Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 5/2009

01-05-2009 | SSAT Poster Presentation

Intraoperative Assessment of Pancreatic Neck Margin at the Time of Pancreaticoduodenectomy Increases Likelihood of Margin-Negative Resection in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer

Authors: Mary Dillhoff, Robert Yates, Kristian Wall, Peter Muscarella, W. Scott Melvin, E. Christopher Ellison, Mark Bloomston

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 5/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The utility of intraoperative assessment of surgical margins is often debated by experienced pancreatic surgeons. We sought to review our experience with pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic cancer to determine the impact of intraoperative frozen section (FS) analysis on margin-negative resection and long-term outcome.

Material and Methods

Between 1992 and 2007, 310 consecutive patients underwent PD at our institution; 223 of these were for pancreatic cancer. Seven patients who underwent R2 resection were excluded. Charts were reviewed to determine demographics, final pathology, perioperative course, and long-term outcome. Data were compared by Fisher’s exact and Student’s t tests. Survival curves were created using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared by log-rank analysis. Predictors of margin-negative resection were determined by logistic regression analysis and predictors of survival determined by Cox proportional hazards analysis.

Results

FS analysis of pancreatic neck resection margins was obtained in 75, while no intraoperative assessment was done in 141. Although patients who underwent FS were younger (median, 62 vs. 67 years, p = 0.01), the two groups were similar in terms of gender, comorbidities, preoperative stenting, pylorus preservation, tumor differentiation, nodal status, tumor size, length of stay, and complication rate. Margin-negative resection was more common when FS was undertaken (99% vs. 81%, p = 0.0001). However, intraoperative FS did not significantly increase overall survival (median, 21.7 vs. 14.6, p = 0.20). Only nodal metastasis was predictive of poor survival (median, 21.7 vs. 13.3 months, p = 0.001).

Conclusions

Intraoperative assessment of the pancreatic neck margin status at the time of PD for pancreatic cancer increases the likelihood of obtaining a margin-negative resection. Noteworthy is that final margin status was not predictive of survival, while only nodal metastasis was, suggesting that tumor biology is the most important factor in patients with pancreatic cancer.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer Statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57(1):43–66.PubMedCrossRef Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer Statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57(1):43–66.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Yeo CJ, Abrams RA, Grochow LB, Sohn TA, Ord SE, Hruban RH, Zahurak ML, Dooley WC, Coleman J, Sauter PK, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD, Cameron JL. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: postoperative adjuvant chemoradiation improves survival. A prospective, single-institution experience. Ann Surg 1997;225(5):621–633. doi:10.1097/00000658-199705000-00018.PubMedCrossRef Yeo CJ, Abrams RA, Grochow LB, Sohn TA, Ord SE, Hruban RH, Zahurak ML, Dooley WC, Coleman J, Sauter PK, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD, Cameron JL. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: postoperative adjuvant chemoradiation improves survival. A prospective, single-institution experience. Ann Surg 1997;225(5):621–633. doi:10.​1097/​00000658-199705000-00018.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kosuri K, Muscarella P, Bekaii-Saab T. Updates and controversies in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 2006;4(1):47–54.PubMed Kosuri K, Muscarella P, Bekaii-Saab T. Updates and controversies in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 2006;4(1):47–54.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Howard TJ, Krug J, Yu J, Zyromski N, Schmidt CM, Jacobson L, Madura J, Wiebke EA, Lillemoe KA. Margin-negative R0 resection accomplished with minimal postoperative complications is the surgeon’s contribution to long-term survival in pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 2006;10(10):1338–1345. doi:10.1016/j.gassur.2006.09.008.PubMedCrossRef Howard TJ, Krug J, Yu J, Zyromski N, Schmidt CM, Jacobson L, Madura J, Wiebke EA, Lillemoe KA. Margin-negative R0 resection accomplished with minimal postoperative complications is the surgeon’s contribution to long-term survival in pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 2006;10(10):1338–1345. doi:10.​1016/​j.​gassur.​2006.​09.​008.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Wagner M, Redaelli C, Lietz M, Seiler CA, Friess H, Buchler MW. Curative resection is the single most important factor determining outcome in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 2004;94:586–594. doi:10.1002/bjs.4484.CrossRef Wagner M, Redaelli C, Lietz M, Seiler CA, Friess H, Buchler MW. Curative resection is the single most important factor determining outcome in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 2004;94:586–594. doi:10.​1002/​bjs.​4484.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Schmidt CM, Glant J, Winter JM, Kennard J, Dixon J, Zhao Q, Howard TJ, Madura JA, Nakeeb A, Pitt HA, Cameron JL, Yeo CJ, Lillemoe KD. Total pancreatectomy (R0 resection) improves survival over subtotal pancreatectomy in isolated neck margin positive pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Surgery 2007;142(4):572–578. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2007.07.016.PubMedCrossRef Schmidt CM, Glant J, Winter JM, Kennard J, Dixon J, Zhao Q, Howard TJ, Madura JA, Nakeeb A, Pitt HA, Cameron JL, Yeo CJ, Lillemoe KD. Total pancreatectomy (R0 resection) improves survival over subtotal pancreatectomy in isolated neck margin positive pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Surgery 2007;142(4):572–578. doi:10.​1016/​j.​surg.​2007.​07.​016.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Raut CP, Tseng JF, Sun CC, Wang H, Wolff RA, Crane CH, Hwang R, Vauthey JN, Abdalla EK, Lee JE, Pisters PW, Evans DB. Impact of resection status on pattern failure and survival after pancreatiocduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 2007;246(1):52–60. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000259391.84304.2b.PubMedCrossRef Raut CP, Tseng JF, Sun CC, Wang H, Wolff RA, Crane CH, Hwang R, Vauthey JN, Abdalla EK, Lee JE, Pisters PW, Evans DB. Impact of resection status on pattern failure and survival after pancreatiocduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 2007;246(1):52–60. doi:10.​1097/​01.​sla.​0000259391.​84304.​2b.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Dunn JA, Almond J, Beger HG, Pederzoli P, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fernandez-Cruz L, Lacaine F, Buckels J, Deakin M, Adab FA, Sutton R, Imrie C, Ihse I, Tihanyi T, Olah A, Pedrazzoli S, Spooner D, Kerr DJ, Friess H, Büchler MW, European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer. Influence of resection margins on survival for patients with pancreatic cancer treated by adjuvant chemoradiation and/or chemotherapy in the ESPAC-1 randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2001;234(6):758–768. doi:10.1097/00000658-200112000-00007.PubMedCrossRef Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Dunn JA, Almond J, Beger HG, Pederzoli P, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fernandez-Cruz L, Lacaine F, Buckels J, Deakin M, Adab FA, Sutton R, Imrie C, Ihse I, Tihanyi T, Olah A, Pedrazzoli S, Spooner D, Kerr DJ, Friess H, Büchler MW, European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer. Influence of resection margins on survival for patients with pancreatic cancer treated by adjuvant chemoradiation and/or chemotherapy in the ESPAC-1 randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2001;234(6):758–768. doi:10.​1097/​00000658-200112000-00007.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Intraoperative Assessment of Pancreatic Neck Margin at the Time of Pancreaticoduodenectomy Increases Likelihood of Margin-Negative Resection in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer
Authors
Mary Dillhoff
Robert Yates
Kristian Wall
Peter Muscarella
W. Scott Melvin
E. Christopher Ellison
Mark Bloomston
Publication date
01-05-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 5/2009
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-009-0845-3

Other articles of this Issue 5/2009

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 5/2009 Go to the issue