Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 8/2007

01-08-2007 | Health Policy

Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening in Primary Care Practice: Innovative Strategies and Future Directions

Authors: Carrie N. Klabunde, Ph.D., David Lanier, M.D., Erica S. Breslau, Ph.D., Jane G. Zapka, Sc.D., Robert H. Fletcher, M.D., M.Sc., David F. Ransohoff, M.D., Sidney J. Winawer, M.D.

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 8/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening has been supported by strong research evidence and recommended in clinical practice guidelines for more than a decade. Yet screening rates in the United States remain low, especially relative to other preventable diseases such as breast and cervical cancer. To understand the reasons, the National Cancer Institute and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality sponsored a review of CRC screening implementation in primary care and a program of research funded by these organizations. The evidence base for improving CRC screening supports the value of a New Model of Primary Care Delivery: 1. a team approach, in which responsibility for screening tasks is shared among other members of the practice, would help address physicians’ lack of time for preventive care; 2. information systems can identify eligible patients and remind them when screening is due; 3. involving patients in decisions about their own care may enhance screening participation; 4. monitoring practice performance, supported by information systems, can help target patients at increased risk because of family history or social disadvantage; 5. reimbursement for services outside the traditional provider—patient encounter, such as telephone and e-mail contacts, may foster enhanced screening delivery; 6. training opportunities in communication, cultural competence, and use of information technologies would improve provider competence in core elements of screening programs. Improvement in CRC screening rates largely depends on the efforts of primary care practices to implement effective systems and procedures for screening delivery. Active engagement and support of practices are essential for the enormous potential of CRC screening to be realized.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Smith RA, Cokkinides V, von Eschenbach AC, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002;52:8–22.PubMed Smith RA, Cokkinides V, von Eschenbach AC, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002;52:8–22.PubMed
3.
go back to reference U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendation and rationale. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:129–31. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendation and rationale. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:129–31.
4.
go back to reference Winawer SJ, Fletcher RH, Miller L, et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-updated based on new evidence. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:544–60.PubMedCrossRef Winawer SJ, Fletcher RH, Miller L, et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-updated based on new evidence. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:544–60.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Shea S, DuMouchel W, Bahamonde L. A meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials to evaluate computer-based clinical reminder systems for preventive care in the ambulatory setting. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1996;3:399–409.PubMed Shea S, DuMouchel W, Bahamonde L. A meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials to evaluate computer-based clinical reminder systems for preventive care in the ambulatory setting. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1996;3:399–409.PubMed
6.
7.
go back to reference Vernon SW. Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997;89:1406–22.PubMedCrossRef Vernon SW. Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997;89:1406–22.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Balas EA, Weingarten S, Garb CT, et al. Improving preventive care by prompting physicians. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:301–8.PubMedCrossRef Balas EA, Weingarten S, Garb CT, et al. Improving preventive care by prompting physicians. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:301–8.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Peterson SK, Vernon SW. A review of patient and physician adherence to colorectal cancer screening guidelines. Semin Colon Rectal Surg. 2000;11:58–72. Peterson SK, Vernon SW. A review of patient and physician adherence to colorectal cancer screening guidelines. Semin Colon Rectal Surg. 2000;11:58–72.
10.
go back to reference Pignone M, Harris R, Kinsinger L. Videotape-based decision aid for colon cancer screening. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:761–9.PubMed Pignone M, Harris R, Kinsinger L. Videotape-based decision aid for colon cancer screening. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:761–9.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Dietrich AJ, Tobin JN, Cassells A, et al. Telephone care management to improve colorectal cancer screening among low-income women: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:563–71.PubMed Dietrich AJ, Tobin JN, Cassells A, et al. Telephone care management to improve colorectal cancer screening among low-income women: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:563–71.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Klabunde CN, Riley GF, Mandelson MT, et al. Health plan policies and programs for colorectal cancer screening: a national profile. Am J Manag Care. 2004;10:273–9.PubMed Klabunde CN, Riley GF, Mandelson MT, et al. Health plan policies and programs for colorectal cancer screening: a national profile. Am J Manag Care. 2004;10:273–9.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Yarnall KSH, Pollak KI, Ostbye T, Krause KM, Michener L. Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? Am J Public Health. 2003;93:635–41.PubMed Yarnall KSH, Pollak KI, Ostbye T, Krause KM, Michener L. Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? Am J Public Health. 2003;93:635–41.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Martin JC, Avant RF, Bowman MA, et al. The Future of Family Medicine: a collaborative project of the family medicine community. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(Suppl 1):S3–32.PubMed Martin JC, Avant RF, Bowman MA, et al. The Future of Family Medicine: a collaborative project of the family medicine community. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(Suppl 1):S3–32.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Larson EB, Fihn SD, Kirk LM, et al. The future of general internal medicine. Report and recommendations from the Society of General Internal Medicine (SGIM) Task Force on the Domain of General Internal Medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:69–77.PubMedCrossRef Larson EB, Fihn SD, Kirk LM, et al. The future of general internal medicine. Report and recommendations from the Society of General Internal Medicine (SGIM) Task Force on the Domain of General Internal Medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:69–77.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Zapka JG, Taplin SH, Solberg LI, Manos MM. A framework for improving the quality of cancer care: the case of breast and cervical cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2003;12:4–13. Zapka JG, Taplin SH, Solberg LI, Manos MM. A framework for improving the quality of cancer care: the case of breast and cervical cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2003;12:4–13.
18.
19.
go back to reference Robertson N, Baker R, Hearnshaw H. Changing the clinical behavior of doctors: a psychological framework. Qual Health Care. 1996;5:51–4.PubMed Robertson N, Baker R, Hearnshaw H. Changing the clinical behavior of doctors: a psychological framework. Qual Health Care. 1996;5:51–4.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, Waler AE, Thomas RE. Changing physicians’ behavior: what works and thoughts on getting more things to work. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2002;22:237–43.PubMedCrossRef Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, Waler AE, Thomas RE. Changing physicians’ behavior: what works and thoughts on getting more things to work. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2002;22:237–43.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes B. Changing physician performance: a systematic review of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA. 1995;274:700–5.PubMedCrossRef Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes B. Changing physician performance: a systematic review of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA. 1995;274:700–5.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Stone E, Morton SC, Hulscher ME, et al. Interventions that increase use of adult immunization and cancer screening services: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:641–51.PubMed Stone E, Morton SC, Hulscher ME, et al. Interventions that increase use of adult immunization and cancer screening services: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:641–51.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Litaker D, Flocke SA, Frolkis JP, Stange KC. Physicians’ attitudes and preventive care delivery: insights from the DOPC study. Prev Med. 2005;40:556–63.PubMedCrossRef Litaker D, Flocke SA, Frolkis JP, Stange KC. Physicians’ attitudes and preventive care delivery: insights from the DOPC study. Prev Med. 2005;40:556–63.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Sandy LG, Schroeder SA. Primary care in a new era: disillusion and dissolution? Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:262–7.PubMed Sandy LG, Schroeder SA. Primary care in a new era: disillusion and dissolution? Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:262–7.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Landon BE, Reschovsky J, Blumenthal D. Changes in career satisfaction among primary care and specialist physicians, 1997–2001. JAMA. 2003;289:442–9.PubMedCrossRef Landon BE, Reschovsky J, Blumenthal D. Changes in career satisfaction among primary care and specialist physicians, 1997–2001. JAMA. 2003;289:442–9.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Moore G, Showstack J. Primary care medicine in crisis: toward reconstruction and renewal. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:244–7.PubMed Moore G, Showstack J. Primary care medicine in crisis: toward reconstruction and renewal. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:244–7.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Thompson NJ, Boyko EJ, Dominitz JA, et al. A randomized trial of a clinic-based support staff intervention to increase the rate of fecal occult blood test ordering. Prev Med. 2000;30:244–51.PubMedCrossRef Thompson NJ, Boyko EJ, Dominitz JA, et al. A randomized trial of a clinic-based support staff intervention to increase the rate of fecal occult blood test ordering. Prev Med. 2000;30:244–51.PubMedCrossRef
28.
29.
go back to reference Wallace MB, Kemp JA, Meyer F, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer with flexible sigmoidoscopy by nonphysician endoscopists. Am J Med. 1999;49:158–62. Wallace MB, Kemp JA, Meyer F, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer with flexible sigmoidoscopy by nonphysician endoscopists. Am J Med. 1999;49:158–62.
30.
go back to reference Schoenfeld PS, Cash B, Kita J, Piorkowski M, et al. Effectiveness and patient satisfaction with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy performed by registered nurses. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;107:214–8. Schoenfeld PS, Cash B, Kita J, Piorkowski M, et al. Effectiveness and patient satisfaction with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy performed by registered nurses. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;107:214–8.
31.
go back to reference Carpiano RM, Flocke SA, Frank SH, Stange KC. Tools, teamwork, and tenacity: an examination of family practice office system influences on preventive service delivery. Prev Med. 2003;36:131–40.PubMedCrossRef Carpiano RM, Flocke SA, Frank SH, Stange KC. Tools, teamwork, and tenacity: an examination of family practice office system influences on preventive service delivery. Prev Med. 2003;36:131–40.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Sansbury LB, Klabunde CN, Mysliwiec P, et al. Physicians’ use of nonphysician healthcare providers for colorectal cancer screening. Am J Prev Med. 2003;25:179–86.PubMedCrossRef Sansbury LB, Klabunde CN, Mysliwiec P, et al. Physicians’ use of nonphysician healthcare providers for colorectal cancer screening. Am J Prev Med. 2003;25:179–86.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Meissner HI, Breen N, Klabunde CN, et al. Patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake among men and women in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2006;15:389–94.CrossRef Meissner HI, Breen N, Klabunde CN, et al. Patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake among men and women in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2006;15:389–94.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Audet AM, Davis K, Schoenbaum SC. Adoption of patient-centered care practices by physicians: results from a national survey. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:754–9.PubMedCrossRef Audet AM, Davis K, Schoenbaum SC. Adoption of patient-centered care practices by physicians: results from a national survey. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:754–9.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Zapka JG, Lemon SC. Interventions for patients, providers, and health care organizations. Cancer. 2004;101(5 Suppl):1165–87.PubMedCrossRef Zapka JG, Lemon SC. Interventions for patients, providers, and health care organizations. Cancer. 2004;101(5 Suppl):1165–87.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Jamtvedt G, Young JM, Kristoffersen DT, et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Sys Rev. 2003;(3):CD000259. Jamtvedt G, Young JM, Kristoffersen DT, et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Sys Rev. 2003;(3):CD000259.
37.
go back to reference Grant RW, Campbell EG, Gruen RL, et al. Prevalence of basic information technology use by U.S. physicians. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:1150–5.PubMedCrossRef Grant RW, Campbell EG, Gruen RL, et al. Prevalence of basic information technology use by U.S. physicians. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:1150–5.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Jimbo M, Nease DE, Ruffin MT, et al. Information technology and cancer prevention. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006;56:26–36.PubMedCrossRef Jimbo M, Nease DE, Ruffin MT, et al. Information technology and cancer prevention. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006;56:26–36.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Price M. Can hand-held computers improve adherence to guidelines? A pilot study of family doctors in British Columbia. Can Fam Physician. 2005;51:1506–7.PubMed Price M. Can hand-held computers improve adherence to guidelines? A pilot study of family doctors in British Columbia. Can Fam Physician. 2005;51:1506–7.PubMed
40.
go back to reference O’Connor AM, Stacey D, Entwistle V, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment of screening decisions. Cochrane Database Sys Rev. 2003;(2):CD001431. O’Connor AM, Stacey D, Entwistle V, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment of screening decisions. Cochrane Database Sys Rev. 2003;(2):CD001431.
41.
go back to reference Pignone M, Bucholtz D, Harris R. Patient preferences for colon cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:432–7.PubMedCrossRef Pignone M, Bucholtz D, Harris R. Patient preferences for colon cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:432–7.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Dolan JG. Patient priorities in colorectal cancer screening decisions. Health Expect. 2005;8:334–44.PubMedCrossRef Dolan JG. Patient priorities in colorectal cancer screening decisions. Health Expect. 2005;8:334–44.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Messina CR, Lane DS, Grimson R. Colorectal cancer screening attitudes and practices: preferences for decision making. Am J Prev Med. 2005;5:439–46.CrossRef Messina CR, Lane DS, Grimson R. Colorectal cancer screening attitudes and practices: preferences for decision making. Am J Prev Med. 2005;5:439–46.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Levy BT, Dawson J, Hartz AJ, et al. Colorectal cancer testing among patients cared for by Iowa family physicians. Am J Prev Med. 2006;31:193–201.PubMedCrossRef Levy BT, Dawson J, Hartz AJ, et al. Colorectal cancer testing among patients cared for by Iowa family physicians. Am J Prev Med. 2006;31:193–201.PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Greiner KA, Engelman KK, Hall MA, et al. Barriers to colorectal cancer screening in rural primary care. Prev Med. 2004;38:269–75.PubMedCrossRef Greiner KA, Engelman KK, Hall MA, et al. Barriers to colorectal cancer screening in rural primary care. Prev Med. 2004;38:269–75.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Flocke SA, Stange KC, Zyzanski SJ. The association of attributes of primary care with the delivery of clinical preventive services. Med Care. 1998;36(Suppl 8):AS21–30.PubMedCrossRef Flocke SA, Stange KC, Zyzanski SJ. The association of attributes of primary care with the delivery of clinical preventive services. Med Care. 1998;36(Suppl 8):AS21–30.PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Sontag SJ, Durczak C, Aranha GV, et al. Fecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer in a Veterans Administration hospital. Am J Surg. 1983;145:89–94.PubMedCrossRef Sontag SJ, Durczak C, Aranha GV, et al. Fecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer in a Veterans Administration hospital. Am J Surg. 1983;145:89–94.PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Ling BS, Moskowitz MA, Wachs D, et al. Attitudes toward colorectal cancer screening tests. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:822–30.PubMedCrossRef Ling BS, Moskowitz MA, Wachs D, et al. Attitudes toward colorectal cancer screening tests. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:822–30.PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Denberg TD, Melhado TV, Coombes JM, et al. Predictors of nonadherence to screening colonoscopy. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:989–95.PubMedCrossRef Denberg TD, Melhado TV, Coombes JM, et al. Predictors of nonadherence to screening colonoscopy. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:989–95.PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Briss P, Rimer B, Reilley B, et al. Promoting informed decisions about cancer screening in communities and healthcare systems. Am J Prev Med. 2004;26:67–80.PubMedCrossRef Briss P, Rimer B, Reilley B, et al. Promoting informed decisions about cancer screening in communities and healthcare systems. Am J Prev Med. 2004;26:67–80.PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Patel P, Forjuoh SN, Avots-Avotins A, et al. Identifying opportunities for improved colorectal cancer screening in primary care. Prev Med. 2004;39:239–46.PubMedCrossRef Patel P, Forjuoh SN, Avots-Avotins A, et al. Identifying opportunities for improved colorectal cancer screening in primary care. Prev Med. 2004;39:239–46.PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Stange KC, Zyzanski SJ, Jaen CR, et al. Illuminating the black box. A description of 4454 patient visits to 138 family physicians. J Fam Pract. 1998;46:377–89.PubMed Stange KC, Zyzanski SJ, Jaen CR, et al. Illuminating the black box. A description of 4454 patient visits to 138 family physicians. J Fam Pract. 1998;46:377–89.PubMed
53.
go back to reference Fairfield KM, Chen WY, Colditz GA, et al. Colon cancer risk counseling by health-care providers: perceived barriers and response to an internet-based cancer risk appraisal instrument. J Cancer Educ. 2004;19:95–7.PubMedCrossRef Fairfield KM, Chen WY, Colditz GA, et al. Colon cancer risk counseling by health-care providers: perceived barriers and response to an internet-based cancer risk appraisal instrument. J Cancer Educ. 2004;19:95–7.PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Klabunde CN, Vernon SW, Nadel MR, et al. Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a comparison of reports from primary care physicians and average-risk adults. Med Care. 2005;43:939–44.PubMedCrossRef Klabunde CN, Vernon SW, Nadel MR, et al. Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a comparison of reports from primary care physicians and average-risk adults. Med Care. 2005;43:939–44.PubMedCrossRef
55.
go back to reference Lewis JD, Asch DA. Barriers to office-based screening sigmoidoscopy: does reimbursement cover costs? Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:525–30.PubMed Lewis JD, Asch DA. Barriers to office-based screening sigmoidoscopy: does reimbursement cover costs? Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:525–30.PubMed
56.
go back to reference Brown ML, Klabunde CN, Mysliwiec P. Current capacity for endoscopic colorectal cancer screening in the United States: data from the National Cancer Institute Survey of Colorectal Cancer Screening Practices. Am J Med. 2003;115:129–33.PubMedCrossRef Brown ML, Klabunde CN, Mysliwiec P. Current capacity for endoscopic colorectal cancer screening in the United States: data from the National Cancer Institute Survey of Colorectal Cancer Screening Practices. Am J Med. 2003;115:129–33.PubMedCrossRef
57.
go back to reference Wigton RS, Alguire P. The declining number and variety of procedures done by general internists: a resurvey of members of the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:355–60.PubMed Wigton RS, Alguire P. The declining number and variety of procedures done by general internists: a resurvey of members of the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:355–60.PubMed
58.
go back to reference McInerny TK, Cull WL, Yudkowsky BK. Physician reimbursement levels and adherence to American Academy of Pediatrics well-visit and immunization recommendations. Pediatrics. 2005;115:833–8.PubMedCrossRef McInerny TK, Cull WL, Yudkowsky BK. Physician reimbursement levels and adherence to American Academy of Pediatrics well-visit and immunization recommendations. Pediatrics. 2005;115:833–8.PubMedCrossRef
59.
go back to reference Rosenthal MB, Frank RG, Li A, et al. Early experience with pay-for-performance: from concept to practice. JAMA. 2005;294:1788–93.PubMedCrossRef Rosenthal MB, Frank RG, Li A, et al. Early experience with pay-for-performance: from concept to practice. JAMA. 2005;294:1788–93.PubMedCrossRef
60.
go back to reference Pourat N, Rice T, Tai-Seale M, et al. Association between physician compensation methods and delivery of guideline-concordant STD care: is there a link? Am J Manag Care. 2005;11:426–32.PubMed Pourat N, Rice T, Tai-Seale M, et al. Association between physician compensation methods and delivery of guideline-concordant STD care: is there a link? Am J Manag Care. 2005;11:426–32.PubMed
61.
go back to reference Roski J, Jeddeloh R, An L, et al. The impact of financial incentives and a patient registry on preventive care quality: increasing provider adherence to evidence-based smoking cessation practice guidelines. Prev Med. 2003;36:291–9.PubMedCrossRef Roski J, Jeddeloh R, An L, et al. The impact of financial incentives and a patient registry on preventive care quality: increasing provider adherence to evidence-based smoking cessation practice guidelines. Prev Med. 2003;36:291–9.PubMedCrossRef
62.
go back to reference Wee CC, Phillips RS, Burstin HR, et al. Influence of financial productivity incentives on the use of preventive care. Am J Med. 2001;110:181–7.PubMedCrossRef Wee CC, Phillips RS, Burstin HR, et al. Influence of financial productivity incentives on the use of preventive care. Am J Med. 2001;110:181–7.PubMedCrossRef
63.
go back to reference Hillman AL, Ripley K, Goldfarb N, et al. Physician financial incentives and feedback: failure to increase cancer screening in Medicaid managed care. Am J Public Health. 1998;88:1699–701.PubMed Hillman AL, Ripley K, Goldfarb N, et al. Physician financial incentives and feedback: failure to increase cancer screening in Medicaid managed care. Am J Public Health. 1998;88:1699–701.PubMed
64.
go back to reference Nadel MR, Shapiro JA, Klabunde CN, et al. A national survey of primary care physicians’ methods for screening for fecal occult blood. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:86–94.PubMed Nadel MR, Shapiro JA, Klabunde CN, et al. A national survey of primary care physicians’ methods for screening for fecal occult blood. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:86–94.PubMed
65.
go back to reference Costanza ME, Hoople NE, Gaw VP, et al. Cancer prevention practices and continuing education needs of primary care physicians. Am J Prev Med. 1993;9:107–12.PubMed Costanza ME, Hoople NE, Gaw VP, et al. Cancer prevention practices and continuing education needs of primary care physicians. Am J Prev Med. 1993;9:107–12.PubMed
66.
go back to reference Vogelaar I, van Ballegooijen M, Schrag D, et al. How much can current interventions reduce colorectal cancer mortality in the U.S.? Mortality projections for scenarios of risk-factor modification, screening, and treatment. Cancer. 2006;107:1624–33.PubMedCrossRef Vogelaar I, van Ballegooijen M, Schrag D, et al. How much can current interventions reduce colorectal cancer mortality in the U.S.? Mortality projections for scenarios of risk-factor modification, screening, and treatment. Cancer. 2006;107:1624–33.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening in Primary Care Practice: Innovative Strategies and Future Directions
Authors
Carrie N. Klabunde, Ph.D.
David Lanier, M.D.
Erica S. Breslau, Ph.D.
Jane G. Zapka, Sc.D.
Robert H. Fletcher, M.D., M.Sc.
David F. Ransohoff, M.D.
Sidney J. Winawer, M.D.
Publication date
01-08-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 8/2007
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0231-3

Other articles of this Issue 8/2007

Journal of General Internal Medicine 8/2007 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine