Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 11/2007

01-11-2007 | Original Article

Physician–Patient Communication about Colorectal Cancer Screening

Authors: Michael S. Wolf, PhD, MPH, David W. Baker, MD, MPH, Gregory Makoul, PhD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 11/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Despite the documented benefits of colorectal cancer screening, patient participation rates remain low. Physician recommendation has been identified as a significant predictor of screening completion.

Objective

The aim of this study is to investigate how primary care physicians perceive colorectal cancer screening communication tasks, as well as to explore the form and content of actual screening discussions.

Design

The research design includes a mailed physician survey and a separate observational study in a sample of videotaped medical encounters.

Participants and Data Sources

The participants were 270 primary care physicians who completed a mailed questionnaire (57.9% response rate) and 18 physician–patient encounters that included discussions of colorectal cancer screening.

Measurement

The questionnaire focused on perceived importance and accomplishment of communication tasks relevant to colorectal cancer screening. Two of the authors reviewed transcripts of videotaped physician encounters to determine whether the same communication tasks assessed in the survey were accomplished. Interrater reliability was high across all of the mutually exclusive coding categories (Kappa > .90).

Results

Physicians rated colonoscopy as the most important screening option to discuss; self-reports indicate that colonoscopy (84.8%) is more frequently mentioned than fecal occult blood test (FOBT; 49.4%), flexible sigmoidoscopy (34.1%), or computed tomography (CT) imaging (18.1%). Explaining benefits and risks, describing test procedure and frequency, eliciting patient preferences, and making a plan for screening were all viewed as very important. Self-reported accomplishment of these communication tasks was considerably higher than that observed in our separate videotape sample.

Conclusion

Most physicians recognize and espouse the importance of recommending colorectal cancer screening to eligible patients. However, findings from both the physician survey and observational study suggest that physicians tend to overestimate the extent of discussions about screening. Interventions may be warranted to improve clinical practice.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cancer Facts and Figures. American Cancer Society. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2006. Cancer Facts and Figures. American Cancer Society. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2006.
2.
go back to reference Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale—update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:544–60.PubMedCrossRef Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale—update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:544–60.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Pignone MP, Rich S, Teutsh SM, Berg AO, Lohr KN. Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:132–41.PubMed Pignone MP, Rich S, Teutsh SM, Berg AO, Lohr KN. Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:132–41.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Byers T, Levin B, Rothenberger D, Dodd GD, Smith RA. American cancer society guidelines for screening and surveillance for early detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: update 1991. CA Cancer J Clin. 1997;47:154–60.PubMedCrossRef Byers T, Levin B, Rothenberger D, Dodd GD, Smith RA. American cancer society guidelines for screening and surveillance for early detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: update 1991. CA Cancer J Clin. 1997;47:154–60.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lieberman DA. Cost-effectiveness model for colon cancer screening. Gastroenterology. 1995;109:1781–90.PubMedCrossRef Lieberman DA. Cost-effectiveness model for colon cancer screening. Gastroenterology. 1995;109:1781–90.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, et al. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1365–71.PubMedCrossRef Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, et al. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1365–71.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:544–60.PubMedCrossRef Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:544–60.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference MMWR. Surveillance for certain health behaviors among selected local areas—United States, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2002 MMWR–Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 2004;53:SS05. MMWR. Surveillance for certain health behaviors among selected local areas—United States, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2002 MMWR–Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 2004;53:SS05.
11.
go back to reference Mandelblatt J, Andrews H, Kao R, et al. The late stage diagnosis of colorectal cancer: Demographic and socioeconomic factors. Am J Public Health. 1996;86:1794–7.PubMedCrossRef Mandelblatt J, Andrews H, Kao R, et al. The late stage diagnosis of colorectal cancer: Demographic and socioeconomic factors. Am J Public Health. 1996;86:1794–7.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Marcella S, Miller JE. Racial differences in colorectal cancer mortality. The importance of stage and socioeconomic status. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54:359-66.PubMedCrossRef Marcella S, Miller JE. Racial differences in colorectal cancer mortality. The importance of stage and socioeconomic status. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54:359-66.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Dolan NC, Ferreira MR, Davis TC, et al. Colorectal cancer screening knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs among persons of lower socioeconomic status: does literacy make a difference? J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:2617–22.PubMedCrossRef Dolan NC, Ferreira MR, Davis TC, et al. Colorectal cancer screening knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs among persons of lower socioeconomic status: does literacy make a difference? J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:2617–22.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lipkus IM, Lyna PR, Rimer BK. Colorectal cancer risk perceptions and screening intentions in a minority population. J Natl Med Assoc. 2000;92:492–500.PubMed Lipkus IM, Lyna PR, Rimer BK. Colorectal cancer risk perceptions and screening intentions in a minority population. J Natl Med Assoc. 2000;92:492–500.PubMed
15.
go back to reference O’Malley AS, Beaton E, Yabroff KR, Abramson R, Mandelblatt J. Patient and provider barriers to colorectal cancer screening in the primary care safety net. Prev Med. 2004;39:56–63.PubMedCrossRef O’Malley AS, Beaton E, Yabroff KR, Abramson R, Mandelblatt J. Patient and provider barriers to colorectal cancer screening in the primary care safety net. Prev Med. 2004;39:56–63.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Wolf MS, Satterlee M, Calhoun EA, et al. Colorectal cancer screening among the medically underserved. J Healthc Poor Underserved. 2006;17:46–54. Wolf MS, Satterlee M, Calhoun EA, et al. Colorectal cancer screening among the medically underserved. J Healthc Poor Underserved. 2006;17:46–54.
17.
go back to reference Malik J, Sansone RA. Physician compliance with colon cancer screening. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:1078–9.PubMedCrossRef Malik J, Sansone RA. Physician compliance with colon cancer screening. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:1078–9.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Schroy PC 3rd, Barrison AF, Ling BS, Wilson S, Geller AC. Family history and colorectal cancer screening: a survey of physician knowledge and practice patterns. Am J Gastroenterology. 2002;97:1031–6.CrossRef Schroy PC 3rd, Barrison AF, Ling BS, Wilson S, Geller AC. Family history and colorectal cancer screening: a survey of physician knowledge and practice patterns. Am J Gastroenterology. 2002;97:1031–6.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Dube CE, Fuller BK, Rosen RK, Fagan M, O’Donnell J. Men’s experiences of physical exams and cancer screening tests: a qualitative study. Prev Med. 2005;40:628–35.PubMedCrossRef Dube CE, Fuller BK, Rosen RK, Fagan M, O’Donnell J. Men’s experiences of physical exams and cancer screening tests: a qualitative study. Prev Med. 2005;40:628–35.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Christie J, Hooper C, Redd WH, et al. Predictors of endoscopy in minority women. J Natl Med Assoc. 2005;97:1361–8.PubMed Christie J, Hooper C, Redd WH, et al. Predictors of endoscopy in minority women. J Natl Med Assoc. 2005;97:1361–8.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Klabunde CN, Vernon SW, Nadel MR, Breen N, Seeff LC, Brown ML. Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a comparison of reports from primary care physicians and average-risk adults. Med Care. 2005;43:939–44.PubMedCrossRef Klabunde CN, Vernon SW, Nadel MR, Breen N, Seeff LC, Brown ML. Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a comparison of reports from primary care physicians and average-risk adults. Med Care. 2005;43:939–44.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Makoul G, Arntson P, Schofield T. Health promotion in primary care: Physician-patient communication and decision making about prescription medications. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41:1241–54.PubMedCrossRef Makoul G, Arntson P, Schofield T. Health promotion in primary care: Physician-patient communication and decision making about prescription medications. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41:1241–54.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Waitzkin H. The politics of medical encounters: how patients and doctors deal with social problems. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1991. Waitzkin H. The politics of medical encounters: how patients and doctors deal with social problems. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1991.
24.
go back to reference Makoul G, Clayman ML. An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;60:301–12.PubMedCrossRef Makoul G, Clayman ML. An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;60:301–12.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Denberg TD, Melhado TV, Coombes JM, et al. Predictors of nonadherence to screening colonoscopy. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:989–95.PubMedCrossRef Denberg TD, Melhado TV, Coombes JM, et al. Predictors of nonadherence to screening colonoscopy. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:989–95.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Greisinger A, Hawley ST, Bettencourt JL, Perz CA, Vernon SW. Primary care patients’ understanding of colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Detect Prev. 2006;30:67–74.PubMedCrossRef Greisinger A, Hawley ST, Bettencourt JL, Perz CA, Vernon SW. Primary care patients’ understanding of colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Detect Prev. 2006;30:67–74.PubMedCrossRef
27.
28.
go back to reference Ling BS, Moskowitz MA, Wachs D, Pearson B, Schroy PC. Attitudes toward colorectal cancer screening tests. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:822–30.PubMedCrossRef Ling BS, Moskowitz MA, Wachs D, Pearson B, Schroy PC. Attitudes toward colorectal cancer screening tests. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:822–30.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Waitzkin H. Doctor-patient communication. Clinical implications of social scientific research. JAMA. 1984;252:2441–6.PubMedCrossRef Waitzkin H. Doctor-patient communication. Clinical implications of social scientific research. JAMA. 1984;252:2441–6.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Ferreira MR, Dolan NC, Fitzgibbon ML, et al. A health care provider-directed intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening among veterans: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:1001–9.CrossRef Ferreira MR, Dolan NC, Fitzgibbon ML, et al. A health care provider-directed intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening among veterans: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:1001–9.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Davis TC, Williams MV, Marin E, Parker RM, Glass J. Health literacy and cancer communication. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002;52:134–49.PubMed Davis TC, Williams MV, Marin E, Parker RM, Glass J. Health literacy and cancer communication. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002;52:134–49.PubMed
32.
go back to reference Meade CD, McKinney WP, Barnas GP. Educating patients with limited literacy skills: the effectiveness of printed and videotaped materials about colon cancer. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:119–21.PubMed Meade CD, McKinney WP, Barnas GP. Educating patients with limited literacy skills: the effectiveness of printed and videotaped materials about colon cancer. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:119–21.PubMed
33.
go back to reference Pignone M, Harris R, Kinsinger L. Videotape-based decision aid for colon cancer screening. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:761–9.PubMed Pignone M, Harris R, Kinsinger L. Videotape-based decision aid for colon cancer screening. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:761–9.PubMed
34.
go back to reference Zapka JG, Lemon SC, Puleo E, Estabrook B, Luckmann R, Erban S. Patient education for colon cancer screening: a randomized trial of a video mailed before a physical examination. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:683–92.PubMed Zapka JG, Lemon SC, Puleo E, Estabrook B, Luckmann R, Erban S. Patient education for colon cancer screening: a randomized trial of a video mailed before a physical examination. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:683–92.PubMed
35.
go back to reference Emmons KM, Puleo E, Weinstein N, Fletcher R, Colditz G. Tailored computer-based cancer risk communication: correcting colorectal cancer risk perception. J Health Commun. 2004;9:127–41.PubMedCrossRef Emmons KM, Puleo E, Weinstein N, Fletcher R, Colditz G. Tailored computer-based cancer risk communication: correcting colorectal cancer risk perception. J Health Commun. 2004;9:127–41.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Walsh JME, Salazar R, Terdiman JP, Gildengorin G, Perez-Stable EJ. Promoting use of colorectal cancer screening tests: can we change physician behavior? J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:1097–101.PubMedCrossRef Walsh JME, Salazar R, Terdiman JP, Gildengorin G, Perez-Stable EJ. Promoting use of colorectal cancer screening tests: can we change physician behavior? J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:1097–101.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Physician–Patient Communication about Colorectal Cancer Screening
Authors
Michael S. Wolf, PhD, MPH
David W. Baker, MD, MPH
Gregory Makoul, PhD
Publication date
01-11-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 11/2007
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0289-y

Other articles of this Issue 11/2007

Journal of General Internal Medicine 11/2007 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine