Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 10/2011

01-10-2011 | Original Article

Prognostic Implications of Lymphadenectomy in Esophageal Cancer After Neo-adjuvant Therapy: a Single Center Experience

Authors: Zachary Torgersen, Abhishek Sundaram, Masato Hoshino, Brittany Willer, Xiang Fang, Tsewang Tashi, Tommy Lee, Sumeet K. Mittal

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 10/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The objective of this study is to explore the prognostic implications of lymphadenectomy in esophageal cancer patients after neo-adjuvant therapy.

Methods

Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database identified esophageal cancer patients with locoregional disease who received neo-adjuvant therapy and surgery. Patients were grouped based on the number of nodes resected, pathological lymph node status, and percentage of positive nodes. Kaplan–Meier curves were used to analyze overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Log-rank test was used to compare survival between groups.

Results

Eighty-four patients formed the study group. Patients with ≥18 nodes resected had a significantly longer median OS than those with <18 nodes resected (68.6 vs. 29.6 months; p = 0.014). Lymph node-negative patients had significantly longer median OS (51.4 vs. 27.4 months; p = 0.025) and DFS (45.3 vs. 12.9 months; p = 0.03) when compared to lymph node-positive patients. Patients with a percentage of positive nodes <0.25 had a significantly longer median OS (31.1 vs. 17.8 months; p = 0.015) and DFS (21.7 vs. 8.9 months; p = 0.021) than patients with ≥0.25% positive.

Conclusion

Extent of lymphadenectomy, percentage of positive nodes, and pathological lymph node status are significant prognostic markers in patients who undergo esophagectomy after neo-adjuvant therapy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2011;61:69–90.CrossRef Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2011;61:69–90.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hyngstrom JR, Posner MC. Neoadjuvant strategies for the treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer. Journal of Surgical Oncology 2010;101:299–304.PubMedCrossRef Hyngstrom JR, Posner MC. Neoadjuvant strategies for the treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer. Journal of Surgical Oncology 2010;101:299–304.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Rizk NP, Ishwaran H, Rice TW, Chen LQ, Schipper PH, Kesler KA, Law S, Lerut TE, Reed CE, Salo JA, Scott WJ, Hofstetter WL, Watson TJ, Allen MS, Rusch VW, Blackstone EH. Optimum lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Annals of Surgery 2010;251:46–50.PubMedCrossRef Rizk NP, Ishwaran H, Rice TW, Chen LQ, Schipper PH, Kesler KA, Law S, Lerut TE, Reed CE, Salo JA, Scott WJ, Hofstetter WL, Watson TJ, Allen MS, Rusch VW, Blackstone EH. Optimum lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Annals of Surgery 2010;251:46–50.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Peyre CG, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, Altorki NK, Ancona E, Griffin SM, Holscher A, Lerut T, Law S, Rice TW, Ruol A, van Lanschot JJ, Wong J, DeMeester TR. The number of lymph nodes removed predicts survival in esophageal cancer: an international study on the impact of extent of surgical resection. Annals of Surgery 2008;248:549–556.PubMedCrossRef Peyre CG, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, Altorki NK, Ancona E, Griffin SM, Holscher A, Lerut T, Law S, Rice TW, Ruol A, van Lanschot JJ, Wong J, DeMeester TR. The number of lymph nodes removed predicts survival in esophageal cancer: an international study on the impact of extent of surgical resection. Annals of Surgery 2008;248:549–556.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Altorki NK, Zhou XK, Stiles B, Port JL, Paul S, Lee PC, Mazumdar M. Total number of resected lymph nodes predicts survival in esophageal cancer. Annals of Surgery 2008;248:221–226.PubMedCrossRef Altorki NK, Zhou XK, Stiles B, Port JL, Paul S, Lee PC, Mazumdar M. Total number of resected lymph nodes predicts survival in esophageal cancer. Annals of Surgery 2008;248:221–226.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Mariette C, Piessen G, Briez N, Triboulet JP. The number of metastatic lymph nodes and the ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes are independent prognostic factors in esophageal cancer regardless of neoadjuvant chemoradiation or lymphadenectomy extent. Annals of Surgery 2008;247:365–371.PubMedCrossRef Mariette C, Piessen G, Briez N, Triboulet JP. The number of metastatic lymph nodes and the ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes are independent prognostic factors in esophageal cancer regardless of neoadjuvant chemoradiation or lymphadenectomy extent. Annals of Surgery 2008;247:365–371.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Twine CP, Lewis WG, Morgan MA, Chan D, Clark GW, Havard T, Crosby TD, Roberts SA, Williams GT. The assessment of prognosis of surgically resected oesophageal cancer is dependent on the number of lymph nodes examined pathologically. Histopathology 2009;55:46–52.PubMedCrossRef Twine CP, Lewis WG, Morgan MA, Chan D, Clark GW, Havard T, Crosby TD, Roberts SA, Williams GT. The assessment of prognosis of surgically resected oesophageal cancer is dependent on the number of lymph nodes examined pathologically. Histopathology 2009;55:46–52.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Wilson M, Rosato EL, Chojnacki KA, Chervoneva I, Kairys JC, Cohn HE, Rosato FES, Berger AC. Prognostic significance of lymph node metastases and ratio in esophageal cancer. The Journal of Surgical Research 2008;146:11–15.PubMedCrossRef Wilson M, Rosato EL, Chojnacki KA, Chervoneva I, Kairys JC, Cohn HE, Rosato FES, Berger AC. Prognostic significance of lymph node metastases and ratio in esophageal cancer. The Journal of Surgical Research 2008;146:11–15.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Peyre CG, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, Van Lanschot JJ, Holscher A, Law S, Ruol A, Ancona E, Griffin SM, Altorki NK, Rice TW, Wong J, Lerut T, DeMeester TR. Predicting systemic disease in patients with esophageal cancer after esophagectomy: a multinational study on the significance of the number of involved lymph nodes. Annals of Surgery 2008;248:979–985.PubMedCrossRef Peyre CG, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, Van Lanschot JJ, Holscher A, Law S, Ruol A, Ancona E, Griffin SM, Altorki NK, Rice TW, Wong J, Lerut T, DeMeester TR. Predicting systemic disease in patients with esophageal cancer after esophagectomy: a multinational study on the significance of the number of involved lymph nodes. Annals of Surgery 2008;248:979–985.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Eloubeidi MA, Desmond R, Arguedas MR, Reed CE, Wilcox CM. Prognostic factors for the survival of patients with esophageal carcinoma in the U.S.: the importance of tumor length and lymph node status. Cancer 2002;95:1434–1443.PubMedCrossRef Eloubeidi MA, Desmond R, Arguedas MR, Reed CE, Wilcox CM. Prognostic factors for the survival of patients with esophageal carcinoma in the U.S.: the importance of tumor length and lymph node status. Cancer 2002;95:1434–1443.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Orringer MB, Marshall B, Chang AC, Lee J, Pickens A, Lau CL. Two thousand transhiatal esophagectomies: changing trends, lessons learned. Annals of Surgery 2007;246:363–72; discussion 372-4.PubMedCrossRef Orringer MB, Marshall B, Chang AC, Lee J, Pickens A, Lau CL. Two thousand transhiatal esophagectomies: changing trends, lessons learned. Annals of Surgery 2007;246:363–72; discussion 372-4.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, Peters JH, Chandrasoma P, DeMeester TR. Curative resection for esophageal adenocarcinoma: analysis of 100 en bloc esophagectomies. Annals of Surgery 2001;234:520–30; discussion 530-1.PubMedCrossRef Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, Peters JH, Chandrasoma P, DeMeester TR. Curative resection for esophageal adenocarcinoma: analysis of 100 en bloc esophagectomies. Annals of Surgery 2001;234:520–30; discussion 530-1.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Luketich JD, Schauer PR, Christie NA, Weigel TL, Raja S, Fernando HC, Keenan RJ, Nguyen NT. Minimally invasive esophagectomy. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2000;70:906–11; discussion 911-2.PubMedCrossRef Luketich JD, Schauer PR, Christie NA, Weigel TL, Raja S, Fernando HC, Keenan RJ, Nguyen NT. Minimally invasive esophagectomy. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2000;70:906–11; discussion 911-2.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Appendix E: Instructions for lymph node dissection. In Rosai J, Ackerman LV, editors. Rosai and Ackerman’s surgical pathology, vol. 2, 9th ed. New York: Mosby, 2004, pp 2948. Appendix E: Instructions for lymph node dissection. In Rosai J, Ackerman LV, editors. Rosai and Ackerman’s surgical pathology, vol. 2, 9th ed. New York: Mosby, 2004, pp 2948.
16.
go back to reference Brown LM, Devesa SS, Chow WH. Incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus among White Americans by sex, stage, and age. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2008;100:1184–1187.PubMedCrossRef Brown LM, Devesa SS, Chow WH. Incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus among White Americans by sex, stage, and age. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2008;100:1184–1187.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2009;59:225–249.CrossRef Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2009;59:225–249.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Portale G, Hagen JA, Peters JH, Chan LS, DeMeester SR, Gandamihardja TA, DeMeester TR. Modern 5-year survival of resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma: single institution experience with 263 patients. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2006;202:588–96; discussion 596-8.PubMedCrossRef Portale G, Hagen JA, Peters JH, Chan LS, DeMeester SR, Gandamihardja TA, DeMeester TR. Modern 5-year survival of resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma: single institution experience with 263 patients. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2006;202:588–96; discussion 596-8.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Burmeister BH, Smithers BM, Gebski V, Fitzgerald L, Simes RJ, Devitt P, Ackland S, Gotley DC, Joseph D, Millar J, North J, Walpole ET, Denham JW, Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group, Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group. Surgery alone versus chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for resectable cancer of the oesophagus: a randomised controlled phase III trial. The Lancet Oncology 2005; 6:659–668.PubMedCrossRef Burmeister BH, Smithers BM, Gebski V, Fitzgerald L, Simes RJ, Devitt P, Ackland S, Gotley DC, Joseph D, Millar J, North J, Walpole ET, Denham JW, Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group, Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group. Surgery alone versus chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for resectable cancer of the oesophagus: a randomised controlled phase III trial. The Lancet Oncology 2005; 6:659–668.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lee JL, Park SI, Kim SB, Jung HY, Lee GH, Kim JH, Song HY, Cho KJ, Kim WK, Lee JS, Kim SH, Min YI. A single institutional phase III trial of preoperative chemotherapy with hyperfractionation radiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Annals of Oncology: Official Journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology/ESMO 2004;15:947–954.CrossRef Lee JL, Park SI, Kim SB, Jung HY, Lee GH, Kim JH, Song HY, Cho KJ, Kim WK, Lee JS, Kim SH, Min YI. A single institutional phase III trial of preoperative chemotherapy with hyperfractionation radiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Annals of Oncology: Official Journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology/ESMO 2004;15:947–954.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Tepper J, Krasna MJ, Niedzwiecki D, Hollis D, Reed CE, Goldberg R, Kiel K, Willett C, Sugarbaker D, Mayer R. Phase III trial of trimodality therapy with cisplatin, fluorouracil, radiotherapy, and surgery compared with surgery alone for esophageal cancer: CALGB 9781. Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2008;26:1086–1092. Tepper J, Krasna MJ, Niedzwiecki D, Hollis D, Reed CE, Goldberg R, Kiel K, Willett C, Sugarbaker D, Mayer R. Phase III trial of trimodality therapy with cisplatin, fluorouracil, radiotherapy, and surgery compared with surgery alone for esophageal cancer: CALGB 9781. Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2008;26:1086–1092.
22.
go back to reference Urba SG, Orringer MB, Turrisi A, Iannettoni M, Forastiere A, Strawderman M. Randomized trial of preoperative chemoradiation versus surgery alone in patients with locoregional esophageal carcinoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2001;19:305–313. Urba SG, Orringer MB, Turrisi A, Iannettoni M, Forastiere A, Strawderman M. Randomized trial of preoperative chemoradiation versus surgery alone in patients with locoregional esophageal carcinoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2001;19:305–313.
23.
go back to reference Walsh TN, Noonan N, Hollywood D, Kelly A, Keeling N, Hennessy TP. A comparison of multimodal therapy and surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma. The New England Journal of Medicine 1996;335:462–467.PubMedCrossRef Walsh TN, Noonan N, Hollywood D, Kelly A, Keeling N, Hennessy TP. A comparison of multimodal therapy and surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma. The New England Journal of Medicine 1996;335:462–467.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Rice TW, Blackstone EH, Adelstein DJ, Zuccaro G,Jr, Vargo JJ, Goldblum JR, Rybicki LA, Murthy SC, Decamp MM. N1 esophageal carcinoma: the importance of staging and downstaging. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2001;121:454–464.PubMedCrossRef Rice TW, Blackstone EH, Adelstein DJ, Zuccaro G,Jr, Vargo JJ, Goldblum JR, Rybicki LA, Murthy SC, Decamp MM. N1 esophageal carcinoma: the importance of staging and downstaging. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2001;121:454–464.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Rizk NP, Venkatraman E, Bains MS, Park B, Flores R, Tang L, Ilson DH, Minsky BD, Rusch VW, American Joint Committee on Cancer. American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system does not accurately predict survival in patients receiving multimodality therapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007;25:507–512. Rizk NP, Venkatraman E, Bains MS, Park B, Flores R, Tang L, Ilson DH, Minsky BD, Rusch VW, American Joint Committee on Cancer. American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system does not accurately predict survival in patients receiving multimodality therapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007;25:507–512.
27.
go back to reference Swisher SG, Hofstetter W, Wu TT, Correa AM, Ajani JA, Komaki RR, Chirieac L, Hunt KK, Liao Z, Phan A, Rice DC, Vaporciyan AA, Walsh GL, Roth JA. Proposed revision of the esophageal cancer staging system to accommodate pathologic response (pP) following preoperative chemoradiation (CRT). Annals of Surgery 2005;241:810–7; discussion 817-20.PubMedCrossRef Swisher SG, Hofstetter W, Wu TT, Correa AM, Ajani JA, Komaki RR, Chirieac L, Hunt KK, Liao Z, Phan A, Rice DC, Vaporciyan AA, Walsh GL, Roth JA. Proposed revision of the esophageal cancer staging system to accommodate pathologic response (pP) following preoperative chemoradiation (CRT). Annals of Surgery 2005;241:810–7; discussion 817-20.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Prognostic Implications of Lymphadenectomy in Esophageal Cancer After Neo-adjuvant Therapy: a Single Center Experience
Authors
Zachary Torgersen
Abhishek Sundaram
Masato Hoshino
Brittany Willer
Xiang Fang
Tsewang Tashi
Tommy Lee
Sumeet K. Mittal
Publication date
01-10-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 10/2011
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-011-1635-2

Other articles of this Issue 10/2011

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 10/2011 Go to the issue