Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 9/2009

01-09-2009 | Original Article

Physicians’ Experience with Surrogate Decision Making for Hospitalized Adults

Authors: Alexia M. Torke, MD, MS, Mark Siegler, MD, Anna Abalos, MD, Rachael M. Moloney, BA, G. Caleb Alexander, MD, MS

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 9/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Hospitalized patients frequently lack decision-making ability, yet little is known about physicians’ approaches to surrogate decision making.

Objective

To describe physicians’ experiences with surrogate communication and decision making for hospitalized adults.

Design

Cross-sectional written survey.

Participants

Two hundred eighty-one physicians who recently cared for adult inpatients in one academic and two community hospitals.

Measurements

Key features of physicians’ most recent surrogate decision-making experience, including the nature of the decision, the physician’s reaction, physician-surrogate communication and physician-surrogate agreement about the best course of action.

Results

Nearly three fourths of physicians (73%, n = 206) had made a major decision with a surrogate during the past month. Although nearly all patients (90%) had a surrogate, physicians reported trouble contacting the surrogate in 21% of cases. Conflict was rare (5%), and a majority of physicians agreed with surrogates about the medical facts (77%), prognosis (72%) and best course of action (65%). After adjustment for patient, physician and decision characteristics, agreement about the best course of action was more common among surrogates for older patients [prevalence ratio (PR) = 1.17 for each decade; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02–1.31], ICU patients (PR = 1.40; CI 1.14–1.51) and patients who had previously discussed their wishes (PR = 1.60; CI 1.30–1.76), and less common when surrogates were difficult to contact (PR = 0.59; CI 0.29–0.92) or when the physician self-identified as Asian (PR = 0.60; CI 0.30–0.94).

Conclusion

Surrogate decision making is common among hospitalized adults. Physician-surrogate decision making may be enhanced if patients discuss their preferences in advance and if physician contact with surrogate decision makers is facilitated.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Raymont V, Bingley W, Buchanan A, David AS, Hayward P, Wessely S, et al. Prevalence of mental incapacity in medical inpatients and associated risk factors: cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2004;364:1421–7.PubMedCrossRef Raymont V, Bingley W, Buchanan A, David AS, Hayward P, Wessely S, et al. Prevalence of mental incapacity in medical inpatients and associated risk factors: cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2004;364:1421–7.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference SUPPORT. A Controlled Trial to Improve Care for Seriously Ill Hospitalized Patients: The Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments (SUPPORT). JAMA. 1995;274:1591–8. SUPPORT. A Controlled Trial to Improve Care for Seriously Ill Hospitalized Patients: The Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments (SUPPORT). JAMA. 1995;274:1591–8.
3.
go back to reference Covinsky KE, Fuller JD, Yaffe K, Johnston CB, Hamel MB, Lynn J, et al. Communication and decision-making in seriously ill patients: findings of the SUPPORT project. The Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48(5 Suppl):S187–93.PubMed Covinsky KE, Fuller JD, Yaffe K, Johnston CB, Hamel MB, Lynn J, et al. Communication and decision-making in seriously ill patients: findings of the SUPPORT project. The Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48(5 Suppl):S187–93.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Teno JM, Fisher ES, Hamel MB, Coppola K, Dawson NV. Medical care inconsistent with patients' treatment goals: association with 1-year Medicare resource use and survival. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50:496–500.PubMedCrossRef Teno JM, Fisher ES, Hamel MB, Coppola K, Dawson NV. Medical care inconsistent with patients' treatment goals: association with 1-year Medicare resource use and survival. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50:496–500.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Teno JM, Clarridge BR, Casey V, Welch LC, Wetle T, Shield R, et al. Family perspectives on end-of-life care at the last place of care. JAMA. 2004;291:88–93.PubMedCrossRef Teno JM, Clarridge BR, Casey V, Welch LC, Wetle T, Shield R, et al. Family perspectives on end-of-life care at the last place of care. JAMA. 2004;291:88–93.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Torke AM, Alexander GC, Lantos J, Siegler M. The physician-surrogate relationship. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:1117–21.PubMedCrossRef Torke AM, Alexander GC, Lantos J, Siegler M. The physician-surrogate relationship. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:1117–21.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hurst SA, Perrier A, Pegoraro R, Reiter-Theil S, Forde R, Slowther AM, et al. Ethical difficulties in clinical practice: experiences of European doctors. J Med Ethics. 2007;33:51–7.PubMedCrossRef Hurst SA, Perrier A, Pegoraro R, Reiter-Theil S, Forde R, Slowther AM, et al. Ethical difficulties in clinical practice: experiences of European doctors. J Med Ethics. 2007;33:51–7.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Abbott KH, Sago JG, Breen CM, Abernethy AP, Tulsky JA. Families looking back: one year after discussion of withdrawal or withholding of life-sustaining support. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:197–201.PubMedCrossRef Abbott KH, Sago JG, Breen CM, Abernethy AP, Tulsky JA. Families looking back: one year after discussion of withdrawal or withholding of life-sustaining support. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:197–201.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Breen CM, Abernethy AP, Abbott KH, Tulsky JA. Conflict associated with decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment in intensive care units. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:283–9.PubMedCrossRef Breen CM, Abernethy AP, Abbott KH, Tulsky JA. Conflict associated with decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment in intensive care units. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:283–9.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Swigart V, Lidz C, Butterworth V, Arnold R. Letting go: family willingness to forgo life support. Heart Lung. 1996;25:483–94.PubMedCrossRef Swigart V, Lidz C, Butterworth V, Arnold R. Letting go: family willingness to forgo life support. Heart Lung. 1996;25:483–94.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Jacob DA. Family members' experiences with decision making for incompetent patients in the ICU: a qualitative study. Am J Crit Care. 1998;7:30–6.PubMed Jacob DA. Family members' experiences with decision making for incompetent patients in the ICU: a qualitative study. Am J Crit Care. 1998;7:30–6.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Tilden VP, Tolle SW, Nelson CA, Fields J. Family decision-making to withdraw life-sustaining treatments from hospitalized patients. Nurs Res. 2001;50:105–15.PubMedCrossRef Tilden VP, Tolle SW, Nelson CA, Fields J. Family decision-making to withdraw life-sustaining treatments from hospitalized patients. Nurs Res. 2001;50:105–15.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Vig EK, Taylor JS, Starks H, Hopley EK, Fryer-Edwards K. Beyond substituted judgment: How surrogates navigate end-of-life decision-making. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54:1688–93.PubMedCrossRef Vig EK, Taylor JS, Starks H, Hopley EK, Fryer-Edwards K. Beyond substituted judgment: How surrogates navigate end-of-life decision-making. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54:1688–93.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Vig EK, Starks H, Taylor JS, Hopley EK, Fryer-Edwards K. Surviving surrogate decision-making: what helps and hampers the experience of making medical decisions for others. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:1274–9.PubMedCrossRef Vig EK, Starks H, Taylor JS, Hopley EK, Fryer-Edwards K. Surviving surrogate decision-making: what helps and hampers the experience of making medical decisions for others. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:1274–9.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Curtis JR, Engelberg RA, Wenrich MD, Shannon SE, Treece PD, Rubenfeld GD. Missed opportunities during family conferences about end-of-life care in the intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;171:844–9.PubMedCrossRef Curtis JR, Engelberg RA, Wenrich MD, Shannon SE, Treece PD, Rubenfeld GD. Missed opportunities during family conferences about end-of-life care in the intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;171:844–9.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lilly CM, De Meo DL, Sonna LA, Haley KJ, Massaro AF, Wallace RF, et al. An intensive communication intervention for the critically ill. Am J Med. 2000;109:469–75.PubMedCrossRef Lilly CM, De Meo DL, Sonna LA, Haley KJ, Massaro AF, Wallace RF, et al. An intensive communication intervention for the critically ill. Am J Med. 2000;109:469–75.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lilly CM, Sonna LA, Haley KJ, Massaro AF. Intensive communication: 4-year follow-up from a clinical practice study. Crit Care Med. 2003;31(5 Suppl):S394–9.PubMedCrossRef Lilly CM, Sonna LA, Haley KJ, Massaro AF. Intensive communication: 4-year follow-up from a clinical practice study. Crit Care Med. 2003;31(5 Suppl):S394–9.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lautrette A, Darmon M, Megarbane B, Joly LM, Chevret S, Adrie C, et al. A communication strategy and brochure for relatives of patients dying in the ICU. New Engl J Med. 2007;356:469–78.PubMedCrossRef Lautrette A, Darmon M, Megarbane B, Joly LM, Chevret S, Adrie C, et al. A communication strategy and brochure for relatives of patients dying in the ICU. New Engl J Med. 2007;356:469–78.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Tilden VP, Tolle SW, Garland MJ, Nelson CA. Decisions about life-sustaining treatment. Impact of physicians' behaviors on the family. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:633–8.PubMedCrossRef Tilden VP, Tolle SW, Garland MJ, Nelson CA. Decisions about life-sustaining treatment. Impact of physicians' behaviors on the family. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:633–8.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Perkins HS, Bauer RL, Hazuda HP, Schoolfield JD. Impact of legal liability, family wishes, and other "external factors" on physicians' life-support decisions. Am J Med. 1990;89:185–94.PubMedCrossRef Perkins HS, Bauer RL, Hazuda HP, Schoolfield JD. Impact of legal liability, family wishes, and other "external factors" on physicians' life-support decisions. Am J Med. 1990;89:185–94.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hardin SB, Yusufaly YA. Difficult end-of-life treatment decisions: do other factors trump advance directives?[erratum appears in Arch Intern Med. 2004; 164(19):2124]. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:1531–3. Hardin SB, Yusufaly YA. Difficult end-of-life treatment decisions: do other factors trump advance directives?[erratum appears in Arch Intern Med. 2004; 164(19):2124]. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:1531–3.
22.
go back to reference Torke AM, Simmerling M, Siegler M, Kaya D, Alexander GC. Rethinking the ethical framework for surrogate decision making: a qualitative study of physicians. J Clin Ethics. 2008;19:110–9.PubMed Torke AM, Simmerling M, Siegler M, Kaya D, Alexander GC. Rethinking the ethical framework for surrogate decision making: a qualitative study of physicians. J Clin Ethics. 2008;19:110–9.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Zhang J, Yu KF. What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. JAMA. 1998;280:1690–1.PubMedCrossRef Zhang J, Yu KF. What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. JAMA. 1998;280:1690–1.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference DuVal G, Clarridge B, Gensler G, Danis M. A national survey of US internists'experiences with ethical dilemmas and ethics consultation. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:251–8.PubMedCrossRef DuVal G, Clarridge B, Gensler G, Danis M. A national survey of US internists'experiences with ethical dilemmas and ethics consultation. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:251–8.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Prendergast TJ. Resolving conflicts surrounding end-of-life care. New Horiz. 1997;5:62–71.PubMed Prendergast TJ. Resolving conflicts surrounding end-of-life care. New Horiz. 1997;5:62–71.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Azoulay E, Pochard F, Kentish-Barnes N, Chevret S, Aboab J, Adrie C, et al. Risk of post-traumatic stress symptoms in family members of intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;171:987–94.PubMedCrossRef Azoulay E, Pochard F, Kentish-Barnes N, Chevret S, Aboab J, Adrie C, et al. Risk of post-traumatic stress symptoms in family members of intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;171:987–94.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Baker R, Wu AW, Teno JM, Kreling B, Damiano AM, Rubin HR, et al. Family satisfaction with end-of-life care in seriously ill hospitalized adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48(5 Suppl):S61–9.PubMed Baker R, Wu AW, Teno JM, Kreling B, Damiano AM, Rubin HR, et al. Family satisfaction with end-of-life care in seriously ill hospitalized adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48(5 Suppl):S61–9.PubMed
28.
go back to reference Wachter RM. The evolution of the hospitalist model in the United States. Med Clin North Am. 2002;86:687–706.PubMedCrossRef Wachter RM. The evolution of the hospitalist model in the United States. Med Clin North Am. 2002;86:687–706.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Wachter RM, Pantilat SZ. The "continuity visit" and the hospitalist model of care. Dis Mon. 2002;48:267–72.PubMedCrossRef Wachter RM, Pantilat SZ. The "continuity visit" and the hospitalist model of care. Dis Mon. 2002;48:267–72.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Miles SH, Koepp R, Weber EP. Advance end-of-life treatment planning. A research review. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:1062–8.PubMedCrossRef Miles SH, Koepp R, Weber EP. Advance end-of-life treatment planning. A research review. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:1062–8.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Shalowitz DI, Garrett-Mayer E, Wendler D. The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:493–7.PubMedCrossRef Shalowitz DI, Garrett-Mayer E, Wendler D. The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:493–7.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Ditto PH, Danks JH, Smucker WD, Bookwala J, Coppola KM, Dresser R, et al. Advance directives as acts of communication: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:421–30.PubMedCrossRef Ditto PH, Danks JH, Smucker WD, Bookwala J, Coppola KM, Dresser R, et al. Advance directives as acts of communication: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:421–30.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Deshpande O, Reid MC, Rao AS. Attitudes of Asian-Indian Hindus toward end-of–life care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:131–5.PubMedCrossRef Deshpande O, Reid MC, Rao AS. Attitudes of Asian-Indian Hindus toward end-of–life care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:131–5.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Kwak J, Salmon JR. Attitudes and preferences of Korean-American older adults and caregivers on end-of-life care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55:1867–72.PubMedCrossRef Kwak J, Salmon JR. Attitudes and preferences of Korean-American older adults and caregivers on end-of-life care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55:1867–72.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Asai A, Fukuhara S, Lo B. Attitudes of Japanese and Japanese-American physicians towards life-sustaining treatment. Lancet. 1995;346:356–9.PubMedCrossRef Asai A, Fukuhara S, Lo B. Attitudes of Japanese and Japanese-American physicians towards life-sustaining treatment. Lancet. 1995;346:356–9.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Teno JM, Licks S, Lynn J, Wenger N, Connors AF Jr., Phillips RS, et al. Do advance directives provide instructions that direct care? SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45:508–12.PubMed Teno JM, Licks S, Lynn J, Wenger N, Connors AF Jr., Phillips RS, et al. Do advance directives provide instructions that direct care? SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45:508–12.PubMed
37.
go back to reference Goodman MD, Tarnoff M, Slotman GJ. Effect of advance directives on the management of elderly critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 1998;26:701–4.PubMedCrossRef Goodman MD, Tarnoff M, Slotman GJ. Effect of advance directives on the management of elderly critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 1998;26:701–4.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Fagerlin A, Schneider CE. Enough: The failure of the living will. Hastings Cent Rep. 2004;34:30–42.PubMedCrossRef Fagerlin A, Schneider CE. Enough: The failure of the living will. Hastings Cent Rep. 2004;34:30–42.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Schneiderman LJ, Gilmer T, Teetzel HD. Impact of ethics consultations in the intensive care setting: a randomized, controlled trial. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:3920–4.PubMedCrossRef Schneiderman LJ, Gilmer T, Teetzel HD. Impact of ethics consultations in the intensive care setting: a randomized, controlled trial. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:3920–4.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Physicians’ Experience with Surrogate Decision Making for Hospitalized Adults
Authors
Alexia M. Torke, MD, MS
Mark Siegler, MD
Anna Abalos, MD
Rachael M. Moloney, BA
G. Caleb Alexander, MD, MS
Publication date
01-09-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 9/2009
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1065-y

Other articles of this Issue 9/2009

Journal of General Internal Medicine 9/2009 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine