Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 4/2007

01-04-2007 | Original Article

Delay Of Insulin Addition To Oral Combination Therapy Despite Inadequate Glycemic Control

Delay of Insulin Therapy

Authors: Gregory A. Nichols, PhD, Yuri H. Koo, JD, MPH, Sonali N. Shah, RPh, MBA, MPH

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 4/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients and providers may be reluctant to escalate to insulin therapy despite inadequate glycemic control.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the proportion of patients attaining and maintaining glycemic targets after initiating sulfonylurea and metformin oral combination therapy (SU/MET); to assess insulin initiation among patients failing SU/MET; and to estimate the glycemic burden incurred, stratified by whether HbA1c goal was attained and maintained.

DESIGN

Longitudinal observational cohort study.

SUBJECTS

Type 2 diabetes patients, 3,891, who newly initiated SU/MET between 1 January 1996 and 31 December 2000.

MEASUREMENTS

Subjects were followed until insulin was added, health plan disenrolment, or until 31 December 2005. We calculated the number of months subjects continued SU/MET therapy alone, in total, and during periods of inadequate glycemic control; the A1C reached during those time periods; and total glycemic burden, defined as the estimated cumulative monthly difference between measured A1C and 8%.

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up of 54.6 ± 28.6 months, 41.9% of the subjects added insulin, and 11.8% received maximal doses of both oral agents. Over half of SU/MET patients attained but failed to maintain A1C of 8%, yet continued SU/MET therapy for an average of nearly 3 years, sustaining glycemic burden equivalent to nearly 32 months of A1C levels of 9%. Another 18% of patients never attained the 8% goal with SU/MET, yet continued that therapy for an average of 30 months, reaching mean A1C levels of 10%.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite inadequate glycemic control, a minority of patients added insulin or maximized oral agent doses, thus, incurring substantial glycemic burden on SU/MET. Additional studies are needed to examine the benefits of rapid titration to maximum doses and earlier initiation of insulin therapy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference UKPDS Group. Glycemic control with diet, sulphonylurea, metformin, or insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: progressive requirement for multiple therapies (UKPDS 49). JAMA. 1999;281:2005–12.CrossRef UKPDS Group. Glycemic control with diet, sulphonylurea, metformin, or insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: progressive requirement for multiple therapies (UKPDS 49). JAMA. 1999;281:2005–12.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:977–86.CrossRef Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:977–86.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference UKPDS Group. UKPDS 33: Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with Type 2 diabetes. Lancet. 1998;352:837–51.CrossRef UKPDS Group. UKPDS 33: Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with Type 2 diabetes. Lancet. 1998;352:837–51.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference UKPDS Group. UKPDS 34: Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications on overweight patients with type 2 diabetes. Lancet. 1998;352:854–65.CrossRef UKPDS Group. UKPDS 34: Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications on overweight patients with type 2 diabetes. Lancet. 1998;352:854–65.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Boccuzzi SJ, Wogen J, Fox J, Sung JCY, Shah AB, Kim J. Utilization of oral antihyperglycemic agents in a drug-insured US population. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:1411–15.PubMedCrossRef Boccuzzi SJ, Wogen J, Fox J, Sung JCY, Shah AB, Kim J. Utilization of oral antihyperglycemic agents in a drug-insured US population. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:1411–15.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Brown JB, Nichols GA. Slow response to loss of glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Manag Care. 2003;9:213–17.PubMed Brown JB, Nichols GA. Slow response to loss of glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Manag Care. 2003;9:213–17.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Cook MN, Girman CJ, Stein PP, Alexander CM, Holman RR. Glycemic control continues to deteriorate after sulfonylureas are added to metformin among patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:995–1000.PubMedCrossRef Cook MN, Girman CJ, Stein PP, Alexander CM, Holman RR. Glycemic control continues to deteriorate after sulfonylureas are added to metformin among patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:995–1000.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference De Witt DE, Hirsch IB. Outpatient insulin therapy in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a scientific review. JAMA. 2003;289:2254–64.CrossRef De Witt DE, Hirsch IB. Outpatient insulin therapy in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a scientific review. JAMA. 2003;289:2254–64.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:1963–72.PubMedCrossRef Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:1963–72.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Shah BR, Hux JE, Laupacis A, Zinman B, van Walraven C. Clinical inertia in response to inadequate glycemic control: do specialists differ from primary care physicians? Diabetes Care. 2005;28:600–06.PubMedCrossRef Shah BR, Hux JE, Laupacis A, Zinman B, van Walraven C. Clinical inertia in response to inadequate glycemic control: do specialists differ from primary care physicians? Diabetes Care. 2005;28:600–06.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Grant RW, Cagliero E, Dubey AK, et al. Clinical inertia in the management of type 2 diabetes metabolic risk factors. Diabet Med. 2004;21:150–5.PubMedCrossRef Grant RW, Cagliero E, Dubey AK, et al. Clinical inertia in the management of type 2 diabetes metabolic risk factors. Diabet Med. 2004;21:150–5.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Grant RW, Buse JB, Meigs JB, The University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC) Diabetes Benchmarking Project Team. Quality of diabetes care in U.S. academic medical centers. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:337–42.PubMedCrossRef Grant RW, Buse JB, Meigs JB, The University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC) Diabetes Benchmarking Project Team. Quality of diabetes care in U.S. academic medical centers. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:337–42.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Guzman S, Villa-Caballero L, Edelman SV. Psychological insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes: the scope of the problem. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:2543–5.PubMedCrossRef Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Guzman S, Villa-Caballero L, Edelman SV. Psychological insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes: the scope of the problem. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:2543–5.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Peyrot M, Rubin RR, Lauritzen T, et al. Resistance to insulin therapy among patients and providers: results of the cross-national Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes, and Needs (DAWN) study. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:2673–9.PubMedCrossRef Peyrot M, Rubin RR, Lauritzen T, et al. Resistance to insulin therapy among patients and providers: results of the cross-national Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes, and Needs (DAWN) study. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:2673–9.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Brown JB, Nichols GA, Perry A. The burden of treatment failure in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:1535–40.PubMedCrossRef Brown JB, Nichols GA, Perry A. The burden of treatment failure in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:1535–40.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hertz RP, Unger AN, Lustik MB. Adherence with pharmacotherapy for type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study of adults with employer-sponsored health insurance. Clin Ther. 2005;27:1064–73.PubMedCrossRef Hertz RP, Unger AN, Lustik MB. Adherence with pharmacotherapy for type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study of adults with employer-sponsored health insurance. Clin Ther. 2005;27:1064–73.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Steiner JF, Prochazka AV. The assessment of refill compliance using pharmacy records: methods, validity, and applications. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:105–16.PubMedCrossRef Steiner JF, Prochazka AV. The assessment of refill compliance using pharmacy records: methods, validity, and applications. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:105–16.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care for patients with diabetes mellitus; clinical practice recommendations 2006. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:S1–S85.CrossRef American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care for patients with diabetes mellitus; clinical practice recommendations 2006. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:S1–S85.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Stratton IM, Alder AI, Neil HAW, Matthews DR, Manley SE, Cull CA, Hadden D, Turner RC, Holman RR, and on behalf of the UKPDS Study Group. UKPDS 35: association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ 8-12-2000;21[7258], 405–12. Stratton IM, Alder AI, Neil HAW, Matthews DR, Manley SE, Cull CA, Hadden D, Turner RC, Holman RR, and on behalf of the UKPDS Study Group. UKPDS 35: association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ 8-12-2000;21[7258], 405–12.
20.
go back to reference Leslie CA, Satin-Rapaport W, Matheson D, Stone R, Enfield G. Psychological insulin resistance: a missed diagnosis? Diabetes Spectr. 1994;7:52–7. Leslie CA, Satin-Rapaport W, Matheson D, Stone R, Enfield G. Psychological insulin resistance: a missed diagnosis? Diabetes Spectr. 1994;7:52–7.
21.
go back to reference Rubin R, Peyrot M. Psychological issues and treatments in people with diabetes. J Clin Psychol. 2001;57:457–78.PubMedCrossRef Rubin R, Peyrot M. Psychological issues and treatments in people with diabetes. J Clin Psychol. 2001;57:457–78.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Koerbel G, Korytkowski M. Insulin therapy resistance: another form of insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes. Pract Diabetol. 2003;22:36–40. Koerbel G, Korytkowski M. Insulin therapy resistance: another form of insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes. Pract Diabetol. 2003;22:36–40.
23.
go back to reference Peyrot M. Psychological insulin resistance: overcoming barriers to insulin therapy. Pract Diabetol. 2004;23:6–12. Peyrot M. Psychological insulin resistance: overcoming barriers to insulin therapy. Pract Diabetol. 2004;23:6–12.
24.
go back to reference Polonsky WH, Jackson RA. What’s so tough about taking insulin? Addressing the problem of psychological insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes. Clin Diabetes. 2004;22:147–50.CrossRef Polonsky WH, Jackson RA. What’s so tough about taking insulin? Addressing the problem of psychological insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes. Clin Diabetes. 2004;22:147–50.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Nichols GA, Alexander CM, Girman CJ, Kamal-Bahl S, Brown JB. Treatment escalation and rise in HbA1c following successful initial Metformin therapy. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:504–9.PubMedCrossRef Nichols GA, Alexander CM, Girman CJ, Kamal-Bahl S, Brown JB. Treatment escalation and rise in HbA1c following successful initial Metformin therapy. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:504–9.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Nichols GA, Alexander CM, Girman CJ, Kamal-Bahl S, Brown JB. A contemporary analysis of secondary failure of successful sulfonylurea therapy. Endocr Pract. 2006; (in press). Nichols GA, Alexander CM, Girman CJ, Kamal-Bahl S, Brown JB. A contemporary analysis of secondary failure of successful sulfonylurea therapy. Endocr Pract. 2006; (in press).
27.
go back to reference Brown JB, Nichols GA, Glauber HS. Case-control study of 10 years of comprehensive diabetes care. West J Med. 2000;172:85–90.PubMedCrossRef Brown JB, Nichols GA, Glauber HS. Case-control study of 10 years of comprehensive diabetes care. West J Med. 2000;172:85–90.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Nichols GA, Glauber HS, Javor K, Brown JB. Achieving further glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. West J Med. 2000;173:5–9.CrossRef Nichols GA, Glauber HS, Javor K, Brown JB. Achieving further glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. West J Med. 2000;173:5–9.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Willey CJ, Andrade SE, Cohen J, Fuller JC, Gurwitz JH. Polypharmacy with oral antidiabetic agents: an indicator of poor glycemic control. Am J Manag Care. 2006;12:435–440.PubMed Willey CJ, Andrade SE, Cohen J, Fuller JC, Gurwitz JH. Polypharmacy with oral antidiabetic agents: an indicator of poor glycemic control. Am J Manag Care. 2006;12:435–440.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Delay Of Insulin Addition To Oral Combination Therapy Despite Inadequate Glycemic Control
Delay of Insulin Therapy
Authors
Gregory A. Nichols, PhD
Yuri H. Koo, JD, MPH
Sonali N. Shah, RPh, MBA, MPH
Publication date
01-04-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 4/2007
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0139-y

Other articles of this Issue 4/2007

Journal of General Internal Medicine 4/2007 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine