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 99. AHRQ Publication 04-E022. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2004.
4.
go back to reference Cottrell E, Whitlock E, Kato E, et al. Defining the benefits of stakeholder engagement in systematic reviews. Research White Paper. AHRQ Publication No. 14-EHC006-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2014. Cottrell E, Whitlock E, Kato E, et al. Defining the benefits of stakeholder engagement in systematic reviews. Research White Paper. AHRQ Publication No. 14-EHC006-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2014.
5.
go back to reference INVOLVE. Briefing notes for researchers: involving the public in NHS, public health and social care research. Eastleigh, UK: INVOLVE; 2012. INVOLVE. Briefing notes for researchers: involving the public in NHS, public health and social care research. Eastleigh, UK: INVOLVE; 2012.
6.
go back to reference Domecq JP, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T, et al. Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2014;14(1):1.CrossRef Domecq JP, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T, et al. Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2014;14(1):1.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Concannon TW, Fuster M, Saunders T, et al. A systematic review of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research. J Gen Intern Med 2014;29(12):1692–1701.CrossRef Concannon TW, Fuster M, Saunders T, et al. A systematic review of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research. J Gen Intern Med 2014;29(12):1692–1701.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Shippee ND, Domecq Garces JP, Prutsky Lopez GJ, et al. Patient and service user engagement in research: A systematic review and synthesized framework. Health Expect 2015;18(5):1151–1166.CrossRef Shippee ND, Domecq Garces JP, Prutsky Lopez GJ, et al. Patient and service user engagement in research: A systematic review and synthesized framework. Health Expect 2015;18(5):1151–1166.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Forsythe LP, Ellis LE, Edmundson L, et al. Patient and stakeholder engagement in the PCORI pilot projects: Description and lessons learned. J Gen Intern Med 2016;31(1):13–21.CrossRef Forsythe LP, Ellis LE, Edmundson L, et al. Patient and stakeholder engagement in the PCORI pilot projects: Description and lessons learned. J Gen Intern Med 2016;31(1):13–21.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Shea B, Santesso N, Qualman A, Heiberg T, Leong A, Judd M, Consumer-driven health care: building partnerships in research. Health Expect 2005;8(4):352–359.CrossRef Shea B, Santesso N, Qualman A, Heiberg T, Leong A, Judd M, Consumer-driven health care: building partnerships in research. Health Expect 2005;8(4):352–359.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference de Wit M, Kirwan JR, Tugwell P, et al.. Successful stepwise development of patient research partnership: 14 years’ experience of actions and consequences in outcome measures in rheumatology (OMERACT). Patient 2017;10(2):141–152.CrossRef de Wit M, Kirwan JR, Tugwell P, et al.. Successful stepwise development of patient research partnership: 14 years’ experience of actions and consequences in outcome measures in rheumatology (OMERACT). Patient 2017;10(2):141–152.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Urquhart-Secord R, Craig JC, Hemmelgarn B, et al.. Patient and caregiver priorities for outcomes in hemodialysis: an international nominal group technique study. Am J Kidney Dis 2016; 68(3):444–458.CrossRef Urquhart-Secord R, Craig JC, Hemmelgarn B, et al.. Patient and caregiver priorities for outcomes in hemodialysis: an international nominal group technique study. Am J Kidney Dis 2016; 68(3):444–458.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Esmail L, Moore E, Rein A. Evaluating patients and stakeholder engagement in research: moving from theory to practice. J Comp Eff Res 2015;4(2):133–145.CrossRef Esmail L, Moore E, Rein A. Evaluating patients and stakeholder engagement in research: moving from theory to practice. J Comp Eff Res 2015;4(2):133–145.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Mullins CD, Abdulhalim AM, Lavallee DC. Continuous patient engagement in comparative effectiveness research. JAMA 2012;307(15):1587–1588.CrossRef Mullins CD, Abdulhalim AM, Lavallee DC. Continuous patient engagement in comparative effectiveness research. JAMA 2012;307(15):1587–1588.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Concannon TW, Meissner P, Grunbaum JA, et al. A new taxonomy for stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research. J Gen Intern Med 2012;27(8):985–991.CrossRef Concannon TW, Meissner P, Grunbaum JA, et al. A new taxonomy for stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research. J Gen Intern Med 2012;27(8):985–991.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Deverka PA, Lavallee DC, Desai PJ, et al. Stakeholder participation in comparative effectiveness research: Defining a framework for effective engagement. J Comp Eff Res 2012;1(2):181–194.CrossRef Deverka PA, Lavallee DC, Desai PJ, et al. Stakeholder participation in comparative effectiveness research: Defining a framework for effective engagement. J Comp Eff Res 2012;1(2):181–194.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Frank L, Forsythe L, Ellis L, et al. Conceptual and practical foundations of patient engagement in research at the patient-centered outcomes research institute. Qual Life Res 2015;24(5):1033–1041.CrossRef Frank L, Forsythe L, Ellis L, et al. Conceptual and practical foundations of patient engagement in research at the patient-centered outcomes research institute. Qual Life Res 2015;24(5):1033–1041.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Tugwell P, Robinson V, Grimshaw J, Santesso N. Systematic reviews and knowledge translation. Bull World Health Organ 2006;84(8):643–51.CrossRef Tugwell P, Robinson V, Grimshaw J, Santesso N. Systematic reviews and knowledge translation. Bull World Health Organ 2006;84(8):643–51.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Schiller C, Winters M, Hanson HM, Ashe MC. A framework for stakeholder identification in concept mapping and health research: a novel process and its application to older adult mobility and the built environment. BMC Public Health 2013;13:428.CrossRef Schiller C, Winters M, Hanson HM, Ashe MC. A framework for stakeholder identification in concept mapping and health research: a novel process and its application to older adult mobility and the built environment. BMC Public Health 2013;13:428.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference O’Haire C, McPheeters M, Nakamoto EK, et al. Methods for engaging stakeholders to identify and prioritize future research needs. Methods Future Research Needs Report No. 4. AHRQ Publication No. 11-EHC044-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2011. O’Haire C, McPheeters M, Nakamoto EK, et al. Methods for engaging stakeholders to identify and prioritize future research needs. Methods Future Research Needs Report No. 4. AHRQ Publication No. 11-EHC044-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2011.
24.
go back to reference Esposito D, Heeringa J, Bradley K, Croake S, Kimmey L. PCORI Dissemination and Implementation Framework. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research; 2015. Esposito D, Heeringa J, Bradley K, Croake S, Kimmey L. PCORI Dissemination and Implementation Framework. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research; 2015.
25.
go back to reference Morain SR, Concannon TW, Wittenberg E. HIV, breast cancer and vaccines: what to high-profile cases reveal about stakeholder engagement in research? J Comp Eff Res 2017;6(1):43–49.CrossRef Morain SR, Concannon TW, Wittenberg E. HIV, breast cancer and vaccines: what to high-profile cases reveal about stakeholder engagement in research? J Comp Eff Res 2017;6(1):43–49.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Gradinger F, Britten N, Wyatt K, et al.. Values associated with public involvement in health and social care research: a narrative review. Health Expect 2015;18(5):661–675.CrossRef Gradinger F, Britten N, Wyatt K, et al.. Values associated with public involvement in health and social care research: a narrative review. Health Expect 2015;18(5):661–675.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Concannon TW. Can Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Improve Health Care? BMJ 2015;351:h3859.CrossRef Concannon TW. Can Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Improve Health Care? BMJ 2015;351:h3859.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Jull J, Mazereeuw M, Sheppard A, Kewayosh A, Steiner R, Graham ID. Tailoring and field-testing the use of a knowledge translation peer support shared decision making strategy with First Nations, Inuit and Métis people making decisions about their cancer care: a study protocol. Res Involv Engagem. 2018;4(6). DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-018-0085-3 Jull J, Mazereeuw M, Sheppard A, Kewayosh A, Steiner R, Graham ID. Tailoring and field-testing the use of a knowledge translation peer support shared decision making strategy with First Nations, Inuit and Métis people making decisions about their cancer care: a study protocol. Res Involv Engagem. 2018;4(6). DOI https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s40900-018-0085-3
35.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine. Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice. Washington: National Academies Press; 2009. Institute of Medicine. Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice. Washington: National Academies Press; 2009.
36.
go back to reference Harvard Business School Press. The Essentials of Negotiation. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing; 2005. Harvard Business School Press. The Essentials of Negotiation. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing; 2005.
37.
go back to reference Malhotra D, Bazerman MH. Negotiation Genius. New York: Bantam Books; 2008. Malhotra D, Bazerman MH. Negotiation Genius. New York: Bantam Books; 2008.
38.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington: The National Academies Press; 2011. Institute of Medicine. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington: The National Academies Press; 2011.
Metadata
Title
Practical Guidance for Involving Stakeholders in Health Research
Authors
Thomas W. Concannon, PhD
Sean Grant, PhD
Vivian Welch, PhD MSc
Jennifer Petkovic, PhD
Joseph Selby, MD MPH
Sally Crowe, PG Dip
Anneliese Synnot, MPH
Regina Greer-Smith, MPH
Evan Mayo-Wilson, DPhil
Ellen Tambor, MA
Peter Tugwell, MD MsC
for the Multi Stakeholder Engagement (MuSE) Consortium
Publication date
01-03-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-018-4738-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Journal of General Internal Medicine 3/2019 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine