Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Japanese Journal of Radiology 8/2014

01-08-2014 | Original Article

Investigating the clinical significance of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm

Authors: Mehmet Korkmaz, Bekir Aras, Bekir Şanal, Mehmet Yücel, Serkan Güneyli, Ahmet Koçak, Fatih Uruç

Published in: Japanese Journal of Radiology | Issue 8/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of twinkling artifacts (TA) in detecting calculi <5 mm in diameter in patients with renal colic pain who had undergone urinary grayscale ultrasonography (US) and computed tomography (CT) imaging assays.

Materials and methods

In this retrospective study, a total of 76 calculi <5 mm detected in 60 patients were evaluated. Whole data were established using an ultrasound (US) probe at frequencies 1.5–4.5 MHz and noncontrast CT. In US, echogenicity and posterior-shadow (PS) parameters were evaluated and compared with color-Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS) and CT signs.

Results

The mean size of measured calculi was 3.9 ± 0.8 mm (range 2–5 mm). The calculus localization rates detected by CT imaging were as follows: kidneys (n = 61, 80.3 %), proximal ureter (n = 4, 5.3 %), middle ureter (n = 3, 3.9 %) and distal ureter (n = 8, 10.5 %). CT detected the calculus in all 76 cases. There was a statistically significant difference in US–CT and CDUS–CT comparisons (p < 0.001 and p = 0.023, respectively); however, no difference was found when comparing both US methods with CT (p = 0.083).

Conclusions

TA can be regarded as a significant marker of urolithiasis, and co-operative usage of Doppler and grayscale methods can yield satisfactory results comparable with CT.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Park SJ, Yi BH, Lee HK, Kim YH, Kim GJ, Kim HC. Evaluation of patients with suspected ureteral calculi using sonography as an initial diagnostic tool: how can we improve diagnostic accuracy? J Ultrasound Med. 2008;27:1441–50.PubMed Park SJ, Yi BH, Lee HK, Kim YH, Kim GJ, Kim HC. Evaluation of patients with suspected ureteral calculi using sonography as an initial diagnostic tool: how can we improve diagnostic accuracy? J Ultrasound Med. 2008;27:1441–50.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Rahmouni A, Bargoin R, Herment A, Bargoin N, Vasile N. Color Doppler twinkling artifact in hyperechoic regions. Radiology. 1996;199:269–71.PubMedCrossRef Rahmouni A, Bargoin R, Herment A, Bargoin N, Vasile N. Color Doppler twinkling artifact in hyperechoic regions. Radiology. 1996;199:269–71.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lee JY, Kim SH, Cho JY, Han D. Color and power Doppler twinkling artifacts from urinary stones: clinical observations and phantom studies. Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:1441–5.CrossRef Lee JY, Kim SH, Cho JY, Han D. Color and power Doppler twinkling artifacts from urinary stones: clinical observations and phantom studies. Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:1441–5.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Trillaud H, Pariente JL, Rabie A, Grenier N. Detection of encrusted indwelling ureteral stents using a twinkling artifact revealed on color Doppler sonography. Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:1446–8.CrossRef Trillaud H, Pariente JL, Rabie A, Grenier N. Detection of encrusted indwelling ureteral stents using a twinkling artifact revealed on color Doppler sonography. Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:1446–8.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Smith RC, Verga M, McCarthy S, Rosenfield AT. Diagnosis of acute flank pain: value of unenhanced helical CT. Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166:97–101.CrossRef Smith RC, Verga M, McCarthy S, Rosenfield AT. Diagnosis of acute flank pain: value of unenhanced helical CT. Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166:97–101.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sommer FG, Jeffrey RB Jr, Rubin GD, Napel S, Rimmer SA, Benford J, et al. Detection of ureteral calculi in patients with suspected renal colic: value of reformatted noncontrast helical CT. Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165:509–13.CrossRef Sommer FG, Jeffrey RB Jr, Rubin GD, Napel S, Rimmer SA, Benford J, et al. Detection of ureteral calculi in patients with suspected renal colic: value of reformatted noncontrast helical CT. Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165:509–13.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Katz DS, Lane MJ, Sommer FG. Non-contrast spiral CT for patients with suspected renal colic. Eur Radiol. 1997;7:680–5.PubMedCrossRef Katz DS, Lane MJ, Sommer FG. Non-contrast spiral CT for patients with suspected renal colic. Eur Radiol. 1997;7:680–5.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Grisi G, Stacul F, Cuttin R. Cost analysis of different protocols for imaging a patient with acute flank pain. Eur Radiol. 2000;10:1620–7.PubMedCrossRef Grisi G, Stacul F, Cuttin R. Cost analysis of different protocols for imaging a patient with acute flank pain. Eur Radiol. 2000;10:1620–7.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Liu W, Esler SJ, Kenny BJ, Goh RH, Rainbow AJ, Stevenson GW. Low-dose nonenhanced helical CT of renal colic: assessment of ureteric stone detection and measurement of effective dose equivalent. Radiology. 2000;215:51–4.PubMedCrossRef Liu W, Esler SJ, Kenny BJ, Goh RH, Rainbow AJ, Stevenson GW. Low-dose nonenhanced helical CT of renal colic: assessment of ureteric stone detection and measurement of effective dose equivalent. Radiology. 2000;215:51–4.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Levine JA, Neitlich J, Verga M, Dalrymple N, Smith RC. Ureteral calculi in patients with flank pain: correlation of plain radiography with unenhanced helical CT. Radiology. 1997;204:27–31.PubMedCrossRef Levine JA, Neitlich J, Verga M, Dalrymple N, Smith RC. Ureteral calculi in patients with flank pain: correlation of plain radiography with unenhanced helical CT. Radiology. 1997;204:27–31.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Middleton WD, Dodds WJ, Lawson TL, Foley WD. Renal calculi: sensitivity for detection with US. Radiology. 1988;167:239–44.PubMedCrossRef Middleton WD, Dodds WJ, Lawson TL, Foley WD. Renal calculi: sensitivity for detection with US. Radiology. 1988;167:239–44.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mitterberger M, Aigner F, Pallwein L, Pinggera GM, Neururer R, Rehder P, et al. Sonographic detection of renal and ureteral stones. Value of the twinkling sign. Int Braz J Urol. 2009;35:532–9 (discussion 540–541).PubMed Mitterberger M, Aigner F, Pallwein L, Pinggera GM, Neururer R, Rehder P, et al. Sonographic detection of renal and ureteral stones. Value of the twinkling sign. Int Braz J Urol. 2009;35:532–9 (discussion 540–541).PubMed
14.
go back to reference Chelfouh N, Grenier N, Higueret D, Trillaud H, Levantal O, Pariente JL, et al. Characterization of urinary calculi: in vitro study of “twinkling artifact” revealed by color-flow sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171:1055–60.PubMedCrossRef Chelfouh N, Grenier N, Higueret D, Trillaud H, Levantal O, Pariente JL, et al. Characterization of urinary calculi: in vitro study of “twinkling artifact” revealed by color-flow sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171:1055–60.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Investigating the clinical significance of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm
Authors
Mehmet Korkmaz
Bekir Aras
Bekir Şanal
Mehmet Yücel
Serkan Güneyli
Ahmet Koçak
Fatih Uruç
Publication date
01-08-2014
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Japanese Journal of Radiology / Issue 8/2014
Print ISSN: 1867-1071
Electronic ISSN: 1867-108X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-014-0337-6

Other articles of this Issue 8/2014

Japanese Journal of Radiology 8/2014 Go to the issue