Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 12/2012

01-12-2012 | Original Research

I Don’t Want to Be the One Saying ‘We Should Just Let Him Die’: Intrapersonal Tensions Experienced by Surrogate Decision Makers in the ICU

Authors: Yael Schenker, MD, MAS, Megan Crowley-Matoka, PhD, Daniel Dohan, PhD, Greer A. Tiver, MPH, Robert M. Arnold, MD, Douglas B. White, MD, MAS

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 12/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although numerous studies have addressed external factors associated with difficulty in surrogate decision making, intrapersonal sources of tension are an important element of decision making that have received little attention.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize key intrapersonal tensions experienced by surrogate decision makers in the intensive care unit (ICU), and explore associated coping strategies.

DESIGN

Qualitative interview study.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty surrogates from five ICUs at two hospitals in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, who were actively involved in making life-sustaining treatment decisions for a critically ill loved one.

APPROACH

We conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with surrogates, focused on intrapersonal tensions, role challenges, and coping strategies. We analyzed transcripts using constant comparative methods.

KEY RESULTS

Surrogates experience significant emotional conflict between the desire to act in accordance with their loved one’s values and 1) not wanting to feel responsible for a loved one’s death, 2) a desire to pursue any chance of recovery, and 3) the need to preserve family well-being. Associated coping strategies included 1) recalling previous discussions with a loved one, 2) sharing decisions with family members, 3) delaying or deferring decision making, 4) spiritual/religious practices, and 5) story-telling.

