Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 8/2020

01-08-2020 | Esophageal Cancer | Original Article

Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy with Linear Stapled Anastomosis Associated with Low Leak and Stricture Rates

Authors: Moshim Kukar, Kfir Ben-David, June S. Peng, Kristopher Attwood, Ryan M. Thomas, Mark Hennon, Chukwumere Nwogu, Steven N. Hochwald

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 8/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Minimally invasive foregut surgery is increasingly performed for both benign and malignant diseases. We present a retrospective series of patients who underwent minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (MIE) with linear stapled anastomosis performed at two centers in the USA, with a focus on evaluating leak and stricture rates.

Methods

Patients treated from 2007 to 2018 were included, and data on demographics, oncologic treatment, pathology, and outcomes were analyzed. The surgical technique utilized laparoscopic and thoracoscopic access, with an intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis using a 6-cm linear stapled side-to-side technique.

Results

A total of 124 patients were included and 114 resections (91.9%) were completed in a minimally invasive fashion with a 6-cm linear stapled side-to-side anastomosis. Patients were predominantly male (90.7%) with a median age of 66.0 years and body mass index of 28.8 kg/m2. Of 121 patients with malignancy, negative margins were obtained in 94.3% and median lymph node yield was 15 (IQR 12–22). In the intention to treat analysis, median operative time was 463 min (IQR 403–515), blood loss was 150 mL (IQR 100–200), and length of stay was 8 days (IQR 7–11). Postoperative complications were experienced by 64 patients (51.6%) including respiratory failure in 14 (11.3%) and pneumonia in 12 (9.7%). In patients who successfully underwent a 6-cm stapled side-to-side anastomosis, anastomotic leaks occurred in 6 patients (5.1%) without need for operative intervention, and anastomotic strictures occurred in 6 patients (5.1%) requiring endoscopic management.

Conclusions

Ivor Lewis MIE with a 6-cm linear stapled anastomosis can be completed with a high technical success rate, and low rates of anastomotic leak and stricture.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Rosman C, Garcia JR, Gisbertz SS, Klinkenbijl JH, Hollmann MW, de Lange ES, Bonjer HJ, van der Peet DL, Cuesta MA. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9829):1887–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60516-9.CrossRefPubMed Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Rosman C, Garcia JR, Gisbertz SS, Klinkenbijl JH, Hollmann MW, de Lange ES, Bonjer HJ, van der Peet DL, Cuesta MA. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9829):1887–92. doi:https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S0140-6736(12)60516-9.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference van der Sluis PC, van der Horst S, May AM, Schippers C, Brosens LAA, Joore HCA, Kroese C, Mohammad NH, Mook S, Vleggaar FP, Rinkes IB, Ruurda J, van Hillegersberg R. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: A randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2019;269(4): 621–630.CrossRef van der Sluis PC, van der Horst S, May AM, Schippers C, Brosens LAA, Joore HCA, Kroese C, Mohammad NH, Mook S, Vleggaar FP, Rinkes IB, Ruurda J, van Hillegersberg R. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: A randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2019;269(4): 621–630.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mariette C, Markar SR, Dabakuyo-Yonli TS, Meunier B, Pezet D, Collet D, D'Journo XB, Brigand C, Perniceni T, Carrère N, Mabrut JY, Msika S, Peschaud F, Prudhomme M, Bonnetain F, Piessen G; Fédération de Recherche en Chirurgie (FRENCH) and French Eso-Gastric Tumors (FREGAT) Working Group. Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(2):152–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1805101.CrossRefPubMed Mariette C, Markar SR, Dabakuyo-Yonli TS, Meunier B, Pezet D, Collet D, D'Journo XB, Brigand C, Perniceni T, Carrère N, Mabrut JY, Msika S, Peschaud F, Prudhomme M, Bonnetain F, Piessen G; Fédération de Recherche en Chirurgie (FRENCH) and French Eso-Gastric Tumors (FREGAT) Working Group. Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(2):152–62. doi:https://​doi.​org/​10.​1056/​NEJMoa1805101.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Straatman J, van der Wielen N, Cuesta MA, Daams F, Roig Garcia J, Bonavina L, Rosman C, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS, van der Peet DL. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophageal Resection: Three-year Follow-up of the Previously Reported Randomized Controlled Trial: the TIME Trial. Ann Surg. 2017;266(2):232–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002171.CrossRefPubMed Straatman J, van der Wielen N, Cuesta MA, Daams F, Roig Garcia J, Bonavina L, Rosman C, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS, van der Peet DL. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophageal Resection: Three-year Follow-up of the Previously Reported Randomized Controlled Trial: the TIME Trial. Ann Surg. 2017;266(2):232–6. doi:https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​SLA.​0000000000002171​.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference van Workum F, Bouwense SA, Luyer MD, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, van der Peet DL, Daams F, Kouwenhoven EA, van Det MJ, van den Wildenberg FJ, Polat F, Gisbertz SS, Henegouwen MI, Heisterkamp J, Langenhoff BS, Martijnse IS, Grutters JP, Klarenbeek BR, Rovers MM, Rosman C. Intrathoracic versus Cervical ANastomosis after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: study protocol of the ICAN randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17(1):505. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1636-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van Workum F, Bouwense SA, Luyer MD, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, van der Peet DL, Daams F, Kouwenhoven EA, van Det MJ, van den Wildenberg FJ, Polat F, Gisbertz SS, Henegouwen MI, Heisterkamp J, Langenhoff BS, Martijnse IS, Grutters JP, Klarenbeek BR, Rovers MM, Rosman C. Intrathoracic versus Cervical ANastomosis after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: study protocol of the ICAN randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17(1):505. doi:https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s13063-016-1636-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference van Workum F, Stenstra MHBC, Berkelmans GHK, Slaman AE, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS, van den Wildenberg FJH, Polat F, Irino T, Nilsson M, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Luyer MD, Adang EM, Hannink G, Rovers MM, Rosman C. Learning Curve and Associated Morbidity of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Retrospective Multicenter Study. Ann Surg 2019;269(1): 88–94. CrossRef van Workum F, Stenstra MHBC, Berkelmans GHK, Slaman AE, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS, van den Wildenberg FJH, Polat F, Irino T, Nilsson M, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Luyer MD, Adang EM, Hannink G, Rovers MM, Rosman C. Learning Curve and Associated Morbidity of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Retrospective Multicenter Study. Ann Surg 2019;269(1): 88–94. CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy with Linear Stapled Anastomosis Associated with Low Leak and Stricture Rates
Authors
Moshim Kukar
Kfir Ben-David
June S. Peng
Kristopher Attwood
Ryan M. Thomas
Mark Hennon
Chukwumere Nwogu
Steven N. Hochwald
Publication date
01-08-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 8/2020
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04320-y

Other articles of this Issue 8/2020

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 8/2020 Go to the issue