Top

Journal of General Internal Medicine

Published in:

01-11-2008 | Original Article

Communication and Decision Making About Life-Sustaining Treatment: Examining the Experiences of Resident Physicians and Seriously-Ill Hospitalized Patients

Authors: Kristy S. Deep, MD, MA, Charles H. Griffith, MD, MSPH, John F. Wilson, PhD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 11/2008

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite evidence-based recommendations for communication and decision making about life-sustaining treatment, resident physicians’ actual practice may vary. Few prior studies have examined these conversations qualitatively to uncover why ineffective communication styles may persist.

OBJECTIVE

To explore how discussions about life-sustaining treatment occur and examine the factors that influence physicians’ communicative practices in hopes of providing novel insight into how these processes can be improved.

PARTICIPANTS AND APPROACH

We conducted and recorded 56 qualitative semi-structured interviews with participants from 28 matched dyads of a resident physician and a hospitalized patient or their surrogate decision maker with whom cardiopulmonary resuscitation was discussed. Transcripts were analyzed and coded using the constant comparative method to develop themes.

MAIN RESULTS

Resident physicians introduced decisions about resuscitation in a scripted, depersonalized and procedure-focused manner. Decision makers exhibited a poor understanding of the decision they were being asked to make and resident physicians often disagreed with the decision. Residents did not advocate for a particular course of action; however, the discussions of resuscitation were framed in ways that may have implicitly influenced decision making.

CONCLUSIONS

Residents’ communication practices may stem from their attempt to balance an informed choice model of decision making with their interest in providing appropriate care for the patient. Physicians’ beliefs about mandatory autonomy may be an impediment to improving communication about patients’ choices for life-sustaining treatment. Redefining the role of the physician will be necessary if a shared decision making model is to be adopted.

Smith AK, Ries AP, Zhang B, Tulsky JA, Prigerson HG, Block SD. Resident approaches to advance care planning on the day of hospital admission. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1597–1602.PubMedCrossRef

Tulsky JA, Chesney MA, Lo B. How do medical residents discuss resuscitation with patients? J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10:436–442.PubMedCrossRef

Fischer GS, Tulsky JA, Rose MR, Siminoff LA, Arnold RM. Patient knowledge and physician predictions of treatment preferences after discussion of advance directives. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:447–54.PubMedCrossRef

Haidet P, Hamel MB, Davis RB, Wenger N, Reding D, Kussin PS, Connors AF Jr, Lynn J, Weeks JC, Phillips RS. Outcomes, preferences for resuscitation and physician-patient communication among patients with metastatic colon cancer. SUPPORT investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. Am J Med. 1998;105:222–229.PubMedCrossRef

Epstein EM, Alper BS, Quill TE. The patient-physician relationship. Communicating evidence for participatory decision making. JAMA. 2004;291:2359–2366.PubMedCrossRef

Larson DG, Tobin DR. The patient-physician relationship. End-of-life conversations. JAMA. 2000;284:1573–1578.PubMedCrossRef

Tulsky JA. Interventions to enhance communication among patients, providers and families. J Palliat Med. 2005;8(Supplement):95–102.CrossRef

Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision making model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49:651–661.PubMedCrossRef

Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA. 1992;267:2221–2226.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Quill TE, Brody H. Physician recommendations and patient autonomy: finding a balance between physician power and patient choice. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125:763–769.PubMed

11.

Yedidia MJ, Gillespie CC, Kacher E, et al. Effect of communications training on medical student performance. JAMA. 2003;290:1210–1212.CrossRef

12.

Whitney SN. A new model of medical decisions: exploring the limits of shared decision making. Med Decis Making. 2003;23:275–280.PubMedCrossRef

13.

White DB, Braddock CH III, Bereknyei S, Curtis JR. Toward shared decision making at the end of life in intensive care units. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:461–467.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Towle A, Godolphin W, Grams G, Lamarre A. Putting informed and shared decision making into practice. Health Expect. 2006;9:321–332.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Edwards A, Elwyn G, Hood K, et al. Patient-based outcome results from a cluster randomized trial of shared decision making skill development and use of risk communication aids in general practice. Fam Pract. 2004;21:347–354.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Schneider C. The Practice of Autonomy: Patients, Physicians and Medical Decisions. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.

17.

Rosenbaum JR, Bradley EH, Holmboe ES, Farrell MH, Krumholz HM. Sources of ethical conflict in medical housestaff training: A qualitative study. Am J Med. 2004;116:402–407.PubMedCrossRef

18.

Wirtz V, Cribb A, Barber N. Patient-doctor decision making about treatment within the consultation—A critical analysis of the models. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62:116–124.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Phillips DC, et al. “Chapter 5: Activity Status and Cognitive Function” in SUPPORT: Study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments: Study Design. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43S:33–37.CrossRef

20.

Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1990.

21.

Weiner JS, Roth J. Avoiding iatrogenic harm to patient and family while discussing goals of care near the end of life. J Palliat Med. 2006;9:451–463.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Heyland DK, Tranmer J, O’Callaghan CJ, Gafni A. The seriously ill hospitalized patient: Preferred role in end-of-life decision making? J Crit Care. 2003;18:3–10.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Entwhistle VA, Watt IS. Patient involvement in treatment decision making: The case for a broader conceptual framework. Patient Educ Counsel. 2006;63:268–278.CrossRef

24.

Breen CM, Abernethy AP, Abbott KH, Tulsky JA. Conflict associated with decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment in intensive care units. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:283–289.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Abbott KH, Sago JG, Breen CM, Abernethy AP, Tulsky JA. Families looking back: one year after discussion of withdrawal/withholding of life sustaining support. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:197–201.PubMedCrossRef

26.

Abernethy AP, Tulsky JA. Disagreements that arise when making decisions about withdrawing or withholding life-sustaining treatment. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12(suppl 1):101.

27.

Deep KS, Griffith CH, Wilson JF. Discussing preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation: What do resident physicians and their hospitalized patients think was decided? Patient Educ and Couns 2008; Mar 10 [Epub ahead of print]

28.

Percy ME, Llewellyn-Thomas H. Assessing preferences about the DNR order: does it depend on how you ask? Med Decis Making. 1995;15:209–216.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Kim S, Goldstein D, Hasher L, Zacks RT. Framing effects in younger and older adults. J Gerontol. 2005;60B:215–218.

30.

Duffy SA, Jackson FC, Schim SM, Ronis DL, Fowler KE. Racial/ethnic preferences, sex preferences, and perceived discrimination related to end-of-life care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54:150–7.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Blackhall LJ Frank G, Murphy ST, Michel V, Palmer JM, Azen SP. Ethnicity and attitudes towards life sustaining technology. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48(12):1779–89, Jun.CrossRef

32.

Alexander SC, Keitz SA, Sloane R, Tulsky JA. A controlled trial of a short course to improve residents’ communication with patients at the end of life. Acad Med. 2006;81:1008–1012.PubMedCrossRef

33.

Rosenfeld KE, Wenger NS, Kagawa-Singer M. End-of-life decision making: A qualitative study of elderly individuals. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:620–625.PubMedCrossRef

Title: Communication and Decision Making About Life-Sustaining Treatment: Examining the Experiences of Resident Physicians and Seriously-Ill Hospitalized Patients
Authors: Kristy S. Deep, MD, MA
Charles H. Griffith, MD, MSPH
John F. Wilson, PhD
Publication date: 01-11-2008
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 11/2008
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0779-6

Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Reserve your place

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin

Prof. Florian Limbourg

Prof. Anoop Chauhan

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND

OBJECTIVE

PARTICIPANTS AND APPROACH

MAIN RESULTS

CONCLUSIONS

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 11/2008

It’s a Trap! Clinical Similarities and Subtle ECG Differences between Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy and Myocardial Infarction

The Relationship Between Measured Performance and Satisfaction with Care Among Clinically Complex Patients

Utilization of Primary Care by Veterans with Psychiatric Illness in the National Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System

National Evaluation of Policies on Individual Financial Conflicts of Interest in Canadian Academic Health Science Centers

Fulfilling the Promise of Hospital Medicine: Tailoring Internal Medicine Training to Address Hospitalists’ Needs

Predictors of Mortality in Patients with Stable COPD

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

At a glance: The STEP trials