CONCLUSIONS

Surrogates’ struggle to reconcile personal and family emotional needs with their loved ones’ wishes, and utilize common coping strategies to combat intrapersonal tensions. These data suggest reasons surrogates may struggle to follow a strict substituted judgment standard. They also suggest ways clinicians may improve decision making, including attending to surrogates’ emotions, facilitating family decision making, and eliciting potential emotional conflicts and spiritual needs.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Angus DC, et al. Use of intensive care at the end of life in the United States: an epidemiologic study. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(3):638–43.PubMedCrossRef Angus DC, et al. Use of intensive care at the end of life in the United States: an epidemiologic study. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(3):638–43.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Thompson BT, et al. Challenges in end-of-life care in the ICU: statement of the 5th International Consensus Conference in Critical Care: Brussels, Belgium, April 2003: executive summary. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(8):1781–4.PubMedCrossRef Thompson BT, et al. Challenges in end-of-life care in the ICU: statement of the 5th International Consensus Conference in Critical Care: Brussels, Belgium, April 2003: executive summary. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(8):1781–4.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Carlet J, et al. Challenges in end-of-life care in the ICU. Statement of the 5th International Consensus Conference in Critical Care: Brussels, Belgium, April 2003. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30(5):770–84.PubMedCrossRef Carlet J, et al. Challenges in end-of-life care in the ICU. Statement of the 5th International Consensus Conference in Critical Care: Brussels, Belgium, April 2003. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30(5):770–84.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Vig EK, et al. Beyond substituted judgment: how surrogates navigate end-of-life decision-making. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54(11):1688–93.PubMedCrossRef Vig EK, et al. Beyond substituted judgment: how surrogates navigate end-of-life decision-making. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54(11):1688–93.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Berger JT, DeRenzo EG, Schwartz J. Surrogate decision making: reconciling ethical theory and clinical practice. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(1):48–53.PubMed Berger JT, DeRenzo EG, Schwartz J. Surrogate decision making: reconciling ethical theory and clinical practice. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(1):48–53.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Torke AM, Alexander GC, Lantos J. Substituted judgment: the limitations of autonomy in surrogate decision making. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(9):1514–7.PubMedCrossRef Torke AM, Alexander GC, Lantos J. Substituted judgment: the limitations of autonomy in surrogate decision making. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(9):1514–7.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Wendler D, Rid A. Systematic review: the effect on surrogates of making treatment decisions for others. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154(5):336–46.PubMed Wendler D, Rid A. Systematic review: the effect on surrogates of making treatment decisions for others. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154(5):336–46.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Tilden VP, et al. Decisions about life-sustaining treatment. Impact of physicians' behaviors on the family. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155(6):633–8.PubMedCrossRef Tilden VP, et al. Decisions about life-sustaining treatment. Impact of physicians' behaviors on the family. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155(6):633–8.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Limerick MH. The process used by surrogate decision makers to withhold and withdraw life-sustaining measures in an intensive care environment. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2007;34(2):331–9.PubMedCrossRef Limerick MH. The process used by surrogate decision makers to withhold and withdraw life-sustaining measures in an intensive care environment. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2007;34(2):331–9.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Braun UK, et al. Voices of African American, Caucasian, and Hispanic surrogates on the burdens of end-of-life decision making. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(3):267–74.PubMedCrossRef Braun UK, et al. Voices of African American, Caucasian, and Hispanic surrogates on the burdens of end-of-life decision making. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(3):267–74.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Apatira L, et al. Hope, truth, and preparing for death: perspectives of surrogate decision makers. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(12):861–8.PubMed Apatira L, et al. Hope, truth, and preparing for death: perspectives of surrogate decision makers. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(12):861–8.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Lind R, et al. Family members' experiences of "wait and see" as a communication strategy in end-of-life decisions. Intensive Care Med. 37(7):1143-50. Lind R, et al. Family members' experiences of "wait and see" as a communication strategy in end-of-life decisions. Intensive Care Med. 37(7):1143-50.
13.
go back to reference Radwany S, et al. End-of-life decision making and emotional burden: placing family meetings in context. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2009;26(5):376–83.PubMedCrossRef Radwany S, et al. End-of-life decision making and emotional burden: placing family meetings in context. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2009;26(5):376–83.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Vig EK, et al. Surviving surrogate decision-making: what helps and hampers the experience of making medical decisions for others. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(9):1274–9.PubMedCrossRef Vig EK, et al. Surviving surrogate decision-making: what helps and hampers the experience of making medical decisions for others. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(9):1274–9.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lautrette A, et al. A communication strategy and brochure for relatives of patients dying in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(5):469–78.PubMedCrossRef Lautrette A, et al. A communication strategy and brochure for relatives of patients dying in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(5):469–78.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Mitchell SL, Tetroe J, O'Connor AM. A decision aid for long-term tube feeding in cognitively impaired older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49(3):313–6.PubMedCrossRef Mitchell SL, Tetroe J, O'Connor AM. A decision aid for long-term tube feeding in cognitively impaired older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49(3):313–6.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Peigne V, et al. Important questions asked by family members of intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(6):1365–71.PubMedCrossRef Peigne V, et al. Important questions asked by family members of intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(6):1365–71.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Azoulay E, et al. Impact of a family information leaflet on effectiveness of information provided to family members of intensive care unit patients: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;165(4):438–42.PubMed Azoulay E, et al. Impact of a family information leaflet on effectiveness of information provided to family members of intensive care unit patients: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;165(4):438–42.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Scheunemann LP, et al. Randomized, controlled trials of interventions to improve communication in intensive care: a systematic review. Chest. 2011;139(3):543–54.PubMedCrossRef Scheunemann LP, et al. Randomized, controlled trials of interventions to improve communication in intensive care: a systematic review. Chest. 2011;139(3):543–54.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Murphy P, et al. Description of the SUPPORT intervention. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48(5 Suppl):S154–61.PubMed Murphy P, et al. Description of the SUPPORT intervention. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48(5 Suppl):S154–61.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Jezewski MA. Do-not-resuscitate status: conflict and culture brokering in critical care units. Heart Lung. 1994;23(6):458–65.PubMed Jezewski MA. Do-not-resuscitate status: conflict and culture brokering in critical care units. Heart Lung. 1994;23(6):458–65.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Kvale S. Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1996. Kvale S. Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1996.
24.
go back to reference Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage Publications; 2006. Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage Publications; 2006.
25.
go back to reference Grbich C. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Introduction. London: Sage Publications; 2007. Grbich C. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Introduction. London: Sage Publications; 2007.
26.
go back to reference Wiegand D. In their own time: the family experience during the process of withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy. J Palliat Med. 2008;11(8):1115–21.PubMedCrossRef Wiegand D. In their own time: the family experience during the process of withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy. J Palliat Med. 2008;11(8):1115–21.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Azoulay E, et al. Risk of post-traumatic stress symptoms in family members of intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;171(9):987–94.PubMedCrossRef Azoulay E, et al. Risk of post-traumatic stress symptoms in family members of intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;171(9):987–94.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference White DB, et al. Expanding the paradigm of the physician's role in surrogate decision-making: an empirically derived framework. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(3):743–50.PubMedCrossRef White DB, et al. Expanding the paradigm of the physician's role in surrogate decision-making: an empirically derived framework. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(3):743–50.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Braun UK, Naik AD, McCullough LB. Reconceptualizing the experience of surrogate decision making: reports vs genuine decisions. Ann Fam Med. 2009;7(3):249–53.PubMedCrossRef Braun UK, Naik AD, McCullough LB. Reconceptualizing the experience of surrogate decision making: reports vs genuine decisions. Ann Fam Med. 2009;7(3):249–53.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Billings JA, Krakauer EL. On patient autonomy and physician responsibility in end-of-life care. Arch Intern Med. 171(9):849-53. Billings JA, Krakauer EL. On patient autonomy and physician responsibility in end-of-life care. Arch Intern Med. 171(9):849-53.
31.
go back to reference Quill TE, Holloway R. Time-limited trials near the end of life. JAMA. 306(13):1483-4. Quill TE, Holloway R. Time-limited trials near the end of life. JAMA. 306(13):1483-4.
Metadata
Title
I Don’t Want to Be the One Saying ‘We Should Just Let Him Die’: Intrapersonal Tensions Experienced by Surrogate Decision Makers in the ICU
Authors
Yael Schenker, MD, MAS
Megan Crowley-Matoka, PhD
Daniel Dohan, PhD
Greer A. Tiver, MPH
Robert M. Arnold, MD
Douglas B. White, MD, MAS
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 12/2012
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2129-y

Other articles of this Issue 12/2012

Journal of General Internal Medicine 12/2012 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine