Top

Journal of General Internal Medicine

Published in:

01-02-2012 | Original Research

A Validation Study of the Spoken Knowledge in Low Literacy in Diabetes Scale (SKILLD)

Authors: Kelly Marvin Jeppesen, MD, MPH, Benjamin P. Hull, BS, Matthew Raines, BS, William F. Miser, MD, MA

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 2/2012

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

In 2005 the Spoken Knowledge in Low Literacy in Diabetes scale (SKILLD) was introduced as a diabetes knowledge test. The SKILLD has not been validated since its introduction.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a validation analysis on the SKILLD.

DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS

Cross-sectional observational study of 240 patients with diabetes at an academic family practice center.

MAIN MEASURES

SKILLD’s correlation with an oral form of the Diabetes Knowledge Test (DKT) was used to assess criterion validity. A regression model tested construct validity, hypothesizing that SKILLD score was independently related to health literacy and education level. Content validity was tested using Cronbach’s Alpha for inter-item relatedness and by comparing SKILLD items with the content of a National Institutes of Health (NIH) diabetes education website. We assessed inter-rater reliability and bias using Spearman correlation coefficients and sign-rank tests between interviewers scoring the same interview.

KEY RESULTS

The SKILLD demonstrated fair correlation with the DKT (Pearson’s coefficient 0.54, 95% CI = 0.49 to 0.66, p < 0.001). Health literacy, education level, male gender, household income, and years with diabetes were independent predictors of SKILLD score in the regression model. Cronbach’s Alpha for inter-item relatedness was 0.54. There were some topics on the NIH website not addressed by the SKILLD. The inter-rater correlation coefficient was 0.79 (95% CI 0.56 to 0.91, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The SKILLD is an adequate diabetes knowledge test and is appropriate for people of all literacy levels. However, it should be expanded to more completely evaluate diabetes knowledge.

Available only for authorised users

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. National Diabetes Statistics fact sheet: General information and national estimates of diabetes in the United States, 2005. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Health; 2005.

McKinlay J, Marceau L. US public health and the 21st century: diabetes mellitus. Lancet. 2000;356:757–61.PubMedCrossRef

Standards of medical care in diabetes--2009. Diabetes Care 2009;32 Suppl 1:S13-61.

Saaddine J, Cadwell B, Gregg E, et al. Improvements in diabetes processes of care and intermediate outcomes: United States, 1988–2002. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(7):465–74.PubMed

Moffet HH, Parker MM, Sarkar U, et al. Adherence to laboratory test requests by patients with diabetes: the diabetes study of northern California (DISTANCE). Am J Manag Care. 2011;17(5):339–344.PubMed

Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2. JAMA. 2002;288:1909–14.PubMedCrossRef

Brown SA. Effects of educational interventions in diabetes care: a meta-analysis of findings. Nurs Res. 1988;37:223–30.PubMed

Brown SA, Garcia AA, Kouzekanani K, Hanis CL. Culturally competent diabetes self-management education for Mexican Americans: the Starr County border health initiative. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:259–68.PubMedCrossRef

Scain SF, Friedman R, Gross JL. A structured educational program improves metabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Educ. 2009;35:603–11.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Samuel-Hodge CD, Keyserling TC, Park S, Johnston LF, Gizlice Z, Bangdiwala SI. A randomized trial of a church-based diabetes self-management program for African Americans with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2009;35:439–54.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Deakin T, McShane CE, Cade JE, Williams RD. Group based training for self-management strategies in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005:CD003417.

12.

Norris SL, Engelgau MM, Narayan KM. Effectiveness of self-management training in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:561–87.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Hawthorne K, Robles Y, Cannings-John R, Edwards AG. Culturally appropriate health education for type 2 diabetes mellitus in ethnic minority groups. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008:CD006424.

14.

Deakin TA, Cade JE, Williams R, Greenwood DC. Structured patient education: the diabetes X-PERT Programme makes a difference. Diabet Med. 2006;23:944–54.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Herenda S, Tahirovic H, Poljakovic D. Impact of education on disease knowledge and glycaemic control among type 2 diabetic patients in family practice. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2007;7:261–5.PubMed

16.

Iqbal N, Morgan C, Maksoud H, Idris I. Improving patients’ knowledge on the relationship between HbA1c and mean plasma glucose improves glycaemic control among persons with poorly controlled diabetes. Ann Clin Biochem. 2008;45:504–7.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Colleran KM, Starr B, Burge MR. Putting diabetes to the test: Analyzing glycemic control based on patients’ diabetes knowledge. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:2220–1.PubMedCrossRef

18.

Panja S, Starr B, Colleran KM. Patient knowledge improves glycemic control: is it time to go back to the classroom? J Investig Med. 2005;53:264–6.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Corser W, Holmes-Rovner M, Lein C, Gossain V. A shared decision-making primary care intervention for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2007;33:700–8.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Bendik CF, Keller U, Moriconi N, et al. Training in flexible intensive insulin therapy improves quality of life, decreases the risk of hypoglycaemia and ameliorates poor metabolic control in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2009;83:327–33.PubMedCrossRef

21.

van den Arend IJ, Stolk RP, Rutten GE, Schrijvers GJ. Education integrated into structured general practice care for Type 2 diabetic patients results in sustained improvement of disease knowledge and self-care. Diabet Med. 2000;17:190–7.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Miller CK, Gutschall M. A randomized trial about glycemic index and glycemic load improves outcomes among adults with type 2 diabetes. Health Educ Behav. 2009;36:615–26.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Duke SA, Colagiuri S, Colagiuri R. Individual patient education for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009:CD005268.

24.

Fitzgerald JT, Funnell MM, Hess GE, et al. The reliability and validity of a brief diabetes knowledge test. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:706–10.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Jeppesen KM, Coyle JD, Miser WF. Screening questions to predict limited health literacy: a cross-sectional study of patients with diabetes mellitus. Ann Fam Med. 2009;7:24–31.PubMedCrossRef

26.

Schillinger D, Grumbach K, Piette J, et al. Association of health literacy with diabetes outcomes. JAMA. 2002;288:475–82.PubMedCrossRef

27.

Powell CK, Hill EG, Clancy DE. The relationship between health literacy and diabetes knowledge and readiness to take health actions. Diabetes Educ. 2007;33:144–51.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Aikens JE, Piette JD. Diabetic patients’ medication underuse, illness outcomes, and beliefs about antihyperglycemic and antihypertensive treatments. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:19–24.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Berkman N, DeWalt D, Pignone M, et al. Literacy and Health Outcomes. Summary, Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 87 (Prepared by RTI International-University of North Carolina Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-02-0016). AHRQ Publication No. 04-E007-1. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. January 2004.

30.

Williams MV, Baker DW, Honig EG, Lee TM, Nowlan A. Inadequate literacy is a barrier to asthma knowledge and self-care. Chest. 1998;114:1008–15.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Wolf MS, Gazmararian JA, Baker DW. Health literacy and functional health status among older adults. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:1946–52.PubMedCrossRef

32.

Gazmararian JA, Baker DW, Williams MV, et al. Health literacy among Medicare enrollees in a managed care organization. JAMA. 1999;281:545–51.PubMedCrossRef

33.

Paasche-Orlow MK, Parker RM, Gazmararian JA, Nielsen-Bohlman LT, Rudd RR. The prevalence of limited health literacy. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:175–84.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Osborn CY, Cavanaugh K, Wallston KA, White RO, Rothman RL. Diabetes numeracy: an overlooked factor in understanding racial disparities in glycemic control. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:1614–9.PubMedCrossRef

35.

Tang YH, Pang SM, Chan MF, Yeung GS, Yeung VT. Health literacy, complication awareness, and diabetic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62:74–83.PubMedCrossRef

36.

Bains SS, Egede LE. Associations between health literacy, diabetes knowledge, self-care behaviors, and glycemic control in a low income population with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011;13(3):335–341.PubMedCrossRef

37.

Kandula NR, Nsiah-Kumi PA, Makoul G, et al. The relationship between health literacy and knowledge improvement after a multimedia type 2 diabetes education program. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;75:321–7.PubMedCrossRef

38.

Wallace AS, Seligman HK, Davis TC, et al. Literacy-appropriate educational materials and brief counseling improve diabetes self-management. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;75:328–33.PubMedCrossRef

39.

Corkery E, Palmer C, Foley ME, Schechter CB, Frisher L, Roman SH. Effect of a bicultural community health worker on completion of diabetes education in a Hispanic population. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:254–7.PubMedCrossRef

40.

Rothman R, Malone R, Bryant B, Horlen C, DeWalt D, Pignone M. The relationship between literacy and glycemic control in a diabetes disease-management program. Diabetes Educ. 2004;30:263–73.PubMedCrossRef

41.

Hill-Briggs F, Renosky R, Lazo M, et al. Development and pilot evaluation of literacy-adapted diabetes and CVD education in urban, diabetic African Americans. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:1491–4.PubMedCrossRef

42.

Wolff K, Cavanaugh K, Malone R, et al. The Diabetes Literacy and Numeracy Education Toolkit (DLNET): materials to facilitate diabetes education and management in patients with low literacy and numeracy skills. Diabetes Educ 2009;35:233–6, 38–41, 44–5.

43.

Kleinbeck C. Reaching positive diabetes outcomes for patients with low literacy. Home Healthc Nurse. 2005;23:16–22.PubMed

44.

Rothman RL, Malone R, Bryant B, et al. The Spoken Knowledge in Low Literacy in Diabetes scale: a diabetes knowledge scale for vulnerable patients. Diabetes Educ. 2005;31:215–24.PubMedCrossRef

45.

Davis TC, Long SW, Jackson RH, et al. Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument. Fam Med. 1993;25:391–5.PubMed

46.

National Diabetes Education Program. Available at: http://www.ndep.nih.gov/. Accessed September 13, 2011.

47.

Herenda S, Tahirovic H, Zildzic M. Impact of education on metabolic control in type 2 diabetic patients in family practice. Med Arh. 2007;61:236–9.PubMed

Title: A Validation Study of the Spoken Knowledge in Low Literacy in Diabetes Scale (SKILLD)
Authors: Kelly Marvin Jeppesen, MD, MPH
Benjamin P. Hull, BS
Matthew Raines, BS
William F. Miser, MD, MA
Publication date: 01-02-2012
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 2/2012
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1900-9

Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Reserve your place

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin

Prof. Florian Limbourg

Prof. Anoop Chauhan

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

OBJECTIVE

DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS

MAIN MEASURES

KEY RESULTS

CONCLUSIONS

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 2/2012

Cost Implications of ACGME’s 2011 Changes to Resident Duty Hours and the Training Environment

The ACGME’s 2011 Changes to Resident Duty Hours: Are They an Unfunded Mandate on Teaching Hospitals?

Relationship of Health Literacy to Intentional and Unintentional Non-Adherence of Hospital Discharge Medications

Erratum to: Cost Implications of ACGME’s 2011 Changes to Resident Duty Hours and the Training Environment

Differential Diagnosis Generators: an Evaluation of Currently Available Computer Programs

Career Satisfaction in Primary Care: A Comparison of International and US Medical Graduates

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

At a glance: The STEP trials