Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 1/2007

01-01-2007 | Original Article

A National Survey of Medical Students’ Beliefs and Knowledge in Screening for Prostate Cancer

Authors: Stephen Marcella, MD, MPH, Cristine D. Delnevo, PhD, MPH, Steven S. Coughlin, PhD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 1/2007

Login to get access

Background

Today’s medical students are being educated at a time when there are no evidence-based guidelines for prostate cancer screening.

Objective

To examine medical students’ knowledge and beliefs concerning prostate cancer screening and specific determinants for their beliefs.

Design, Setting, and Participants

One thousand six hundred and forty four students were sampled at 20 medical schools using a web-based, cross-sectional survey.

Main Outcome Measures

Basic knowledge and beliefs about prostate cancer testing, epidemiology, and therapy were ascertained.

Results

Four of 8 knowledge items were answered incorrectly by 50% or more of students. Seven of 8 students believe that early diagnosis from screening can improve survival from prostate cancer. Second- and third-year students were more likely than fourth-year students to believe that the digital rectal exam (DRE) and the prostate-specific antigen test were accurate, adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.8; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.2 to 2.7 and 1.7; 1.3 to 2.2 for second and third years, respectively, for the DRE. Black and Hispanic students were no more likely than white students to agree that early screening diagnosis improves survival, but blacks were more likely to agree with screening black or Hispanic men (AOR 7.8; 95% CI, 5.3 to 11.4 and 3.2; 2.2 to 4.7, respectively). More knowledgeable students were less likely to believe in the benefit of early detection and the accuracy of the prostate-specific antigen (AOR 0.3; 95%CI, 0.2 to 0.5).

Conclusions

Medical students generally are very optimistic about the benefits of screening for prostate cancer. Increased knowledge about prostate cancer is associated with a more conservative view of screening. Other predictors are independent of this knowledge.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Voss JD, Schectman JM. Prostate cancer screening practices and beliefs. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:831–7.PubMedCrossRef Voss JD, Schectman JM. Prostate cancer screening practices and beliefs. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:831–7.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Sirovich BE, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S. Screening men for prostate and colorectal cancer in the United States: does practice reflect the evidence? JAMA. 2003;289:1414–20.PubMedCrossRef Sirovich BE, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S. Screening men for prostate and colorectal cancer in the United States: does practice reflect the evidence? JAMA. 2003;289:1414–20.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Jacobsen SJ, Bergstralh EJ, Guess HA, et al. Predictive properties of serum-prostate-specific antigen testing in a community-based setting. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:2462–8.PubMedCrossRef Jacobsen SJ, Bergstralh EJ, Guess HA, et al. Predictive properties of serum-prostate-specific antigen testing in a community-based setting. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:2462–8.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for prostate cancer: recommendation and rationale. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:915–6. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for prostate cancer: recommendation and rationale. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:915–6.
5.
go back to reference Sox HC, Mulrow C. An editorial update: should benefits of radical prostatectomy affect the decision to screen for early prostate cancer? Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:232–3.PubMed Sox HC, Mulrow C. An editorial update: should benefits of radical prostatectomy affect the decision to screen for early prostate cancer? Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:232–3.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Smith RA, Cokkinides V, von Eschenbach AC, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002;52:8–22.PubMedCrossRef Smith RA, Cokkinides V, von Eschenbach AC, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002;52:8–22.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Walsh JM, McPhee SJ. A systems model of clinical preventive care: an analysis of factors influencing patient and physician. Health Educ Q. 1992;19:157–75.PubMed Walsh JM, McPhee SJ. A systems model of clinical preventive care: an analysis of factors influencing patient and physician. Health Educ Q. 1992;19:157–75.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Briss P, Rimer B, Reilley B, et al. Promoting informed decisions about cancer screening in communities and healthcare systems. Am J Prev Med. 2004;26:67–80.PubMedCrossRef Briss P, Rimer B, Reilley B, et al. Promoting informed decisions about cancer screening in communities and healthcare systems. Am J Prev Med. 2004;26:67–80.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Purvis Cooper C, Merritt TL, Ross LE, John LV, Jorgensen CM. To screen or not to screen, when clinical guidelines disagree: primary care physicians’ use of the PSA test. Prev Med. 2004;38:182–91.PubMedCrossRef Purvis Cooper C, Merritt TL, Ross LE, John LV, Jorgensen CM. To screen or not to screen, when clinical guidelines disagree: primary care physicians’ use of the PSA test. Prev Med. 2004;38:182–91.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hoffman RM, Papenfuss MR, Buller DB, Moon TE. Attitudes and practices of primary care physicians for prostate cancer screening. Am J Prev Med. 1996;12:277–81.PubMed Hoffman RM, Papenfuss MR, Buller DB, Moon TE. Attitudes and practices of primary care physicians for prostate cancer screening. Am J Prev Med. 1996;12:277–81.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Fowler FJ, Bin L, Collins MM, et al. Prostate cancer screening and beliefs about treatment efficacy: a national survey of primary care physicians and urologists. Am J Med. 1998;104:526–32.PubMedCrossRef Fowler FJ, Bin L, Collins MM, et al. Prostate cancer screening and beliefs about treatment efficacy: a national survey of primary care physicians and urologists. Am J Med. 1998;104:526–32.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Austin OJ, Valente S, Hasse LA, Kues JR. Determinants of prostate-specific antigen test use in prostate cancer screening by primary care physicians. Arch Fam Med. 1997;6:453–8.PubMedCrossRef Austin OJ, Valente S, Hasse LA, Kues JR. Determinants of prostate-specific antigen test use in prostate cancer screening by primary care physicians. Arch Fam Med. 1997;6:453–8.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lawson DA, Simoes EJ, Sharp D, et al. Prostate cancer screening—a physician survey in Missouri. J Community Health. 1998;23:347–58.PubMedCrossRef Lawson DA, Simoes EJ, Sharp D, et al. Prostate cancer screening—a physician survey in Missouri. J Community Health. 1998;23:347–58.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Delnevo CD, Steinberg MB, Abatemarco DJ, Hausman AJ. Correlates of clinical preventive practices among internal medicine residents. Prev Med. 2003;36:645–51.PubMedCrossRef Delnevo CD, Steinberg MB, Abatemarco DJ, Hausman AJ. Correlates of clinical preventive practices among internal medicine residents. Prev Med. 2003;36:645–51.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Turner BJ, Amsel Z, Lustbader E, Schwartz JS, Balshem A, Grisso JA. Breast cancer screening: effect of physician specialty, practice setting, year of medical school graduation, and sex. Am J Prev Med. 1992;8:78–85.PubMed Turner BJ, Amsel Z, Lustbader E, Schwartz JS, Balshem A, Grisso JA. Breast cancer screening: effect of physician specialty, practice setting, year of medical school graduation, and sex. Am J Prev Med. 1992;8:78–85.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Delnevo CD, Abatemarco DJ, Gotsch AR. Health behaviors and health promotion/disease prevention perceptions of medical students. Am J Prev Med. 1996;12:38–43.PubMed Delnevo CD, Abatemarco DJ, Gotsch AR. Health behaviors and health promotion/disease prevention perceptions of medical students. Am J Prev Med. 1996;12:38–43.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Kwong JC, Dhalla IA, Streiner DL, Baddour RE, Waddell AE, Johnson IL. Effects of rising tuition fees on medical school class composition and financial outlook. CMAJ. 2002;166:1023–8.PubMed Kwong JC, Dhalla IA, Streiner DL, Baddour RE, Waddell AE, Johnson IL. Effects of rising tuition fees on medical school class composition and financial outlook. CMAJ. 2002;166:1023–8.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Bellas PA, Asch SM, Wilkes M. What students bring to medical school: attitudes toward health promotion and prevention. Am J Prev Med. 2000;18:242–8.PubMedCrossRef Bellas PA, Asch SM, Wilkes M. What students bring to medical school: attitudes toward health promotion and prevention. Am J Prev Med. 2000;18:242–8.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Delnevo CD, Hausman AJ. Injury-prevention counseling among residents of internal medicine. Am J Prev Med. 2000;19:63–5.PubMedCrossRef Delnevo CD, Hausman AJ. Injury-prevention counseling among residents of internal medicine. Am J Prev Med. 2000;19:63–5.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Frank E, Galuska DA, Elon LK, Wright EH. Personal and clinical exercise-related attitudes and behaviors of freshmen U.S. medical students. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2004;75:112–21.PubMed Frank E, Galuska DA, Elon LK, Wright EH. Personal and clinical exercise-related attitudes and behaviors of freshmen U.S. medical students. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2004;75:112–21.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Zapka JG, Luckmann R, Sulsky SI, et al. Cancer control knowledge, attitudes, and perceived skills among medical students. J Cancer Educ. 2000;15:73–8.PubMed Zapka JG, Luckmann R, Sulsky SI, et al. Cancer control knowledge, attitudes, and perceived skills among medical students. J Cancer Educ. 2000;15:73–8.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Association of American Medical colleges. Medical school graduation questionnaire: all schools report. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2003. Association of American Medical colleges. Medical school graduation questionnaire: all schools report. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2003.
23.
go back to reference Holmberg L, Bill-Axelson A, Helgesen F, et al. A randomized trial comparing radical prostatectomy with watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:781–9.PubMedCrossRef Holmberg L, Bill-Axelson A, Helgesen F, et al. A randomized trial comparing radical prostatectomy with watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:781–9.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Fowler FJ, Welch HG. Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States. JAMA. 2004;291:71–8.PubMedCrossRef Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Fowler FJ, Welch HG. Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States. JAMA. 2004;291:71–8.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Bell DS, Hays RD, Hoffman JR, Day FC, Higa JK, Wilkes MS. A test of knowledge about prostate cancer screening: online pilot evaluation among southern California physicians. J Gen Intern Med. 2006; 21:310–4.PubMedCrossRef Bell DS, Hays RD, Hoffman JR, Day FC, Higa JK, Wilkes MS. A test of knowledge about prostate cancer screening: online pilot evaluation among southern California physicians. J Gen Intern Med. 2006; 21:310–4.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Thompson IM, Pauler DK, Goodman PJ, et al. Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level <=4.0 ng per milliliter. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2239–46.PubMedCrossRef Thompson IM, Pauler DK, Goodman PJ, et al. Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level <=4.0 ng per milliliter. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2239–46.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Ruutu M, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1977–84.PubMedCrossRef Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Ruutu M, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1977–84.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Daley EM, McDermott RJ, McCormack Brown KR, Kittleson MJ. Conducting web-based survey research: a lesson in internet designs. Am J Health Behav. 2003;27:116–24.PubMed Daley EM, McDermott RJ, McCormack Brown KR, Kittleson MJ. Conducting web-based survey research: a lesson in internet designs. Am J Health Behav. 2003;27:116–24.PubMed
Metadata
Title
A National Survey of Medical Students’ Beliefs and Knowledge in Screening for Prostate Cancer
Authors
Stephen Marcella, MD, MPH
Cristine D. Delnevo, PhD, MPH
Steven S. Coughlin, PhD
Publication date
01-01-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 1/2007
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-006-0015-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2007

Journal of General Internal Medicine 1/2007 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine