Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 11/2007

01-11-2007 | Original Article

Understanding Patient Preference for Integrative Medical Care: Results from Patient Focus Groups

Authors: Anne M. McCaffrey, MD, MPH, Guy F. Pugh, MD, Bonnie B. O’Connor, PhD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 11/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Integrative medicine (IM), a combination of conventional and complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), has become a popular source of medical care, yet little is known about its use.

Objective

To identify the motivations of people who choose IM for their primary care needs.

Design

Qualitative study from focus group data of regular users of IM.

Participants

Six focus groups that include a total of 37 regular users of IM who consented to participate in a study of IM use.

Approach

Focus group meetings were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Qualitative analysis using grounded theory was used to derive the motivations for use of IM.

Results

Participants beliefs include the following: the combination of CAM and conventional medicine is better than either alone; health is a combination of physical, emotional, and spiritual well being; nutrition and lifestyle play a role in wellness; and pharmaceuticals should be avoided except as a last resort. Participants suffer from health problems that are not well treated by conventional medicine. Participants want to discuss CAM with physicians and obtain guidance on its use. Participants want time with their providers, to feel listened to and to have the opportunity for shared decision-making.

Conclusion

Much of what patients are seeking in integrative medical care is likely universally shared: a strong therapeutic relationship with providers who listen and provide time and knowledgeable advice. Users believe a combined approach of CAM and conventional medicine is better than either alone and want to be able to discuss CAM use with their providers.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Ettner SL. Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990–97. JAMA. 1998;280:1569–75.PubMedCrossRef Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Ettner SL. Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990–97. JAMA. 1998;280:1569–75.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Tindle HA, Davis RB, Phillips RS, Eisenberg DM. Trends in use of complementary and alternative medicine by US adults: 1997–2002. Altern Ther Health Med. 2005;11:42–9.PubMed Tindle HA, Davis RB, Phillips RS, Eisenberg DM. Trends in use of complementary and alternative medicine by US adults: 1997–2002. Altern Ther Health Med. 2005;11:42–9.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Barnes PM, Powell-Griner E, McFann K, Nahin RL. Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults: United States, 2002. Adv Data. 2004;343:3–19. Barnes PM, Powell-Griner E, McFann K, Nahin RL. Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults: United States, 2002. Adv Data. 2004;343:3–19.
4.
go back to reference Astin JA. Why patients use alternative medicine: results of a national survey. JAMA. 1998;279:1548–53.PubMedCrossRef Astin JA. Why patients use alternative medicine: results of a national survey. JAMA. 1998;279:1548–53.PubMedCrossRef
6.
7.
go back to reference Maizes V. Revisiting the health history. An integrative medicine approach. Int J Integr Med. 2002;4(3). Maizes V. Revisiting the health history. An integrative medicine approach. Int J Integr Med. 2002;4(3).
8.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Complementary and Alternative Medicine in the United States. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies Summary Report. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2005. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Complementary and Alternative Medicine in the United States. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies Summary Report. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2005.
9.
go back to reference Glaser BW, Strauss A. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine; 1968. Glaser BW, Strauss A. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine; 1968.
10.
go back to reference Wilson JL. Adrenal Fatigue, the 21st Century Stress Syndrome. Petaluma: Smart Publications; 2001. Wilson JL. Adrenal Fatigue, the 21st Century Stress Syndrome. Petaluma: Smart Publications; 2001.
11.
go back to reference Crook WG. The Yeast Connection: A Medical Breakthrough. Jacson: Professional Books; 1986. Crook WG. The Yeast Connection: A Medical Breakthrough. Jacson: Professional Books; 1986.
12.
go back to reference Eisenberg DM, Kessler RC, Van Rompay MI. Perceptions about complementary therapies relative to conventional therapies among adults who use both: results from a national survey. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135:344–51.PubMed Eisenberg DM, Kessler RC, Van Rompay MI. Perceptions about complementary therapies relative to conventional therapies among adults who use both: results from a national survey. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135:344–51.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Verhoef MJ, Scott CM, Hilsden RJ. A multimethod research study on the use of complementary therapies among patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Altern Ther Health Med. 1998;4:68–71.PubMed Verhoef MJ, Scott CM, Hilsden RJ. A multimethod research study on the use of complementary therapies among patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Altern Ther Health Med. 1998;4:68–71.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Laine C, Davidoff F, Lewis CE, et al. Important elements of outpatient care: a comparison of patients’ and physicians’ opinions. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125:640–5.PubMed Laine C, Davidoff F, Lewis CE, et al. Important elements of outpatient care: a comparison of patients’ and physicians’ opinions. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125:640–5.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Gerteis M, Edgman-Levitan S, Daley J, et al. Through the Patient’s Eyes: Understanding and Promoting Patient-Centered Care. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publisher; 1993. Gerteis M, Edgman-Levitan S, Daley J, et al. Through the Patient’s Eyes: Understanding and Promoting Patient-Centered Care. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publisher; 1993.
16.
go back to reference Richardson MA, Sanders T, Palmer JL, Greisinger A, Singletary SE. Complementary/alternative medicine use in a comprehensive cancer center and the implications for oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:2505–14.PubMed Richardson MA, Sanders T, Palmer JL, Greisinger A, Singletary SE. Complementary/alternative medicine use in a comprehensive cancer center and the implications for oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:2505–14.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Siahpush M. Postmodern values, dissatisfaction with conventional medicine and popularity of alternative therapies. J Sociol. 1998;34:58–70.CrossRef Siahpush M. Postmodern values, dissatisfaction with conventional medicine and popularity of alternative therapies. J Sociol. 1998;34:58–70.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Coulter ID, Willis EM. The rise and rise of complementary and alternative medicine: a sociological perspective. Med J Aust. 2004;180:587–9.PubMed Coulter ID, Willis EM. The rise and rise of complementary and alternative medicine: a sociological perspective. Med J Aust. 2004;180:587–9.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Hesse BW, Nelson DE, Kreps GL. Trust and sources of health information. Arch Intern Med. 2005;16:2618–24.CrossRef Hesse BW, Nelson DE, Kreps GL. Trust and sources of health information. Arch Intern Med. 2005;16:2618–24.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Understanding Patient Preference for Integrative Medical Care: Results from Patient Focus Groups
Authors
Anne M. McCaffrey, MD, MPH
Guy F. Pugh, MD
Bonnie B. O’Connor, PhD
Publication date
01-11-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 11/2007
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0302-5

Other articles of this Issue 11/2007

Journal of General Internal Medicine 11/2007 Go to the issue

Reflection

Rounds

Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine