Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 8/2016

01-08-2016 | Original Research

Prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence among Women Veterans who Utilize Veterans Health Administration Primary Care

Authors: Rachel Kimerling, Ph.D, Katherine M. Iverson, Ph.D, Melissa E. Dichter, Ph.D., M.S.W, Allison L. Rodriguez, B.A., Ava Wong, M.P.H, Joanne Pavao, M.P.H

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 8/2016

Login to get access

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to identify the prevalence of past-year intimate partner violence (IPV) among women Veterans utilizing Veterans Health Administration (VHA) primary care, and to document associated demographic, military, and primary care characteristics.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort design, where participants completed a telephone survey in 2012 (84% participation rate); responses were linked to VHA administrative data for utilization in the year prior to the survey.

PARTICIPANTS

A national stratified random sample of 6,287 women Veteran VHA primary care users participated in the study.

MAIN MEASURES

Past-year IPV was assessed using the HARK screening tool. Self-report items and scales assessed demographic and military characteristics. Primary care characteristics were assessed via self-report and VHA administrative data.

KEY RESULTS

The prevalence of past-year IPV among women Veterans was 18.5% (se = 0.5%), with higher rates (22.2% - 25.5%) among women up to age 55. Other demographic correlates included indicators of economic hardship, lesbian or bisexual orientation, and being a parent/guardian of a child less than 18 years old. Military correlates included service during Vietnam to post-Vietnam eras, less than 10 years of service, and experiences of Military Sexual Trauma (MST). Most (77.3%, se = 1.2%) women who experienced IPV identified a VHA provider as their usual provider. Compared with women who did not report past-year IPV, women who reported IPV had more primary care visits, yet experienced lower continuity of care across providers.

CONCLUSIONS

The high prevalence of past-year IPV among women beyond childbearing years, the majority of whom primarily rely on VHA as a source of health care, reinforces the importance of screening all women for IPV in VHA primary care settings. Key considerations for service implementation include sensitivity with respect to sexual orientation, race/ethnicity, and other aspects of diversity, as well as care coordination and linkages with social services and MST-related care.
Literature
1.
Hahn SA, Postmus JL. Economic empowerment of impoverished IPV survivors: a review of best practice literature and implications for policy. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2014;15(2):79–93.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Spivak HR, Jenkins L, VanAudenhove K, et al. CDC Grand Rounds: a public health approach to prevention of intimate partner violence. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014;63(2):38–41.
3.
Wong J, Mellor D. Intimate partner violence and women’s health and wellbeing: impacts, risk factors and responses. Contemp Nurse. 2014;46(2):170–9.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Dillon G, Hussain R, Loxton D, Rahman S. Mental and physical health and intimate partner violence against women: a review of the literature. Int J Fam Med. 2013;2013:313909.
5.
World Health Organization. Understanding and addressing violence against women: Intimate partner violence. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2012.
6.
Moyer VA, U. S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for intimate partner violence and abuse of elderly and vulnerable adults: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(6):478–86.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Institute of Medicine. Clinical Preventive Services for Women: Closing the Gaps. Washington: DC; 2011.
8.
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 119; 2010.
9.
de Boinville M. Screening for domestic violence in health care settings. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2013.
10.
Frayne SM, Phibbs CS, Saecho F, et al. Sociodemographics, Utilization, Costs of Care, and Health Profile. Washington, DC: Department of Veterans Affairs, Women’s Health Evaluation Initiative; 2014.
11.
Veterans Health Administration Domestic Violence Task Force. Plan for Implementation of the Domestic Violence/Intimate Partner Violence Assistance Program. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration;2013.
12.
Iverson KM, Wells SY, Wiltsey-Stirman S, Vaughn R, Gerber MR. VHA primary care providers’ perspectives on screening female veterans for intimate partner violence: a preliminary assessment. J Family Violence. 2013;28(8):823–31.CrossRef
13.
Sprague S, Goslings JC, Hogentoren C, et al. Prevalence of intimate partner violence across medical and surgical health care settings: a systematic review. Violence Against Women. 2014;20(1):118–36.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Dichter ME, Cerulli C, Bossarte RM. Intimate partner violence victimization among women veterans and associated heart health risks. Womens Health Issues. 2011;21(4 Suppl):S190–4.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Iverson KM, King MW, Resick PA, Gerber MR, Kimerling R, Vogt D. Clinical utility of an intimate partner violence screening tool for female VHA patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(10):1288–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Iverson KM, King MW, Gerber MR, et al. Accuracy of an intimate partner violence screening tool for female VHA patients: a replication and extension. J Trauma Stress. 2015;28(1):79–82.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Breiding MJ, Chen J, Black MC. Intimate Partner Violence in the United States—2010. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2014.
18.
Hahn JW, McCormick MC, Silverman JG, Robinson EB, Koenen KC. Examining the impact of disability status on intimate partner violence victimization in a population sample. J Interpers Viol. 2014;29(17):3063–85.CrossRef
19.
Walters ML, Chen J, Breiding MJ. The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 Findings on Victimization by Sexual Orientation. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2013.
20.
Gates G. Lesbian, gay, and bisexual men and women in the US military: Updated estimates. The Williams Institute; 2010.
21.
Fraser C. Family issues associated with military deployment, family violence, and military sexual trauma. NursClin N Am. 2011;46(4):445-455, vi.
22.
Iverson KM, Mercado R, Carpenter SL, Street AE. Intimate partner violence among women veterans: previous interpersonal violence as a risk factor. J Trauma Stress. 2013;26(6):767–71.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Iverson KM, Huang K, Wells SY, Wright JD, Gerber MR, Wiltsey-Stirman S. Women veterans’ preferences for intimate partner violence screening and response procedures within the Veterans Health Administration. Res Nurs Health. 2014;37(4):302–11.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Kimerling R, Pavao JR, Greene L, et al. Access to mental health care among women veterans: is VA meeting women's needs? Med Care. 2015;53(4 Suppl 1):S97–104.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Sohal H, Eldridge S, Feder G. The sensitivity and specificity of four questions (HARK) to identify intimate partner violence: a diagnostic accuracy study in general practice. BMC Fam Pract. 2007;8:49.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Institute of Medicine. Capturing social and behavioral domains and measures in electronic health records: phase 2. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2014.
27.
Phibbs CS, Cowgill EH, Fan AY. Guide to the PSSG Enrollee File. Guidebook. Menlo Park, CA: VA Palo Alto, Health Economics Resource Center; 2013.
28.
Department of Defense. Enhanced Post-Deployment Health Assessment (PDHA) Process (DD Form 2796); 2008.
29.
King DW, King LA, Vogt DS. Manual for the Deployment Risk and Resilience Inventory (DRRI): A Collection of Measures for Studying Deployment-Related Experienced of Military Veterans. Boston, MA: National Center for PTSD; 2003.
30.
31.
Rodriguez HP, Marshall RE, Rogers WH, Safran DG. Primary care physician visit continuity: a comparison of patient-reported and administratively derived measures. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(9):1499–502.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Sterne JAC, White IR, Carlin JB, et al. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls. Br Med J. 2009;338:b2393.CrossRef
33.
Stata Statistical Software: Release 12 [computer program]. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2011.
34.
Dichter ME, Marcus SC. Intimate partner violence victimization among women veterans: health, health care service use, and opportunities for intervention. Mil Behav Health. 2013;1(2):107–13.CrossRef
35.
Kimerling R, Alvarez J, Pavao J, Mack KP, Smith MW, Baumrind N. Unemployment among women: Examining the relationship of physical and psychological intimate partner violence and posttraumatic stress disorder. J Interpers Violence. 2009;24(3):450–63.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Tolman RM, Raphael J. A review of research on welfare and domestic violence. J Soc Iss Spec Iss Impact Welfare Reform. 2000;56(4):655–82.
37.
Baker CK, Billhardt KA, Warren J, Rollins C, Glass NE. Domestic violence, housing instability, and homelessness: a review of housing policies and program practices for meeting the needs of survivors. Aggress Violent Behav. 2010;15(6):430–9.CrossRef
38.
Hamilton AB, Poza I, Washington DL. “Homelessness and trauma go hand-in-hand”: pathways to homelessness among women veterans. Womens Health Iss. 2011;21(4 Suppl):S203–9.CrossRef
39.
Pavao J, Alvarez J, Baumrind N, Induni M, Kimerling R. Intimate partner violence and housing instability. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32(2):143–6.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Bair-Merritt MH, Lewis-O'Connor A, Goel S, et al. Primary care-based interventions for intimate partner violence: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2014;46(2):188–94.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Dichter ME, True G. “This is the Story of Why My Military Career Ended Before it Should Have”: Premature Separation from Military Service Among U.S. Women Veterans. Affilia; 2014.
42.
Arata CM. From child victim to adult victim: A model for predicting sexual revictimization. Child Maltreat. 2000;5(1):28–38.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Desai S, Arias I, Thompson MP, Basile KC. Childhood victimization and subsequent adult revictimization assessed in a nationally representative sample of women and men. Violence Vict. 2002;17(6):639–53.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Noll JG, Horowitz LA, Bonanno GA, Trickett PK, Putnam FW. Revictimization and self-harm in females who experienced childhood sexual abuse: results from a prospective study. J Interpers Viol. 2003;18(12):1452–71.CrossRef
45.
Kimerling R, Alvarez J, Pavao J, Kaminski A, Baumrind N. Epidemiology and consequences of women's revictimization. Women’s Health Iss. 2007;17(2):101–6.CrossRef
46.
Bonomi AE, Anderson ML, Rivara FP, Thompson RS. Health care utilization and costs associated with physical and nonphysical-only intimate partner violence. Health Serv Res. 2009;44(3):1052–67.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
47.
Ford-Gilboe M, Varcoe C, Noh M, et al. Patterns and predictors of service use among women who have separated from an abusive partner. J Fam Violence. 2015;30(4):419–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
48.
Katz DA, McCoy K, Sarrazin MV. Does improved continuity of primary care affect clinician-patient communication in VA? J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29(Suppl 2):S682–8.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Iverson KM, Vogt D, Dichter ME, et al. Intimate partner violence and current mental health needs among female veterans. J Am Board Fam Med. 2015;28(6):772–6.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Bertakis KD, Azari R, Helms LJ, Callahan EJ, Robbins JA. Gender differences in the utilization of health care services. J Fam Pract. 2000;49(2):147–52.PubMed
51.
Rosenthal MB, Alidina S, Friedberg MW, et al. A Difference-in-Difference Analysis of Changes in Quality, utilization and cost following the Colorado multi-payer patient-centered medical home pilot. J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31(3):289–96.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence among Women Veterans who Utilize Veterans Health Administration Primary Care
Authors
Rachel Kimerling, Ph.D
Katherine M. Iverson, Ph.D
Melissa E. Dichter, Ph.D., M.S.W
Allison L. Rodriguez, B.A.
Ava Wong, M.P.H
Joanne Pavao, M.P.H
Publication date
01-08-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 8/2016
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-016-3701-7

Other articles of this Issue 8/2016

Journal of General Internal Medicine 8/2016 Go to the issue

Letter to the Editor

Moral Distress Amongst Physician Trainees Regarding Futile Treatments

Capsule Commentary

Capsule Commentary on Patel et al., Change in Length of Stay and Readmissions Among Hospitalized Medical Patients After Inpatient Medicine Service Adoption of Mobile Secure Text Messaging

Clinical Practice: Clinical Images

Terry’s Nails and Lindsay’s Nails: Two Nail Abnormalities in Chronic Systemic Diseases

Original Research

“Deterioration to Door Time”: An Exploratory Analysis of Delays in Escalation of Care for Hospitalized Patients

Review Paper

Motivational Interviewing Improves Medication Adherence: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Original Research

Does Motivation Matter? Analysis of a Randomized Trial of Proactive Outreach to VA Smokers
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Reserve your place

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

Read more

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine
Image Credits