Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 3/2013

01-03-2013 | Original Article

LigaSure™ Vs. Conventional Dissection Techniques in Pancreatic Surgery—a Prospective Randomised Single-Centre Trial

Authors: Faik Guentac Uzunoglu, Maximilian Bockhorn, Judith Alexandra Fink, Matthias Reeh, Eik Vettorazzi, Karim Abdel Gawad, Dean Bogoevski, Yogesh Kumar Vashist, Tung Yu Tsui, Alexandra Koenig, Oliver Mann, Jakob Robert Izbicki

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 3/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Surgical procedures in pancreatic surgery are well established, but still involve time-consuming manual dissection. We compared the use of LigaSure with conventional dissection techniques in pancreatic surgery in a prospective randomised single-centre trial (registration number: NCT00850291).

Methods

Patients with tumours of the pancreatic head that were assumed to be technically resectable were randomised to LigaSure or conventional surgery. The primary endpoint of this study was overall operation time. Secondary endpoints were preparation time until tumour resection, intraoperative blood loss, number of given units of packed red blood cells, costs of surgery, postoperative morbidity, length of hospital stay and mortality.

Results

There was no difference in overall operation time between the two groups (P = 0.227). Median costs for pancreatic surgery were significantly less in the conventional group with €3,047 (range 2,004–5,543) vs. €3,527 (range 2,516–5,056, P = 0.009). Preparation time, intraoperative blood loss, number of units of packed red blood cells, postoperative morbidity, length of hospital stay and mortality did not differ between the two groups.

Conclusion

Our data indicate that the LigaSure device is equivalent to conventional dissection modalities in pancreatic surgery.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Harold KL, Pollinger H, Matthews BD, Kercher KW, Sing RF, Heniford BT. Comparison of ultrasonic energy, bipolar thermal energy, and vascular clips for the hemostasis of small-, medium-, and large-sized arteries. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 1228–1230.PubMedCrossRef Harold KL, Pollinger H, Matthews BD, Kercher KW, Sing RF, Heniford BT. Comparison of ultrasonic energy, bipolar thermal energy, and vascular clips for the hemostasis of small-, medium-, and large-sized arteries. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 1228–1230.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kennedy JS, Stranahan PL, Taylor KD, Chandler JG. High-burst-strength, feedback-controlled bipolar vessel sealing. Surg Endosc 1998; 12: 876–878.PubMedCrossRef Kennedy JS, Stranahan PL, Taylor KD, Chandler JG. High-burst-strength, feedback-controlled bipolar vessel sealing. Surg Endosc 1998; 12: 876–878.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Amaral JF. Ultrasonic dissection. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 1994; 2: 181–185.PubMed Amaral JF. Ultrasonic dissection. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 1994; 2: 181–185.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Sigel B, Dunn MR. The mechanism of blood vessel closure by high frequency electrocoagulation. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1965; 121: 823–831.PubMed Sigel B, Dunn MR. The mechanism of blood vessel closure by high frequency electrocoagulation. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1965; 121: 823–831.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Cipolla C, Graceffa G, Sandonato L, Fricano S, Vieni S, Latteri MA. LigaSure in total thyroidectomy. Surg Today 2008; 38: 495–498.PubMedCrossRef Cipolla C, Graceffa G, Sandonato L, Fricano S, Vieni S, Latteri MA. LigaSure in total thyroidectomy. Surg Today 2008; 38: 495–498.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Eroglu A, Turkyilmaz A, Aydin Y, Erdem AF, Tokur M, Karaoglanoglu N. The use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in esophageal cancer surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 84: 2076–2079.PubMedCrossRef Eroglu A, Turkyilmaz A, Aydin Y, Erdem AF, Tokur M, Karaoglanoglu N. The use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in esophageal cancer surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 84: 2076–2079.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Nienhuijs S, de Hingh I. Conventional versus LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy for patients with symptomatic Hemorrhoids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; CD006761. Nienhuijs S, de Hingh I. Conventional versus LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy for patients with symptomatic Hemorrhoids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; CD006761.
8.
go back to reference Saiura A, Yamamoto J, Koga R, Sakamoto Y, Kokudo N, Seki M, Yamaguchi T, Yamaguchi T, Muto T, Makuuchi M. Usefulness of LigaSure for liver resection: analysis by randomized clinical trial. Am J Surg 2006; 192: 41–45.PubMedCrossRef Saiura A, Yamamoto J, Koga R, Sakamoto Y, Kokudo N, Seki M, Yamaguchi T, Yamaguchi T, Muto T, Makuuchi M. Usefulness of LigaSure for liver resection: analysis by randomized clinical trial. Am J Surg 2006; 192: 41–45.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. PLoS Med 2010; 7: e1000251.PubMedCrossRef Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. PLoS Med 2010; 7: e1000251.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibanes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 2009; 250: 187–196.PubMedCrossRef Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibanes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 2009; 250: 187–196.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205–213.PubMedCrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205–213.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler M. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005; 138: 8–13.PubMedCrossRef Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler M. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005; 138: 8–13.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Yeo CJ, Buchler MW. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 2007; 142: 20–25.PubMedCrossRef Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Yeo CJ, Buchler MW. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 2007; 142: 20–25.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bansal N, Roberts WS, Apte SM, Lancaster JM, Wenham RM. Electrothermal bipolar coagulation decreases the rate of red blood cell transfusions for pelvic exenterations. J Surg Oncol 2009; 100: 511–514.PubMedCrossRef Bansal N, Roberts WS, Apte SM, Lancaster JM, Wenham RM. Electrothermal bipolar coagulation decreases the rate of red blood cell transfusions for pelvic exenterations. J Surg Oncol 2009; 100: 511–514.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Daskalopoulos G, Karyotis I, Heretis I, Delakas D. Electrothermal bipolar coagulation for radical prostatectomies and cystectomies: a preliminary case-controlled study. Int Urol Nephrol 2004; 36: 181–185.PubMedCrossRef Daskalopoulos G, Karyotis I, Heretis I, Delakas D. Electrothermal bipolar coagulation for radical prostatectomies and cystectomies: a preliminary case-controlled study. Int Urol Nephrol 2004; 36: 181–185.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Belli G, Fantini C, Ciciliano F, D'Agostino A, Barberio M. Pancreaticoduodenectomy in portal hypertension: use of the Ligasure. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2003; 10: 215–217.PubMedCrossRef Belli G, Fantini C, Ciciliano F, D'Agostino A, Barberio M. Pancreaticoduodenectomy in portal hypertension: use of the Ligasure. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2003; 10: 215–217.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Gehrig T, Muller-Stich BP, Kenngott H, Fischer L, Mehrabi A, Buchler MW, Gutt CN. LigaSure versus conventional dissection technique in pancreatoduodenectomy: a pilot study. Am J Surg 2011; 201: 166–170.PubMedCrossRef Gehrig T, Muller-Stich BP, Kenngott H, Fischer L, Mehrabi A, Buchler MW, Gutt CN. LigaSure versus conventional dissection technique in pancreatoduodenectomy: a pilot study. Am J Surg 2011; 201: 166–170.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hagen B, Eriksson N, Sundset M. Randomised controlled trial of LigaSure versus conventional suture ligature for abdominal hysterectomy. BJOG 2005; 112: 968–970.PubMedCrossRef Hagen B, Eriksson N, Sundset M. Randomised controlled trial of LigaSure versus conventional suture ligature for abdominal hysterectomy. BJOG 2005; 112: 968–970.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Takiguchi N, Nagata M, Soda H, Nomura Y, Takayama W, Yasutomi J, Tohyama Y, Ryu M. Multicenter randomized comparison of LigaSure versus conventional surgery for gastrointestinal carcinoma. Surg Today 2010; 40: 1050–1054.PubMedCrossRef Takiguchi N, Nagata M, Soda H, Nomura Y, Takayama W, Yasutomi J, Tohyama Y, Ryu M. Multicenter randomized comparison of LigaSure versus conventional surgery for gastrointestinal carcinoma. Surg Today 2010; 40: 1050–1054.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lee WJ, Chen TC, Lai IR, Wang W, Huang MT. Randomized clinical trial of Ligasure versus conventional surgery for extended gastric cancer resection. Br J Surg 2003; 90: 1493–1496.PubMedCrossRef Lee WJ, Chen TC, Lai IR, Wang W, Huang MT. Randomized clinical trial of Ligasure versus conventional surgery for extended gastric cancer resection. Br J Surg 2003; 90: 1493–1496.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Bockhorn M, Burdelski C, Bogoevski D, Sgourakis G, Yekebas EF, Izbicki JR. Arterial en bloc resection for pancreatic carcinoma. Br J Surg 2011; 98: 86–92.PubMedCrossRef Bockhorn M, Burdelski C, Bogoevski D, Sgourakis G, Yekebas EF, Izbicki JR. Arterial en bloc resection for pancreatic carcinoma. Br J Surg 2011; 98: 86–92.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Bockhorn M, Cataldegirmen G, Kutup A, Marx A, Burdelski C, Vashist JK, Mann O, Liebl L, Konig A, Izbicki JR, Yekebas EF. Crossing the Rubicon: when pancreatic resection with curative intent ends in an R2 status. Impact of "desmoplastic pseudo-pancreatitis" and anatomical site of irresectability. Ann Surg Oncol 2009; 16: 1212–1221.PubMedCrossRef Bockhorn M, Cataldegirmen G, Kutup A, Marx A, Burdelski C, Vashist JK, Mann O, Liebl L, Konig A, Izbicki JR, Yekebas EF. Crossing the Rubicon: when pancreatic resection with curative intent ends in an R2 status. Impact of "desmoplastic pseudo-pancreatitis" and anatomical site of irresectability. Ann Surg Oncol 2009; 16: 1212–1221.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Yekebas EF, Bogoevski D, Cataldegirmen G, Kunze C, Marx A, Vashist YK, Schurr PG, Liebl L, Thieltges S, Gawad KA, Schneider C, Izbicki JR. En bloc vascular resection for locally advanced pancreatic malignancies infiltrating major blood vessels: perioperative outcome and long-term survival in 136 patients. Ann Surg 2008; 247: 300–309.PubMedCrossRef Yekebas EF, Bogoevski D, Cataldegirmen G, Kunze C, Marx A, Vashist YK, Schurr PG, Liebl L, Thieltges S, Gawad KA, Schneider C, Izbicki JR. En bloc vascular resection for locally advanced pancreatic malignancies infiltrating major blood vessels: perioperative outcome and long-term survival in 136 patients. Ann Surg 2008; 247: 300–309.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
LigaSure™ Vs. Conventional Dissection Techniques in Pancreatic Surgery—a Prospective Randomised Single-Centre Trial
Authors
Faik Guentac Uzunoglu
Maximilian Bockhorn
Judith Alexandra Fink
Matthias Reeh
Eik Vettorazzi
Karim Abdel Gawad
Dean Bogoevski
Yogesh Kumar Vashist
Tung Yu Tsui
Alexandra Koenig
Oliver Mann
Jakob Robert Izbicki
Publication date
01-03-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 3/2013
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-2107-z

Other articles of this Issue 3/2013

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 3/2013 Go to the issue