Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 10/2011

01-10-2011 | Original Research

The Patient–Doctor Relationship and Online Social Networks: Results of a National Survey

Authors: Gabriel T. Bosslet, MD, MA, Alexia M. Torke, MD, Susan E. Hickman, PhD, Colin L. Terry, MS, Paul R. Helft, MD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 10/2011

Login to get access

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

The use of online social networks (OSNs) among physicians and physicians-in-training, the extent of patient–doctor interactions within OSNs, and attitudes among these groups toward use of OSNs is not well described.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the use of OSNs, patient interactions within OSNs, and attitudes toward OSNs among medical students (MS), resident physicians (RP), and practicing physicians (PP) in the United States.

DESIGN/SETTING

A random, stratified mail survey was sent to 1004 MS, 1004 RP, and 1004 PP between February and May 2010.

MEASUREMENTS

Percentage of respondents reporting OSN use, the nature and frequency of use; percentage of respondents reporting friend requests by patients or patients’ family members, frequency of these requests, and whether or not they were accepted; attitudes toward physician use of OSNs and online patient interactions.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 16.0% (19.8% MS, 14.3% RP, 14.1% PP). 93.5% of MS, 79.4% of RP, and 41.6% of PP reported usage of OSNs. PP were more likely to report having visited the profile of a patient or patient’s family member (MS 2.3%, RP 3.9%, PP 15.5%), and were more likely to have received friend requests from patients or their family members (MS 1.2%, RP 7.8%, PP 34.5%). A majority did not think it ethically acceptable to interact with patients within OSNs for either social (68.3%) or patient-care (68.0%) reasons. Almost half of respondents (48.7%) were pessimistic about the potential for OSNs to improve patient–doctor communication, and a majority (79%) expressed concerns about maintaining patient confidentiality.

CONCLUSION

Personal OSN use among physicians and physicians-in-training mirrors that of the general population. Patient–doctor interactions take place within OSNs, and are more typically initiated by patients than by physicians or physicians-in-training. A majority of respondents view these online interactions as ethically problematic.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
5.
go back to reference Hawn C. Take two aspirin and tweet me in the morning: how Twitter, Facebook, and other social media are reshaping health care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28(2):361–368.CrossRef Hawn C. Take two aspirin and tweet me in the morning: how Twitter, Facebook, and other social media are reshaping health care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28(2):361–368.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Chretien KC, Greysen SR, Chretien JP, Kind T. Online posting of unprofessional content by medical students. JAMA. 2009;302(12):1309–1315.PubMedCrossRef Chretien KC, Greysen SR, Chretien JP, Kind T. Online posting of unprofessional content by medical students. JAMA. 2009;302(12):1309–1315.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lacson SM, Bradley C, Arkfeld DG. Facebook medicine. J Rheumatol. 2009;36(1):211.PubMed Lacson SM, Bradley C, Arkfeld DG. Facebook medicine. J Rheumatol. 2009;36(1):211.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Moubarak G, Guiot A, Benhamou Y, Benhamou A, Hariri S. Facebook activity of residents and fellows and its impact on the doctor-patient relationship. J Med Ethics. 2011;37(2):101–104.PubMedCrossRef Moubarak G, Guiot A, Benhamou Y, Benhamou A, Hariri S. Facebook activity of residents and fellows and its impact on the doctor-patient relationship. J Med Ethics. 2011;37(2):101–104.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Guseh JS 2nd, Brendel RW, Brendel DH. Medical professionalism in the age of online social networking. J Med Ethics. 2009;35(9):584–586.PubMedCrossRef Guseh JS 2nd, Brendel RW, Brendel DH. Medical professionalism in the age of online social networking. J Med Ethics. 2009;35(9):584–586.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kellerman SE, Herold J. Physician response to surveys. A review of the literature. Am J Prev Med. 2001;20(1):61–67.PubMedCrossRef Kellerman SE, Herold J. Physician response to surveys. A review of the literature. Am J Prev Med. 2001;20(1):61–67.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Thompson LA, Dawson K, Ferdig R, Black EW, Boyer J, Coutts J, Black NP. The intersection of online social networking with medical professionalism. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(7):954–957.PubMedCrossRef Thompson LA, Dawson K, Ferdig R, Black EW, Boyer J, Coutts J, Black NP. The intersection of online social networking with medical professionalism. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(7):954–957.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Fletcher D. Facebook. Time. 2010;175(21):32–38. Fletcher D. Facebook. Time. 2010;175(21):32–38.
17.
go back to reference Grover M. Defining the patient-physician relationship in the era of Facebook. Acad Med. 2010;85(8):1262.PubMedCrossRef Grover M. Defining the patient-physician relationship in the era of Facebook. Acad Med. 2010;85(8):1262.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference MacDonald J, Sohn S, Ellis P. Privacy, professionalism and Facebook: a dilemma for young doctors. Med Educ. 2010;44(8):805–813.PubMedCrossRef MacDonald J, Sohn S, Ellis P. Privacy, professionalism and Facebook: a dilemma for young doctors. Med Educ. 2010;44(8):805–813.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Gorrindo T, Groves JE. Web searching for information about physicians. JAMA. 2008;300(2):213–215.PubMedCrossRef Gorrindo T, Groves JE. Web searching for information about physicians. JAMA. 2008;300(2):213–215.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Greysen SR, Kind T, Chretien KC. Online professionalism and the mirror of social media. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(11):1227–1229.PubMedCrossRef Greysen SR, Kind T, Chretien KC. Online professionalism and the mirror of social media. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(11):1227–1229.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Farnan JM, Paro JA, Higa J, Edelson J, Arora VM. The YouTube generation: implications for medical professionalism. Perspect Biol Med. 2008;51(4):517–524.PubMedCrossRef Farnan JM, Paro JA, Higa J, Edelson J, Arora VM. The YouTube generation: implications for medical professionalism. Perspect Biol Med. 2008;51(4):517–524.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Lagu T, Kaufman EJ, Asch DA, Armstrong K. Content of weblogs written by health professionals. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(10):1642–1646.PubMedCrossRef Lagu T, Kaufman EJ, Asch DA, Armstrong K. Content of weblogs written by health professionals. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(10):1642–1646.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Rosenblum D. What anyone can know - The privacy risks of social networking sites. Ieee Security & Privacy. 2007;5(3):40–49.CrossRef Rosenblum D. What anyone can know - The privacy risks of social networking sites. Ieee Security & Privacy. 2007;5(3):40–49.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Martin BC. Don’t survey physicians! Chicago: American Medical Association; 1974. Martin BC. Don’t survey physicians! Chicago: American Medical Association; 1974.
28.
go back to reference Gorrindo T, Gorrindo PC, Groves JE. Intersection of online social networking with medical professionalism: can medicine police the Facebook boom? J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(12):2155. author reply 2156.PubMedCrossRef Gorrindo T, Gorrindo PC, Groves JE. Intersection of online social networking with medical professionalism: can medicine police the Facebook boom? J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(12):2155. author reply 2156.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Patient–Doctor Relationship and Online Social Networks: Results of a National Survey
Authors
Gabriel T. Bosslet, MD, MA
Alexia M. Torke, MD
Susan E. Hickman, PhD
Colin L. Terry, MS
Paul R. Helft, MD
Publication date
01-10-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 10/2011
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1761-2

Other articles of this Issue 10/2011

Journal of General Internal Medicine 10/2011 Go to the issue

Clinical Practice: Clinical Images

Radiation Pneumonitis

Healing Arts: Materia Medica

The Seventy Percent Solution

Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine