Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 5/2007

01-05-2007 | Original Article

Group Visits: Promoting Adherence to Diabetes Guidelines

Authors: Dawn E. Clancy, MD, MSCR, Peng Huang, PhD, Eni Okonofua, MD, MSCR, Derik Yeager, MS, Kathryn Marley Magruder, MPH, PhD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 5/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current diabetes management guidelines offer blueprints for providers, yet type 2 diabetes control is often poor in disadvantaged populations. The group visit is a new treatment modality originating in managed care for efficient service delivery to patients with chronic health problems. Group visits offer promise for delivering care to diabetic patients, as visits are lengthier and can be more frequent, more organized, and more educational.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of group visits on clinical outcomes, concordance with 10 American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines [American Diabetes Association, Diabetes Care, 28:S4–36, 2004] and 3 United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) cancer screens [U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstf/resource.htm, 2003].

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A 12-month randomized controlled trial of 186 diabetic patients comparing care in group visits with care in the traditional patient–physician dyad. Clinical outcomes (HbA1c, blood pressure [BP], lipid profiles) were assessed at 6 and 12 months and quality of care measures (adherence to 10 ADA guidelines and 3 USPSTF cancer screens) at 12 months.

RESULTS

At both measurement points, HbA1c, BP, and lipid levels did not differ significantly for patients attending group visits versus those in usual care. At 12 months, however, patients receiving care in group visits exhibited greater concordance with ADA process-of-care indicators (p < .0001) and higher screening rates for cancers of the breast (80 vs. 68%, p = .006) and cervix (80 vs 68%, p = .019).

CONCLUSIONS

Group visits can improve the quality of care for diabetic patients, but modifications to the content and style of group visits may be necessary to achieve improved clinical outcomes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes fact sheet, United States, 2003. Atlanta, GA, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2003. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes fact sheet, United States, 2003. Atlanta, GA, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2003.
2.
go back to reference American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2002. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:917–32.CrossRef American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2002. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:917–32.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hofer TP, Zemencuk JK, Haywar RA. When there is too much to do: how practicing physicians prioritize among recommended interventions. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:646–53.PubMedCrossRef Hofer TP, Zemencuk JK, Haywar RA. When there is too much to do: how practicing physicians prioritize among recommended interventions. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:646–53.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Beck A, Scott J, Williams C, et al. Cooperative health care clinics: a group approach to individual care. JAGS. 1997;45:543–9. Beck A, Scott J, Williams C, et al. Cooperative health care clinics: a group approach to individual care. JAGS. 1997;45:543–9.
5.
go back to reference Clancy DE, Cope DW, Magruder KM, Huang P, Wolfman T. Evaluating concordance to American diabetes association standards of care for type 2 diabetes through group visits in an uninsured or inadequately insured patient population. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:2032–6.PubMedCrossRef Clancy DE, Cope DW, Magruder KM, Huang P, Wolfman T. Evaluating concordance to American diabetes association standards of care for type 2 diabetes through group visits in an uninsured or inadequately insured patient population. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:2032–6.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Trento M, Passera P, Borga E, et al. A 5-year randomized controlled study of learning, problem solving, and quality of life modifications in people with type 2 diabetes managed in group care. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:670–5.PubMedCrossRef Trento M, Passera P, Borga E, et al. A 5-year randomized controlled study of learning, problem solving, and quality of life modifications in people with type 2 diabetes managed in group care. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:670–5.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sadur CN, Moline N, Costa M, et al. Diabetes management in a health maintenance organization. Diabetes Care. 1991;12:2011–7. Sadur CN, Moline N, Costa M, et al. Diabetes management in a health maintenance organization. Diabetes Care. 1991;12:2011–7.
8.
go back to reference Wagner EH, Grothaus LC, Sandhu N, et al. Chronic care clinics for diabetes in primary care: a system-wide randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(4):695–700.PubMedCrossRef Wagner EH, Grothaus LC, Sandhu N, et al. Chronic care clinics for diabetes in primary care: a system-wide randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(4):695–700.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. and the National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee. Seventh report of the joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. Hypertension. 2003;42:1206–52.PubMedCrossRef Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. and the National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee. Seventh report of the joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. Hypertension. 2003;42:1206–52.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care for patients with diabetes mellitus (position statement). Diabetes Care. 2004;28:S4–36.CrossRef American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care for patients with diabetes mellitus (position statement). Diabetes Care. 2004;28:S4–36.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Mayberry RM, Davis T, Alema-Mensah E, Samadi AR, Finley R, Jones A. Determinants of glycemic status monitoring in Black and White Medicaid beneficiaries with diabetes mellitus. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2005;16(4 Suppl A):31–49.PubMedCrossRef Mayberry RM, Davis T, Alema-Mensah E, Samadi AR, Finley R, Jones A. Determinants of glycemic status monitoring in Black and White Medicaid beneficiaries with diabetes mellitus. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2005;16(4 Suppl A):31–49.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Davis TC, Long SW, Jackson RH. Rapid estimate of adult health literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument. Fam Med. 1993;25:391–395.PubMed Davis TC, Long SW, Jackson RH. Rapid estimate of adult health literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument. Fam Med. 1993;25:391–395.PubMed
14.
go back to reference May DS, Kiefev CI, Funkhouser E, Fouad MN. Compliance with mammography guidelines: physician recommendation and patient adherence. Prev Med. 1999;28(4):386–94.PubMedCrossRef May DS, Kiefev CI, Funkhouser E, Fouad MN. Compliance with mammography guidelines: physician recommendation and patient adherence. Prev Med. 1999;28(4):386–94.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Group Visits: Promoting Adherence to Diabetes Guidelines
Authors
Dawn E. Clancy, MD, MSCR
Peng Huang, PhD
Eni Okonofua, MD, MSCR
Derik Yeager, MS
Kathryn Marley Magruder, MPH, PhD
Publication date
01-05-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 5/2007
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0150-3

Other articles of this Issue 5/2007

Journal of General Internal Medicine 5/2007 Go to the issue

Original Article

Do Doctors Vote?

Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine